A marriage made in Hell


Media Matters:

During the September 19 edition of his CNN Headline News show, Glenn Beck asserted: "Now, I'd like to say that my sense of humor has evolved past the point where I don't enjoy watching someone get Tasered. I'd like to say that, but I can't. To me, Taser videos are a little like potato chips. I just can't watch just one." ... Beck claimed that Meyer "was asking for it and deserved every single volt that he got," and stated: "I say hit him with another 50,000 volts." He later added: "I would have Tasered him just for being stupid enough to listen to John Kerry for two hours, just yammering on. In my opinion, I don't see Meyer as a victim of an overly aggressively law enforcement agency. It looks as though this guy wanted to get Tasered." ... The segment was accompanied by on-screen text that read: "Shock and Awesome."

In a thorough and deserving smackdown of Ledeen, Glenn Greenwald wrote this in his post entitled, The art of neoconservative innuendo:

This is how neoconservatives function. Ledeen's intellectually dishonest tactic is found in virtually every one of Bill Kirstol's columns and Fox News television sneers. For instance, Kristol -- attacking Columbia University President Lee Bollinger's invitation to New Adolph Hitler President Ahmadinejad to speak -- says today: "A perfect synecdoche for too much of American higher education: they are friendlier to Ahmadinejad than to the U.S. military." So is Bollinger anti-American? A Traitor? As always, Kristol merely leaves the dirty innuendo against anyone who opposes more wars against Israel's enemies, but always lacks the courage explicitly to make the argument. [emphasis mine -ww]

I juxtapose Beck with Kristol to point out something that I see as very worrying.

There will may* come a day when the ever so serious 'Kristols' (Gaffney's, Ledeen's, [Cheney?] etc) will stop using innuendo and come right out and say plainly what they think. It will happen when they think it is politically safe to do so. The wink-wink nudge-nudge will stop, replaced by alarm.

Remarks like Beck's and incidents like the attack on the father of a fallen Marine because the Marine "needed a rescue", make more certain the day when it will be safe to move the epithet of 'traitor' and assertions of treason, cast upon those-with-whom-we-disagree, from the realms of lower tier blowhards like Beck, Coulter and Malkin, (they are legion) to the elite opinion forming power circle of Very Serious Persons. The press will then feel free (irony alert), if not beholden, to present such attacks as credible, having merit, and leave hanging the question, "What is to be done about the scary thought of traitors in our midst?"

When that day comes the courtship of cowardly innuendo and public expressions that validate violence and oppression, like Beck's does, will become a proper marriage, consummated not by incidents of circumstance, but by direct cause and effect.

I suspect it may take a catastrophic event --real or invented-- or very dire circumstance --deep economic hardship looking to blame-- to lift the veil of the bride to be kissed. But, the hideous couple is at the alter already, waiting for sanction.

So, Mr Kristolnacht, is Bollinger anti-American? A Traitor?

"I do"


-- * In retrospect, this word better reflects my intention -ww


ww September 21, 2007 - 3:07pm
( categories: USA )

And I am truly ashamed CNN allows Beck to have air time.

“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.”

Charles Darwin

darwin September 21, 2007 - 5:50pm

... and yet there they are, with permission. It can't be for the ratings. Beck's numbers are pitiful. Kristol is so far from the mainstream one could rightfully call him 'fringe'.

Yet there they are, and not by default. (sigh)

ww September 21, 2007 - 6:01pm

the highly civilized, cultured and technologically advanced birthplace of Schiller, Goethe and Brahms, either.

You bet it could. It is happening, right before your eyes.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch September 21, 2007 - 7:38pm

... that I can come off a bit alarmist, and probably do more than is my general state of mind. (I'm a eNFp, after all :)

Keeping tabs, if you will, isn't something I really sought after. I don't go looking for evidence. I just happen to notice and it trips a trigger.

I'm also aware that some will be reticent to even entertain the thought that we could witness something akin to civilian vigilante corps, or community security squads, etc, that act more in concert with the state than current Minuteman outfits do, the likes of which we haven't seen since the good-ol'-boys networks operated in the South with approval.

The seeds have always been planted. This administration and its sycophants have fertilized them, given them careers and a ready made alternative reality that many seem to validate. (~20% is all it takes)

Ya, I think it can happen here. There is no natural goodness inherent in Americans that would exclude us from such a fate were the right circumstances to align at the wrong time. I suspect it would be a uniquely American form. Perhaps with improved packaging.

ww September 21, 2007 - 9:05pm

I followed your link to the Keirsey Personality Test. That was a tough questionaire for me to answer. I'm too cheap to pay for the full analysis, but my general category is a "Rational". Reading that summary, I'm not comfortable that all of it's me. Interesting.....



Turn back to the Constitution - and
READ it.

Rick September 22, 2007 - 12:02am

I'm skeptical. I don't see myself as a Guardian. That's not INTJish.

Lesly September 22, 2007 - 3:03pm

Another "Rational". I smell a scam to sell some otherwise worthless drivel. I could see the trends in the questions and I suspect that on another day I might score completely differently.

Petronius September 22, 2007 - 7:34pm

... as it relates to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, but I like his stance on ADHD.

Perhaps a reader with some psychologist type learnin' could chime.

ww September 22, 2007 - 7:42pm

learnin', but my fiancee does and she says this line of tests is generally pretty decent. It by no means pins down every single person who takes it, but its accurate much more often than most other such tests.

I've taken it a few times over the years and usually waffle between INTJ and ENTJ--can't quite decide if I'm extroverted or introverted.

Bolo September 24, 2007 - 9:27pm

... while taking the test that there were perhaps a few questions I might answer differently depending on the moment or the day. Also, that we are three people; how we see ourselves, how others see us, and who we are. I would expect some people not to give the test much credence.

I was actually a bit surprised at my results because in the main I judged them to be fairly accurate. But then, judging ones own results on a test like this doesn't really confirm much, other than perhaps that I liked what it told me.

Thanks, and congrats. :P

ww September 25, 2007 - 2:02am

"A perfect synecdoche for too much of American higher education: they are friendlier to Ahmadinejad than to the U.S. military."

"So is Bollinger anti-American? A Traitor?"

He is saying Bollinger is a traitor, as well as a lot of other campus administrations.

I'll get worried when there is another house committee on Unamerican Activities and it starts rounding up the town of Berkeley.

Now as to the first passage, a young Glenn Beck should not be allowed out with anyone's daughter because he does not know the meaning of 'no'.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly September 21, 2007 - 8:28pm

..."you have no audience".

He's probably the price they had to pay for allowing Cafferty his 5 minutes / hour. And Cafferty ain't even a librul - just a (relatively) honest conservative.

Gordon September 21, 2007 - 9:02pm

People I've met who listen to, and believe, those mentioned in the post remind me of Amway Conventioneers or Stepford couples - and their humor mimics that of their idols. The smug, nasty innuendos, the derision of any who think differently, the refusal to look at any other viewpoint and to use "Liberal" like a terrible curse. There is no honesty, and this mindset, engineered by leaders seen and unseen, is widening the chasm we are seeing in America. What there is, is an almost childish humor, complete with snickers and silent "neener neener."

KayseJ September 21, 2007 - 11:09pm

"The End of America: Letters of warning to a young patriot / a citizen's call to action", picked it up this afternoon. 10 steps in the fascist process which multiply upon themselves:

1. invoke an external and internal threat
2. establish secret prisons
3. develop a paramilitary force
4. surveil ordinary citizens
5. infiltrate citizen's groups
6. arbitrarily detain and release citizens
7. target key individuals
8. restrict the press
9. cast criticism as espionage and dissent as treason
10. subvert the rule of law

result: every school of the americas strategy distilled nicely. fascism, etc.... overall the book has a non-frantic, but pertinent, tone to it. pretty well written so far. i'll have to do a book review!

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong September 22, 2007 - 9:06pm

"You know something is wrong when the New England Patriots face stiffer penalties for spying on innocent Americans than Dick Cheney and George Bush." - Bill Richardson

ww September 23, 2007 - 4:58pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.