Bernanke In Real Trouble


Update 4: Looks like Obama put a call in to his buddy Reid. Sure, I'm just guessing here. But it smells that way to me. Reid will vote to confirm Helicopter Ben.

Update 3: Here's the Senate scorecard. As of 348pm CST the tally is 19 for, 12 against, 15 uncommitted and 54 available.

Update 2: Well placed sources indicate Majority Leader Reid (D-NV) is now, 'officially undecided,' and has reached out to Minority Leader McConnell (R-KY) to count Republican votes. Odds just got worse for Bernanke. Ryan Grim at HuffPo has the update.

Update: Sen. Boxer becomes the latest no vote. This is gaining steam. Bernanke is in real trouble now.

Here's the Boxer statement:

"I have a lot of respect for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. When the financial crisis hit in late 2008, he took some important steps to prevent what many economists believe could have been an even greater economic catastrophe.

However, it is time for a change – it is time for Main Street to have a champion at the Fed. Dr. Bernanke played a lead role in crafting the Bush administration’s economic policies, which led to the current economic crisis. Our next Federal Reserve Chairman must represent a clean break from the failed policies of the past."

Let's give credit where credit is due: during the collapse, many of Bernanke's actions were unorthodox and as it appears now, relatively successful. But the bottom line is that he has failed as a regulator. I'm inclined to think he was the guy you wanted at the helm during a banking crisis, but now? No, it is time for someone else to step in. And it appears ever more likely.

Previous Updates: Ben Bernanke's vote in the Senate has been pushed back. Opposition is growing. The list of 'nays' grows longer every day. Will 'Helicopter' Ben get thrown under the bus?

At this point I'd say odds are even he just might.


Sean Paul Kelley January 22, 2010 - 4:40pm

You've got to hand it to him, before he messed around (and before 2007) he got that on the map in America's alternative political universe. The cover for the holds was made in great part by Paul.

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong January 22, 2010 - 4:38am

Ron Paul is a looney toon, but Bernanke should be sent out. Sanders - from the linked article - seems like a much more pertinent critic:

Sanders said that Bernanke's record doesn't warrant a new term. The Federal Reserve has four main responsibilities: to maximum employment and prevent inflation; to keep the financial system from imploding; to maintain the safety and soundness of financial institutions; and to protect consumers against deceptive and unfair financial products.

NateTG January 22, 2010 - 11:19am

Couldn't happen to a nicer guy... :-P

I won't hold my breath, though, for his dismissal---once his buddies in Big Money start lobbying for him, votes will change his way, I'm sure.

-5.75,-4.05
"God gives men a brain and a penis, and only enough blood to run one at a time." -- Robin Williams

justadood January 22, 2010 - 11:28am

I hope it's not just a ploy by congresscritters to get more $ for themselves. They wouldn't do that would they and I wonder who the next gs employee is that going to be tapped for the job?

jo6pac January 22, 2010 - 1:37pm

The White House can quietly orchestrate no votes and enough uncertainty that Bernanke gets the hint and withdraws from consideration. Obama doesn't have to get his hands dirty dumping him in the open at this late stage.

Numerian January 22, 2010 - 1:20pm

Is so obviously responsible for all of Obama's troubles, so no more changes are required to Obama's team....

There. Problem fixed. Now (maybe or maybe not) on to those pesky voters, for Nov 2010...unless Obama does not care about congress, as a (R) congress would give him people other than him to blame...

Synoia January 22, 2010 - 5:36pm

but your scenario would suit Rahm to a 'T'.....

-5.75,-4.05
"God gives men a brain and a penis, and only enough blood to run one at a time." -- Robin Williams

justadood January 22, 2010 - 6:29pm

Numerian for chairman of the Federal Reserve!

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong January 22, 2010 - 7:00pm

Namely, whoever is appointed to the chairmanship is going to be reviled by the end of the four year term, having presided over a depression that exceeds in depth and agony the 1930s depression.

Numerian January 22, 2010 - 8:09pm

you're proven wrong here.

But we are approaching chaos again and that could bring us right back down to the March lows, if some adults do not show up to slow (if not quell) the rebellion.

I'd actually like to see a return to the days of Volcker, with a very downsized Wall Street, but I'm not sure we can get there without first having the depression you're talking about.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly January 23, 2010 - 1:10pm

That what this is about for me.

The argument that the guy did the best he could to control the damage of a train wreck he helped cause doesn't sit well with me.

This smacks of the Joker blowing up an apartment building then helping a little old lady walk through the wreckage.

This and the recent campaign finance ruling by the Supreme Court means that we will have to fight brutally, throwing politicians, CEOs, and big bankers to the dogs if we are to hang onto any scraps left of independent thinking in our government.

We voters just have to brutally trash those guys. This is no time for "aww...he couldn't see it coming" and "he did the best he could" excuses. This is time to purge and clean.

And I see no good reason why the Democrats and Obama himself shouldn't be thrown out with the rest of them of they can't decide where their loyalities lay (or worse, if they have sided with corporations against American citizens, as apparently they have).

Color me mad as hell, and wouldn't mind voting along with 50 million others like me.

A sorry excuse is grounds for a left hook to the jaw, as far as I'm concerned. At least then maybe they would quit lying for a few glorious moments.

KUDOS to the first person who stands up at the next speech where they say "nobody saw it coming," and yells STFU. That's what they need to hear right now.

yogi-one January 23, 2010 - 1:28am

The media says this is because banks are worried Obama is going to crack down on them. But it could be just the end of the irrational 2009 stock market "boom".

creativelcro January 23, 2010 - 1:23pm

Things like insane overvaluation, an equity bubble ginned up with bailout money by black-box trading and little volume couldn't have anything to do with it, right?

p/e ratios are nuts, but the kleptocrats will blame the next crash on Obama's watery, ineffectual no-prop-trading thing anyway.

forty2 January 24, 2010 - 2:44pm

Besides the failures cited above to fulfill the Fed's mission, he has also:

1) Continued to ignore asset bubbles, including the recent one in commodities.
2) Maintained a zero interest rate policy that represents a transfer of wealth from savers to a handful of failed large banks, that have refused to use their profits to lend to businesses or consumers. This policy has also deprived savers, especially the elderly and retired, of any decent interest income, forcing them to seek out risky assets like equities or commodities, thus fueling the bubble in these sectors.
3) Spoken repeatedly of the need to revive the economy through reflation and a restoration of the credit markets to their pre-2008 level, when the housing bubble was at it peak. Most of his rescue initiatives have been consistent with this policy goal.
4) Never once talked about the importance of deleveraging in all sectors of the economy, through either debt paydowns or defaults, as a necessity before the economy can revive. This would have forced Congress and the administration to deal seriously with the individual suffering caused by this deleveraging process.
5) Succored major banks with bailouts and ongoing preferential treatment, when these banks are very likely insolvent, judging by how the stock market treats them. This is a repeat of the Japanese experience with "zombie banks", which led to 10 years of economic stagnation.
6) Usurped the Congressional power to borrow and spend by ballooning the Fed balance sheet without reference or approval from Congress.
7) Persistently allowed new banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to continue to act like investment banks or hedge funds.
8) Maintained a shroud of secrecy over Fed decisions and actions in the credit crisis, even to the point of filing delaying and obstreperous suits to prevent enforcement of court "sunshine" orders.
8) Insisted that the Fed's low interest rates during the 2001-2002 recession had nothing to do with the ensuing housing bubble, an argument that is considered risible by almost all economists.
9) Received the strong endorsement of Alan Greenspan.

Numerian January 23, 2010 - 6:46pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.