The Road to Wellville


Dean Baker gets it.

Health care is stimulus. But better than a credit, would be to go for the simple sweep. National. Univerisal. Single Rate. Health Care. Why is this?

• It will generate service jobs, the group that will be hit hard as the economy turns down.
• It will shift national effort permanently: from flipping burgers to making people live longer and healthier lives.
• It will save more money than it costs quickly, as processing costs and other costs associated with privatized health insurance go away.
• It provides a career for the people who will benefit from the "New GI bill."


Stirling Newberry November 5, 2008 - 6:30am
( categories: Miscellany )

I have it from good sources (and they really can't get much better than my source) that economic "stabilization" and healthcare will top the Dem agenda for the coming session.

So now is the time to make sure that our elected officials understand how interconnected the two issues are. And making a strong argument for the big-picture economic benefit of healthcare reform might not fall on deaf ears this time around.

Let 'em now, because for at least a little while they'll all be very happy to hear from their constituents.

Lex November 5, 2008 - 9:17am

will be crucial

Stirling Newberry November 5, 2008 - 10:18am

This is a trade advantage for Canada. Rather than having GM paying for expensive health insurance for unionized workers in the US, in Ontario the workers themselves pay premiums and GM (large companies) pay a modest payroll tax instead.
Albert

Albertde November 5, 2008 - 12:31pm

The Dems will need strong allies to get this done. Big business is ready to be on board, since benefits are hurting their global competitiveness. It's also a huge reason for off-shoring, not only of blue collar but also white collar jobs. For example, the US auto industry is toast without government sponsored benefits such as healthcare. SS and Medicare are also key in supplementing and even replacing expensive pension plans that businesses are now limiting or canceling because they are unaffordable.

Things have reached a tipping point and major players realize that the system needs a redesign. Let the debate begin.

tjfxh November 5, 2008 - 1:11pm

This moment will be squandered at the present rate.

Wake me after the Republican that comes in after Obama is ready to be defeated.

Stirling Newberry November 5, 2008 - 1:25pm

who thought two years ago that Obama could be elected president, having first to beat the Clinton machine and then the GOP attack machine.

Let's wait a bit and see. However, I'm not very encouraged by what appears to be Obama's first appointment — Rahm Emmanuel as WHCOS.

tjfxh November 5, 2008 - 2:38pm

Is that your projection - 16 years?

It will certainly solve the expense problem from the baby boomers. Many will be dead.

Synoia November 5, 2008 - 2:47pm

two volumes a while ago and have been trying to find time to read them. I'm only on ~pg. 100 of vol. 1, but I see what you're saying even more now.

While we are ripe for a big change, it can still be squandered. I hadn't realized how many failed "moments" had been generated in the past--Reagan being a good example of a recent failed one. Heck, I guess Bush in 2000 was another, right? It will be interesting to see if Obama in 2008 succeeds.

Bolo November 5, 2008 - 3:53pm

Way more than 2000, 9/11 was an opportunity to do good, but people have chosen to do well instead.

NateTG November 5, 2008 - 4:18pm

when what we need now is a new Franklin Roosevelt.

chalo November 6, 2008 - 1:03am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.