Kyoto could cause permanent gas price increases


"Are you somewhat upset about gas at $2 a gallon and looking forward to lower prices? Well, just remember that the Kyoto Protocol (to combat a hypothetical global warming), avidly promoted by the Clinton-Gore administration, would raise prices even higher - on a permanent basis.

As disclosed by The Washington Times, an internal memo of the Energy Department blamed much of the June price run-up in the Midwest on the rigid regulations of the EPA. Supplies of gasoline became tight because of the EPA requirement for the Chicago market, starting on June 1, for "reformulated" gasoline (blended with ethanol distilled from corn). Refiners ended up with having to supply different formulations for fuels for different areas to meet EPA rules. With no flexibility to swap supplies and with refineries operating at peak capacity, just one pipeline breakdown or one refinery fire would then cause supply shortfalls and price spikes."

The "expert", S. Fred Singer for the Washington Times
"Oil price spike with no peak in sight"
August 11, 2000

Permanent $2 a gallon gas under the Kyoto Protocol! Don't we all wish. And I almost forgot all about the "crisis" in "peak capacity."

And here's another walk down memory lane. Anyone remember this "failure"?


stuart noble June 11, 2008 - 3:10am
( categories: Global Energy )

You've got the speculation-theory advocates, the "peak oil" advocates.

The truth seems to be that the oil industry was unprepared for the sudden increase in demand.

I suspect that the current situation will be alleviated somewhat when demand slacks off a bit in response to higher prices. Right now, there's no particular reason for any of the oil-producing countries to increase their production facilities. As long as prices increase, the oil's steadily appreciating in the ground.

What none of our leaders seem to understand is that it's not oil per se, but energy that makes our life possible. Carter, when putting the kabosh on nuclear FBR really did us a disservice, saddling our nuclear industry with huge inefficiencies (in a conventional reactor design, only about 5 percent of the fissile material is used, which results in a huge waste disposal problem).

Cheap abundant energy is what the nation needs. What form it takes is largely immaterial in the long run.

Petronius June 11, 2008 - 5:37pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.