... one man neo-con freak show. I submit that he was the original neo-con. A conservative trend setter who strangely already emerged with this world view right after the wall came down. Long before anybody even branded the term in the Western world.

At any rate he is not to be taken serious and rates on the hilarity-meter of statecraft at the very end of the scale rubbing shoulders with Berlusconi.

are heads of state.

I have a Minneapolis bias. But you can't deny they have an agenda to expand government power over this. the last thing we should do is expand their authority right now! First the EU gets ahold of yr cheese distribution, then yr light bulbs! beware...
--
Hongpong.com

This guy doesn't believe global warming is reversible (except perhaps if we make charcoal)

Your work on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons led eventually to a global CFC ban that saved us from ozone-layer depletion. Do we have time to do a similar thing with carbon emissions to save ourselves from climate change?

Not a hope in hell. Most of the "green" stuff is verging on a gigantic scam. Carbon trading, with its huge government subsidies, is just what finance and industry wanted. It's not going to do a damn thing about climate change, but it'll make a lot of money for a lot of people and postpone the moment of reckoning. I am not against renewable energy, but to spoil all the decent countryside in the UK with wind farms is driving me mad. It's absolutely unnecessary, and it takes 2500 square kilometres to produce a gigawatt - that's an awful lot of countryside.

What about work to sequester carbon dioxide?

That is a waste of time. It's a crazy idea - and dangerous. It would take so long and use so much energy that it will not be done.

Do you still advocate nuclear power as a solution to climate change?

It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction measures.

So are we doomed?

There is one way we could save ourselves and that is through the massive burial of charcoal. It would mean farmers turning all their agricultural waste - which contains carbon that the plants have spent the summer sequestering - into non-biodegradable charcoal, and burying it in the soil. Then you can start shifting really hefty quantities of carbon out of the system and pull the CO2 down quite fast.

Source: New Scientist: One last chance to save mankind