SearchUser loginNavigationTeam Agonist
Universal Pantograph provides technical support for The Agonist. ThoughtfulAbu Aardvark GlobalTimelyMixed Bag of Candy: Who's onlineSyndicate |
Lonely Planet Guides SuckI just had to say it. Lonely Planet guides officially suck now. When I started traveling 15 years ago you had a choice: Let's Go, which was pretty much a party guide for recent university graduates going to Europe or the Lonely Planet, which certainly told one where to find the party, but were also a bit on the cerebral side, with really solid, well-researched information. One could literally sit down and read a Lonely Planet Guide about country 'X' and learn a lot. But no more. The information is often unreliable and pretty much identical to every other guide book out there--everyone follows the same trail and ends up in the same guest houses/hostels/hotels. Look, I like the chance encounter of meeting someone in Malaysia whom I hung out with in Cambodia. But I don't want to see them in city after city. Therefore, I've decided to eschew buying a LP for India. I'm going to wing it. Where ever I end up is where I end up. They now sucketh. If you are planning travel in the near future, do your best to see if you can find a Bradt Guide. They're a bit hard to find and their countries are limited. But they are stellar, quality, off the beaten track and extremely well researched, as they actually pay their researchers a living wage, unlike Lonely Planet which gives a young, know-little writer $10,000 for six months to research a whole country when they use to pay them three times that much. No wonder a guy wrote an entire Lonely Planet via google, never setting foot in the country. I'll be using a Bradt guide for Central Asia this time around. Sean Paul Kelley January 14, 2009 - 8:40am
( categories: Agonist Travel Journals )
|
![]() Premium Advertising
Advertise Liberally |