On Greenspan's Mea Culpa


I used to tell my father, when he wanted to talk about Fed policy and rates and the markets, "don't get me started on Alan Greenspan." This was even before the dot-com bubble collapsed. So, I'll keep this post very short. Greenspan was recently questioned by the indefatigable Henry Waxman, who asked:

“You had the authority to prevent irresponsible lending practices that led to the subprime mortgage crisis. You were advised to do so by many others,” said Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, chairman of the committee. “Do you feel that your ideology pushed you to make decisions that you wish you had not made?”

Greenspan replied, “Yes, I’ve found a flaw. I don’t know how significant or permanent it is. But I’ve been very distressed by that fact.”

Distressed? Well fuck you Alan Greenspan!

Of course, when Waxman followed up and asked, "were you wrong?" Greenspan replied, "partially."

Then he said, "“This crisis,” he told lawmakers, “has turned out to be much broader than anything I could have imagined. It has morphed from one gripped by liquidity restraints to one in which fears of insolvency are now paramount.”

More than anything you could have imagined? And this man was actually considered a 'Maestro?' So much for foresight.

You know what Alan, I've forgotten more than you will ever know about markets and I learned all my lessons the hard way--by making mistakes, and accepting responsibility for them. But I never made a fatal mistake like yours, which will leave you an historical legacy of immense negativity, and most of my decisions in life and business have been tempered by prudence, something you and your Randian ideology know nothing about. This ideology must be crushed. It, and it's cousin, neo-conservatism, must be eradicated from the body politic of the United States if we are to regain any semblance of sanity in our economic and domestic and foreign policies. It's that simple.

Sorry to be so crude, but sometimes, well, I gotta call 'em like I see them.

Credit where credit is due, however, when Greenspan discussed the role of Freddie and Fannie and the Republican meme of the CRA:

Many Republican lawmakers on the oversight committee tried to blame the mortgage meltdown on the unchecked growth of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government-sponsored mortgage-finance companies that were placed in a government conservatorship last month. Republicans have argued that Democratic lawmakers blocked measures to reform the companies.

But Mr. Greenspan, who was first appointed by President Ronald Reagan, placed far more blame on the Wall Street companies that bundled subprime mortgages into pools and sold them as mortgage-backed securities. Global demand for the securities was so high, he said, that Wall Street companies pressured lenders to lower their standards andproduce more “paper.”

“The evidence strongly suggests that without the excess demand from securitizers, subprime mortgage originations (undeniably the original source of the crisis) would have been far smaller and defaults accordingly far lower,” he said.

Might that be a crude attempt at salvaging your reputation? Better late than never? Actually, no, better never in this case. My judgment of you stands, you're a fraud.


Sean Paul Kelley October 23, 2008 - 11:54pm
( categories: Economics: USA | The Markets )

"You know what Alan, I've forgotten more than you will ever know about markets". That comment brought back a lot of memories. I made the same basic statement to my boss when I was in the property and casualty insurance business a few years ago. Needless to say, within four months I was marginalized, stripped of key operational duties and was pressured unmercifully to quit. As a result, I left under duress and it took me a great deal of time to recover. In the long run, it was for the best as I realized I had become a total corporate drone and leaving allowed me to save myself.

steelhead October 24, 2008 - 12:45am

should have said was that the flaw in his model was that it did not account for the systemic fraud by everybody involved, not just the Street. Everybody means everybody, including any guy who was asking him questions.

Had he prior been a beat cop rather than a Ph.D., he would have been a better chairman.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly October 24, 2008 - 7:26am

The idea that the "free market" is populated solely or even chiefly by rational actors is silly. That's why was have laws, a legal system, regulation and oversight. To leave the market to itself presumes that everyone is basically honest and that there won't be wholesale cheating because everyone knows and agrees that otherwise things will break down. History shows this assumption to be erroneous and it has been disproved yet again. Even the referees need to be monitored also.

This time even people who would not be tempted to do these things on their own didn't want to be left out, so they jumped in too. Enron may have been an outlier in its day. But this time around, just about everyone got in on the game, from the elite to the subprime guy.

tjfxh October 24, 2008 - 1:04pm

Greenspan tried to juice the economy at a time that we needed a recessionary correction (dot com bubble bursting). His reasoning was probably politically motivated.

Now we get the bill for that action with 7 years of compound interest added.

Doesn't look like bushco will make the finish line from the look of things.

By the time the next administration takes over the helm, options will be very limited.

I did inhale.

Don October 24, 2008 - 7:29am

Mr Greenspan:

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

and you didn't know this?

Synoia October 24, 2008 - 10:14pm

We're talking about a man who did Ayn Rand back in the day. A useful idiot.

“The Playboy reader invites a female acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Picasso, Nietzsche, jazz, sex.” - Hugh Hefner

Tonsure Wimple October 25, 2008 - 2:53am

I just imagined the pillow talk. I think I threw up in my mouth a little.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 25, 2008 - 4:31am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.