The Choice


Sean Paul asks about whether this is the ultimate crisis or not. The answer is whether we learn from it. I say no. When I see suburbanites setting up braisers and selling squirrel skewers, then I will know we've learned. Until then I think we are going to get the response of printing paper, and then having elites get together and figure out how to slice away another slab of middle class expectations.

In their minds, this is a paper crisis. In their minds the same people who were in charge before, will be in charge now, only with non-voting government shares on the books. The people like Instablunder who pimped this slide, will still be well paid and on the inside.

They weren't wrong, they aren't sorry, and that means it is going to happen again.


Stirling Newberry October 10, 2008 - 10:48am
( categories: Miscellany )

In their minds, this is a paper crisis.

Ergo print more paper to replace the bad and everything will be OK. Right.

tjfxh October 10, 2008 - 11:03am

In principle, the market has some way to go down, and I haven't really seen anything that suggests the fundamental problems (other than an overvalued stock market) are being addressed.

As long as people are choosing oppulence over security and consumption over enjoyment, we'll have the same problems.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHPOzQzk9Qo

NateTG October 10, 2008 - 11:11am

The fix for a problem can never be accomplished during the heat of crisis. If an extreme crisis occurs and someone must step in to solve it, that will not be the fix. We hope it does not come to that since we know that there are plans set up to establish martial law which is just as the totalitarians would like and right in line with their militarist ideas of how to get things done. So keeping everyone calm until after the election and the inauguration is key.

The fix must be initiated by committees of Congress who are already questioning those who have participated in the unregulated orgy that got us into this mess, thanks to Reagan, GHWB, Clinton (sad to say), and GW/Cheney. Keeping the public mobilized to pressure Congress to find answers to prevent a recurrence of the problem may be easy since things will take awhile to improve and folks are going to continue to be pissed off.

So we want to remain cool and support the transition to Obama in the manner that he has maintained so well, a cool and collected demeanor with the promise of public involvement at each step of the way. After the inauguration we can pressure the White House and Congress to address the issue by setting up a national forum of experts, that may include some from outside the nation, and devoid of insiders, who can address the problem and render the discussion in terms comprehensible to the informed citizen.

Such transparency, once established as a process, can then be applied to other problems and we can advance backwards through the actions of various agencies under GW. Eventually some people might even end up in jail, charged with treason, etc. We must just remember to keep our cool, take things one step at a time, and promote the idea that things will work out if we all work together to advance positive outcomes. That would be rebuilding the American team.

Channing
Ventura CA USA

Powder Monkey October 10, 2008 - 11:22am

please elucidate. any links?

1700: "Abolish slavery!"
1800: Woman's Suffrage!"
2000:"World Peace!"

bernadene October 10, 2008 - 12:52pm

But there's this and this and this and this and this to be aware of. Cheerful stuff!

Fortunately, the authorities are quick to assure us that there's no reason for alarm, and we should move along.

chalo October 10, 2008 - 1:55pm
varney October 10, 2008 - 2:18pm

I wouldn't trust him to confirm much. Maybe the day of the week.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 10, 2008 - 2:32pm

So we want to remain cool and support the transition to Obama in the manner that he has maintained so well, a cool and collected demeanor with the promise of public involvement at each step of the way.

The profound effect of simple "leadership by example" never fails to amaze me.

Of course, the essence of leadership implies that one is being followed - very different than "command", with which it's often confused.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 10, 2008 - 1:23pm

Channing, nice to see your inputs again.

"There are two types of folk music:
quiet folk music and loud folk music.
I play both."

Dave Alvin

Peter C October 11, 2008 - 8:26am

The Moment of Truth

The question now is whether these moves are too little, too late. I don’t think so, but it will be very alarming if this weekend rolls by without a credible announcement of a new financial rescue plan, involving not just the United States but all the major players.

Why do we need international cooperation? Because we have a globalized financial system in which a crisis that began with a bubble in Florida condos and California McMansions has caused monetary catastrophe in Iceland. We’re all in this together, and need a shared solution.

Why this weekend? Because there happen to be two big meetings taking place in Washington: a meeting of top financial officials from the major advanced nations on Friday, then the annual International Monetary Fund/World Bank meeting Saturday and Sunday. If these meetings end without at least an agreement in principle on a global rescue plan — if everyone goes home with nothing more than vague assertions that they intend to stay on top of the situation — a golden opportunity will have been missed, and the downward spiral could easily get even worse.

This is the momentous point at which budding globalization has its chance to forge a cooperative approach to global problems to replace US economic hegemony and political unilateralism. This is the big news and the big opportunity.

tjfxh October 10, 2008 - 11:51am

True to some extent, but all those various banks and such have already started collapsing. Everyone had to acknowledge Enron was really a seismic fraud after it was gone. The absence of the entities in question is still a huge battering ram into their fake reality.

Usually these entities find a way to stick someone else with the bill & still continue to exist, but the systemic collapse is of such a size that that doesn't work anymore.

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong October 10, 2008 - 12:36pm

By Anthony Faiola
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 10, 2008; A01

The worst financial crisis since the Great Depression is claiming another casualty: American-style capitalism.

Since the 1930s, U.S. banks were the flagships of American economic might, and emulation by other nations of the fiercely free-market financial system in the United States was expected and encouraged. But the market turmoil that is draining the nation's wealth and has upended Wall Street now threatens to put the banks at the heart of the U.S. financial system at least partly in the hands of the government.

The Bush administration is considering a partial nationalization of some banks, buying up a portion of their shares to shore them up and restore confidence as part of the $700 billion government bailout. The notion of government ownership in the financial sector, even as a minority stakeholder, goes against what market purists say they see as the foundation of the American system.

Yet the administration may feel it has no choice. Credit, the lifeblood of capitalism, ceased to flow. An economy based on the free market cannot function that way.

The government's about-face goes beyond the banking industry. It is reasserting itself in the lives of citizens in ways that were unthinkable in the era of market-knows-best thinking. With the recent takeovers of major lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the bailout of AIG, the U.S. government is now effectively responsible for providing home mortgages and life insurance to tens of millions of Americans. Many economists are asking whether it remains a free market if the government is so deeply enmeshed in the financial system.

Given that the United States has held itself up as a global economic model, the change could shift the balance of how governments around the globe conduct free enterprise. Over the past three decades, the United States led the crusade to persuade much of the world, especially developing countries, to lift the heavy hand of government from finance and industry.

But the hands-off brand of capitalism in the United States is now being blamed for the easy credit that sickened the housing market and allowed a freewheeling Wall Street to create a pool of toxic investments that has infected the global financial system. Heavy intervention by the government, critics say, is further robbing Washington of the moral authority to spread the gospel of laissez-faire capitalism....

Other than a few fringe heads of state and quixotic headlines, no one is talking about the death of capitalism. The embrace of free-market theories, particularly in Asia, has helped lift hundreds of millions out of poverty in recent decades. But resentment is growing over America's brand of capitalism, which in contrast to, say, Germany's, spurns regulations and venerates risk.

more

tjfxh October 10, 2008 - 12:54pm

The Pendulum swung as far to the right as it will in this cycle, now is come back toward the center.

The world cooperation "save" the financial system will result in worldwide "rules" for country's to police their financial sector, t avoid the pit in the future.

Synoia October 10, 2008 - 4:48pm

For years and years the official mantra was, "It can't happen here", this sort of institutional/systemic collapse usually occurs in overheated Asian economies, or in Latin America, Mexico, Russia, et al.
The major Western developed nations declared themselves immune from such shocks, as they ran the show, through the IMF, World Bank, "Washington Consensus", you name it, the West controls it. Or rather, we can now say, it used to. The UK and US had long abandoned the notion of building national wealth through production, it was all about wealth accrual amongst a powerful and influential subset of their national economies: the financial sector. Whose principal task was inventing more and more fanciful schemes for moving money globally, and taking a huge cut of "profits" at each turnover of "assets". The dollar as reserve currency would exist forever, foreign banks and investors would forever buy up US/UK debt and indirectly finance bubble after bubble, as what they needed to sell, we would buy, at whatever cost to personal/national levels of indebtedness. Well, guess what, debts are getting called in, and those now who are the creditors to US/UK get to set the terms, and will not listen any longer to lecturing from the advanced capitalist nations on the "proper way" to manage national economies. As the Mo Green character in "The Godfather" said to Michael Cordoleone, "You don't buy me out, I buy you out". In his case, he eventually was eliminated; in the current case we will take the hit, and long overdue it is.



“les Etats-unis, c’est le seul pays à être passé de la préhistoire à la décadence sans jamais connaitre la civilisation…”...Georges Clemenceau

barrisj redux October 10, 2008 - 12:58pm

who is more irrelevant and inconsequential that does Junior appear at this time? His hurried 5-min. pronouncements get minimal or no coverage, and indeed whenever his handlers decree that he should say SOMETHING, the financial markets continue their relentless slides. Everyone knows that Paulson/Bernancke are the de facto drivers of what passes for policy at the moment, and Junior is merely a titular Head of State who is just looking on, wondering when O when can he get back to Texas and stop the pretenses.



“les Etats-unis, c’est le seul pays à être passé de la préhistoire à la décadence sans jamais connaitre la civilisation…”...Georges Clemenceau

barrisj redux October 10, 2008 - 1:12pm

He was a hand-puppet.

On some level he knew what his role was, too.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 10, 2008 - 1:49pm

even if he just goes through the motions because someone tells him he has to as President, it has to be crappy to do these "pronouncements"


"The mythical John McCain is an affable, straight-talking, moderately conservative war hero who is an expert on foreign policy" - Bob Herbert

nymole October 10, 2008 - 1:50pm

as a pretty tragic figure.

Seeking the justification of history has been a theme with him since taking office, and history is not going to be kind.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 10, 2008 - 2:09pm

He's oblivious to the pain he causes

Numerian October 10, 2008 - 5:10pm

There is no statute of limitations on war crimes or crimes against humanity.

tjfxh October 10, 2008 - 5:13pm

Of course Bush is an evildoer.
eom.


"The mythical John McCain is an affable, straight-talking, moderately conservative war hero who is an expert on foreign policy" - Bob Herbert

nymole October 10, 2008 - 11:33pm

"Tragic" in a Shakespearean sense? No, everything that has befallen the US and its people was a direct result of this man's misfeasance and non-feasance. Someone intellectually, temperamentally, and morally manifestly unfit for the office...the "tragedy" is that Junior was first appointed by the Supreme Court, then elected by the very people now suffering under his (mal)administration. He reached well above his station, shows no remorse or seemingly even understanding of how all it went pear-shaped...may God have mercy on his wretched soul, because he won't get any from the rest of humanity or history. At least Adolf Hitler had the good sense to know when the game was up and acted accordingly.



“les Etats-unis, c’est le seul pays à être passé de la préhistoire à la décadence sans jamais connaitre la civilisation…”...Georges Clemenceau

barrisj redux October 10, 2008 - 5:18pm

God was playing with him & Job didn't deserve it.

Justice is what I'm hoping & praying for for Junior W and his puppeteers.

"All I know is just what I read in the newspapers." - Will Rogers

readr satx October 10, 2008 - 6:59pm

I challenge anybody - ANYONE - to sit through a viewing of Alex Gibney's "Taxi to the Dark Side" and conclude that Bush is anything BUT a "tragic figure". Yes, there are Haynes, Yoo, Bybee, Addington, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al, but, at the top there is Bush - despite heroic efforts to isolate and provide "deniability" by his "reports" - who stands accused of signing off ultimately on a heinous regime of state-sponsored torture, mayhem, and crimes against humanity. The filthy swine long ago should have been impeached, then hauled off to The Hague to answer before the world the charges that should be brought against him. A miserable, corrupted, mortally flawed human being who has sown so much sorrow, destruction, and perversion of human values, WITH INTENT AND DELIBERATION.
"Tragic"? Sod the bugger.



“les Etats-unis, c’est le seul pays à être passé de la préhistoire à la décadence sans jamais connaitre la civilisation…”...Georges Clemenceau

barrisj redux October 11, 2008 - 12:45am

In my comment, I was trying to distinguish between a 'tragic' figure who has bad luck from none of their doing, such as Job, and someone who does plenty of wrong and therefore deserves 'justice'. I meant harsh, unrelenting justice, such as a trial at The Hague.
I don't think Bush is a 'tragic' figure because he has intended to cause all that he has. He has made tragedies for other people, but he deserves justice, i.e. punishment, as do his puppeteers.
So I meant to say that to me [To Me], 'tragic' means bad things happen to the person through none of his efforts; 'deserving justice' means that the person has done bad things.
He and his have tried to bring down our country.
Hope this explanation helps. Peace.

"All I know is just what I read in the newspapers." - Will Rogers

readr satx October 12, 2008 - 1:16am

on the radio today from an older woman who was a young child during the Depression. She said: "Fear is a liar - it distorts everything".


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena October 10, 2008 - 9:15pm

One way or another, the plan will be to create more money.

If the rules say they can't do that, then they'll change the rules.

I did inhale.

Don October 10, 2008 - 9:45pm

If a rule can't be broken it's not a rule.


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena October 10, 2008 - 9:53pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.