Categories

Archives

The Adventures of Captain Carnage: The Crash of 2008


^AORDAll Ordinaries5222.00 12:11AM ETDown 408.90 (7.26%)
^SSECShanghai Composite4637.31 12:41AM ETDown 277.13 (5.64%)
^HSIHang Seng21904.13 1:15AM ETDown 1914.73 (8.04%)
^BSESNBSE 3015812.74 1:15AM ETDown 1792.61 (10.18%)
^JKSEJakarta Composite2254.58 1:30AM ETDown 231.30 (9.30%)
^KLSEKLSE Composite1439.49 Jan 18Down 21.22 (1.45%)
^N225Nikkei 22512573.05 1:00AM ETDown 752.89 (5.65%)
^NZ50NZSE 503607.13 Jan 21Down 39.77 (1.09%)
^STIStraits Times2746.76 5:30PM ETDown 170.39 (5.84%)
^KS11Seoul Composite1609.02 1:02AM ETDown 74.54 (4.43%)
^TWIITaiwan Weighted7581.96 12:46AM ETDown 528.24 (6.51%)

Now back in August I said US stocks had reached a peak. I also noted that Bernanke and others were suddenly extremely generous with liquidity, even in the face of a supposedly good economy. Ergo, they knew things were not good. Other minor credit meltdowns in addition to the big one convinced me that Ben Bernanke has forgotten how to run a central bank. One of the key lessons of the Great Depression is not to let the money supply contract in the face of a business down turn. It turns recession in to a road to contagion.

Right now the global stock markets are over-reacting, precisely because they had been overly optimistic before. Decoupling is a nice word, it applies mainly to the decoupling from reality of both resources prices, which are wildly inflated, and asset prices, which have been wildy inflated for sometime.

Are we in a crash? The answer overseas is “yes”. The answer here? Quite probably very soon.

A crash has no widely agreed upon rigorous definition. There are rigorous definitions that are not widely agreed on, and there are widely agreed on definitions that are not rigorous. Therefore I am going to supply one of my own: a crash is when the destruction of value is sufficient to force a downwards spiral of selling to cover liquidity constraints. Basically, a crash occurs when worse investments expose bad investments in an acceleration spiral.

A “correction” is different, it does not have the spiralling quality, and therefore does not tend to overshoot on the down side. Stocks generally come back from a correction quickly, where as a crash requires the injection of fresh liquidity to counter act. In the absence of this injection of liquidity, they do not recover quickly.

Also important to the anatomy of a crash is an “Ohmstead Break”. This is a moment where there is a spike of selling that begins the downward spiral. Margin calls beget margin calls. We are now seeing this in markets around the world.

It is still possible this is merely a very sharp correction from inflated levels. However, if so, it should be seen as the climax of a long period of devaluation of the dollar, and the reduction in the real value of the US equity market versus the rest of the world. Taken in inflation and currency adjusted terms, the US stock market is considerably below where it was at the start of Bush’s term of office, and though not below the bottom of the Crash of 2002. Everyone else is in even worse shape, but the wealthy, despite a greater share of wealth, have less capacity to make effective investments.

The root cause here is simple a lack of investment supply. Not enough businesses that can produce a stream of revenue sufficient to pay the cost of money. Until this problem is addressed, the world markets can careen from bubble to bubble, but not make real progress.

What would it take to make a crash clear? Really the answer is generally too late, but the time the loan data comes through, the crash has already happened. This makes sense, people are not going to wait to find out, since if it is only a correction, they can get back in, and if it is a crash, they don’t want to wait until it is too late.

The market crash, viewed from the long term, is the discounting of the capital used to supply the US home bubble. Around the world people have been allocating resources and labor under the assumption that the US would keep buying and that the American consumer’s level of demand was suspended in air. In fact, it was just that there was too much easy money.

Many people think back to 1929. That is the wrong model. Instead, it is best to see the present period as an analogy to the series of panics that occured during the classical gold standard, where there was a tension between the monetary and capital base. Gold was obtained through colonial conquest, and technological improvement in extraction. This made it related to the growth of the economy in that resources and technology to together were a good proxy for an over all economy. However the coming of the petroleum age did a number of things. One is it decoupled mineral wealth from energy wealth, the other is that it decoupled resources from their traditional qualities. Petroleum changed the game too dramatically. By 1929, the coal economy was ready to give out, and the attempts to force the world back on to rock money were doomed to failure.

However, we are not there yet, there isn’t a clearly superior new economy ready to leap and take the place of the old one. Instead, we have pieces of it which are clearly distorting old values and valuations, but cannot properly be measured in our current base of oil-for-paper economics. Computers create happiness that is not measured in how much oil they convert into homes, but they don’t monetize easily either. This means it is hard for money based on monetizing oil-to-homes-to-paper to measure the real value they create. We keep over, and under, estimating what the new economy can do, because it won’t do the one thing that investors want it to do, and that is make the old petroleum economy more profitable. There’s no more profit to be had, only the ability to downshift older working zones in favor of newer ones.

This means that, as with the late years of the 19th century and early years of the 20th century, stock valuations, measured in absolute terms, are going to remain relatively flat, though with very wide swings. The petroleum and second wave electrical economy didn’t save the coal economy, but destroyed it with the same brute efficiency that German dive bombers and tanks would dismantle the Polish army in 1939.

This means that this crash is not the end, nor even the beginning of the end, of the present financial system. Instead what will be imposed is a massive bailout that will hobble US fiscal policy – the the delight of reactionaries who will let 8 years of discipline pass in the hopes that when there are goodies to be passed out they will take power and plunder the treasury to the tune of trillions of dollars more. It is only when that next plundering occurs, and the US economy does keel over from it, that we will really reach the end of American’s tether on this. Stupidity got us into the mess, and Americans are lining up to support yet more stupidity.

What should be done? Immediate, dramatic and forceful restructuring of the tax and entitlement systems, the banking system, and the energy system. Only by changing the incentives away from flipping houses, will we see a dramatic shift away from consumption and towards manufacturing. Historically this has taken a massive collapse in equities and a war.

Nothing seems to have altered that.

Short term? There’s no place to hide. Even petro-currencies will take a beating. This is a global contraction, and the best thing to do is have money in places, like the Swiss Franc, which are safe havens. Petro-currencies will bounce back first, and then the industrial currencies. While China will take a beating short run, its currency will be forced to appreciate in real terms, and therefore it is best to continue to seek Yuan exposure.

That the current fumbling attempts at stimulus are already mired in an attempt by Bush to force his misguided fiscal policies on the next administration shows that the present executive is worthless, and that Ben Bernanke won’t get up and say the obvious “excessive pandering to the wealthy has endangered the US fiscal position” means he’s not much better. The Congress? Well they managed to vote Bush a few blank checks, caved on the Constitution and on just about everything else in order to get one more year of pork, so it is wisest to presume that while they won’t do the worst possible thing, they may well do the second or third worst possible thing.

Fixing this is not difficult intellectually, it is getting a fat and torpid American electorate to realize that there are trillions in useless fat lying around the economy that have got to go, to be replaced by better and more efficient forms of economic activity.

The problem is that monetary policy can juice up what people are doing, but it has a harder time convincing people to do something else. It is a blunt instrument, the Fed can bludgeon the economy to stopping, or whack it into starting, but it is fiscal and regulatory policy which direct and shape the economy’s growth within the demands that people have. Bernanke and others have given to much authority to the monetary instrument, whose primary goal should be to maintain equilibrium, so that policy can be worked through stable and linear means.

The ultimate failure of Bernanke is that he hasn’t read his own papers carefully enough, and he has forgotten that economies can be guided by money supply, but not remade. A multi-trillion dollar world economy can be rev’ed on go pills, but while the fed can print money, it can’t print oil.

5 comments to The Adventures of Captain Carnage: The Crash of 2008

  • Jonathryn

    Really very well put and on so many levels.

    I’ve been looking everywhere to park my money since August and came to the same conclusion–that there’s nowhere to hide. Gold seemed overvalued; the best indication of this came when I heard advertisements on AM radio for gold investments in a pitch redolent of Florida real estate speculation. Oil seemed too high–assuming that the supply can be sustained at this level at least for the short term, you just can’t sell it for over $100/bbl. The money market seems safe, right? Yes, but only if they’re invested in very short-term-maturity treasuries, that is, treasuries that mature in a day or so. Well, I came to find out that many of the larger money market funds prospectuses don’t list what kind of instruments they’re invested in. Could be short term treasuries. Could be junky commercial paper. Could be CDOs backed by real estate. They just didn’t say. Then one of GE’s spinoffs broke the buck. In any case, why would I want to be invested in dollars when the dollar is being buried alive by the yen, the pound, the euro? Time to look for a Swiss bank, I thought. In conversations with a Cantonal bank, I discovered that UBS’s exposure to the real estate bubble had put all the Swiss Cantonal banks in jeopardy. Then UBS had a multi-billion dollar writedown. Went to Europe and discovered what some people had been whispering about: the Euro was very, very overvalued and when things broke down in the US it would come crashing down. I also discovered that Societe Generale was exposed, and would start making writedowns. German banks: the same. UK and Spanish banks: underwriting their own real estate bubbles, only a matter of time. No banking in Euros for me.

    The Canadian and Australian banking systems are now rated better than Swiss banks anyway, and their officers speak English. But Canada’s too close to the US; their banks must have had exposure. And they did. And so did at least one Australian bank. Besides, no bank anywhere in the world is going to advertise that they have exposure. If any banks advertised that they didn’t have exposure, it’s news to me. That would make a killer advertisement: Bank with us, we’re not exposed to the big shitpile. Perhaps none of them know, or perhaps they realize that a run on any major bank will wipe them all out regardless of whether they have exposure or not.

    Emerging markets? Too volatile, and in any case if the Dow goes down 10%, their bourses go down twice or three times that much; if Citibank goes under, thirty of their banks will get rolled up. In most markets there’s at least somewhere to park your money, but in this market? It’s like the sun turned into a supernova and we’re all gonna get fried.

    As to the reactionaries “who will let 8 years of discipline pass in the hopes that when there are goodies to be passed out they will take power and plunder the treasury to the tune of trillions of dollars more,” well, I’m not so sure. Wall Street has been funding the big D against the GOP for a while now, since before the 2006 elections. Nostalgia for Clinton economics? Fiscal discipline? Reliable economic indicators? An SEC and DOJ that actually prosecutes bad actors in the marketplace who stink up the place for everybody?

  • Stirling Newberry

    the international consensus is that the rich own the world and the rest of us just make trouble. That’s their take away from the 1968-1982 period: that if the public is active and informed that it leads to “excess” and that Reagan and Thatcher led us to a change that we were “ready’ for.

  • Jeff Wegerson

    “but while the fed can print money, it can’t print oil.”

    And while the fed can’t print solar power, Nanosolar can; at $1 to $2 per watt, which competes with coal.

    http://www.nanosolar.com/printsemi.htm

  • HongPong

    Cross-spamming this around all today’s DoomThreads…. Hey everybody look at my chart. We went to the WSJ world markets page and charted up yesterday’s trouncing along with YOY index % change, for all the global indices.

    It’s the second coming of Ross Perot!!!

    Feel free to repost anywhere you feel like: full size version more than 2000 pixels of EconoDoom wide!!
    http://www.hongpong.com/files/blackmonday.jpg


    Hongpong.com

  • darwin

    I think that is the question. Since the stock bubble was wrung out in 2002, and this is the impact of the housing bubble coming down now, is it possible that it will take us lower than where we were in 2002?

    I can see us getting back to even from the Bush disaster, but – we’ve spent a lot of money we didn’t have since then… what will be the effect of that spending, and the unwinding of the entirely artificial creation of “wealth” from the transfer of it to the rich?

    And when are we going to get to actually make things again? The engineers and scientists among us are Very Bored…. ;^)

    “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.”

    Charles Darwin

Leave a Reply