Brand Recognition Quiz


Is there anyone in the world who thinks the people in this photo didn't know what they were standing in front of?

Photobucket

The Nazi SS symbol has to be one of the most recognized of all time, certainly rivaling CocaCola and the McDonald's Golden Arches, but the Marine Corps tried to spin the facts anyway.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told the Marine Corps on Friday to re-investigate and take appropriate action against the Marine snipers who posed with a logo resembling a notorious Nazi symbol.

...An initial Marine investigation into the matter concluded that the troops would not be disciplined because there was no malicious intent. The Marines mistakenly believed the "SS" in the shape of white lightning bolts on the blue flag were a nod to sniper scouts – not members of Adolf Hitler's special unit that murdered millions of Jews, Catholics, gypsies and others, said Maj. Gabrielle Chapin, a spokeswoman at Camp Pendleton, Calif.

And for $10 at CPAC you can buy a T-shirt immortalizing Marines pissing on corpses. Hearts and minds, dude.


Steve Hynd February 10, 2012 - 8:47pm
( categories: Afghanistan )

totally different. How could professional soldiers know that it's the insignia of one of history's most fearsome fighting forces...and willing perpetrators of genocide?

And the Corps couldn't have known, so even if it was willful, we're just talking about a few bad apples and they'll be punished.

Lex February 10, 2012 - 10:32pm

after it violates Middle East air spaces to bomb Iran.

Lesly February 10, 2012 - 10:37pm

...poorly educated in general. This was especially evident by the display of the SS lightening symbols and the mundane, when a reporter referred to the Tesla X "falcon doors" as inspired by the DeLorian in Back to the Future. Gull Wing doors were of course the unique feature of the 1952 Mercedes 300 SL Gull Wing model.
The behavior of the U.S. military is probably the worst since Korea, the Philippines, and the Indian Wars before that.
The U.S. is in total decline, led by a total failure of the educational system and thereby it's teaching of meaningful moral attitudes and behavior.
Even the military's initial response was ignorant and telling.
It's just going to get worse; we're replacing moral values with twisted, Christian, cult like ideals, which have nothing to do with spirituality. Add to that the hypocritical "family values" crap in a society that is directly responsible for the destruction of family.


Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them,and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows,or with both~FDouglas

Celsius 233 February 11, 2012 - 12:29am

that symbol's been in some of the most popular video games ever made - Castle Wolfenstein and Doom, to name but two - as well as widely-seen movies such as "Raiders Of The Lost Ark", "American History X" and "Valkyrie".

Ten young Americans somewhat ignorant of history? Not unthinkable.

Ten young Americans, all completely ignorant of a symbol that shows up in that many pop culture entertainment sources? Flatly impossible.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch February 12, 2012 - 6:46am

Luckily I have two boys aged 21 and 18 and a bunch of their friends are always around the house. So I've been asking them what they see. Every one says "That's the SS symbol" or similiar. When read the Marine Corps excuse, the responses are along the lines of "Really? That's retarded".

Steve Hynd February 12, 2012 - 2:28pm

What an utter pile of bullshit. And they didn't really expect us to be that gullible - they just didn't care.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch February 13, 2012 - 2:30am

That Waffen SS were similar to the US Rangers.

Originally the SS were similar to the US Secret Service, then they experienced mission creep to Special Forces, Death Camp Guards and Dignitary protection.

The SS were worse that the US' troops running Bagram, Gitmo, and the Special Forces, how exactly? Didn't Gas the Jews, but torture Muslims is ok?

All empires need such forces. Praetorian Guard, SAS, etc.

Synoia February 11, 2012 - 1:09am

has been adapted by the Aryan Brotherhood.

Members of San Antonio's Swat Team are tattooed with the same.

I mentioned the connection to a Swat member friend a few years back. He had no clue.

I did inhale.

Don February 11, 2012 - 9:22am

It would be like displaying the deaths head insignia:

Oh, wait.*

Is it stupid? Sure. Is it something that a bunch of young men raised on heavy metal imagery with little understanding of history could do without many of them being aware of what the symbol means? Sure. Just like many of the people who are up in arms about this will be ignorant of the historical role of the SS other than "SS = death camps".

Of course, I fondly remember the memories of a number of people who fought with Estonian regular and irregular forces, ended the war fighting under the SS flag, sought to resist Soviet occupation after the war and ended up having to flee for their lives to Canada (held by those who did the running to be one of only three nations that would take them). I'm sure all that's considered too complicated for folks to whom these things are only abstract symbols.

* For those who haven't had exposure to the insignia, that's the cap badge of the 17th/21st Lancers. I believe it continues to live on the British regimental system in some fashion (I haven't kept up with our amalgamation entirely, so the British forces one is completely beyond me).

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 11, 2012 - 10:11am

...Scout-Sniper platoon's officer? And why the heck didn't he know what his men were doing? By my understanding of the current TOE for a scout-sniper unit, that's a bit over half the men in the unit.

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 11, 2012 - 10:20am

Because he was probably down with it.

Also, your death's head analogy is a little weak. Unless a unit is using the exact imagery of the SS Tottenkopf, then it's not much different than saying that the inspiration is the Jolly Roger and they got it from Pirates of the Caribbean. They're soldiers/Marines. They're job is death and they go to work with the expectation that they could die.

Any realistic person won't be surprised by military units/men having a fair amount of death imagery. The Ace of Spades is fairly popular for that reason, no? This ain't that.

Lex February 11, 2012 - 10:37am

...(or don't think it important) my point is that the connotations that an observer draws (or projects) from an association with a particular piece of imagery are not anywhere near as important as the actions of the individuals involved. That we have quite little insight into in this instance. We had a lot of quite relevant insight into the idiots pissing on Taliban corpses, but inference from this is fraught.

"You want to infer that I'm a wicked person from failing to fall into line for the chorus of outrage? Have at it - I couldn't give a fuck." ~ me

JustPlainDave February 11, 2012 - 11:05am

I don't think that it's terribly important in this case. It's not that i assume that these scout snipers are catching babies on bayonets because they chose the imagery. I don't. But the imagery is there.

This is the US military, with the drug testing and the not allowing soldiers to buy porn and the handing out of Bibles. They're very concerned with imagery and the purity of soldiers/Marines for the sake of bringing democracy and God to the world. Seems that they're less concerned in certain cases, doesn't it?

Lex February 12, 2012 - 10:10am

...weird about the contrast between how the institutions socialize soldiers around sex, drugs and booze, on one hand and killing people on the other, I'm right there with you. Sex, drugs, booze, bad - killing people, good and to be in some ways celebrated. Me, I'm not real comfortable with that, but then I think this is a business that should involve older people than it does.

What I don't get is the notion that these guys are necessarily bad (rather than stupid) and I don't get how it is that one asserts that the Corps is okay with this when their behaviour is clearly at odds with it. The coverage makes it clear that the Corps had already found out about it, investigated and dealt with it at the unit level. They decided that it wasn't something that warranted punishment - or that punishment could not legally be sustained, but I would presume given their statements that they gave some guidance as to not displaying SS runes. What's the issue here? Because they didn't call everyone's attention to it and publicly flagellate themselves they must somehow have been down with it? Sorry, I just don't get it - if it was 1953 it'd be an open and shut case, but it's not.

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 12, 2012 - 10:59am

We can't buy Pajamas at the Kid's Gap or Fred Myers because they look like this

It is disgusting, the people marketing kid's clothing are dehumanizing boys.
Here is a death's head with drumsticks of the musical kind:

Joaquin February 12, 2012 - 3:53am

Plenty of Eastern Europeans fought under the insignia and against the USSR in World War II. If i'm remembering my history right, a lot of those troops made some of the best, most willing concentration camp guards too.

Now you're right that a lot of the angry people won't know (or care) that the SS was much more than death camps, but ya know, that's kind of the SS's fault, isn't it? I mean, they did run the death camps and all.

And, no, the ignorance defense doesn't work because the double lightening bolt SS insignia is a favorite of neo-nazis. So it's not like you need to know the minutia of WWII history to have been exposed to it and its worst meaning. Also, these are professional soldiers, right? Wouldn't their training included some history of warfare? Given that their grandfathers/great grandfathers fought against the SS and the Wehrmacht is kind of big in military history i would think that they'd be exposed to some of this. You're also arguing that they're stupid as a defense. I'm sorry, but i'd prefer that the guys representing me abroad with guns aren't stupid.

But thanks, i knew someone would write my first comment over and be serious about it.

Lex February 11, 2012 - 10:27am

on our education system and the military lowering their recruitment criteria.

Tina February 11, 2012 - 10:31am

...requirements for entry into the Scout-Sniper program are generally considered to be pretty high in comparison to other areas. One would have to establish that the requirements and standards for that program had been relaxed or that they had had a shortage of qualified candidates (i.e., that they ended up a lot closer to the "floor" of their requirements than had previously been the case).

I rather tend to think that this is a failure of leadership and that these guys aren't that different from the folks that have gone before them - the relevant differences in my view would centre around the notions that the runes don't have the same clear associations for that generation that they do with us and/or that the association is considered less visceral. I can look at a photo and tell you what it means to me, but I can't look at it and tell you what it means to everyone else.

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 11, 2012 - 11:11am

One of the little observations that I've drawn from 40 some years of drawing breath now is that one should be quite wary of condemning the ignorance defence (or its closely related cousin, the unintended consequence defence). Ignorance is a lot more widely and evenly distributed than even those who consider themselves wise believe. Never know when one might need it one's own self.

Should they have known? Sure. Did many or most of them know? Probably. Could many or some of them not know and/or not grasp the significance of it? Yeah, actually. (Sad that that's the case, but yes.) Does it mean that they're "bad people" [tm]? I don't know. Do I think their officer should have put a stop to it? Yeah. (If I were their officer there would have been quite an extensive little series of sessions spent flying the butterfly.) Do I think that folks sitting half a world away looking only at one photo in isolation and passing sweeping judgment are maybe a little over the top? Yes. Do I think that the folks sitting in judgement should maybe spend as much time contemplating their own personal hypocrisies (such as sitting in front of computers full of "conflict minerals" while sitting in moral judgement) and maybe keep in mind that they've feet of clay as well? Yeah, I do.

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 11, 2012 - 10:52am


It is worth remembering that the Founding Fathers were all traitors.

steeleweed February 11, 2012 - 9:02pm

that i'm assuming that they're all horrible people who are clearly neo-nazis. Except i'm not.

I'm simply saying that i don't buy that nobody who saw that got the connotations. And the ones who did didn't do anything about. I'm well aware that the world is full of ignorance; it's still not a defense. Ignorance is too easily feigned. Allowing it as a defense based on the level of societal frequency of ignorance and ease of feigning it means that anything goes.

How much time do you spend contemplating your personal hypocrisies, and what the fuck does sitting in front of a computer have to do with, "hey, you know, maybe the US military shouldn't be allowing Nazi insignia."? This isn't like the Marines killed some civilians and me saying that they're terrible people for doing it (as i've generally made the point that we send them to the horrors of combat and then expect perfect morals from them in it, and that's outright bullshit).

But whatever, Dave. Since you've gone into your usual MO of moral/intellectual superiority and twisting the argument far from its original parameters to prove the point of your moral/intellectual superiority, i think i'm done.

Lex February 12, 2012 - 10:26am

...isn't necessarily what it means to everybody. One has to allow for that, challenging as it may be.

Deciding what everything means to everyone too absolutely, just so that a value judgement can convincingly be placed on it is - in my view - a form of hypocrisy. In my view, we all constantly do a lot worse things than display SS runes and we need to try to remember that. Many of the things that we use and consume in our lives are produced in part from quite negative processes - before we go rushing to judgement on most things I think we should consider that.

That's not intended to demonstrate moral/intellectual superiority - it's intended to suggest that we should keep a sense of proportion about things and demand more of ourselves rather than just lightning rodding on others.

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 12, 2012 - 10:43am

...the platoon of Rock Warriors that has been flaunting such imagery in their logo for years:

And you never questioned what the KiSS Army is all about, did you?

KD February 11, 2012 - 10:41am
Don February 11, 2012 - 1:00pm

eom

Lex February 12, 2012 - 10:27am

these guys get paid to kill people.

I had a cell-mate for a time, name of Joe Ficarra. He was a hit-man for the mafia.

Short, dark, old, inconspicuous. Listened to opera music. Well read.

I asked him once about the people he killed, trying somehow to square the fact this guy killed people with the fact that he seemed a decent type.

Why do you kill these folks?

Because they pay me $20,000.

What did they do?

I don't know.

Would you kill me for $20,000?

Yes.

Snipers ask no questions. They say, yes sir, and shoot who they're told to shoot.

I did inhale.

Don February 11, 2012 - 1:05pm

ignorance my eye! there should be someone/Captain, General/ above them that "knew". Such a farce/cop out. Nazi regala can't be some obscure and distant history unknown to those in the American Military. maybe the average Murcan wouldn't know about the Nazis and the SS, after all dumbing down has the been the goal of the Elites since St. Ronnie. the Military had to know. or else the Military is in worse trouble than just being the stormtroopers/snipers for the Elites and their OIL empire.

The parallels are so glaring, so obvious.

these are focused intelligent highly esteemed members of the "American" Military Way. Like they have no desire to compare themselves to previous hit squads/elite units from Military history. After all the Nazi movies? yeah right!

this is all about who has the biggest dick, and these men would be sure to compare themselves to the "best" in history at what they do. War really does make strange bedfellows.

After all we are an Empire, first and foremost.

Boy , what this says..... The Jews must really love knowing they have such idiots working for them in the Middle East. These Military Americans must be really easy to fool if they don't know the "symbols" they use in their own "tribe."

Bernard February 11, 2012 - 9:11pm

Why look, on the site linked below, you can buy that exact flag. Now i don't know where they bought the flag, and i'm not suggesting that that they ordered it from this site. But if they did, or bought it from a similar retailer, my guess is that the ignorance defense falls a little flat.

http://www.totls.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16%3Aclose-out-corner&catid=1%3Ahome&Itemid=30

Scroll about 3/4 of the way down the page, after all the Nazi standards with extra wax molds, Tottenkopf cap insignias and what not. You'll find that very flag in the last row of Nazi battle flags (to be fair, there are two Japanese flags, so maybe the Marines thought the SS was Japanese or something)

Lex February 12, 2012 - 11:13am

I think these guys are fully aware of what the runes mean, I just think they are trying to associate with the Waffen SS side of the SS. Most people see the runes and automatically think death camp guards having no knowledge of the combat side of the organization.

Incredibly stupid thing to do.

I just finished reading the book 'Trigger Men' by Hans Halberstadt. It's about the American sniper both army and Marine, the training and their employment in the past 40 years. Not the best written book, but full of information on that skill/trade.
http://www.amazon.ca/Trigger-Men-Spider-Man-Magnificent-Bastards/dp/0312354568

Leaftree February 12, 2012 - 12:13pm

Exclusive: Marines' Nazi-Flag Whistleblower Comes Forward
An Iraq vet, now a Holocaust expert, explains why he exposed Marines' use of an SS flag.
—By Adam Weinstein | Sat Feb. 11, 2012 3:29 PM PST
262

When Marine investigators learned last November that a scout sniper platoon in Afghanistan was using a Nazi SS flag as its standard, it wasn't a member of the unit who told them. It was Iraq war veteran Waitman Beorn, a visiting history professor at Loyola University New Orleans, also a Fulbright and Guggenheim fellowship recipient who teaches at the National Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. Dr. Beorn's research on Nazis and genocide is informed by his military background: He is a West Point graduate and former officer who served as a scout platoon leader in Iraq from 2003-04. Through his work he seeks to teach "ethical decision-making in a military context using the Holocaust as a vehicle."

Shortly after I first wrote about the flag controversy last week, Beorn got in touch to explain how and why he chose to report the incident to the Marine Corps' inspector general. (Though Beorn contacted military authorities, he didn't play a part in the incident's recent unearthing by the media.) For one, he had learned through military contacts that the use of the SS flag was not an isolated incident. He hoped that exposing it could lead to an important "teachable moment" that might help alleviate what he considers to be a serious issue. In an email interview, he shared with Mother Jones details of how the Marine Corps responded to him and how the Corps has since addressed this moral education issue with the troops. He said he was disappointed with the emerging media narrative that the military had responded poorly. "I was surprised by the speed with which they acted and the seriousness with which they appeared to take it," he wrote.

But he also emphasized: "I think our public needs to realize that this is not a case of the 'liberal media' going after our brave men and women in uniform. Symbols are important. They send messages. These messages are important." He explained his special interest in the SS incident with regard to military training, and what he thought would be the appropriate punishment for the service members in question—especially during wartime. In a follow-up email he wrote: "My focus is on the importance of positive unit cultures, and that the use of this image highlights a problem. For example, I was just informed that a Marine posted on a blog that he had had the tattoo for 17 years, which seems to highlight this point for me."

The following email exchange has been lightly edited for clarity.
more

http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/exclusive-marines-nazi-flag-whistleblower-talks
more

Tina February 14, 2012 - 3:56pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.