Faux populism, the Palin effect and the end of the Republican party as we know it


Tonight's Nelson Report discusses the election, last weeks performance and behavior of the Republican 'ruling' class.

Excerpt after the jump

by Christopher Nelson, from The Nelson Report

POLITICS...first, last night we were over-simplifying beyond our norm, and said all Obama had to do to win an Electoral College victory is hold all the 2004 Kerry states, and take just one '04 Bush state.

We meant, of course, a "Bush state" big enough to put Obama over the magic 269 electoral vote level, and not just any old place like, say, Alaska, home of Real Americans.

In that regard...and as lead-in to a discussion on why any intelligent Republican is increasingly depressed...a quick check of ALL the so-called "battleground states" shows that Obama leads (if narrowly in some cases) in ALL of those that Bush won in '04. All...

In fact, Obama may be pulling away in Virginia, with 13 electoral votes, Colorado, with 8, Indiana, with 7, and New Mexico, with 5. You can do the math, and it helps explain why talk in senior Republican circles is whether it's still possible to "save" some of the House and Senate seats at risk.

Following last week's Obama/McCain debate, the biggest laugh of the night came on CNN, when Reagan and Poppa Bush White House guru David Gergan, when asked what McCain could still do to win, blurted out, "Beats the hell out of ME!"

But aside from organizational and technical issues, the reasons for thoughtful Republican dismay aren't a laughing matter. We printed last night the bulk of Colin Powell's devastating deconstruction of the McCain Campaign's negativity, and highlighted his concern about the xenophobic, racist elements, especially against Muslim Americans.

Comes today the latest condemnation of controversial "robo calls"...computerized phone messages...which directly accuse Obama of complicity in 9/11 because of his "friendship" with 1960's radical bomber William Ayers.

Republican Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, (Collins an "endangered" Republican), had previously pleaded with the Republican National Committee to stop this offensive practice, as has Minnesota Republican incumbent Norm Coleman, currently lagging in the polls.

Today, a highly respected veteran state-level Minnesota Republican, former State Sen. Barbara Lorman, followed Powell's example and formally endorsed Obama, citing two reasons: first, Obama's "ability to bridge the partisan divide to work toward solid solutions that will get our nation back on the right track..."...

And second:

"All of us should be extremely wary of the half-truths and outright untruths that have been spread by the recent negative campaigning and shameful automated phone calls."

Here's the clincher, expressed in public by Lorman, but already shown, in private, by the polls:

"While my admiration for Sen. Obama has grown with his positive approach to addressing the challenges facing our nation, my disappointment with the McCain campaign has deepened. The negative tactics are inappropriate, downright dishonorable, and have no place in the State of Wisconsin."

But it isn't just hard-ball politics..."dishonorable" politics, by Lorman's measure...it's a far deeper problem, we're arguing tonight. It's literally existential angst that we're seeing in key sectors of the Republican electorate.

McCain is clearly losing a measurable percentage of traditional, life-time Republicans who find they simply do not believe many of the "values" arguments and attitudes now being enforced as Republican dogma.

Some of the list, or litany, has been clear for a number of years, starting with the rejection of science on global warming, and the rise of "faith based" officials throughout the Bush Administration with an "agenda" which was carried out despite the consequences for the nation.

In its most extreme form, VP nominee Sarah Palin has talked about "real America" and, with McCain's encouragement, very directly excluded "urban America" as a place of equal value and rights...even if one disagrees with them.

So neither McCain nor Palin can claim innocence when Republican Rep. Robin Hayes introduced McCain at a North Carolina event last weekend with the remark that "liberals hate real Americans that work and believe in God."

Think about that...liberals hate Americans who work and believe in God...this from a sitting United States Congressman.

Now Obama brought some of that nonsense on himself, it must be noted, with his ill-advised, infamous, and condescending remark about "terrified small town Americans" who "cling to guns and religion"...but he has been excoriated for that (starting with Hillary!) and has apologized repeatedly.

Here's what the Republican adaptation of "real Americans" can lead to in its most extreme form: Republican Congresswoman Michelle Bachman actually telling NBC news that it would be a "great idea" if the news media conducted an "investigation" to find out whom of her Congressional colleagues are "anti-American".

Think about THAT...this women is so twisted in her perception of political "opponents" that she thinks its a smile to be asked about investigating her colleagues, the elected representatives of the American people, to see who is disloyal.

This is "McCarthysim" in its pure form...individually ludicrous to be sure, but not in the aggregate. Bachman clearly is a prancing fool, but she's not alone, and as the election is likely to drive out Republican moderates, since they must run in contested districts.

The danger is that the intellectual face of Congressional Republicans next year will be much more likely to reflect Bachman's vicious idiocy, than it will the fundamentally decent, genuine, patriotic conservatism of Virginia Republican Tom Davis, whom we mentioned above as retiring, to the loss of the Party and the country.

Concerns such as the above are no doubt in play for what looks like a debacle on Nov. 4, warns Republican political expert Michael Franc, VP for Government Relations at The Heritage Foundation.

Franc and Heritage Asia Studies Center chief Walter Lohman gave excellent talks at the Keidanren lunch today, and we'll try to look at some of the details of Walter's Asia discussion tomorrow.

For tonight, Franc said his study of the in-depth polling data indicates that not only are educated Republicans fleeing the party in some numbers, they are actively going over to Obama and the Democrats.

And, Franc said, clearly there's a "Palin effect" in that she may have solidified the conservative Republican base for McCain, but her faux "populism" is hurting McCain with traditional Republican elites.


Tina October 22, 2008 - 4:56am
( categories: Analysis | USA: Campaign 2008 )

but in the coming crisis, the rightwing extremism will appeal to many

Father Coughlin

jwp October 22, 2008 - 6:18am

for John McCain h/t FDL, lol one of my fav oldies :)

Tina October 22, 2008 - 6:34am

Sarah Palin Displays the Latest in Donkey Fashion

it is easy to see why she is becoming a drag on the party

Tina October 22, 2008 - 6:49am

Guess all the elephants have gone off to the elephant graveyard.

dsquared October 22, 2008 - 10:00am

Politico.com, By Jeanne Cummings, October 22

The Republican National Committee has spent more than $150,000 to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her family since her surprise pick by John McCain in late August.

According to financial disclosure records, the accessorizing began in early September and included bills from Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York for a combined $49,425.74.

The records also document a couple of big-time shopping trips to Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, including one $75,062.63 spree in early September.

The RNC also spent $4,716.49 on hair and makeup through September after reporting no such costs in August.

The cash expenditures immediately raised questions among campaign finance experts about their legality under the Federal Election Commission's long-standing advisory opinions on using campaign cash to purchase items for personal use.


"Frankly, we've lost a lot in recent years." - General Colin Powell

Raja October 22, 2008 - 11:37am

... there's a lot of psychology in there for someone to parse, or some think there is, anyway. It means McCain/Palin gets pwnd on the small town narrative at least. But her fans love her for it I'm guessin', and wish her all the best. Who doesn't want their candidate looking spiffy? Boom chica wah wah

ww October 22, 2008 - 12:00pm

Word is McCain wanted Lieberman...

not Governor Spice. The Rove people compromised on picking a 'girl' which jibed with Mccain's backup plan to pick up Hillary dead-enders - but the Rove-o-bots insisted on a 'red meat' honeypie - not the Liddy Dole type mainstream Republican.

I'm really wondering if lots of non 'hater' GOP rich people might have welcomed the Connecticut Jew or Liddy Dole - MCcain could legitimately run against his party and called himself an 'independent' - Lieberman has a history of civil rights support back in MCcain's heyday of the 1960's - that just might have been Mccain-crazy enough to work.

But the Rove-o-trons wouldn't have it.

Looking back, it appears that MCCain was defeated by Bush (and Rove-think) twice - once in the 2000 primary and now in the 2008 general election.

KingElvis October 22, 2008 - 9:22am

couldn't happen to a nicer loon. I could never understand how the St Cloud area elected her, here is hoping they correct their error. A sign of the times is her republican opponent has reentered the race as a write in candidate. He knows he won't win, he doesn't want dem or independent votes, he just wants to draw enough republican votes to throw her out of office.

Tina October 22, 2008 - 9:46am

Thinking that she might have a shot in 2012? Obviously, after this saga, I doubt the GOP would be interested in her. But...

creativelcro October 22, 2008 - 10:50am

Bachmann's an even bigger joke than Palin. She basically said during the campaign that all her decisions are made by God and her husband. She doesn't even have that bulldog "charisma"--she only won her seat because her opponent was a well-intended but completely irrelevant outsider who had no position on any issue except for child abduction.

polymander October 22, 2008 - 3:30pm

The elite of the right is splitting from the populism of the right big-time. Even some of the far right elite like Bill Kristol is squirming. Money bags Richard Viguerie jumped ship long ago.

It's becoming obvious that given the Atwater/Rove strategy it come down to the GOP can't win without feeding red meat to the populist base and doing so has ceased to just turn off moderates but even to drive them away. Moreover, the ideological litmus tests that are now required are forcing out all but extremists.

Add to that the changing times, the growing liberalism at the lower end of the generational ladder and the increasing multi-racial character of the US population, and you see that the present GOP direction is down a dead end street.

The GOP is going to have to reinvent itself to be competitive in 2012. The challenges the US will be facing then will be far different from the ones it is facing now.

One of the biggest factors that is looming is declining "surplus energy," that is, the return on energy investment. It's taking more energy investment, hence greater monetary investment, to produce a unit of energy. Economic growth directly proportional to the availability of energy and prosperity to the cost of energy. Moreover, as the cost of energy increases, so does everything that uses energy, such as extraction of natural resources used in production. Here we have major factors converging — population growth, energy surplus decline, poisoning the nest, and climate change. No way to avoid this gathering tsunami.

Couple this with increasing demand owing to population growth, as well as the pressing need to control negative (for health, climate) externalities like pollution, and the upward pressure on price (cost of a unit of energy) is evident, even if inflation is not increasing and speculation is not rife.

Right now, the country has not yet realized that the old game is over, and new rules are beginning to apply. This is going to involve a realignment of political coalitions in light of these newly emerging challenges. These are some of the key factors that will soon be shaping political discourse. These will also have international implications going forward that will eclipse more petty concerns, thereby shaping foreign as well as domestic policy.

The coming debate is whether an economic liberal (free market) solution (rightist) or a more managed solution (leftist) due to world crisis. There isn't going to be room for much error here to avoid impending catastrophe, or at least minimize it.

So far, this is the elephant in the room so as not to rock the boat and come across as negative on the future. But after the election, we'll be hearing a lot more about it. The coming recession will mask the pressure on energy price increase by reducing demand for awhile, but policy makers and planners will be well aware that growth will not be resuming on the former basis after the excesses are wrung from the system. Bold new solutions will be required, as well as old-fashioned ones, like conservation.

tjfxh October 22, 2008 - 12:54pm

there is now no indication of an energy crisis to be solved by drilling or green political coalitions.

There is no longer a global boom. China, among other nations, is shuttering plants; as usual, markets clean things up and are cleaning up things now.

The elephant in the room is one which still thinks he's rich.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly October 22, 2008 - 3:39pm

only fools can believe they can make lasting coalitions out of the byproducts.

Of course they're shredding each other - that's what they were taught to do. That's how they were told the game was played.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 23, 2008 - 3:59am

... inevitable now. But I remember being pretty sullen about Republican control a few years back. ;)

ww October 23, 2008 - 5:27am

back before I made this series of posts starting in 2005. I'm guessing historians might broadly agree on Spring 2005 as the tipping point.

But with no viable and attractive Democratic candidate ready to fill the vacuum, it wouldn't have meant that much, and that's where the element of sheer luck came in. Obama was an impossible-to-predict "wild card", and I distrusted him on principle as "entirely too fortuitous" for a long time. After long reading and careful scrutiny I'm over that now. I think America caught a very, very lucky (and long overdue) break.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 23, 2008 - 11:31am

... hope and want to believe you are right about that. Obama does appear to have the depth of critical thought and the clear mind necessary, in my feeble estimation. (After Bush its a godsend instead of minimum requirement)

What remains is how he handles real, immense power. And getting elected. He's too rightwing for my taste but what the 'ell. If he wins I'll jump up and down with fists and voice raised. :)

ww October 25, 2008 - 5:39pm

could use a lefty.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly October 25, 2008 - 7:02pm

Nice one, maub.

ww October 26, 2008 - 4:52am

Wikipedia: Energy Economics
Basic concepts and links

Wikipedia: Net Energy Gain
Basic concepts relating to surplus

Economics of Energy
Engineering paper on basic concepts that is not overly technical

Abelard.org/briefings/energy-economics
Primer on energy economics

Chris Martenson's Crash Course, #17 (a, b, c)-18
Good video presentation of basics

Pentagon study says oil reliance strains military: Urges development of alternative fuels
This is important because capital-intensive technological advance frequency comes initially from military-funded R&D.

EROEI
Wikipedia article on energy returned on energy invested. Investigates further factors needed to understand surplus in addition to energy in v. energy out.

tjfxh October 22, 2008 - 6:12pm

that the faux populist "Joe the plumber" "spreading the wealth around is socialism", McCain attempts to find a theme have hit gold.

"Joe the plumber's house has been foreclosed" does not seem to be part of any reality check in the heartland:
From Politico:

Most heartening for conservatives will likely be a new Associated Press poll, conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media, which showed the presidential race as a one-point contest. According to this survey, Obama leads McCain among likely voters nationwide by just 44 percent to 43 percent.

That showing represents a six-point improvement for McCain since AP-GfK’s last poll, which had Obama ahead of McCain by seven points, 48 percent to 41 percent.

Perhaps even more encouraging to Republicans are two new surveys conducted by the highly respected Mason-Dixon polling firm, in the key states of Florida and Virginia, which show McCain well within striking distance in both battlegrounds.

McCain's strong showing is partly attributable to his strong debate performance; Thursday was his best night of the survey. Obama's best night was Sunday, hours after the Powell announcement, and the full impact of that endorsement may not have been captured in any surveys yet. Future polling could show whether either of those was merely a support "bounce" or something more lasting.

Americablog claims AP's results are false

Meanwhile, the robocalls continue....

Just poke me in the eye with a pencil now.


"The mythical John McCain is an affable, straight-talking, moderately conservative war hero who is an expert on foreign policy" - Bob Herbert

nymole October 23, 2008 - 8:36am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.