- click here
Editor in Chief: Steve Hynd News Editor: Tina Contributing Editor: Raja Special Contributor: Numerian Contributor: Don Henry Ford, Jr. Assoc. Contributor: Brian Downing Assoc. Writer: Cliff Schecter Assoc. Writer: Nat Wilson Turner Editor Emeritus:Sean Paul Kelley
Tracy Barnett Balloon Juice Drudge Retort Electric Politics The Gist Informed Comment In The Pink Col. Patrick Lang Lance Mannion Mondoweiss Raw Story Jia Tolentino's Books Bruce Schneier Seeing the Forest Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
aliasBruce Arms Control Wonk Jack Cluth Feministing Istanbul Notes Istanbul Calling Beyond Bridges The Reaction Rook's Rant Rubber Hose
Mixed Bag of Candy: Newshoggers Crooks and Liars Scholars and Rogues Ian Welsh Corrente PKU News St Martin Private Eye
Corner: Media Matters Rethink Afghanistan truthout AlterNet truthdig Glenn Greenwald Elephant Journal
Brian Downing's Picks: Al Jazeera Asia Times Night Watch Emirates Journal Soldiers for the Truth The War Report Iraq Casualties Global Security Nat's Nuclear Jazz Lounge: After the Future Grits For Breakfast Clusterfuck Nation The Narcosphere Latin America Herald-Tribune The Latin Americanist Boing Boing
Numerian's Numbers: Mother Jones Tom Dispatch Der Spiegel Big Picture Calculated Risk Bonddad House Bubble Prudent Bear
The Minnesota Supreme Court issued a judgment in favor of Al Franken this afternoon. Norm Coleman has conceded. The Democrats now have a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. Will they use it?
where the Majority Leader takes 'craven' to new depths...
Maher was right--At least in the Senate, Dems are the new Republicans, and Republicans are crazy. I'm cautiously pessimistic of any real progress coming from the Senate, as things presently stand
-5.75,-4.05 "God gives men a brain and a penis, and only enough blood to run one at a time." -- Robin Williams
The Problem With The Public Option Is That It Lowers The Cost Of Health Insurance Open Left, by Chris Bowers, June 30
The main goal of health care reform is to lower the cost of health insurance. Apropos, Olympia Snowe thinks that the problem with a public health insurance option is that a public option would... wait for it... lower the cost of health insurance:
In an Associated Press interview in Portland, Snowe said it would be unfair to include a government-run health insurance option that would take effect immediately. "If you establish a public option at the forefront that goes head-to-head and competes with the private health insurance market ... the public option will have significant price advantages," she said.
In an Associated Press interview in Portland, Snowe said it would be unfair to include a government-run health insurance option that would take effect immediately.
"If you establish a public option at the forefront that goes head-to-head and competes with the private health insurance market ... the public option will have significant price advantages," she said.
Well, duh. That is the whole point. You can't lower the price of health insurance unless you start offering lower-priced health insurance. It's a tautology.
YaY!
No.
How about putting this up for a poll with only 'yes' and 'no' as options?
The Learning Center Financial Questions Answered
Advertise Liberally