No Expectation Of Privacy In The Digital World


We live in a time of less and less privacy: less privacy of action and apparently, less of thought. If you think for a moment that your digital life is firewalled because of anonymity or can be compartmentalized, think again. There is literally no expectation of privacy for anything you do.

Granted, Twitter feeds are public, by their very nature. But thinking you can read someone's Twitter feed and people aren't looking at who you are reading? C'mon, how stupid are you?

Sure, you can attempt to firewall yourself by creating an anonymous avatar. But that will only get you so far. So, my suggestion is this. It's a kind of corollary to an old letter writing chestnut my father says, "son, don't write it down unless you are absolutely certain you can live with it, forever."

Same goes for the internet. Don't write something down unless you are absolutely certain you can live with the consequences. I speak from personal experience.


Sean Paul Kelley February 4, 2010 - 1:01pm
( categories: Liberties | Technology )

And very true. Emails have legs, and can go anywhere. Especially flame mails.

Synoia February 4, 2010 - 1:32pm

Republicans are finding that out every day. Anything you write, say or appear in on video will most likely be around until our sun goes nova.

Just imagine: Even after old Sol blows up and vaporizes everything inside the orbit of Mars, the last tangible relic of our species may well be Voyager, our interstellar greeting card that has a picture of a guy spread-eagled with his dick hanging out. How embarrassing.
.
Cows get milked, rubes get bilked,
And fat cats dine on fools and cream.

Jimbo92107 February 4, 2010 - 2:30pm

You only need privacy when you go public. If you go public then you give up your privacy anyway. Privacy is a privilege. Private property is theft. In its own way privacy is theft as well. What is it that you need to hide? What are you hiding from?

Privacy is a trick of the security mentality. By getting one to believe in privacy they legitimize secrets. Possession of secrets creates distrust. Distrust corrodes leadership. Without lots and lots of leaders the privitizers are safe in their secret private hidey-holes.

Privacy is an illusion anyway. If they are going to come after you then your privacy will not save you. Only your publicity has a shot at saving you.

My advice: deal with it.

Jeff Wegerson February 4, 2010 - 2:50pm

Of course it could also not work without public scrutiny.

Many things and thoughts need to be nurtured privately before they are ready for the public eye.

No offense meant but I find your attitude rather juvenile.

quax February 4, 2010 - 3:34pm

You should take my 'juvenile' comment as a compliment :)

I wouldn't want a stranger to be able to pull up a picture of me like that simply by searching for my name. Hence I protect my privacy. Guess I am just a bit more conservative that way.

quax February 4, 2010 - 3:50pm

I look much younger in the newer ones. :^)

Jeff Wegerson February 4, 2010 - 5:33pm

that only sane and reasonable people would attempt to violate a person's privacy. To say that's not the case is an understatement.

What, for instance, is a woman escaping an abusive or stalking man to do?

kovacs February 4, 2010 - 3:47pm

I would allow a stalked woman, indeed anyone being stalked, to have one. Or better yet, take away more privacy and provide a 24-hour guard.

Jeff Wegerson February 4, 2010 - 5:37pm

Technology has moved to the front lines in the fight against domestic violence.

Advocacy organizations are using increasingly sophisticated high-tech solutions in their efforts to keep victims safe, even as they struggle to keep pace with abusers using technology to control and threaten their victims.

“Worldwide, it’s an epidemic,” says Alexis A. Moore, an abuse survivor and founder of the California-based victim advocacy group Survivors in Action.

“Perpetrators are changing their information and their manoeuvres. Their road map changes by the hour, where our training and education and awareness programs happen on a yearly basis, if that. Laws take years to develop.”

GPS devices on vehicles or cellphones can be used to track a victim’s movement without their knowledge and abusers can hack into their victim’s online accounts to track e-mails or instant-messages, says Cynthia Fraser, a technology safety specialist with the Washington-based National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV).

Advocates first started hearing about high-tech abuse a decade ago, she says, but it’s becoming a bigger problem because the technology is so widely and cheaply available. Even abusers who are not tech-savvy can learn how to stalk their partner with the help of the Internet, Fraser says.

The consequences of leaving a digital trail can be deadly. Fraser recalls one case where an abused woman wrote an e-mail about her plans to leave but didn’t empty her computer trash bin after deleting the message. Her abuser found the message and killed her.
Source


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena February 4, 2010 - 11:23pm

... girlfriend of mine from 15 years ago. Her last name was Meyer and her first name is extremely generic as well. If I just google her name I get 63,500 hits. I really didn't expect to be successful in tracking her down, expecially since Facebook isn't that popular in Germany, and the social network sites that are, put a bit more emphasis on privacy.

Nevertheless I just had to provide one more detail - her degree which was somewhat unusual and I found her right away - including some recent pictures and her current business Telephone number.

Pretty scary.

quax February 5, 2010 - 6:46pm

... for commenting in various places but I still try to live by that rule. Only very rarely do I use my own name. Nevertheless I get 133 google results - since my name is very rare all are in relation to me but a good number of them is from data assemblers who pretend they can sell additional information about me (one giving me a doctorate by probably confusing me with my mother who is a M.D. and shares my initials).

Some of the stuff is very old e.g. an Amazon book review from 10 years ago.

But there are two entries I am rather proud off. In one I make fund of a global warning denier's comments at a German newspaper. In turn a short while later this guy got sarcastic with me when I wrote a comment at the same newspaper about the real estate market in the US. I predicted that it will crash and that the scope of the problem has the potential to bring down the global financial system with it. I wrote that a year before it happened. Sometimes Google is good for gloating.

quax February 4, 2010 - 3:30pm

google-gloating! I like that.

"Sí che dal fatto il dir non sia diverso."

-Dante

Sean Paul Kelley February 4, 2010 - 3:40pm

eom

quax February 4, 2010 - 3:56pm

"Sí che dal fatto il dir non sia diverso."

-Dante

Sean Paul Kelley February 4, 2010 - 3:59pm

http://pipl.com/

Seriously, just playing around with it a little and thinking of the implications made me shudder.

If one is willing to spend a little money then much more information is available from various sources.

kovacs February 4, 2010 - 3:45pm

They contain everything that Google has minus the redundant crap and places me correctly on the map - yuk.

quax February 4, 2010 - 4:24pm

Nonentities Rule


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena February 4, 2010 - 10:28pm

subpoena?

Should we stop posting here? :-)

AMC February 4, 2010 - 4:06pm

fight it for all I was worth.

"Sí che dal fatto il dir non sia diverso."

-Dante

Sean Paul Kelley February 4, 2010 - 4:43pm

In principle people own their privacy and information about them, but the ownership rights of private people are not honored.

You can see the neofascist system at work: Corporations have right to steal information from private people and the government blesses it.


-- Do you feel bad for Obama? He’s the president — he kind of asked for it.

Singular February 4, 2010 - 9:25pm

I've dealt with a fair number of internet trolls particularly when posting on election fraud. They could care less if I'm using an pseudonym and they're not interested, for the most part, in who I am outside of the internet. Their purpose it to harass and defame in the public work space. The more embarrassing the finding, the more trolls show up. Astroturfing is common as are outright attempts at intimidation.

Professional trolls don't care who you are in your 3-D world, they care what you say and who hears it on the internet.

Michael Collins February 6, 2010 - 12:31am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.