SearchUser loginNavigationCreate new accountTeam AgonistEditor in Chief: Steve Hynd ThoughtfulGlobalTimelyMixed Bag of Candy: Corner: Brian Downing's Picks: Numerian's Numbers: Who's onlineThere are currently 4 users and 1501 guests online.
Online users:Syndicate |
Iran Trip UpdateI was up very late last night trying to finagle a visa to Iran. I doubt I'll be very productive today. The trip's on hold for at least another week. If the visa comes in by Wednesday then the earliest we'll leave is May 3 or 4. That's all I have at this point. Other than a huge case of the let-downs. ~ Actually, since I've got Iran on the brain, here's a question. Say you bomb Iran. What next? What's the end game? We cannot occupy the whole country ~ it's physically impossible. What's the end-game? Or better yet, what's the political goal we're seeking at the end of armed conflict? (Insert obligatory Clausewitzian reference here.) And is it achievable? Remember, the 'enemy' has a say in this; more than any other potential armed conflict the US has faced in the post-Cold War era, this 'enemy' has a vote. So, what happens? Is anyone in our government thinking about that?!? Let's have that debate. Chew on this graf:
And then go read James Fallows at the Atlantic Online. Again, what's the end game? Sean Paul Kelley April 11, 2006 - 12:06pm
|
![]() Premium AdvertisingAgonist Page on FaceBookAgonist Facebook Activity |