Do As I Say, Not As I Do


I'm not one to quote Maureen Dowd, but when she nails it, she nails it:

[W]ith this country’s military and moral force so depleted, the Bushies can hardly tell Russia to stop doing what they themselves did in Iraq: unilaterally invade a country against the will of the world to scare the bejesus out of some leaders in the region they didn’t like.

Never mind the fact that Georgia provoked the fight and Iraq didn't. It's pretty much the same.

And when, oh when, are we going to get over this whole, "evil, we're fighting evil" crap?

“Unfortunately, today we are looking evil directly in the eye,” he said. “And today this evil is very strong, very nasty and very dangerous, for everybody, not only for us.”

Last but not least the real meat of the matter is in her final graf:

As Michael Specter, the New Yorker writer who has written extensively about Russia, observed: “There was a brief five-year period when we could get away with treating Russia like Jamaica — that’s over. Now we have to deal with them like grown-ups who have more nuclear weapons than anybody except us.”

Like grown ups? Fat chance with McCain's chief foreign policy advisor being the former registered former agent of Georgia. Fat chance with the Old White Haired Dude, as Paris Hilton called him, echoing the Bush foreign policy line. Can Obama's pragmatism make it through the filter of the right wing noise machine? Let us hope so.


Sean Paul Kelley August 17, 2008 - 12:31am

Good for the goose, good for the gander?

Pravda

So you have the colossal audacity, Mr. Bush, to “warn” Russia to pull back? As the wanton, perverse war criminal under whose watch the world saw the crime known as “shock and awe” committed, I’d say you were well out of your mind to suggest that Russia should pull back.

What’s a little shock and awe among inferior people we want to rob and destroy, eh?

What do human beings need an infrastructure for?

Why do they need clean water? Why do they need electricity?

What’s a little torture?

What’s a little regime change? Don’t recall when that was a goal of yours?

What’s a little deviant, perverted sexual experimentation and humiliation?

What’s a few secret detention camps?

What’s wrong with destroying an environment for 4 billion years and generations after generations of people? After all, they’re just rag heads, aren’t they Mr. Bush?

Perhaps when Russia even begins to match your tremendous feats of glory can you speak about pulling back you fool of the worst kind.

You can also tell your number two man to shut up. Cheney said "Russian aggression must not go unanswered, and that its continuation would have serious consequences for its relations with the United States."

So how do you plan to answer this erroneously termed “aggression”? He says this will “worsen” relations with the United States? Buddy, relations with the United States could hardly be any worse than they are now.

The United States shows no respect for Russia. The United States shows no respect for any other country weaker than itself, much less a rival as you perceive Russia to be. How about your NATO? Today the west, tomorrow the world, eh? America uber alles!

How about your missile shield breathing down the neck of the Russian nation? There to protect Europe from Iran? The most totally absurd thing that only a moron would believe.

How about your deliberate breaking of your agreements regarding Serbian Kosovo? UN Resolution 1244 which your country agreed to, is the ink dry…you deliberately went against it and recognized Kosovo in total disregard and in violation of that agreement.

And you expect your words to be heeded or even listened to? You are joking! It is said when Caligula went mad he heard laughing.

Do you hear people laughing at you Mr. Bush?

more at the link.

I did inhale.

Don August 17, 2008 - 10:26am

2 wrongs doesn not one right make.

Pravda, *and* a lot of people on this forum should pause and remember that we do not live in a 2-country world. The US + russia make up less than 5% of the worlds people.

When the US does evil stuff there is no excuse that others did as bad or worse. When russia does evil it can't just point to the US and justify it by saying the US does similar things.

This is akin to claiming that just because bully A beats up people, bully B is justified to beat up some other people.

I say this not only to Pravda, but to a lot of other people that have posted under various Georgia threads on this forum. It is sickening to see what I consider otherwise sensible people go far towards accepting that there should be such a thing as a russian 'sphere of interest', and that we shouldn't object to/resist Russia endulging in war and other crimes in it's own sphere, simply because this is not 'our business', and because the US has done the same other places. You have no right to condemn other peole to forcibly live in a
russian 'sphere of influence' against their democratically expressed will.

It is very neccesary to condemn russia for what it is doing, just as the US should be condemned for a lot of what it is doing. Even if you don't like G.W. Bush and his cronies, it they stand up against russian opression it's a very good thing, they should be acclaimed and suported (and then they can be sent to the Hague for their own crimes later...)

incy August 17, 2008 - 1:33pm

the point is, Bush is in no postion of moral authority and neither are we, having allowed (supported) him to get away with similar acts.

I did inhale.

Don August 17, 2008 - 1:40pm

whatever comes out of Bush's mouth is a joke. He is a complete and utter embarrassment.


"While not a Playboy reader, she invites a male acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Chagall, Nietzsche, jazz, sex." - not a Hugh Hefner quote

adrena August 17, 2008 - 2:59pm

"When russia does evil it can't just point to the US and justify it by saying the US does similar things."

True. But Russia was dealing with a country on its border that was trying to join an alliance that was hostile to it. An alliance that was building bases in countries all around it. An alliance that was planning to construct missile bases in neighboring countries that could be used to give them a first-strike capability in a nuclear exchange.

This is not a matter of Russia trying to dictate who countries in its "sphere of influence" could form alliances with. It is Russia trying to prevent being surrounded by hostile military installations.

Let me be blunt: What Russia has done is excusable. It is not the act of a perfect country but it is excusable. There is no comparison with the US invading countries thousands of miles from its border so that it can control the oil supply. None.

If I were a Russia citizen I might be concerned with recent developments in that country. But I'm not. I'm a US citizen and I'm sickened by what is being done with my tax money. I am especially disgusted with the way my government has deliberately cultivated an antigonistic relationship with Russia over the last 15 years.

Beto August 17, 2008 - 7:40pm

incy:

And when were you going to condemn Georgia for what they did?

Were you going to condemn Georgian peacekeepers for firing without warning on Russian, South Ossetian, Abkhazian peace-keeper troops prior to Georgia's invasion after Georgia agreed to a cease fire? Were you going to condemn those murders and the murders of innocent citizens that died in the attack by Georgia?

Were you going to condemn Georgia's predawn attack, even though Saakashvili had only 3 hours before announced a cease fire?

Were you going to condemn Mikheil Saakashvili for not adhering to the advice of his US handlers, which had told him for years not to provoke Russia?

And when were you going to condemn Mikheil Saakashvili for jailing the opposition, ordering snap elections, instituting martial law, shutting down opposition newspapers, radio and TV as well as voter fraud?

Is that democracy for you?

Were you going to condemn that oppression, or are you just conveniently forgetting it happened?

liquid August 17, 2008 - 11:42pm

and it's designed messaging to the republican base and it's what they want to hear.

mrmx August 17, 2008 - 2:05pm

BushCo, McSame and the NeoCons don't give a f*ck. It is their belief that they can "survive" a nuclear war. Less people, more wealth for them.

steelhead August 17, 2008 - 6:53pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.