Obama and Blago


The smartest thing Obama can do right now regarding Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich is what he hints at in this article. Gather up all the information he knows about the process, how his staff interacted with the governor and then lay it all out for the public to see. What Obama can't do is pull the same Bush line about, "I'm not going to comment on an ongoing ivestigation." That shit smacks of something to hide. Just out with it. I'm relatively positive that Obama and his staff had relatively little to do with Blago's idiocy. But they key action they can take right now is to come out with it all. Phone logs, conversations, the lot of it. Do it now. Get it out. As all Americans know, it isn't the crime that gets you, it's the cover-up. And believe me, the Republicans are dying to use anything they can that removes or wheedles down any of Obama's legitimacy, just like they did Clinton.


Sean Paul Kelley December 12, 2008 - 12:03am

I risk getting repetitive here, but I am having trouble seeing a qualitative difference between Blago and the rest of the political class in this country. He was just more crass and chronologically compressed about his pattern of activity.

This is exactly how patronage always goes, but polite people space it out, and don't suffer wiretaps all over. The grave mistake is to see him as some isolated singularity, rather than at the silly end of the grim continuum.

The focus needs to be put back on the systemic crash and the labor conflict therein. This mess has (conveniently) upended the calculus of the Kool Kids, permitting them to circle around and tut-tut another hayseed from the Midwest, while pretending that their sordid class of activities are somehow different.

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong December 12, 2008 - 3:08am

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley December 12, 2008 - 5:17am

Chris Matthews on Hardball last night spent a good part of his hour making exactly your point on patronage.

hvd December 12, 2008 - 8:50am

and that's why Obama lost some credibility with me since he's making a mountain out of a molehill. why it's more ethical for bill clinton "to earn" $110 million in 8 years or a hedge fund manager "to earn" a billion is beyond me.

this guy got a speeding ticket.

to me, America is the country that took patronage to a whole new level.

mrmx December 12, 2008 - 9:57am

I've heard several news commentators allude to the fact that Obama dropped the dime on Blago. They also say that Fitzgerald would have liked to investigate longer to get a tighter case.
It does make perfect sense. Get this mess mostly out of the way before inauguration, so it's an old story when Obama actually begins to govern.
If so, I like the pragmatism and ruthlessness of the decision.

JT December 12, 2008 - 1:18pm

Additionally there seems to be the prospect that this will really sting Rahm Emanuel, who after all was the successor in Blago's Congressional seat.

I believe Emanuel would be an effective thrasher for Obama up on Capitol Hill, but he is also a pretty hardcore Zionist who isn't exactly torn up over the way things are going down in the West Bank.

(There are some stories around about him being tight with the Mossad and even investigated for foreign intelligence connections along those lines back when he was a White House fixer in the 1990s... Further weird angles being the prospect Clinton warned Monica Lewinsky that a foreign intelligence service had penetrated the White House's communications system, could have likely been the Mossad via those darn telecom contractors like Comverse Infosys and Amdocs. Murky murky...)

--
Hongpong.com

HongPong December 12, 2008 - 6:03pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.