"Internet On The Cheap"


Let's make something clear: the future doesn't happen in America anymore. Got it?

Why do I say that? Well, this is a perfect example:

Top phone company AT&T Inc. shrugged off concerns on Tuesday that it would need to build a more expensive, all-fiber network to handle an expected surge in high-speed Internet and video traffic.

What they are saying is this: we don't want to invest in the future because we have a technology (substandard in many ways) that is just barely meeting demand and we're going to squeeze as much profits out of this as possible. Screw you and your dreams of internet speeds like they have in South Korea and parts of Europe. We don't want to be French!

It really makes no sense to me. Wasn't getting fibre into the home called the 'golden mile?' And wasn't the winner of that race going to really make oodles of cash? Looks like AT&T just conceded.


Sean Paul Kelley December 19, 2006 - 3:03pm
( categories: Net Neutrality Diary )

'we' being the collective 'we' of the public at large, that the largest part of the improvements to the information infrastructure have happened because of the breakup of Ma Bell, and the efforts and competition of the Baby Bells.

Yet another abortion to lay at the feet of the Bush Administration....wonder which of his golf buddies got rich off this one?

-5.75,-4.05 "I am in earnest; I will not equivocate; I will not excuse; I will not retreat a single inch; and I will be heard."
William Lloyd Garrison
US abolitionist & editor (1805 - 1879)

justadood December 19, 2006 - 6:32pm

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061220-8471.html

"But more importantly, the vote does away with most build-out requirements. Those requirements generally insist that companies offer service to all the residents in the town, rather than cherry-picking the profitable areas..."

Bolo December 21, 2006 - 12:36pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.