Media Pushback


Sean-Paul Kelley | San Antonio | March 18

Fellow Bloggers,

Matt Stoller and I are very concerned about how Democratic bloggers are being consistently under-represented in the mainstream media and in academic settings. By being segmented away from these forums, we are effectively pushed out of the discourse of opinion-leaders. The result is that conventional wisdom is boiled down to statements like 'Everyone thought that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq' or 'Everyone thought there would be surpluses before Bush's tax cuts'. Conventional wisdom is made largely without our input, which is dangerous and unfair. We want to change that and here is a first step.

More after the jump


What has really irritated us in recent days was >this post over at Digby's place about an upcoming event at The Brookings Institution. There are no liberals on the panel. And there are no liberals who will be live-blogging the event - in fact, all live-bloggers are right-of-center, two are even Right-wing operatives—Josh Trevino and Ed Morrisey.

This is a serious problem, and while we don't mean to pick on Brookings specifically, nor do we wish Brookings to disinvite anyone the example presented here is especially egregious. There are other serious issues with diversity in media, but the lack of diversity in political opinions is at least as problematic as any of them.

We'd like to correct this, starting with the panel at the Brookings Institute. Brookings went so far as to mislead a reader of Digby's saying that the following bloggers had been invited to sit on the panel but declined: Juan Cole, Kevin Drum, Kos, Atrios, Matthew Yglesias, Bill Scher and Chris Bowers.

This is what one of Digby’s readers wrote to the Brookings Institution:

“The upcoming conference on the impact of the new media should be interesting. It could be far more valuable with more substantive representation from the blogging community. Your choice of bloggers to represent the vast blogging environment seems unnecessarily limited: the left right balance is particularly off. Wonkette is funny, snarky, and cuts through a lot of BS, while Andy Sullivan is much more serious, thoughtful, and delves into much deeper topics. (Oh, by the way, Andy has said he "quit" blogging - I guess he didn't mention that.)

“There are far better choices of bloggers from the left who could balance Andrew Sullivan and give a more serious tone to the discussion - these are off the top of my head: DailyKos, Americablog (much involved in the Gannon/Guckert controversy, and he's in DC!), Juan Cole (Iraq expert), Digby at Hullabaloo, Atrios, Chris Bowers of MyDD, Political Animal from Washington Monthly, Matt Yglesias from Tapped, Bill Scher of LiberalOasis, and I could go on.

“A left/right balance is great - we on the left all accept the challenge of presenting our ideas within a formidable debate. Wonkette won't do that: she will get some twitters from the audience, but this discussion should have a little higher purpose.”

Mr. Gavin of the Brookings Institution replied:

We attempted to get many of the bloggers you mentioned, but they were unavailable. Between Andrew and Ana, and the live-bloggers--as well as some of the other panelists--I think our event will make for a full and informative roundtable discussion. Hope you can make it or tune in via the webcast.

This week Sean-Paul tried to contact all of the bloggers asking them if they had indeed been invited to SIT on the panel. Six of the eight bloggers in question replied that they had not, in fact, been invited to sit on the panel. The other two were unavailable for comment. Only one said he had been invited, and that was only to live-blog the event. Yesterday, March 17, Sean-Paul called Patrick Gavin at the Brookings Institute and asked him if he invited those same bloggers he said that he had, in his own reply. After much hemming and hawing Mr. Gavin said he had indeed invited many liberal bloggers to sit on the panel but was unsure which ones. After more questions he could name only two: Markos Moulitsas Zuniga and Joshua Micah Marshall.

This situation is simply unacceptable. We must push back against this or we will never achieve any semblance of balance in the media. If we do not, we abdicate our ability to tell our own side of the story and leave it to others to define us.

Please call Patrick Gavin at the Brookings institution and politely insist that they include a real liberal blogger at their event. Here are there numbers: 202-797-6310, or 202-797-6105.

We'd like you to post a link to this letter and your own comments on your blog if possible and help us out.

Sincerely,

Matt Stoller and Sean-Paul Kelley

PS--All supporting documentation available on request.

Update: Steve Gillard has some comments.

Update 2: Melanie chimes in as well.


Update 3: In paragraph 2 we say there are no liberals on the panel. Technically that is not true. But what we meant to say is that there are no LIBERAL BLOGGERS on the panel. We regret the error.



Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 1:39pm
( categories: AgonistWire | Media Criticism )

Gee, I'm right here in DC and only a Metro ride away from Brookings.  But noticing any female "liberal" bloggers besides Wonkette just isn't on the media's agenda.

beltwaybump March 18, 2005 - 10:41am

But here's the thing.  Prominent Democratic bloggers have to want to do it.  In Digby's comments, Atrios said that he'd been invited to live-blog it and declined.

Now, I'll admit that liveblogging is lame.  And that's not Atrios' schtick.  But wouldn't it be better to show up and complain about not being on the panel?  Sitting at home and sulking about the unfairness of it all is really lame. I imagine some of these guys think it might be beneath them to lobby for representation (i.e. blog about it).  But that's just how things work.

space March 18, 2005 - 12:16pm

You've struck a nerve I'd say.

Stirling Newberry March 18, 2005 - 12:40pm

ratings and don't care about showing balance or what is good about blogs.  In fact I think they are trying to demonize blogging.  It is a direct threat to their medium and I warn people to know what they are getting into before they get a little to caught up in getting exposure, for whatever reason.  This may hurt the blogging movement.  I find it kind of strange how in one hand people will complain about how corporate, unbalanced, lazy, uninformend, and manipulative the corporate media is.  The fact that they are part of the military industrial complex is disturbing to me and would raise questions about their motivations and intentions.

rschewe March 18, 2005 - 6:20pm

She's got a fowl mouth and is kind a cute. And she is An "A" list blogger. Someone told me she actually has a booking agent for these kinds of things. Figures.

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 10:43am

of a P.R. man. He found talent, and set up a system to promote it.

http://www.nickdenton.org/

Wonkette did not happen from grass roots up. The fact that the person that is wonkette is talented and knowledgeable is not in dispute. Rather, I point this out because I think it relates to some of the things you are trying to do with this thread.

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 1:54pm

We have a short list of bloggers who are willing to do it. Melanie is one. And there are others.

The problem is they made no effort to reach and and find some other bloggers. How difficult is it to go to technorati and find DC bloggers who are liberal and willing to come and then send them an email?

Yeah, I thought so: it's simple. And they just didn't do that. That is what we are angry and upset about this.  

Me and Matt and a few other liberal blogggers are in the process of creating some kind of org to lobby the media for more appearences and academe settings too. We are getting there. It took the Republicans twenty years, at least. So it ain't going to happen tomorrow but it will happen. And we're working on it.

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 12:31pm

Stirling, call me if you can. I am on the phone with Matt right now. But gimme about 5 mins.

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 12:44pm

to keep the agenda of 'numero uno' in mind. They are not in existence to provide a fair hearing to bloggers. They have their own mission.

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 2:02pm

They are supposed to be a Liberal Think Tank. Are they Centrist now or Right?

This whole dust-up is BS. And seriously, does Wonkette add anything to Brookings? Fer Gawd's sake, she's a gossip columnist!

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 2:07pm

as does everyone else competing for media coverage in a media run capitalistically. (Once again, before screaming in disgust, your alternative to that is: publicly-owned media.)

P.S. I think with your efforts like this thread, you have provided them with some buzz, that's what I think.

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 2:15pm

some efforts on all this should go is to make serious coverage of news and issues marketable/profitable again. Others would rather use this for political gain. I think those two interests compete, and rather strongly.

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 2:18pm

Maybe just maybe Brookings sees that conservative bloggers and Wonkette types will get them the buzz that they have not been getting.

I even noted this here; liberal bloggers don't talk about the Brookings' Institute ideas. They talk about Wolfowitz and neo-cons and the AEI all the time! You've given them very short shrift:

...While these guys are writing in the beltway or whatever, Brookings Institution had a very proactive event in Turkey with Strobe Talbott:

http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?ID=37330

But even though the AEI didn't do same, that doesn't get any play, what the neo-cons are doing and saying is what interests everyone. And if that ends up being the focus of the left again, while it just might be making a mistake in interpretation? Should deconstructing, dissing and fearing the neo-con arguments be the left's priority now? Or should it be promoting their own analysis and recommendations, after figuring out what Bush's are?

It's the reframing question I am raising, obviously. Offense, not defense. But also, figure out first what you're fighting against. It may not be neo-cons anymore.



from:

http://agonist.org/comments/2005/2/26/123639/193/11#11

You haven't helped them much at all in the past!

Anyone note their thing on Kyoto?

http://agonist.org/comments/2005/3/12/12831/7679/59#59

If I were them, I might even think that most of you think you can do it better than them.

Maybe Brookings has decided they can't win going the scholarly route, and need to participate in the continuation of talk radio(outrage/rant/emote/mud wrestle/'animal house' frat fight) that much of the blogosphere has become.

With conservative bloggers and gossip, they would get 'outrage', and, consequently, some attention?

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 3:22pm

Addendum to above post.

'We must be heard.

And title has the word "victory".

You are at war with the Brookings Institute?

It's they who have been trying to be heard just as long or longer than you.

In this vein, I really don't get why liberal bloggers are at war with what is labeled by everyone else as "the liberal media." Doesn't make much sense to me. They and you should be allies. Unfortunately, the upstairs guys constantly are telling them that the "liberal" label hurts the bottom line, so cut it out. And while that is happening, liberal bloggers constantly trying to stab them too.

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 3:53pm

The squeaky wheel gets oiled. We are under-represented and until we push back we will remain underrepresented. I just don't get what you are saying. It makes no sense. How are we supposed to tell our story in a calm raional manner if we never get the chance to tell our story. That is what this is about. Nothing more, nothing less. We just want a chance to tell it and not have ourselves defined by others.

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 6:30pm

I've been using Brookings white papers on my site since the day I went live and just added another Shibley Telhami op-ed today (their stuff is good, as is CSIS's.)  I use the think tanks all the time, but they are too stupid to notice.

Melanie

beltwaybump March 18, 2005 - 9:15pm

There are different ways to be squeaky.

When you work in a retail situation, and a customer comes in ranting and raving that he's mad as hell and not going to take it anymore, you give him a consolation prize to make him be quiet and not scare all the other customers away.

Then there's the guy that come in and says: I have this idea how you could sell more of those things over there, why do you do it like that, if you did it like this I would buy one of these and I bet a lot of other people would too. And you take that guy over to the boss and the boss takes him out to lunch.

;-)

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 6:41pm

you're not getting my point. We tried that at first with Brooking. We've been working on this all week. We tried to come up with a win-win that wouldn't embarrass anyone or make a stink. They simply would not budge. So, we made a conscious decsion to make it an issue. We haven't screamed. We have not been ugly. We requested that callers be polite but firm. We tried everything before we chose this option, believe me.

And they left us no choice. There is nothing agressive or ulgy in the letter Matt and I wrote. We're polite. We just want to take action. And sometimes you just have to take action. It's the only way things get done.

And we won. Ruy Texiara and Laura Rozen are officially going to be there. They've already put it on the masthead. We partly won. We wanted a real liberal to sit on the panel but this will suffice for now.  

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 6:49pm

What this one person, me, sees when I see a story presented as "liberal bloggers fight Brookings Institute and win,"

or, for that matter, a story presented as "liberal blogger X" versus the "liberal media",

mostly what I see is Karl Rove's dreams coming true.

Divide and conquer.

You are a part of the media now. Still presenting as a poor fighting underdog just hits this reader like an excuse for not building coalitions.

artappraiser March 18, 2005 - 7:15pm

Sean Paul Kelley March 18, 2005 - 9:54pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.