Geopolitics and Hegemony


It's been a long time since I've read an article on geopolitics in the mainstream media that kept me both interested and fascinated.

But this essay, "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony" by Parag Khanna has done both and more.

In its scope and ambition, not to mention the author's clear experience of travel outside the United States and the corridors of global power, it succeeds. And well, at that.

I'm not quite through with my second reading. And I can't say I agree with it all. But as food for thought and future discussion it's pretty damn good.

I'll write on it sometime this week, hopefully tomorrow, but until then give it a read. You'll not be disappointed.


Sean Paul Kelley January 27, 2008 - 11:52pm
( categories: USA: Foreign Relations )

... is the projection that the EU will continue to grow at this neck breaking speed. Just can't see this happening.

quax January 28, 2008 - 12:35am

I would also be curious to know where the author sees Japan in its projections. Would it be demoted it to second-world as well?

Cael January 28, 2008 - 1:31am

The article suggest an EU of 30 States, considering that there are already 27 States in the EU and the Balkans are lining up to join 30 is a gimme.

A more interesting question is whether Sarkosy's Mediterranean Union goes anywhere, if it does the EU could expand to include the whole of North Africa, starting with Algeria, Tunisia & Morocco and moving eastward to absorb Libya & Egypt. At which point the EU would really start looking like the Roman Empire.

Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives. John Stuart Mill

Don Quijote January 28, 2008 - 11:38am

But, I can't see the United States' muscular view of itself capable of absorbing this message.

The US' Military expenditures are its major investmnts in the future, and the ROI from this set of investments appears negative...

In other words, we are putting our money where our hearts lie, Guns.

Synoia January 28, 2008 - 3:16am

It is a very good and thought provoking article, but I don't think it propoerly accounts for the rumbling going on in banking. The purpose of capitalism is to produce capital and it has seriously overproduced. That is what the whole credit bubble is about. Money can only be saved by investing it, but there is a finite quantity of investment potential in the economy and an infinite amount of human desire for wealth. When the investment houses ran out of safe places to invest, they basically put a padlock on a dumpster and called it a safe, but forgot to tell the trash company not to pick it up. The fact is that the banking system is the fat man at the head of the table, clutching his chest, as that last bite of caviar dribbles down his chin.
When the dust settles, we will still have lots of guns, but not so many bullets.

brodix January 28, 2008 - 9:26am

just one wafer-thin mint to cleanse the palate?

Gordon January 28, 2008 - 12:19pm

Would mssr. like his CDO financials on plates, or all mixed up in ze bucket?

zot23 January 28, 2008 - 2:25pm

and it is now too unkempt to lie in. All administrations in the last half of the 20th century played the global hegemony game, but it took George W. Bush to kick over the table and scatter the pieces during his two-term, PNAC-inspired hissy fit.

I have no problem with the multi-polar world Khanna documents here, but the U.S. needs government leadership and a more enlightened spirit of entrepenurialism leavened with the proper amount of (gasp) socialism to succeed economically in it. If we allow the present military-industrial-congressional colossus to continue as is, we need only look to movie "fantasy" as depicted in RoboCop, Max Headroom, and Bladerunner to see what kind of society we will be living in the not-so-distant future.



Turn back to the Constitution - and
READ it.

Rick January 28, 2008 - 9:32am

to turn to science fiction. We can look to Argentina or Brazil. What set of economic advisers are we going to get. The guys who designed the American Consensus will, if Naomi Klein is right, regard the U. S.' problems as an opportunity. If Henry Liu's predictions about hyperinflation or depression are correct, there are a lot of 'Shock' economists who will urge us to privatize or just dump Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. They've done it a number of places. Maybe we can try it here.

pihwht January 28, 2008 - 12:18pm

The reason privatizing Social Security just didn't fly was because it couldn't. The private sector is awash in surplus capital as it is. Government borrowing, ie. recycling this private wealth back through the public sector, keeps it afloat already.
It's time for reverse Shock Doctrine. Nationalize the banking system. Have the Treasury issue money directly and make local banking a function of local government, with profits as community income. It may seem like pie in the sky, but when this bubble blows, it's going to seem quite logical.

brodix January 28, 2008 - 2:23pm

What others want for themselves trumps what we want for them.

America has a lot of soul searching to do. But that's a good thing.

adrena January 28, 2008 - 11:02am

of the kid at the scrub baseball games who owned the only baseball bat.
I have the bat and you play the game according to my rules.
Now everyone else have a bat, ball and mitt and they are telling him the rules.
He is still fighting for control and everyone are getting ready to kick him out of the game.

repressive governments mix administrative clumsiness & inefficiency with authoritarian tendencies.

kimmy January 28, 2008 - 7:38pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.