The Road To Phnom Penh: On Border Crossings and Bus Travel


Me and the Mekong FerryOne of the best aspects of traveling by bus is border crossings. No, not the bureaucratic bullshit you have to endure, but the chance to see almost instantaneous changes in culture, architecture and politics. Take the Cambo-Vietnamese border for example: one moment everything is orderly, almost militaristic, clean, surrounded by high-Asian Communist architecture of bland, blocky lines. And the next moment everything is immensely poorer--and Vietnam is not a rich country--and dirtier--and Vietnam is not a clean country. The architecture on the Cambodian side is a crazy blend of Hindu and Buddhist, much more baroque than Thai or even Laotian temples. Everything is now a disorderly free for all and as you pass further into Cambodia the houses change from the well mannered small farms with pens for all the different animals and sheds for farming machines to houses on stilts, thatch roof huts, pigs, chickens, goats and humans all sharing the same space. Whereas agriculture in Vietnam is more mechanized than that in Cambodia this means that water-buffaloes proliferate. So do cows, the Indian kind.

More after the jump.

House on WaterA lot of the Cambodian countryside lay fallow too. It's obviously been farmed before but it has the tell-tale signs of two or possible three decades of neglect. Brambles, thatches and weeds cover an older layer of well plotted paddies that now look like swampy wastes. Seldom is my window view broken by a free holder reclaiming the land. It's obvious, just by the distress in the countryside that Cambodia is still a broken land, whether it's 'killing fields', UXOs, or the memory of Pol Pot's atrocities. And the widening disparity between wealth and poverty has grown into a perverted chasm of gluttony and suffering.

As one approaches the city the gap widens again, becoming ever more obvious. Large, huge homes, newly built, sit behind great barricades and fences. Next to the fences shanties and lean-tos betray the needs of unemployed men and youths who gather by as Mercedes' rush by with armed motorcycle guards. As always, urban poverty is much uglier than its rural cousin. Children with one arm, or both mangled from UXOs are an all too common sight on the streets on Phnom Penh. There aren't many smiles, as the dark wind of history has only recently blown through Cambodia, it lurks just under the surface. I've seen haunted places before, but never an entire society.

Phnom Penh is a dangerous city too. Petty crime is on the rise and tourists are advised to leave all their valuables inside hotel safes. Offers to buy 'little girls' are almost as common as those to buy 'skunk weed' and 'heroin.' The runny noses of addicts, jonesing for their next fix are visible on almost every turn. And even though Cambodia isn't as intense as India it runs a close second here in the capital. It's filthy and the smells are less than salubrious, a combination of human, animal and vegetable waste wafts over the city.

As for the provenance of all this grief? Some would point their fingers in righteous anger towards Nixon and Kissinger. But like all historical morality tales it's just not that simple. One must also look to the Vietnamese who started the chain reaction of Cambodia's implosion by using the country as a sanctuary on the road to liberating the South, in a sense forcing Nixon's hand to bomb the country, thus further destabilizing it to the point where a monster like Pol Pot could flourish. Sure, America played its part, but it is far more complicated than the one-off 'black and white' narratives which dominate the discussion still.

Meanwhile, back in the capital, a barge fights the strong current of the Tonle Sap, creeping slowly upstream with a cargo of bricks. Colorful flags ripple in the breeze along the waterfront and I've ordered too much food. I feel ashamed. I leave two spring rolls on the plate, while not 25 meters away a woman holding a naked child begs.

Cacaphonous shouts ring out. "You want tuk-tuk Mr," yells one young man. Another says, "Motorbike?" And another asks if I want the ubiquitous 'skunk weed' on offer. Lots of construction machinery is everywhere. Making a hell of a racket on the riverfront. But the Tonle Sap ignores it all, flowing relentlessly downstream towards its union with the Mekong and then the South China Sea.

It's a completely dollarized economy--ATMs dispense dollars and everyone takes them. Naked infants, toddlers and young children run amok. The Cambodians, I think to myself, resemble the Mayans. They are short, stocky, stout and dark. Even the architecture reminds me of some of the big lipped, big eared Olmec statuary of Mexico.

The language shares clear affinities with Thai and Isaan and sounds very, very little like Vietnamese. Words have many more consonant clusters and syllables than Vietnamese, which has a morphology based on mono-syllables.

The Hindu influence, as I have already mentioned is extremely prevalent. Much more so than in Thailand, Laos or Vietnam. It's like parts of the country have been preserved in amber since the fall of the last great Hindu kingdom in the 14th Century.

Every country has its travel rhythms. Those in Thailand are laid back. You go to the bus station to move from place to place. No hard sell. It's similar in Laos--except mopeds are difficult to rent in many places. The buses and roads in Laos are atrocious as well. About as bad as Georgia and Ethiopia.

Vietnam was pushy, aggressive--they want to get you from one place to the next, especially as there is always a commission involved. They pick you up at your hotel and take you to the bus. And the buses are nice--comparable to a Greyhound back home. The buses in Thailand run the gamut from awful, as in Laos, to plush, like the VIP cruisers in Mexico. Three rows, a TV and they recline almost like a bed.

In Cambodia, however, travelers are guarded. The fear, while not palpable, isn't too far from the surface. The buses that make the main travel run, Ho Chi Minh City-Phnom Penh-Siem Reap-Bangkok are nice. They come equipped with a toilet, unlike those in Vietnam and Laos where you are at the mercy of the driver's bladder not your own. They also collect you at your hotel. All in all, buses are a nice way to travel here in South East Asia, especially with the closure of Bangkok's airport.

Finally, getting around Phnom Penh is rather easy. The tuk-tuk drivers are always in your face, but as supply way outstrips demand haggling is a breeze. If you walk away they melt, immediately. You can then climb in and drive away to whatever site awaits your attention.


Sean Paul Kelley November 26, 2008 - 6:25am

A real travel journal.

I can't help but wonder what effect big ag (cheap industrial food) has played on the abandoned farm land you describe.

I'm not as well-traveled as you, but I hear you on the border crossing. If you fly into a Mexican resort and then fly home, you have never seen the real Mexico.

If you fly into Mexico, get out in a car and drive around, you've seen a small piece of Mexico.

But when you cross that border, the place where the friction of two countries is at its highest pitch, then you gain context that brings the rest of the country into sharp focus.

No easy way to get at the good stuff.

I did inhale.

Don November 26, 2008 - 9:44am

I remember talking to two American MBA's who went to Cambodia who went to try to help the farming situation.

They said the two main problems were all the corruption (of course)... various middlemen wanted too much for better fertilizer, rice etc. It was no longer worth it.

But then also the farmers would just farm until they had what they wanted. The majority wouldn't keep farming to get ahead or extra cash or whatever.

brygeaux November 26, 2008 - 8:29pm

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley November 26, 2008 - 10:40pm

spectacularly wrong, beginning with whole Nixon was right to bomb Cambodia.

shah8 November 26, 2008 - 1:16pm

was "right" to bomb Cambodia. Like I said, this place doesn't sit well with black and white narratives. Your response proves my point.

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley November 26, 2008 - 10:38pm

Quote:
As for the provenance of all this grief? Some would point their fingers in righteous anger towards Nixon and Kissinger. But like all historical morality tales it's just not that simple. One must also look to the Vietnamese who started the chain reaction of Cambodia's implosion by using the country as a sanctuary on the road to liberating the South, in a sense forcing Nixon's hand to bomb the country, thus further destabilizing it to the point where a monster like Pol Pot could flourish. Sure, America played its part, but it is far more complicated than the one-off 'black and white' narratives which dominate the discussion still.
/quote

I merely offer the wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_Campaign

Nixon's hand being forced has an implication that he was "justified" or "right" to react as he had. The wiki is pretty emphatic on just how nebulous Nixon's actions were, and in the end, how pointless it was. The Viet were there with the considered and relunctant approval of the Prince of Cambodia, and they did not distabilize the countryside anymore than the fact that there was a huge war going on next door.

Moreover, what *really* bugs me is the studied ignorance of US and Chinese policy in Cambodia--That bombing destabilized the countryside in general and created zones of lawlessness that allowed creatures like Pol Pot to grow into monsters. The US and China backed Pol Pot's murderousness for much of his reign (the US stopped for awhile in the middle) because he was such an anti-Viet nationalist. It was the Viets who brought peace to Cambodia, buddy. Hun Sen might not ever be the greatest of guys to rule a place, but at least he didn't believe in the murderously whack things that his predessecors did.

*That's* shades of gray, from someone who knew at least the first thing about this history...

shah8 November 27, 2008 - 2:31pm

Nixon was right to do what he did. I simply didn't say.

As for knowledge of history: I've forgotten more than you'll ever know.

So, come off the pissing contest, alright? Besides, have you ever been to Cambodia?

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley November 27, 2008 - 11:29pm

:-) . No, I'm not gay... A female colleague who saw this pic made me write that! Of course, I did not tell her you are a nut! ;-)

creativelcro November 26, 2008 - 1:37pm

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley November 26, 2008 - 10:41pm

Words have many more consonant clusters and syllables than Vietnamese, which has a morphology based on mono-syllables.

So much so that the Vietnamese here tend to pronounce "House" as "Hou".

Synoia November 26, 2008 - 4:08pm

"It's obviously been farmed before but it has the tell-tale signs of two or possible three decades of neglect."

Except up there it was stone walled fields, with new trees growing in them.

Synoia November 26, 2008 - 4:10pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.