Stupid Stimulus Tricks


Senate votes to delay transition to digital television.

Why? Because there isn't enough money in the coupon program. So the country has to wait on freeing up the spectrum because there isn't one Senator, and one member of the House of Representatives smart enough to put the necessary extra funds in the stimulus bill.

We want people to be spending. Right? Coupon. Spend. Coupon. Spend.

As the good people of Corrente would say: "Department of What is wrong with you people?"

[Updated: the money has, in fact, been included in a vote on the 15th of January. Hat tip to Mike Nellis for finding this.]


Stirling Newberry January 26, 2009 - 10:51pm
( categories: Economics: USA )

They should have let the digital for 2 weeks to wake folks up. Then when the riots were getting out of hand, re-start the coupon program for a month or so.

Zman1527 January 26, 2009 - 11:10pm

AP, By David Espo & Andrew Taylor, January 26

WASHINGTON – House Democrats are likely to jettison family planning funds for the low-income from an $825 billion economic stimulus bill, officials said late Monday, following a personal appeal from President Barack Obama at a time the administration is courting Republican critics of the legislation.

Several officials said a final decision was expected on Tuesday, coinciding with Obama's scheduled visit to the Capitol for separate meetings with House and Senate Republicans.

The provision has emerged as a point of contention among Republicans, who criticize it as an example of wasteful spending that would neither create jobs nor otherwise improve the economy.

Under the provision, states no longer would be required to obtain federal permission to offer family planning services — including contraceptives — under Medicaid, the health program for the low-income.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja January 27, 2009 - 12:43am

but not surprising. If the dems give this up we will I guess know their stance on healthcare. Do they not realize how expensive the consequences will be.


"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams! Live the life you've imagined." -Henry David Thoreau

Tina January 27, 2009 - 12:51am

New Right-Wing Stimulus Myth: Progressives Want To Spend ‘Hundreds Of Millions On Contraceptives’

Think Progress, By Amanda Terkel, January 26

In recent days, conservatives have been stepping up their opposition to any stimulus proposal that favors smart spending over tax cuts for businesses. To push their argument — which most economists have discredited — they have tried to call out wasteful spending in the bill. Last week, for example, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) went on a tirade about funding to revitalize the National Mall.

This week, the focus is on contraceptives. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) has claimed that the package would spend “hundreds of millions on contraceptives.” Yesterday on ABC’s This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) about the provision. Pelosi replied:

PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those - one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

[...]

Like other portions of the stimulus bill, this measure would not only aid states, but also provide preventative, cost-saving health care to help low-income women support their families and keep working. It focuses on access to recommended services and contraception to prevent unplanned pregnancies and promote maternal and infant health — not abortion. ThinkProgress has learned that an upcoming Congressional Budget Office report estimates that this change would save $200 million over five years and $700 million over 10.


Included in this article is yet more evidence of just how classy Rush Limbaugh is.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja January 27, 2009 - 1:02am

Clearly people having sex is the cause of all economic problems.

Stirling Newberry January 27, 2009 - 8:41am

The eighth baby was the surprise

Los Angeles Times, By Jeff Gottlieb & Sam Quinones , January 27

From left, Drs. Mandhir Gupta, Karen Maples and Harold Henry discuss Monday’s birth of octuplets, the second time it has occurred in the U.S.

A team of 46 doctors, nurses and surgical assistants at Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center meticulously planned the births for weeks. As the date approached, they held two practice runs. They didn't want any surprises.

But they got one anyway Monday morning when it came time for the delivery.

"We had plans for seven babies. Then we found baby H," Dr. Karen Maples said. "My eyes got to be the size of saucers."

It took only five minutes -- from 10:43 a.m. to 10:48 a.m. -- for all six boys and two girls to be delivered and processed lovingly through an assembly line of medical workers.

The mother and her medical corps had made history.

It was only the second known delivery of octuplets in the U.S., physicians and experts said.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja January 27, 2009 - 8:54am

Los Angeles Times, By Jessica Garrison, Andrew Blankstein & Jeff Gottlieb, January 30

The woman who gave birth to octuplets this week already has six young children and never expected ["Who could have predicted!"] that the fertility treatment she received would result in eight more babies, her mother said Thursday.

The woman, who has not been publicly identified, had embryos implanted last year, and "they all happened to take," Angela Suleman said, leading to the eight births Monday. "I looked at those babies. They are so tiny and so beautiful."

She acknowledged that raising 14 children is a daunting prospect.

"It's going to be difficult," Suleman added, noting that her daughter's father is going back to Iraq, where neighbors said he worked as a contractor, to help support the expanded family.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja January 30, 2009 - 8:58am

if funding were cut off, that it would stop decrepit, Republicans getting their Viagra prescriptions filled? Jeez, anyone reading this would falsely believe Republicans don't reproduce in the conventional manner.

canuck January 27, 2009 - 9:41am

The transition to digital TV was a pain in ass here.

Stupid government didn't check beforehand that digital boxes are compatible with subtitle systems of all the channels. Especially the state owned channel had difficulties because it broadcasts multilingual subtitles.

25% of young singles do not have a TV-set. The best time of TV has been passed and replaced by the internet.


--Sell Alaska to China!

Singular January 27, 2009 - 2:47am

Only saves 40 Bucks. Not having one doesn't prevent anyone outright from getting the converter. Proceed with the switch and fund the program as can.

ww January 27, 2009 - 10:11am

You perhaps have no idea how many older and just plain poor people in marginal reception areas who still have rabbit ears won't be able to get the digital signal even with the converter. It isn't a majority of people, but that's not the point.

Department of "Why don't old people understand what we want them to do?" is stupid.

Department of (More)Correct Stimulus. Pay for minimal, public cable for people(despite the obvious corporate backlash howls ) via voucher
if that turns you on. Makes it much easier for internet (since free wi-fi in the US seems to be anti-American).

Big Brother has already arrived anyway.


I feel the American worker has been sacrificed to the capitalist idols in the ancient Mayan fashion. - Sue Lamb, NYT reader

nymole January 27, 2009 - 10:37am

If the program is watchable in analog it will lock digitally. 'Sides since when do we hold everybody up because a few need time to catch up. Not since grade school, IRRC.

The decision that low income houses, Hispanic folk, and the elderly would get pimped was made a long time ago. Its TV, not dialysis.

ww January 27, 2009 - 11:06am

I don't feel held up because somebody else can't take the bandwidth
and use it for more commercial stuff.

I've been in a number of places where the rabbit ears kinda worked, but the digital image from the converter was constantly trying to resolve into a digital mess, oh those pixels were flying.

Mine works fine, so I've been going out and trying to get some(even) older people's converters to work for them.

eom.

Gee I haven't said that to you since we both toiled away on Venezuela:-)


I feel the American worker has been sacrificed to the capitalist idols in the ancient Mayan fashion. - Sue Lamb, NYT reader

nymole January 27, 2009 - 11:17am


ww January 27, 2009 - 1:50pm

wapo
Wednesday, January 28, 2009; 1:08 PM

WASHINGTON -- The House has defeated a bill to postpone the upcoming transition from analog to digital television broadcasting by four months to June 12.

House Republicans succeeded in scuttling a bill to delay the transition, which is scheduled for Feb. 17, less than two days after the Senate unanimously passed the plan.

The defeat is a setback for the Obama administration and Democrats on Capitol Hill, who fear too many Americans are not ready for the switchover.

The Nielsen Co. estimates more than 6.5 million U.S. households that rely on analog television sets to pick up over-the-air broadcast signals could see their TV sets go dark next month if the transition is not postponed.


"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams! Live the life you've imagined." -Henry David Thoreau

Tina January 28, 2009 - 2:59pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.