Great News From Afghanistan


There is great news from Afghanistan today:

Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of the Afghan president and a suspected player in the country’s booming illegal opium trade, gets regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency, and has for much of the past eight years, according to current and former American officials.

As Steve asks in a tweet:

[What will happen] when the population we’re trying to win over from the Taliban realizes that the person who stole their votes was on the CIA payroll?

Really, does the CIA ever really think through its actions? As I noted while I was in Nicaragua, some of the things people imagine the CIA is getting up to usually are not true at all. But that's not the point. The point is that they believe it and in a place like Afghanistan where conspiracy theories are the rule, rather than the exception this cannot be good news.


Sean Paul Kelley October 28, 2009 - 11:36am
( categories: Afghanistan )

Looks like the CIA is trying to replicate its success in Colombia.

If by "success" you mean arming and funding murderous thugs tied to the drug trade, death squads, terrorism, impunity through deniability for the thoroughly delegitimized puppet government, and endless civil war.

What's not to like?

grassroot October 28, 2009 - 12:03pm

...in country have already known for a long, long time. The magic acronym CIA apparently makes folks back here sit up and notice, but I'd actually bet that it's less significant than what the guy's received via DoD (unless CIA's the formal payment channel they decided to funnel stuff through - DoD driven or not [maybe less oversight]). Chayes, to pick just one commentator, has been consistently vocal on this for a very long time.

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave October 28, 2009 - 12:36pm

From the time we started backing the NA this was the strategy, and from what i've read the CIA handed out the money. It's not just Ahmed Karzai. Steve also has a post up linking to a list of Afghan warlords. According to just about every account outside of US mainstream news, everyone on that list has been on our payroll.

Go back and read statements from Bush/Cheney officials; they publicly called it "the warlord strategy", and it became more important as the administration ramped up plans for Iraq.

All this talk coming from both sides of the Potomac about "population centric counter-insurgency" is pretty much crap. We spent the last eight years nailing our own feet to the floor. Americans may not know it, but i'll bet that just about every illiterate Afghan can explain the underlying problem.

Lex October 28, 2009 - 1:58pm

But what the he'll difference does it make what happens in Afghanistan? I am really missing something. The most amazing waste of mental energy I have ever seen. Three super powers in 100 years have invaded that god fosaken landlocked rock. It is honestly the height of idiocy.

Scotjen61 October 28, 2009 - 9:02pm

Send more troops! Win the war! Lets get the Missouri out of mothballs for the surrender ceremony now!

Zman1527 October 29, 2009 - 9:06am

As antiquated as the notion of formal surrender in irregular sub-national warfare, it would appear...

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave October 29, 2009 - 9:44am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.