<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://agonist.org">
<channel>
 <title>The Agonist - Net Neutrality Forum, Net Neutrality, Net Neutrality Diary</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/taxonomy/term/169 161 170/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title>AP Files 7 DMCA Takedowns Against Drudge Retort</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/chickadee/20080612/ap_files_7_dmca_takedowns_against_drudge_retort</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/news/3368/ap-files-7-dmca-takedowns-against-drudge&quot;&gt;Rogers Cadenhead&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apparently AP&#039;s legal knickers are in a serious knot over Drudge Retort users links to its stories, contending that copyright is being violated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;I&gt;Duplicate post, please comment &lt;a href=&quot;http://agonist.org/ww/20080613/ap_files_7_dmca_takedowns_against_drudge_retort&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:41:51 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. eyes free Internet as part of airwaves auction</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/20080529/u_s_eyes_free_internet_as_part_of_airwaves_auction</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Peter Kaplan | Washington | May 29&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208400898&quot;&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt; - U.S. communications regulators are considering auctioning a piece of the airwaves to buyers willing to provide free broadband Internet service without pornography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin is proposing to auction an unused piece of 25-MHz wireless spectrum, with the condition the winning bidder offer free Wi-Fi access and filter out obscene content on part of those airwaves, a spokesman for the FCC said Thursday (May 29).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under Martin&#039;s proposal, the winner would be allowed to use the rest of the airwaves for commercial services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plan would address criticism from some consumer advocates, who say the the government has not done enough to get broadband service into more U.S. households. It also could win praise from anti-obscenity watchdog groups.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology">Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:45:22 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The main reason net neutrality is under attack</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/forum/the_main_reason_net_neutrality_is_under_attack</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The main reason &quot;Net Neutrality&quot; is under attack is because of the rising case of identity theft. This problem is caused by dim-witted individuals, YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE, using their credit cards to buy bogus products on illedgtimit websites. Because of these shit for brains, dumbasses our freedom to use the internet, which is possibly our last form of freedom in a so-called democratic world, is now at the mercy of men who think with their wallets. Now if you want to help, here&#039;s what you do:&lt;br /&gt;
 Step 1: Ask around and try to find a person who is a victim of I.D Theft.&lt;br /&gt;
 Step 2: Invite them into your house for a cup of tea and a few biscuits.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/agonist_net_neutrality_project_0">Net Neutrality Forum</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:00:35 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>House Takes up Net Neutrality Debate</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/20080507/house_takes_up_net_neutrality_debate</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Kenneth Corbin | May 7&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetnews.com/government/article.php/3745181/House+Takes+up+Net+Neutrality+Debate.htm&quot;&gt;InternetNews.com&lt;/a&gt; - A House subcommittee held a hearing today to consider legislation that would codify broad principles intended to prevent Internet service providers (ISPs) from slowing or degrading the delivery of certain content over their networks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once again, all sides of the Net Neutrality debate lined up to stake their positions while the House debated how to treat the latest bill addressing how traffic on ISPs should be treated. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At this morning&#039;s hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee&#039;s subcommittee on telecommunications and the Internet, ISPs warned that Net neutrality legislation could slow broadband deployment by imposing heavy regulations that would create uncertainties in the business model. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The weak state of the economy is front pages news,&quot; said Walter McCormick, president and CEO of the U.S. Telecom Association. &quot;But one of the bright spots is broadband,&quot; he added, warning that the law could put a &quot;chill&quot; on further investment in the sector.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:28:42 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC Public Hearing on the Future of the Internet at Stanford Tomorrow Thursday, April 17th </title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/peter_c/20080416/fcc_public_hearing_on_the_future_of_the_internet_at_stanford_tomorrow_thursday_april_17th</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you are in the Stanford California area tomorrow.  FCC hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
This is a huge deal coming down, as most Agonistas know.  If you have&lt;br /&gt;
never been to a FCC hearing, it is well worth the effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savetheinternet.com/=stanford&quot;&gt;http://www.savetheinternet.com/=stanford&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=”http://www.savetheinternet.com/=stanford”&gt;&lt;img src=”http://www.savetheinternet.com/graphics/sti_stanford.jpg” width=”150″ height=”200″ border=”0″ alt=”Stanford hearing” /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/opinion_0">Opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:01:29 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Global Gridlock</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/zuma/20080404/global_gridlock</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;A target=&quot;_new&quot; title=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;amp;aid=8499&quot; HREF=&quot;http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;amp;aid=8499&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Global Gridlock:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How the US Military-Industrial Complex Seeks to Contain and Control the Earth and it&#039;s Eco-System&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Dr. Kingsley Dennis&lt;br /&gt;
Global Research, March 31, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Argentinean writer Jorge Luis Borges once famously wrote of a great Empire that created a map that was so detailed it was as large as the Empire itself. The actual map itself grew and decayed as the Empire itself conquered or lost territory. When the Empire finally crumbled, all that remained was the map. In some sense we can say that it is the map in which we live; we occupy a location within a simulation of reality. Although semanticists say that &#039;the map is not the territory&#039;, within this digitised age the territory is increasingly becoming the map and the separation between the physical and the digitised rendition is blurring. In this context, to &#039;know the map’ gives priority to intervene upon the physical. In recent years many of us have been scrambling to get &#039;on the Net&#039; and thus be &#039;mapped&#039;; within a few years we may find that living &#039;off the Net&#039; will no longer be an option.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/miscellany">Miscellany</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/analysis_0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/usa/usa_homeland_security">USA: Homeland Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:27:03 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cox Cable is Spying On Me!</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/jimbo92107/20080306/cox_cable_is_spying_on_me</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today I received an accusatory, threatening email from Cox Cable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cox&#039;s message accuses me of downloading something from a &quot;bittorrent&quot; site or something like that. Although a thorough search of my computer found no evidence of what they mentioned, what this letter does prove is that Cox Cable and the NBC company are engaged in an active, coordinated program of spying on the American public. These two companies appear to have joined AT&amp;amp;T in tracking and gathering information on American citizens.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How widespread is this scheme? I know they are spying on me; are they spying on you, too? &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/opinion_0">Opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:42:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcastic! Philly&#039;s cable giant pays people off the street to pack hearing -- on Internet free speech</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/leaftree/20080226/comcastic_phillys_cable_giant_pays_people_off_the_street_to_pack_hearing_on_internet_free_speech</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Comcast spokeswoman Jennifer Khoury said that the company paid some people to arrive early and hold places in the queue for local Comcast employees who wanted to attend the hearing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of those placeholders, however, did more than wait in line: They filled many of the seats at the meeting, according to eyewitnesses. As a result, scores of Comcast critics and other members of the public were denied entry because the room filled up well before the beginning of the hearing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.attytood.com/2008/02/comcastic_phillys_cable_giant.html&quot;&gt;http://www.attytood.com/2008/02/comcastic_phillys_cable_giant.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:20:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AT&amp;T&#039;s plans to filter the Internet</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/tina/20080129/at_ts_plans_to_filter_the_internet</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Submitted by lambert on Tue, 2008-01-29 09:52.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is planning to open “all packets” on the Internet, and examine them for intellectual property violations. Email, IM, everything. So, when Gizmodo writer Joel Johnson was invited onto AT&amp;amp;T’s Hugh Johnson Show to talk about gadgets, he decided to talk about that instead. The video:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read more and watch the video at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.correntewire.com/at_ts_plans_to_filter_the_internet&quot;&gt;Corrente&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology">Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama To The Telecoms: You Don&#039;t Get To Tell People How To Use The Internet</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/ian_welsh/20071029/obama_to_the_telecoms_you_dont_get_to_tell_people_how_to_use_the_internet</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/Vd8qY6myrrE&amp;amp;rel=1&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/Vd8qY6myrrE&amp;amp;rel=1&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/10/29/obama-pledges-net-neutrality-support&quot;&gt;Obama says what we want to hear:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would you make it a priority in your first year of office to re-instate Net Neutrality as the law of the land? And would you pledge to only appoint FCC commissioners that support open Internet principles like Net Neutrality?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama gave a resounding reply:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/usa/usa_campaign_2008">USA: Campaign 2008</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:00:04 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast blocks some Internet traffic</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/20071019/comcast_blocks_some_internet_traffic</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Peter Svensson | New York | October 19&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21376597/&quot;&gt;AP&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;i&gt;Tests confirm data discrimination by number 2 U.S. service provider&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comcast Corp. actively interferes with attempts by some of its high-speed Internet subscribers to share files online, a move that runs counter to the tradition of treating all types of Net traffic equally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The interference, which The Associated Press confirmed through nationwide tests, is the most drastic example yet of data discrimination by a U.S. Internet service provider. It involves company computers masquerading as those of its users.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:22:24 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yet Again, the Future Ain&#039;t Happening Here</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/bolo/20071016/yet_again_the_future_aint_happening_here</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think most regular readers here are already familiar with this theme, so I&#039;ll get right to the good stuff.  A small startup ISP in Toronto is offering very different, very open web access.  Read below to see (&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/Sticking-it-to-lhomme-Canadian-co-op-forms-own-ISP.ars&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nomad does things a little differently. The company is subscriber-owned, volunteer-run, and open-source friendly. It offers a neutral Internet connection with no bandwidth caps or throttling, and it makes a point of creating wireless access points at the end of each DSL connection that can be used, for free, by the public.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/economics/economics_usa">Economics: USA</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/opinion_0">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/usa/usa_domestic_issues">USA: Domestic Issues</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:29:15 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>To Form A More Perfect Union</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/zuma/20071002/to_form_a_more_perfect_union</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://zuma.theprawn.com/thedeclarationofindependence.txt&quot;&gt;http://zuma.theprawn.com/thedeclarationofindependence.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no mind/body split, nor any body/planet split, nor any Creation/planet split. As sure as the butterfly effect, everything is connected. Reality and it&#039;s consequences are their own record as sure as that in the light, as well as the radio waves, that emanates out from Earth every day.&lt;br /&gt;
 That which is hidden is known to be hidden; the lump in the rug betrays itself. We see things as they plainly are.&lt;br /&gt;
 To be at peace and productive and healthy, we must have civilization, between ourselves, and other nations, and with Earth herself. Earth on it&#039;s own is a model of self-cooperation, another aspect of Evolution Darwin apparently didn&#039;t emphasize (if noted at all).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/global/global_politics_and_culture">Global Politics and Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/histories">Histories</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/human_rights">Human Rights</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/usa/usa_liberty_watch">Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/oceania">Oceania</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/opinion_0">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/unproven_stories">Unproven Stories</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/usa">USA</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:16:33 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AT&amp;T and Verizon: We Can Cut You Off If You Criticize Us</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/ian_welsh/20071001/at_t_and_verizon_we_can_cut_you_off_if_you_criticize_us</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/4898&quot;&gt;New clause in AT&amp;amp;T contracts:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you taken a look at AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s Terms of Service for High-Speed Internet (HSI) lately? Some changes they&#039;ve made are downright draconian. In the section labeled &quot;5.1 Suspension/Termination,&quot; AT&amp;amp;T says the normal stuff about lack of payment and so forth. But clause (c) says they can terminate your service for conduct that AT&amp;amp;T believes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;(c) tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&amp;amp;T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries. Source: AT&amp;amp;T Terms of Service &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verizon.net/policies/vzcom/tos_popup.asp&quot;&gt;there&#039;s Verizon&#039;s clause (which, so far as I know, is not new):&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Without prejudice to any other rights that Verizon may have, Verizon reserves the right and sole discretion to change, limit, terminate, modify at any time, temporarily or permanently cease to provide the Service or any part thereof to any user or group of users, without prior notice and for any reason or no reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/att-say-bad-things-about-us-and-well-cancel-your-internets/&quot;&gt;Martin at Scholars and Rogues thinks this is about net neutrality, and in a neutral sense it is.&lt;/a&gt;  But in a larger sense it&#039;s about oligopoly and monopoly - and about free markets.  Let me start with a digression.  I&#039;ve been reading about Franklin Roosevelt lately, and what I just read about today, specifically, was the rural electrification of America.  See, until Roosevelt, 9 out of 10 rural citizens didn&#039;t have electric power, though most of the cities did.  Roosevelt desperately wanted them to have power and made very sincere efforts to convince them to provide it.  But they weren&#039;t interested.  It just wasn&#039;t &quot;worth it&quot; to them to do so and every farmer who was market efficient to serve was already being served, because of course the if there was a profit to be made, someone would have made it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the government went ahead and did it themselves, and in response, rather than letting the government grab them all up, the private companies suddenly started doing it themselves.  Massive new electrical projects drove rates through the floor, by 1950 9/10 farmers had electricity, and the companies were even making profits off it (public and private companies.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;More After the Jump&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/analysis_0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/economics/economics_usa">Economics: USA</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:00:23 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon rejects text messages from an abortion rights group</title>
 <link>http://agonist.org/20070927/verizon_rejects_text_messages_from_an_abortion_rights_group</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Adam Liptak | Sept 27&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/27/america/27verizon.php&quot;&gt;IHT&lt;/a&gt; - Saying it had the right to block &quot;controversial or unsavory&quot; text messages, Verizon Wireless has rejected a request from Naral Pro-Choice America, the abortion rights group, to make Verizon&#039;s mobile network available for a text-message program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other leading wireless carriers have accepted the program, which allows people to sign up for text messages from Naral by sending a message to a five-digit number known as a short code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dispute over the Naral messages is a skirmish in the larger battle over the question of &quot;net neutrality&quot; — whether carriers or Internet service providers should have a voice in the content they provide to customers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/business/27cnd-verizon.html?hp&quot;&gt;Verizon Reverses Itself on Abortion Messages&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://agonist.org/topic/technology/net_neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:34:07 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
