NY Fed AIG Coverup - "criminal or civil charges possible" SIGTARP


Neal Barofsky dropped a bombshell at the end of an interview with Richard Teitelbaum of Bloomberg.com yesterday. He indicated that individuals at the New York Federal Reserve Bank may be liable for criminal or civil charges. Barofsky is the Special Inspector General of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (SIGTARP).

Barofsky says the question of whether the New York Fed engaged in a coverup will result in some sort of action.

“We’re either going to have criminal or civil charges against individuals or we’re going to have a report,” Barofsky says. “This is too important for us not to share our findings.”

In a statement, the New York Fed said: “Allegations that the New York Fed engaged in a coverup of its intervention in AIG are not true. The New York Fed has fully cooperated with the Special Inspector General.”

He (Barofsky) won’t say whether the investigation is targeting Geithner personally.

There's a double hedge here, of course. There may just be a "report" and Geithner may or may not be a target. That's far from comforting for the Secretary of the Treasury.

Barofsky was more specific about insider trading by bankers aware of TARP awards prior to public disclosure of the largess.

Barofsky ... says he’s also looking into possible insider trading connected to TARP. He says his agency would want to know if bankers bought stock in their companies before it was made public that their institutions would get TARP money, for example.

“There was a time when, if you got that word the stock price would go up, and if you were to trade on that information prior to the public announcement, that would be classic insider trading,” Barofsky says.

The article quoted a Chicago based executive saying that Barofsky has not gone fare enough into the core criminal behavior on Wall Street, underwriters of CDOs. This is a key point. While targeting the NY Fed and insider trading on the street represent crimes by individuals or groups (aka conspiracy), the process of underwriting CDOs is a system wide charge of fraud. Imagine the disgorgement and recovery.

Janet Tavakoli, founder of Chicago-based Tavakoli Structured Finance Inc., says Barofsky hasn’t been aggressive enough. She says SIGTARP should be running criminal probes of the bankers who underwrote and managed the collateralized debt obligations that were at the center of the financial meltdown.

Tavakoli's comments go right to the heart of real justice. "Bankers who underwrote and managed the collateralized debt obligations" were not only at the center of the financial meltdown, they were the proximate cause.

Prosecuting those who caused the financial crisis would lead to the next logical step: confiscating all the ill gotten gains and returning them to the people. The market went down and the people lost a bundle. The market is now back up and those losses are still in place. But guess who made a bundle on the fluctuation? This must be corrected.
Barofsky talks the talk and does it well. Will he walk the walk.

Link: Office of the Special Inspector General of the Troubled Assets Relief Program

Sign up to receive SIGTARP press released email updates


Michael Collins April 29, 2010 - 3:52am
( categories: Global Financial Crisis )

While the chance exists that this is merely a dog and pony show for Main Street America, it is hard to investigate something like this and not uncover at least a little bit of dirt.

Each step closer to the source brings us closer to fearful lackeys singing songs rather than falling on their swords.

I like to mix it up with the metaphors ;)

Gannon April 29, 2010 - 1:18pm

I get what you're saying. This is a step, a good one. It's not the big step, but it's got potential. Just the fact that Barofsky refused to say, "Oh, Lord no, Secretary Geithner is not a terget" is great. Let the guy sweat. The real issue, imho, is a prosecution based on a rotten system thus creating the potential for massive recovery of stolen goods. That's where this has to end up.

Michael Collins April 29, 2010 - 3:26pm

waiting for the prosecutions...

Gasp!

Synoia April 29, 2010 - 1:48pm

Can Barofsky walk the walk. Talk is cheap but this kind of talk is welcome now. Send a chill through the street and corridors of power. See who lawyers up. If Geithner "resigns," that will be a sign. Let's hope that this is just the first of many steps forward.

Michael Collins April 29, 2010 - 3:27pm

He had no shame when he was evading taxes, anyone who ecieves a 1099 knows that have to pay 15% self-employed tax.

Why the IRS didn't stamp on him as they would you or I is an interesting question.

Synoia April 29, 2010 - 3:46pm

I've noticed that the NY Fed story has been picked up here and there. What if Geithner is actually indicted or named a "person of interest?"

That would be interesting. There would be a heads up to him and the WH and he'd resign? No?

On the 1099, bad enough the chief Treasury person is a sneak but it's even worse to deny the employee Social Security. You jogged a long forgotten memory. When I was a child, my family had a woman come to the house once a week and clean. She did this for a circle of friends to which my family belonged. My father went to the other families and set up a Social Security account for the woman. I found out about this when I returned home and paid her a visit. She told me the story and related what a positive impact it had on her life. So if a WWII vet, Eisenhower independent can do this, what's wrong with little Timmy?

Michael Collins April 29, 2010 - 11:55pm

The admin is really going after the torturers too right?

Zman1527 April 30, 2010 - 11:43am

That is a disgrace. They thought so little of it, they didn't do their normal routine - going after the little guy. They should have isolated the chain of command and followed it right to the top. This crap came out of the White House at an identifiable moment in time. But it's such a hot story, the attitude is mum's the word.

I think Barofsky telegraphed his move when he said criminal "or" civil charges "or" a "report." What's that? A report. We'll see if he makes a move and what Cuomo does with BofA and Blumenthal of CT does with the Moody's/S&P. They have more incentive to prosecute since they're actually elected to office. One can "hope," but it's not advisable.

Michael Collins May 1, 2010 - 10:58am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.