Leaving No Tracks


Fourth in a four part profile. (Part One) (Part Two) (Part Three) (Feature)

By Barton Gellman and Jo Becker | Tuesday, June 26, 2007

WaPo - Sue Ellen Wooldridge, the 19th-ranking Interior Department official, arrived at her desk in Room 6140 a few months after Inauguration Day 2001. A phone message awaited her.

"This is Dick Cheney," said the man on her voice mail, Wooldridge recalled in an interview. "I understand you are the person handling this Klamath situation. Please call me at -- hmm, I guess I don't know my own number. I'm over at the White House."

Wooldridge wrote off the message as a prank. It was not. Cheney had reached far down the chain of command, on so unexpected a point of vice presidential concern, because he had spotted a political threat arriving on Wooldridge's desk.

In Oregon, a battleground state that the Bush-Cheney ticket had lost by less than half of 1 percent, drought-stricken farmers and ranchers were about to be cut off from the irrigation water that kept their cropland and pastures green. Federal biologists said the Endangered Species Act left the government no choice: The survival of two imperiled species of fish was at stake.

Law and science seemed to be on the side of the fish. Then the vice president stepped in.


ww June 27, 2007 - 1:10am

...comments that a Hill staffer sent to Laura Rozen about the Post Cheney revelations that include foreboding consequences for Addington.

ww June 25, 2007 - 11:24am

This is the Washington Post. I doubt you will any precedent for the term "Cheney's crowd". It always used to be "Cheney's team". Even above, you see "Cheney's lawyer" instead of "legal counsel". There's a lot more of these rhetorical hints in there.

The article has a number of high powered people quoted on the record. Including Yoo turning on Addington and Cheney. Hmm. Someone must have given them the go ahead.

Beside blaming Cheney's "crowd" for all the bad stuff around torture and wiretapping, it even says that his overreach now means that poor 'ittle W is more constrained than he should be.

Rice comes out a saint, as does Olsen. Both Gonzo and Meirs come out as idiot tools of the Dick. And this is just part 2 of 4.

"Hatchet job" is too weak. Cheney and a whole bunch of othes are being thrown under a very big, very heavy bus.

Note to Libby: you can be on the bus or under it?

Gordon June 25, 2007 - 1:20pm

More at FireDogLake

"The president's job is to think not only about today, but tomorrow"
george bush delivers deep insights in a speech given on
April 19, 2007
Tipp City High School
Tipp City, Ohio

Peter C June 25, 2007 - 2:57pm

and annotated them, and read FDL & Next Hurrah.

There are, I think, 3 threads. The base piece was written very circumspectly - no overt criticisms (you have to read between the lines), attributed quotes that qualify as critical or at least non-flattering, but all the hard stuff is unattributed. In other words, I think the reporters wrote a hard hitting portrait, but nothing like a hatchet job.

The first piece has a couple heavy-handed awkward edits that stand out, and are hatchet strikes. The 2nd is a bit more subtle, but it's still looks editted to me, with some jarring language for a portrait. These are along the lines of "squelching" "squashing" "crushing" - all very descriptive verbs where the background tone is much more circumspect.

The other jarring thing (though it doesn't look like an edit) is the claims that Cheney's strong arm tactics with the courts have handcuffed Bush. OK, there's a tad of evidence Cheney may have ticked off Kennedy on the court, but otherwise this looks like crap.

So it looks like planned pressure on Cheney that at the last minute was made a good deal more vicious.

Gordon June 25, 2007 - 5:27pm

A GOP Plan To Oust Cheney

By Sally Quinn
Tuesday, June 26, 2007; 12:00 AM
WaPo

The big question right now among Republicans is how to remove Vice President Cheney from office. Even before this week's blockbuster series in The Post, discontent in Republican ranks was rising.

As the reputed architect of the war in Iraq, Cheney is viewed as toxic, and as the administration's leading proponent of an attack on Iran, he is seen as dangerous. As long as he remains vice president, according to this thinking, he has the potential to drag down every member of the party -- including the presidential nominee -- in next year's elections.

Removing a sitting vice president is not easy, but this may be the moment. I remember Barry Goldwater sitting in my parents' living room in 1973, in the last days of Watergate, debating whether to lead a group of senior Republicans to the White House to tell President Nixon he had to go. His hesitation was that he felt loyalty to the president and the party. But in the end he felt a greater loyalty to his country, and he went to the White House.

Today, another group of party elders, led by Sen. John Warner of Virginia, could well do the same. They could act out of concern for our country's plummeting reputation throughout the world, particularly in the Middle East.

For such a plan to work, however, they would need a ready replacement. Until recently, there hasn't been an acceptable alternative to Cheney -- nor has there been a persuasive argument to convince President Bush to make a change. Now there is.

The idea is to install a vice president who could beat the Democratic nominee in 2008. It's unlikely that any of the top three Republican candidates -- former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Sen. John McCain of Arizona or former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney -- would want the job, for fear that association with Bush's war would be the kiss of death.

Nor would any of them be that attractive to the president. Giuliani is too New York, too liberal. His reputation as a leader, forged on 9/11 and the days after, carries him only so far. McCain, who has always had a rocky relationship with the president, lost much of his support from moderate Democrats and independents (and from a fair amount of Republicans) when the Straight Talk Express started veering off course. And no matter what anyone says about how Romney's religion doesn't matter, being a Mormon is simply not acceptable to Bush's base. Several right-wing evangelicals have told me they don't see Mormons as "true Christians."

That leaves Fred Thompson. Everybody loves Fred. He has the healing qualities of Gerald Ford and the movie-star appeal of Ronald Reagan. He is relatively moderate on social issues. He has a reputation as a peacemaker and a compromiser. And he has a good sense of humor.

He could be just the partner to bring out Bush's better nature -- or at least be a sensible voice of reason. I could easily imagine him telling the president, "For God's sake, do not push that button!" -- a command I have a hard time hearing Cheney give.

Not only that, Thompson would give the Republicans a platform for running for the presidency -- and the president a way out of Iraq without looking like he's backing down. Bush would be left in better shape on the war and be able to concentrate on AIDS and the environment in hopes of salvaging his legacy.

Cheney is scheduled this summer for surgery to replace his pacemaker, which needs new batteries. So if the president is willing, and Republicans are able, they have a convenient reason to replace him: doctor's orders. And I'm sure the the vice president would also like to spend more time with his ever-expanding family.

Tina June 26, 2007 - 5:18am

I have a difficult time understanding just what Fred Thompson would gain by joining the administration while every other Republican is jumping ship or running away from Bush as if being chased by a swarm of killer bees. So long as Thompson is undeclared he can bask in the political limelight of ingenuous reluctance and not suffer the inevitable popularity slump the early declareds will suffer. He has nowhere to go but up.

If he becomes VP then he inherits Iraq, and its negative baggage, before the election and no matter what he does, he'll become prematurely open to criticism. Does Thompson really want to endure photo ops with Bush? He'll look like an ethical sell-out when the carrot of power is waved under his nose.

jason_els June 26, 2007 - 9:09am

but it's not pie in the sky.

No GOP candidate has more than a slim chance in '08. So Freddie becomes VP in 07 - heck maybe even Pres before the term is up! He runs as incumbent; if he's made everyone feel safe and warm, hasn't publicaly barfed in any world leader's lap, hasn't been caught eating puppies, (and naturally the media will be fully cooperating) it's by far the best shot of the GOP surviving 08.

Gordon June 26, 2007 - 9:24am

The needle on the Republican political compass of building a case to dump Cheney appears to be swinging towards true north. It’s hard to tell if George the Younger will bend to the will of advice from his elders, or sit back and let a palace purge engineered by others out to sink Cheney succeed.

At this point in time, Fred looks to be the natural pinch hitter choice looking for a 4-year contract.

Get Fred in, actuate the Iraq Study Group plan, draw down the troops rapidly and keep the rest behind the wire to reduce causalities, let contract foreign drivers deliver freight and fuel to the permanent bases to keep from reporting U. S. military deaths and casualties.

The troops stay in Iraq to enforce the Carbon Laws; Fred looks like a dude who can get the job done with a chance of hitting a grand slam. No matter if Fred or Hillary wins, the objective of U. S. trigger pullers guarding the Oil has been met. Access to oil profits by the Multinational Oil Corporations stands a better chance with armed U. S. taxpayer supported troops at the ready. The U.S. Imperial Empire marches on into the sunset.

"The president's job is to think not only about today, but tomorrow"
george bush delivers deep insights in a speach given on
April 19, 2007
Tipp City High School
Tipp City, Ohio

Peter C June 26, 2007 - 10:16am

"It’s hard to tell if George the Younger will bend to the will of advice from his elders, or sit back and let a palace purge engineered by others out to sink Cheney succeed." But I don't think these pieces would have been written without Bush's blessing. You've got Josh Bolten, James Baker, John Ashcroft and others on record (not saying anything damning, but still being critical). You've also got rather jarring attempts to fit W with a halo.

I'm not entirely sure whether Fred is part of the plan - he's stuck up for Cheney and Libby pretty strongly. But it also looks to me like the plan has been modified at the last minute (some clumsy editting).

Gordon June 26, 2007 - 12:41pm

My meter is on the Baker group Et al. Boy George may not have any say in this. The Republicans have to come up with someone other than the bunch that has been in the Republican debates on TV.

"The president's job is to think not only about today, but tomorrow"
george bush delivers deep insights in a speach given on
April 19, 2007
Tipp City High School
Tipp City, Ohio

Peter C June 26, 2007 - 1:43pm

...Fred's association with Cheney makes it an orderly transition. After all, the WaPo pieces don't really attack what Cheney did (except around the edges), but how he did it. So same policies, but he doesn't run a shadow gov't, doesn't have spies in all other agencies, doesn't worship Baal in the WH basement while beating drums made from hides of his enemies... And his scowl is so much more attractive than that tired old Cheney snarl.

Ditch the Doberman. Say hello to the Basset hound.

Gordon June 26, 2007 - 1:52pm

Fred runs the same talking points on Iraq. "We have to defeat them there so we don't have to fight them here". Fred would insure the Veto of any increase in taxes on the Uber wealthy class. I can hear the ink on those campaign donation checks drying as I type this. Cheney may be in on this. He has picked a way to exit. But, somehow I can't see Cheney putting down the needle of power addiction willingly .

"The president's job is to think not only about today, but tomorrow"
george bush delivers deep insights in a speach given on
April 19, 2007
Tipp City High School
Tipp City, Ohio

Peter C June 26, 2007 - 2:04pm

...Cheney aides, "proteges" and "friends" (not sure all of the last are "former") on record that I think you may have something.

Maybe it was getting slapped down by the 4th Circuit (the most conservative in the nation), or the fact that his "4th branch" arguments have been treated as laughable by the press. Whatever. He's made LBJ look like a wuss and done at least 25 years of damage in 6.5 years. He can retire to Wyoming, sit on the porch with a 120 proof IV drip and shoot caged birds, feeling proud of his accomplishments.

Gordon June 26, 2007 - 2:38pm

Liz Cheney is an adviser to Feel-Good-Freddie.

ww June 26, 2007 - 2:08pm

... but I generally concur. Thompson has been given imprimatur from the pundit class and journamalists as well. Aside form the fact that Fred isn't suited to lead anyone anywhere but astray, the 'plan' includes the unfortunate result of insulating Cheney from retribution.

This all assumes the narrowly defined strategy goes accordingly. I have serious doubts about success for any attempt to oust Cheney. Unless, he dies or suffers oxygen deprivation while being trickled charged by the Energizer Bunny®.

Do you suppose EB's commercial acting gig is just a cover? He couldn't be one of ours, Cheney would just out him.

ww June 26, 2007 - 10:19am

I can feel Photoshop beckoning... I don't think my skills are up to it, but I might give it a try.

Bolo June 26, 2007 - 12:54pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.