ABC News Is Reporting . . .


. . . that Iran has been caught supplying weapons to the Taliban for use against NATO forces in Afghanistan:

NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran's proxy war against the United States and Great Britain.

But why is it that Gates said there was no evidence for this claim? Maybe ABC might want to better identify their "senior coalition official." (Maybe an OVP official?)

That Iran would arm the Taliban just doesn't pass the smell test for me. And what does this mean:

The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges "contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area."

When was it reported that the demolition charges in Iraq which supposedly came from Iran had "fake U.S. markings"? Did I miss something?

Lastly, I want an investigation into who leaked this treasonous national security information, damnit!

Update: Cernig says no dice, also, that it's the OVP shopping bad-intel around.


Sean Paul Kelley June 6, 2007 - 6:37pm
( categories: Afghanistan | Iran )

I already posted on this on Sunday June 3rd. Recall, this is the evidence Newsweek says Cheney's faction is unusually interested in and has already been hawked by reliable shill Robin Wright in the WaPo.

The Brits have another opinion, according to Newsweek:

"British officials who asked for anonymity because of the nature of their work emphasize that they lack hard evidence linking the shipments to the Revolutionary Guards, and that the weapons could just as easily have been bought on the black market in Iran."

Karzai isn't buying it either:

" Asked his own view, Karzai appeared eager to give the Iranian government a pass.

He said there was no evidence of Iranian government involvement, adding, ``Iran and Afghanistan have never been as friendly as they are today.''

There is no reason for Iran to aid the Taliban, Karzai said. ``It is in the interests of our brothers in Iran'' to support the development of a more stable and prosperous Afghanistan."

So the Afghans and the Brits don't believe the spin - and the US is as much a part of the coalition as anyone so my guess is both the leaked document and the anonymous senior coalition official" came from the crazy wing of the White House i.e. Cheney's office.

Regards, C

Steve Hynd June 6, 2007 - 7:53pm

...is this roundup from CSM.

"Political Islam is a dream or a nightmare, but not a sociological reality." - Olivier Roy, Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah

JustPlainDave June 6, 2007 - 8:59pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.