The Irony Of Ezra Pound


It's ironic that one of my favorite poets, Ezra Pound (whom I am reading a new biography of), was so intimately involved in the creation of so much of the modern 'art' that I dislike. He pushed harder than just about any American poet I know for the democratization of art in pre-War England, forcing artists like Cezanne, Picasso, Gaugauin and Kandinsky on the stuffy, upper-class 'Bloomsbuggers', as he called them--not without merit considering Lytton Strachey's habits and loves (ever see the movie Carrington? If not, rent it--splendid). Anyhow, it's just strange and ironic to me. His poetry has always symbolized a kind of youthful swagger--call it post-Victorian trash talk. And to think he had such influence on poets like Eliot and Yeats. And also that many of the writers he associated with are largely forgotten and the Bloomsbury set is seeing a renascence of sorts. Ironies abound, no?

Strange, to me at least, that I find so little of value in the visual arts of the time (and much of the present) and their subsequent development but so much value in the same abstractive values that have been applied to the written word since Pound's era.

Like I said, it's ironic.

Nota bene: Please, don't take my comments to mean I find no beauty or value in all abstract art. Not so, as I find much lush, vigorous beauty in the abstract art found in and on Islamic mosques and maddressehs. It's just that modern Western abstract art seems to lack any vitality--in the sense of it being vital and visceral. But perhaps this is part of the larger question between the decadence and decline of the Western tradition of 'representation and realism' in art versus the Islamic injunction against the same. There are certainly cycles of decadence and decline in Islamic art too--just compare a Timurid era mosque with a Qajar era madresseh! So gauche and unaffecting is the Qajar-era work and how soaring and ineffable the Timurid one.

Or maybe it's just me. I don't like the breakdown in realism and representation in painting and am conservative in my art tastes as it is, be they Islamic or Western--although much modern photography is quite captivating. And what of music, that most abstract of all the arts? I guess I could go on forever, so I'll stop.

Oh, what the hell, here's some more.

It's not that I see any value in forcing a return to Poussin and Titian or Veronese or Giorgione. God no! What would be vital about forcing a return to the sterile past--as Tom Wolfe would have us do--after all, the past is over. Does Wolfe write in Iambic Hexameter? Fuck no!

Let's do something new. Let's see something new. But can't it be vital? In reading Pound's bio I realized what I dislike about modern painting and visual art is the lack of craftsmanship and the lack of ornament. (And Pound was central in stripping ornament from modern art.)

It seems to me that ornament is to art as 'forms' are to Plato and life--if you are even a bit Platonic in your personal philosophy. Ornament is critical, too, in the development in craftsmanship just as learning to write and diagram a complete English sentence is to prose and poetry. "Wax on, wax off," as Mr. Miyagi would say!

When one has mastered the sentence and rules of grammar then, and only then, can one break the rules with full effect--making it new, per Pound's famous injunction. It is then that a craftsman becomes a master, when innovation seems totally logical--poetic--perfect. Without craftsmanship one is left with a host of Jackson the Drippers. There is no ornament, only a breaking of the rules, only reckless experimentation and a pointless attempt to outrage the sensibilities of the time, as opposed to capturing the outrageousness of the times for all eternity, like Yeats, Pound, Eliot, Whitman, the Itinerants in Russia and others did.

That's art. At least to me.


Sean Paul Kelley April 19, 2008 - 3:34pm

i have tons of files sitting in my old hard drive that i miss. you moved me to regain a pound/usura mp3
http://reactor-core.org/usura.html

***

trevor bell taught my sister to disdain representational drawing as craft, that it wasn't art. it took her decades to unlearn that. academia is a big business...

35+ years ago, zappa said drop out and get an education.

at the same time, mcluhan had much to say about 'drop outs' as those seeing a larger picture in terms of societal pattern recognition.

http://zuma.vip.warped.com/last.htm

the math basis of representational drawing can be approximately represented in this:

http://zuma.vip.warped.com/rov.jpg

my first wife was schizophrenic and clung fervently to essential truths for her sanity sake, A sq. plus B sq. = C sq.

so too in the trig behind art.

the 60 degree cone is indeed cosmic to me. even simply in how one can find it in a cube and it's diagonal's measures. one finds that relation still in the diagonal stripes in rov.jpg made from a vertical 45 degree V.P.

picasso may well have known the rules he was 'breaking', but i have to wonder if jackson pollock did, and so wonder if he did what he did in lieu of doing other....

mcluhan spoke of containers.
this was what trevor bell was trying to impart to my sister, to look at the frame as well, to regard it's reality as well. art installations were still newish in the early '70s....

but what was lost was within.

all of which is a great digression from pound. and usury. a bit anyway...

the illo in last.htm is called no.png as it speaks on headbutting as much as containment....

i don't wanna be a butthead.

Zuma April 19, 2008 - 6:31pm

after posting the above comment, i went out into the livingroom where my lisa had a page marked off in a book about mary engelbreit ('The Art and the Artist'), page 63.
To Imagine Is Everything
it begins with this quote:
'To know is nothing at all, to imagine is everything.' -Anatole France Thibault
einstein said as much himself.

lisa turned me on to mary engelbreit. i'd never heard of her before.
i envy her work and career and wish i'd done similar myself.

Zuma April 19, 2008 - 6:43pm

You don't find it, um ... cloyingly sentimental? A kind of posterized Kinkade? Bloom where you are planted? Life is a chair of bowlies?

tfisb April 19, 2008 - 7:16pm

i understand well why you might ask. at first blush it may seem just that. at first blush one may equally dismiss robert crumb's equally 'simple' and [thus] 'cloying' Mr. Natural character, and miss the actual subversiveness of it beneath that seemingly on the surface. one may as easily dismiss einstein's quote on imagination as her pointed use of anatole france thibault's. the subversive proposition of the challenge to our imaginations all these people make is not at all the same as the escapist appeal to our imaginations kinkade sells.

see, i have this huge book of hers at my disposal that i wish i could place in your lap and i can't. her life's work isn't well or easily summarized by me and in bringing her up, the onus to do so adequately is indeed upon me. for my inadequacy, i implore you accept there is as much more to her work as robert crumb's when people merely view his 'keep on truckin' panel. alas, he too is gone now from the stage and i may be using a useless analogy.

lisa just reminded me that kinkade has even a stable of artists producing 'his' 'output'. he is not his product.

so, i used the imagination quote as a shortcut to summary. an unimaginative one at that.

let me just say she puts herself out as a thinking person, a creatively thinking person, and as such does inspire anew, to go forth not only creatively but then yes, positively. a mindful positivism, not a mindless one at all.

Zuma April 19, 2008 - 8:20pm

I think I'm going to have to wait for your article on "The Subversive Engelbreit." But I'm certainly looking forward to it :)

tfisb April 19, 2008 - 11:37pm

the positive subversiveness of much of our culture is patently impotent to much of our society.
her book speaks well enough of her itself.
any creator who can get one to step back, as trevor bell urged his students, and take in the larger message, subverts.

what is her medium? that book? her cards? her coffee cups?
or her words and pictures themselves alone?

alex calder and peter max and many great others also can as well adorn a 747, and with less content. the closest analogy to her i find is crumb.

maybe one day even me. if i'm lucky. but don't hold your breath. seriously.

(all this on a PS?)

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 12:09am

You've already succeeded. What could be more subversive than equating Robert Crumb and Mary Engelbreit? In trying to do it myself, I was momentarily liberated from all capacity for rational thought.

tfisb April 20, 2008 - 1:17am

broader venues are desirable when old ones get sclerotic.

maybe now i might mention my hellokittymanifesto.html page...

or that the teletubbies conspiracy was real?

and don't even get me started on peewee herman's funhouse...

it's true, i learned everything i needed to know in kindergarten.

and promptly forgot it all when puberty hit.

and then remembered it all when the meatball hit.

that's progress.

how about walt whitman? leaves of grass? no?

bugs bunny?

bob denver?

captain beefheart? zappa? the 1910 fruit gum company? united fruit? fruit of the loom? the loom of the fruit? the cry of the full bull goose loon? the dissyncopated sounds of a Hobart doughmixing machine?

harold and maud?

m.a.s.h.?

reno 911?

green acres?

andalusian dog?

howl?

yoko ono?

ana voog?

t. s. eliot?

rimbaud?

brautigan?

Visionary, subversive, poetry from genius
A Listmania! list by IVAN JIMENEZ CORREAL (MADRID Spain)

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 2:11am


omnis caro faenum

tfisb April 20, 2008 - 3:21am

__________________________________________
See the new Agonist Topic Section on Tibet

quiet Bill April 20, 2008 - 12:45am

(for those who haven't been to a shopping mall for the last 15 years of so)

(fair use; no challenge to copyright intended; please don't sue me Mary)

tfisb April 20, 2008 - 1:29am

seems i either blew out some folks' logical circuits or touched a nerve. or crossed some taboo.

take even trina robbins. counter culture icon. female! cartoonist! certified subverter.
http://www.secession.at/art/2002_robbins_e.html

The exhibition offers a glimpse into women's production of comics in the USA, and Trina Robbins stands for this emancipatory intention with her entire life story. She is one of the protagonists of the underground comix movement. She published her first comics in the early sixties in New York (East Village Other). In 1968 she moved to San Francisco, the birthplace of underground comix, where she continuously collaborated in creating networks and platforms for women's production of comics, for example as founder of the Wimmen's Comic Collective and as editor of the anthology It Aint Me Baby. Women's Liberation. These collectives provided the framework for the first comics series that dealt with feminist topics like abortion, coming out, and sexuality.

In order to prove that even comics that do not reduce their female characters to full-breasted sex wonders can be commercially successful, Trina Robbins drew and authored stories like Meet Misty, GoGirl and contributed stories to Barbie, which provided especially young girls with an alternative to the supermen and superheroes and their female appendages spawned by the male fantasies of power so favored by the industry. For instance, the mother and daughter team of the Go-Girl comics drawn by Ann Timmons not only battles against evil, but also with the problem that super powers and the ability to fly neither make them rich nor help them to win a relatively commonplace flame.

mary engelbreit and trina robbins both started about the same time, in the same culture, up against the same odds and challenges -each considerably different then from now. regardless, miss robbins was considerably more frank about it, miss engelbreit did indeed insinuate herself into the malls with noted penetration. miss robbins focused on comics and with fidelity. girly stuff all around, no matter [& despite even] the counter cultural graphical roots.

paperdollconvention2008

Jenny Taliadoros publishes two amazing publications: Paper Doll Studio and Paper Doll Review. I first heard about the magazines when Mary Engelbreit did a profile on the paper doll collection of her grandmother, Helen Johnson, and the family tradition of paper art and collecting that Judy Johnson and daughter Jenny continue. I still remember the impressive files that Helen kept her collections in!

paperdollconvention2008

I had the opportunity to interview Trina Robbins more than a year ago for a Paper Doll Review article. She's a prolific writer, artist and herstorian. If it wasn't for Trina, I wouldn't have a clue about Gladys Parker (Mopsy Modes and Flapper Fanny) or Jackie Ormes (Torchy Togs).

Here are some of the Trina books I have in my collection, most of which are available for purchase on her Web site, www.trinarobbins.com

Nell Brinkley and the New Woman in the 20th Century
Paper Dolls from the Comics
Tomorrow's Heirlooms (Fashions of the 60s and 70s)
A Century of Women Cartoonists
From Girls to Grrrlzz: A History of Women in the Comics
Go Girl!: The Time Team
California Girls

girly stuff! like not manly stuff! imagine!
stuff not even peewee herman or bob denver would touch.
certainly robert crumb wouldn't. (but loudly, to his credit.)
so who? who? whom will stand up lit and proud for the like not manly girly stuff from amongst the skinny white guy squad?
("Don Knotts in Three's Company!") no no no, hush.
("Woody Allen?") no, dammit, not even.
me.

"dance with your monsters, listen to what they've got to tell you! :-) xo" -tam laporte

this wasn't done for tam, obviously, but ana voog. many many years ago. there were 3 other dress pieces as well. none girly enough. (are we still talking about art? there's one hell of a segue'. web cams. camgrrrls. jessica simpson. reality shows and competition.) i would certainly do a paper doll radically differently now, post-engelbreit.

sorry trina, it wasn't you who really ultimately subverted me.

the malls... where i once had girly peter max stuff everywhere, it's now all mary engelbreit? i guess i should go see for myself. it's been that long.

maybe it's not that it's 'girly stuff' that's objectionable. maybe it's that it lacks conflict or sex. the fluffy clouds thing. i've been criticized online for years for lacking aggression. not lately though. bad sign. time to hit the mall. in my badass mary engelbreit leather jacket.

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 6:13am

screw all conventions, even that of nonconventionality.

in any case, and in *all* cases, the creative imperative will not be denied, by any one for any one. i wouldn't have it any other way.

http://zuma.vip.warped.com/itz/

Zuma April 19, 2008 - 8:26pm

I used to think that viewing through a fish-eye lens was totally alien. Now it's just another camera effect, with certain advantages and disadvantages. I used to think that black light art from the sixties was the ultimate. Escher was a god. Marshall McLuhan was a disjointed kook.

I think the change for me came when I first saw the works of Alexander Calder at the Walker Art Institute in Minneapolis. His colorful mobiles and sculptures were simply fun to look at. But...why? It was then that I began to realize how there are archetypal shapes, angles, object relationships and sizes that trigger natural emotional reactions in me and probably in other people.

Abstract artists explore these areas, what I like to call 'menamena' (after the Sesame Street song). Often the effect isn't to make us smile, like Calder's works, but to make us aware that our perceptions of reality are self-limited. We literally live in boxes that our thoughts rarely venture outside of. The purpose of abstract art is to knock on our doors and invite us to step outside, just for a few moments.

It's healthy.
.
Good times for Smiley! :-D

Jimbo92107 April 19, 2008 - 9:47pm

Because it is the time we inhabit, it is difficult to accept that we are probably living in another Dark Age for the arts. It's just another Kali Yuga thing. Most people aren't even looking or listening.
Look at what we pay attention to and experience in our daily lives.
Look what comes on teevee. Think about what comes into your sensory fields.
From the required art forms of the 20th century totalitarian states to the required art forms of academia and the art market place...most of it has been commodified, coopted, bought, used, abused, etc.
When we even talk about the arts as some separate precious thing that we set on a shelf and ignore most of our 24/7's.
It's just a low time for the arts and a lot of other things.
How's that for a happy Sunday morning in America;-))

JT April 20, 2008 - 10:37am

I would like to see a thread where agonists contributed their poetry. Doesn't have to be weekly like Friday Cat Slagging - maybe just a one off.

Nominay April 20, 2008 - 5:00pm

i agree, and would like to see such not limited to only poetry.

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 5:04pm

my little rhymes would qualify too? :)

adrena April 20, 2008 - 5:29pm

why ask me?

are they certifiably anything?

and just how little are they? (will i need new reading glasses?)

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 5:57pm

Never mind, Zuma. I might throw in a rhyme, one day, somewhere, when the opportunity arises. :)

adrena April 20, 2008 - 6:03pm

has it come to the time
for me to begin to think
of something that will rhyme
with a flying kitchen sink?

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 6:09pm

on December 6, St. Nicholas day, to include a rhyme with some gifts. In my younger days in Holland, a week prior to Dec 6, the whole country was literally thrown into a frenzy of rhyming.

adrena April 20, 2008 - 6:18pm

that's interesting! even if just to know more about ya.
the tradition is a nice one, nice to hear about.

Zuma April 20, 2008 - 6:31pm

Eliot dedicates The Wasteland to Pound. He refers to him as the better craftsman( il miglior fabbro). In A Retrospect Pound gives a kind of guide to writing verse. He speaks of the direct treatment of whatever the poem is written about. He abhors unnecessary words. He wants composition “in the sequence of a musical phrase, not in the sequence of a metronome.” I see nothing abstract in Pound’s work. I see distaste for dead form and for prolixity. In his essay The Renaissance he says “we are tired of men upon perches."

So am I. But I call perches podiums.

What you object to is correct. However, the bad art and literature we have today is not bad on Pound's account. Pound says to use no ornament or use good ornament(again from A Retrospect). He is not opposed to ornament that has a point in the verse.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly April 20, 2008 - 7:33pm

"Art is philosophy in the wild" - Eduardo Kac (cats)

www.ekac.org

“The Playboy reader invites a female acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Picasso, Nietzsche, jazz, sex.” - Hugh Hefner

Tonsure Wimple April 20, 2008 - 9:32pm

if you want realism, any digital camera captures it better than any artist could reproduce.

Modern art is about stripping away and capturing emotion on the medium. For instance when I stood on the Glass Window Bridge on Eleuthera Island, Bahamas (one of the most beautiful places in the world)--just the bridge itself separates the Caribbean from the Atlantic--one side dark, navy blue, white-capped, rollers with the other placid, turquoise, lapping on the shore--I could picture an artist using straight, vertical, and dark colours for the Atlantic, with curvy, horizontal, serene colors depicting the Caribbean. Minds don't store details when a person looks at something--it takes in the scene and records it using shorthand storing information more economically based on the person's education, experiences, and emotions.

Modern art captures feeling and that's how the mind interprets information.

There no longer is any need for an artist to mechanically duplicate what the eye sees. The artist's responsibility is recording emotions and feelings. There are artists who mechanically duplicate details, but their drawings fail to elicit responses from viewers. Great art never was about details--it's about what the painting means to the viewer.

One of my favourite artists is Emily Carr Very strong colours that compliment her style. Didn't believe there actually were colours like she had painted until I visited British Columbia. Bright blues and greens do dominate some of the scenes she captured. But it isn't just Emily's marvellous use of colour...it's the total package that she was able to capture. Her paintings are very moving.

By the way, good poetry strips away unnecessary wordage--poetry is the ultimate in frugality of words including Ezra Pound...bet there were times he agonized over which words to eliminate.

Gone are the days when poets rambled on and on and on. "Economy" is the mark of artistic works albeit literature or visual works including effective techniques using in modern film. Hitchcock was a master of understatement in the films that made him famous.

-------

Speaking of art … did you read that the oldest oil paintings in the world have been found in a cave in Afghanistan?

From the link … ”It is said the cave paintings were probably the work of artists travelling along the Silk Road, the ancient trade route between China, across Central Asia to the West and show scenes of Buddhas in vermilion robes and mythical creatures.”

canuck April 22, 2008 - 9:50am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.