Repeat After Me


Repeat after me: if it is too big to fail then it is too big to exist. That should be the first and foremost lesson of this financial crisis. The latest "too big to fail" is Citigroup:

Citigroup Inc faced a crisis of confidence on Wednesday as investors questioned the survival prospects of the U.S. banking giant, and its shares tumbled 23 percent to a 13-year low.

The second-largest U.S. bank by assets has been reeling on concerns that mounting losses from credit cards, mortgages and toxic debt could overwhelm its efforts to slash costs and add deposits. Last month, Wells Fargo & Co dealt a blow by derailing Citigroup's bid to buy Wachovia Corp.

Citigroup shares closed down $1.96 at $6.40 on the New York Stock Exchange and have fallen 33 percent this week as some investors concluded that Chief Executive Vikram Pandit's plan to shed 52,000 jobs and cut expenses by one-fifth won't restore the bank to health.

"People are looking at their business model and wondering how on earth they're going to be able to survive," said William Larkin, a fixed-income manager at Cabot Money management in Salem, Massachusetts.

It Citigroup fails, which won't surprise me one bit, it will be the prime case as to why Glass-Steagall should never, ever, ever have been repealed. And remember, it was Citigroup who forced Congress to repeal the law. I'd laugh at the folks at Citigroup if its failure weren't so perilous for the economy. Citigroup would make the AIG bailout look like, well, I can't think of a suitable metaphor other than a four letter word that starts with "F" and I've already used it once today.


Sean Paul Kelley November 20, 2008 - 11:00am

SNAFU -> FUBAR -> FUIB -> Henry Paulson

Tim November 20, 2008 - 12:06pm

There is an article from Reuters stating that financials need at least one trillion more. In the most common language, No fuckin' way. http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE4AJ1GV20081120?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews&rpc=23&sp=true

Now Citi is feeling the pain, and suddenly, I've lost any sympathy that may have been left. These were the ones who not only pushed for deregulation, but insisted Bush change bankruptcy laws. They are realizing the end result of greed, and I see it as "karma" biting them in their larcenous asses.

Bail-outs are understandable for manufacturing, expect we don't do much of that in this country any longer. We've traded American jobs for bottom lines. Other than the Big 3, what else to we really make? We've reshaped our economy and it's become a house of (credit)cards.

Can America survive those suited bandits? Sterling and others have a better handle on that, but I'm working to remember stories my grandparents told of the Depression and hard work...and see that in our future. A very changed America will come out on the other side.

KayseJ November 20, 2008 - 1:08pm

Citigroup's retail bank Citibank holds more than 33 trillion in derivatives contracts as of Q2 2008. See page 32 of this document:

http://www.occ.treas.gov/ftp/release/2008-115a.pdf

But they have nothing on JP Morgan Chase, yikes! I wonder what kind of chain reaction a failure would create?

bry November 20, 2008 - 5:41pm

i totally agree. we should be resisting this ploy, and making laws to restrict corporate growth in such a way as to hamper government.

joe in oklahoma November 20, 2008 - 1:31pm

Not by consumers. The average consumer is now well-protected with $250,000 of deposit insurance. It's the small businesses, mutual funds, local governments and others with sizable account who will get nervous about getting their money back. Nothing drives a bank down quicker than a bank run.

Numerian November 20, 2008 - 1:46pm

C would go broke in one of your posts. Prescient fellow.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly November 20, 2008 - 7:30pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.