Chewing Off The Hand That Pays Your Bills and Gets You Elected: Texas Bloggers Got pwned


Rick Noriega stock plummeted yesterday when SA Express News reporter R.G. Ratcliffe quoted the wannabe US Senate candidate disparaging the one group that brought him some notoriety (even from halfway around the world, this story got my attention).

Noriega early last month went to Chicago to rub elbows with liberal bloggers at the Yearly Kos convention, and received the endorsement of Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas.

But then Noriega returned home and told the Texas Broadcasters Association that the blogs are as destructive a force in democracy as talk radio.

"We've seen talk radio become an organizing tool for the die-hard right, while liberals are credited with turning the blogosphere into a political weapon. Each of those media has a targeted demographic group and works them into an ideological lather," Noriega said.

"This, I believe, is damaging to the political culture in this country."

The Noriega campaign clumsily tried to explain it away as "Noriega was not criticizing all politically active blogs, just those that engage in the 'politics of division.'" What the hell does that mean? I was for blogs before I was against them? Poppycock. I'm sorry but Noriega didn't make any distinction, a distinction that should have been made very clear to the broadcasters. If that is what he meant. He could have been pandering. But a darling of the netroots would never pander, would he?

What is worse is that many of those in the Texas online progressive movement jumped to blindly defend Rick rather than reevaluate their support for someone who took them for granted and used them. First they blamed the reporter for trying to drive a wedge between Rick Noriega and the blogs (even going at length to insult him). Then they blamed the Watts campaign. Then they blamed his speech writer and Noriega for not saying what he means. Then, that the speech taken out of context. And finally, they produced a speech with no attribution of what he may or may not have said. Politicians stray from prepared speeches and say what they want. The question is who is he pandering to? The broadcasters or bloggers?

Matt Glazer at BOR did write something titled "Just the Facts" that looked sort of reflective (it showed on my Google alert) but it was taken down. It read "Noriega's statement comparing blogs to right wing talk radio is incredibly off base, but it seems out of context at best." Then again, as noted in the article, Glazer worked for Rep. Pete Gallego who organized legislative endorsement for Noriega. Too many connections for one not to suspect some coordination by Noriega and some bloggers. (Perhaps this is too strong of a statement. Nonetheless, Noriega goofed. ~spk)

I don't buy Noriega's great respect for the blogosphere. He's just using it as another constituency group. Pander on dude! Cuz Texas bloggers got played. They just can't face it yet.

Update: From Corrente:

Everyone makes mistakes, and this is what the primary season is all about, getting out the kinks and learning to run a smooth, lighting fast reactive campaign (among other things).

That's always been my point in this whole Noriega-Watts rivalry online. Let's have a real primary here in Texas! Let's not do it the old fashioned way where the candidates were picked to us by the TDP elite. That way lies the old way and failure. I'm for an open and hard fought primary. Isn't that what democracy is all about?

Update: When someone offers a stand-up, no nonsense apology like this well, I am just as happy as can be eating crow. So, Charles, if you would like to serve me up a dish, I'm prepared to eat it. An apology like that takes character.


Sean Paul Kelley September 10, 2007 - 5:57am
( categories: USA: Campaign 2008 )

(cause i'm not a lawyer)

what if he was just tired? it happens on the campaign trail, and the candidate can't predict what every jr speechwriter is going to come up with every day. suppose he was tired, got pushed on stage with a sheet and told, "you're on!" and had to run with it?

campaigns are funny, in a lot of ways they are like a circus. every once in a while the guy juggling all the balls drops one.

here's my question, and i honestly don't know: has he stabbed the netroots in the back before? one is a data point, two is a line, three is a pattern. that's my general rule.

chicago dyke September 10, 2007 - 8:35am

Look, it was a stupid thing to say. However it was taken out of context.

My take on it is over at TK.

I like and respect you, Sean-Paul. Frankly, the hate-on you've got for Rick is something you might want to explain, because it doesn't make much sense to me.

Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.

boadicea September 10, 2007 - 8:43am

what I cannot stand about so many people who are backing Noriega, this, you are either with us or against us attitude. It's very Bushian in its conception. Please stop doing it. You are hurting Texas that way.

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination."

Sean Paul Kelley September 10, 2007 - 11:45am

You just called us too stupid to know we've been had. Is that being with your blogger colleagues or against us?

Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.

boadicea September 10, 2007 - 11:49am

This is in no way an accurate representation of the feelings of the Texas Netroots, specifically the dozens of Netrootsers who are part of the Draft Noriega and/or Bloggers for Noriega movements.

Every campaign makes mistakes, period. Show me a netroots candidate who is perfect, and I'll sell you some ocean front property in East El Paso.

Rick Noriega is the real deal, and the only candidate in this race worthy of netroots support.

As Democrats, we're often too eager to throw our own people under the bus when they make minor mistakes. We stand behind Rick Noriega.

VinceLeibowitz September 10, 2007 - 10:01am

apologize to his base for making such a goof. It's pretty simple in my book: netroots means accountability. Will he show that accountability?

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination."

Sean Paul Kelley September 10, 2007 - 11:46am

Rather than a knee jerk reaction, how about we see how things develop in the FDL chat this afternoon?

Just a thought.

Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.

boadicea September 10, 2007 - 11:52am

I'm not sure why you think I got "pwned", Sean-Paul. I believe, from my personal knowledge of Rick Noriega, that he and his campaign screwed up. Nobody's perfect, after all. He's going to address the matter today on Firedoglake, and I have faith that he will satisfy most of the people who were justifiably disappointed in what he said. Feel free to join in and draw your own conclusions afterwards.

I have to say, I'm a little insulted to read that you think I'm too stupid to realize when someone is bullshitting me.

kuff September 10, 2007 - 10:04am

bloggers had such thin skin. Sheesh. You'd think I just killed someone's favorite candidate or something. The same kind of hysteria surrounded Bell vs. what'shisname last go round. Charles, I personally am very surprised you, of all people, the Dean of the Texas blogosphere are 'insulted' by this. A curious reaction. But then again, maybe the fact that I am in Denmark right now and my internal clock is all screwed up has me insensitive.

What's the matter, the Texas blogosphere can't handle a little hard-hitting real criticism? Seriously, are you saying my criticism isn't fair?

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination."

Sean Paul Kelley September 10, 2007 - 11:50am

Read what you wrote, Sean-Paul: "Texas bloggers got played. They just can't face it yet." How exactly am I supposed to take that?

Putting all that aside for the moment, what you're saying is that Rick Noriega isn't the person we think he is based on this incident. We are saying that this was a screwup that isn't representative of the man, and that it won't happen again. Moreover, Noriega is engaging with the folks at Firedoglake, who as you know have already strongly supported him in the past and who have also been burned by candidates before, later today. Don't you think you owe all of us the courtesy of seeing what he has to say for himself before you declare we've all been a bunch of chumps?

I don't mind criticism. I'm also perfectly willing to admit that events may prove you right, and that I have been an idiot. Won't be the first time, that's for sure. What I am saying is that you're making a very strong accusation based on one incident, and you've done it before Noriega has had a chance to personally respond. If he gets on FDL and waffles or digs himself in deeper, then I may be forced to conclude I'm wrong and you're right, and if that happens, I'll say so. Will you do the same if he proves us right?

kuff September 10, 2007 - 1:00pm

The Agonist. "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination."

Sean Paul Kelley September 10, 2007 - 1:24pm

I greatly appreciate your willingness to be fair and openminded. You rock, dude.

kuff September 10, 2007 - 3:31pm

Pete Gallego hired me to work Natural Resources legislation for the session only. The letter signed by 49 sitting Texas State House members was signed and delivered after I left Rep. Gallego's office in June. I was not involved in that process in any way, shape or form.

You can call conspiracy all you want, but there are no dots to connect. I started StopCorny.com to help elect the Democrat and I have worked tirelessly to promote a balance of stories that are pro-Watts, pro-Noriega, and anti-Cornyn.

The odd thing is that people in the Watts campaign have gone around trying to undermine my credibility and lied about my relationship to the campaign even though I have never once been asked to help or get involved (even though I have offered to the entire communications team and many in the political department). Rather than embracing my offers to help, some have gone to reporters saying I am a paid Noriega shill and that my bias is overwhelming.

Let me state unequivocally, no U.S. Senate campaign is paying me for my service or my words. No person or organization has told me what to write about. I have not endorsed and do not plan to endorse any candidate until after January.

Rather than looking whiney or self-important, I took down the post. To my surprise, another writer at BOR, Phil Martin, has written something on the issue.

Instead of questioning my motives and reading between the lines, I hope you and your readers will feel comfortable contacting me on this issue. My e-mail is Matt-at-BurntOrangeReport.com

Read Burnt Orange Report

Matt Glazer September 10, 2007 - 10:29am

He attacked liberal bloggers as a way of pandering to the media. Liberal/progressive bloggers are his true base and he blew that base off to pander. If I were y'all I'd be pissed off. But since everyone seems to have thrown their lot in with the guy it's swept under the rug. That will not help Texas blogs in the long run or the Texas netroots. That's how I see it and that's the call I made. If you don't like it, make a post of your own about it and criticize me. We're all grown ups here, right? And as long as the posts are polite I am always inclined to link to them.

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination."

Sean Paul Kelley September 10, 2007 - 11:43am

How does the Watts campaign calling the MSM questioning the integrity of individual bloggers help the Texas netroots or the blogosphere as a whole? I am simply curious. I do not endorse or support Noriega's statement, but he went to Chicago for YearlyKos and has been involved in talking/courting the netroots. Rather than jump to conclusions, I am waiting to see what the Noriega campaign has to say for themselves. I know how the Watts campaign wants me to take it, but I am doing some research first.

Read Burnt Orange Report

Matt Glazer September 10, 2007 - 1:00pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.