Right now, Yahoo! is front-paging a piece from the WSJ’s Sara Murray and Patrick O’Connor that says Romney lost because his campaign didn’t have enough money and so he had to take time out from swing-state campaigning to fundraise in safe states.
Of course, the story takes no account of the massive cash spends made by GOP super-PACs on Romney’s behalf.
Also, if Mittens hadn’t been so poor, he would never have been fundraising at tens of thousands of dollars a plate in a California mansion, and so never would have been caught by the help making his infamous “47%” remarks…
So Romney lost because he was too poor, or too unlucky in his host’s choice of flunky, or something.
This post was read 100 times.