Merrill In Talks To Sell Itself to BoA?


Wow. That's about all I can say. The idea of no Merrill on Wall Street is pretty sobering:

As efforts to acquire Lehman faltered, Bank of America turned to Merrill Lynch and offered $50 billion in stock for that investment bank, people briefed on the negotiations said. The deal, valued at $29 a share, could be announced as soon as Sunday night, these people said. Merrill shares closed at $17.05 on Friday.

The Street of dreams really is hurting. No doubt, Merrill assets will be over at BoA if they can engineer the sale in time. Lehman is dead, as the news points to a bankruptcy filing. What a way to wake up.

Meanwhile, more bad news: AIG might fail. And the gas companies have said, as reported by the Times, that prices are going to rise because they can't refining enough to meet demand:

Oil companies were warning motorists on Sunday that they would not be able to produce adequate supplies of gasoline in the days ahead because so many of their refineries were still not operating in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike. As a result, prices at the pump are soaring again.

So, do the math, the markets, which were supposed to be happy about the Fannie and Freddie nationalizations last week, will wake up to the news that Mother Merrill is trying to sell itself, Lehman will go bankrupt, AIG might fail, and gas prices, which hammer consumers hard, are headed higher in the short term.

Happy Monday morning.

As of 8:59am Singapore time, the Merrill/BoA deal is done. $44 billion worth of dumb, dumb, dumb for BoA. Didn't they buy Countrywide too? What happens if BoA falls on hard times? I'm sorry, one bank, especially at a time of such overwhelming systemic risk, should not be allowed to own so much.

As the Journal article notes:

The fate of both Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs will be front and center Monday morning, as the Street wakes up to a world where the independent broker-dealer are increasingly thin in number.

Sure, Goldman and Morgan will be looking for suitors, but why? It seems to me that bigger concentrations of risk are a bad idea for the economy as a whole. Perhaps it's just a way for the CEO's to protect their golden parachutes?

Update: AIG Seeks $40 Billion Fed Bridge Loan, Times Says.

Banks, Firms Set Up $70 Billion Fund for Liquidity

Lotsa news, moving fast this morning. Most Asian markets are closed today.


Sean Paul Kelley September 14, 2008 - 10:32pm
( categories: Analysis | The Markets )

Merrill Lynch has $966 billion in assets and $931 billion in liabilities. They are counterparty to $4.2 trillion in derivatives trades. They get brownie points for including HTML anchors in their 10-Q.

From How big are Merrill, Lehman and AIG?

Petronius September 14, 2008 - 8:18pm

might think with all the credit facilities the Fed has made available, that it can ride out the storm and when it is over, it will have Merrill's huge brokerage arm, and investment bank as the reward. And the taxpayers will pay for the rest.

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley September 14, 2008 - 8:42pm

The bank is positioning itself as too big to fail.

steelhead September 14, 2008 - 11:00pm

link

Lehman's collapse wipes out a company that had a market value of $45.5 billion in February 2007. Merrill's sale to Bank of America for $29 a share, while about a 70 percent premium to Merrill's value on Friday, compares with the company's $86 billion market capitalization in January 2007.


"Frankly, we've lost a lot in recent years." - General Colin Powell

Raja September 15, 2008 - 5:49am

And we still don't know how much toxic waste is being hidden both on the books (marked to fantasy) and off the books.

Now that Hank the Hammer's bazooka has misfired, looks like they'll be firing up Ben's helicopters.

tjfxh September 14, 2008 - 8:47pm
tjfxh September 14, 2008 - 9:08pm

(18 mins ago)
The Hong Kong Standard

Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America Corp. are part of a group of 10 firms providing a total of US$70 billion (HK$546 billion) for a US borrowing facility aimed at providing liquidity.

Other firms participating are Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse Group, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs Group, Morgan Stanley and UBS, a joint statement said.

Tina September 14, 2008 - 9:38pm

WSJ
By DENNIS K. BERMAN, JON HILSENRATH and DEBORAH SOLOMON
September 14, 2008 9:19 p.m.

The Federal Reserve is expected to expand its lending facilities in the wake of the likely demise of Lehman Brothers, taking a wider array of securities, including equities, as collateral for its loans, say people familiar with the matter.

The moves, which potentially represent another landmark step in the Fed's efforts to address the deepening credit crisis, are expected to be temporary. They are meant to calm markets as they head into one of the most perilous trading environments in decades with Lehman's massive market positions on the verge of being unwound.

The Fed has already dramatically expanded its lending facilities in the past few months. Most notably, after the collapse of Bear Stearns in March, it said it would make short-term emergency loans to investment banks under a lending facility called the Primary Dealer Credit Facility.

As of Wednesday, no firms had used the facility since July, but amidst the uncertainty created by the likely demise of Lehman Brothers and the possible takeover of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America, there could be a rush to borrow from the Fed as trading resumes Monday. Bankers say the unwinding of Lehman Brothers' many trading positions could also create a large need for short-term funds.

more

Tina September 14, 2008 - 9:41pm

With a rate reset in oh, how about 2 years?

What's sauce for the goose...

Petronius September 14, 2008 - 9:45pm

They are "temporary" and "short-term." (wink, wink)

tjfxh September 14, 2008 - 10:00pm

The Fed press release only mentions collateral acceptable under normal tri-party repos will now be acceptable at the Fed's PDSF. Maybe that is where equities come in.

What sort of haircuts will they take for equities? Will they be fast enough to adjust the haircuts upwards when the equity markets tank?

By the way, when you hit the link to the WSJ article, make sure you read all of the comments attached. You might as well be on Daily Kos or some socialist rag for all the anger being directed at Bernanke, Paulson, American capitalism, Wall Street bankers, etc. What's going on here? Don't the WSJ subscribers ever read the editorials in that newspaper? Surely they would know these are temporary hiccups in the market that can easily be cured by a massive tax cut for the rich.

Numerian September 14, 2008 - 10:43pm

as it has, they are just taxpayers like the rest of us, who are going to be paying for this "socialism for the rich" for a long time, while watching housing and asset values plunge, and retirement funds dwindle away. Somehow I find it hard to feel too sorry for them, considering how they cheered all the way up, way beyond even irrational exuberance. It got to be sheer craziness.

tjfxh September 14, 2008 - 11:02pm

* Jill Treanor
* The Guardian,
* Monday September 15 2008
* Article history

In the two decades since Tom Wolfe described the investment bankers on Wall Street as self-styled "masters of the universe", that sense of invincibility has only grown. Until now.

The decline of first Bear Stearns and now Lehman Brothers and the concern surrounding Merrill Lynch has been a rude awakening. Wall Street, which had survived the bursting of the technology bubble and the slew of Enron-related scandals with little more than a bloodied nose, is no longer a one-way bet.

Richard Fuld, Lehman's chief executive, refused to think the unthinkable when he told investors last Wednesday that the bank would come through the crisis and presented a survival plan.

But Wall Street was not convinced. Such is the nervousness fuelled by the credit crisis, and the apparent vulnerability of the once indomitable firm, that it took just another day for him to realise that Lehman needed to find a buyer. Shares in the bank, which were at $66 in February, before the Bear Stearns near collapse, closed on Friday at just $3.65 after a brutal week of selling.

These will be anxious times for Lehman staff who left work on Friday, not knowing if they would have a job to return to today. The firm employs 26,000 people worldwide. The job market has already been flooded with former staff at Bear Stearns, and few banks are hiring. Lehman had already let 1,500 go during the third quarter, in an effort to cut costs.

The fall of Lehman Brothers marks an ignominious end for one of the oldest names on Wall Street. The investment bank was founded in 1850 and run by three brothers who began trading cotton in Alabama and moved to New York to take advantage of the burgeoning financial markets. The first initial public offering they underwrote was the International Steam Pump Company, in 1889.

so much for legacy
more

Tina September 14, 2008 - 10:33pm

As of this post, DJIA futures down 326

Will we see a 10,000 Dow this week?

UPDATE: COB MondayWe're on our way! DJIA down a stunning 504.48 to 10,918. When was the last time the Dow was at this level?

Be prepared for more carnage when the Nikkei opens for business tomorrow after a long weekend.

Petronius September 14, 2008 - 11:18pm

Lehman, Merrill - even Goldman - got levered up to their eyeballs during the boom. Now they, and the rest of us, are paying the price.
By Colin Barr, senior writer
September 14, 2008: 11:07 PM EDT
CNN

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- In the end, the weight of the housing collapse was too much for the weaker players in an over-leveraged U.S. financial sector to bear.

Sunday evening brought ominous tidings. Lehman Brothers is likely to be liquidated after officials at the Federal Reserve and Treasury failed to line up a buyer. But what's likely to be more distressing for investors around the globe are the reports that Lehman is far from the only U.S. financial titan that stands in need of help.

more with history lesson

Tina September 14, 2008 - 11:21pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.