Chris Bell and The Texas Democratic Convention


A lot of rumors have been floating around that Chris Bell changed the night of his speech to the state convention because of a.) a possible floor fight over the candidacy of the new state party chair and b.) to disenfranchise rural and distant delegates. The Agonist did a little reporting on this today and yesterday and here's what we found out. (I do live in San Antonio, Texas you know.)

First off, there are some Gammage dead-enders who just won't let go. They began the whisper campaign against Mr. Bell, implying he wants to disenfranchise rural and distant Texas delegates by moving up the speech to Friday. A party insider informed me that "Chris's speech will be on Friday because that's when the state party has asked him to speak." Adding, "Friday night is traditionally the night where the gubernatorial nominee speaks."

I want to make something clear, I have nothing against Bob Gammage personally. He's an honorable man. I do have a problem with many of his supporters who hide behind anonymous names and damn near slander myself and other Bell supporters. Sore losers, if you ask me.

The timing of the speech is more about tuning the Democratic party to the media and the media cycle than any Gammage dead-enders conspiracies of disenfrachising rural delegates. Again, our insider tells us, "Better to have an entire news cycle to ourselves than to get one column inch at the bottom of an article about the presidential hopefuls that will be the big draw on Saturday."

That would seem rather self-evident, yes?

When I contacted the Bell campaign their response was a simple, "That's when the Texas Democratic Party asked Chris to speak, and he was happy to agree to their request."


Sean Paul Kelley March 30, 2006 - 1:51am

For one, your saying this is some conspiracy on part of "Gammage Dead-Enders" proves my point that Bell's getting involved unnecessarily brings back the divisions of the primary campaign, which doesn't help unify a party where he needs 90% of the base to win.

Second, yes, the Governor's speech is usually on a Friday, so maybe that part of the info passed on to me was wrong. But the old "we just agreed to the TDP's timeline" line is lame. The TDP chair and the candidate are both supporting the same person for TPD chair replacement. Um, ok. Sure.

ktm March 30, 2006 - 2:55am

I got it from a Gammage supporter and someone else who is involved int he 'floor fight' for party chair. The Gammage folks are the ones making noises about bolting to Carole 4 names or Kinky. I would happily have voted for Gammage had he won. You cannot say that about many of the Gammage people who continue to hide behind their anonymous online names.

I stand by what I wrote.

Love Firefox, Hate IE

Sean Paul Kelley March 30, 2006 - 3:02am

Is continuing to lambast primary Gammage supporters an effective tactic to getting them to feel comfortable with fully supporting Bell?

You do our candidate a disservice. And by our, I mean Bell.

ktm March 30, 2006 - 3:06am

mail from people (and you know who I am talking about) for my post at BOR. I'm sick of it. Every day there are at least 3 or 4. I realize that's the nature of the beast but some of the folks (again, you know who) are out of control.

And, for the record, I did not lambast Bob Gammage. I said: "I want to make something clear, I have nothing against Bob Gammage personally. He's an honorable man. I do have a problem with many of his supporters who hide behind anonymous names and damn near slander myself and other Bell supporters. Sore losers, if you ask me."

Love Firefox, Hate IE

Sean Paul Kelley March 30, 2006 - 3:14am

First off, there are some Gammage dead-enders who just won't let go. They began the whisper campaign ... Gammage dead-enders conspiracies

S-P, that's lambasting primary Gammage supporters. It's not needed and really doesn't make any of them feel welcome.

I don't know who sends you hate mail (I guess you are more popular than I) but if it's from Baby Snooks, he/she/it is just crazy. Who in the world would have the time to send you e-mails ever day bitching about anything. I'd just block the e-mail addresses if it was that much of a problem.

I doubt it is hate mail. I've seen hate mail (during the NNN campaign). I'd really doubt what you're getting comes close.

ktm March 30, 2006 - 5:01pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.