"Panic"


Here's the lede:

President Bush and his top advisors fanned out across the troubled Middle East over the last week to showcase their diplomatic initiatives to restore strained relationships with traditional allies and forge new ones with leaders in Iraq.

Here's the meat:

But instead of flaunting stronger ties and steadfast American influence, the president's journey found friends both old and new near a state of panic.

And here is the diplomatic understatement:

Mideast leaders expressed soaring concern over upheavals across the region that the United States helped ignite through its invasion of Iraq and push for democracy — and fear that the Bush administration may make things worse.

This is bad. We talked yesterday about the role of Iran in Iraq. We also discussed how to 'firewall' Iraq once we leave. But as the Times article makes clear that isn't going to be an easy task now that all the regional players are jostling for position.

What could make things worse, in the words of the Times? That's easy: the longer Bush stays in denial the greater the risk of regional war.


Sean Paul Kelley December 3, 2006 - 3:25pm

Given Bush's history of being about ten thousand times more interested in "seeming to do something" than in actually doing it, It is hard to imagine that Bush's meetings will be anything more than press photo-ops. If anything actually happens, it will be in Cheney's meeting in SA. My guess is the Saudis are taking him behind the laundry. They will not sit still for any solution in Iraq that fails to provide Sunnis a primary role in government. None of Americas other allies in the region - Egypt, Jordan, or Turkey - has any interest in some Shia state a la Iran either. Looks like Iraq better hold on to that Saddam guy, they might need him again...

mtspace December 4, 2006 - 1:28am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.