Obama terror drones: CIA tactics in Pakistan include targeting rescuers and funerals


The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, By Chris Woods and Christina Lamb, February 4

The CIA’s drone campaign in Pakistan has killed dozens of civilians who had gone to help rescue victims or were attending funerals, an investigation by the Bureau for the Sunday Times has revealed.

The findings are published just days after President Obama claimed that the drone campaign in Pakistan was a ‘targeted, focused effort’ that ‘has not caused a huge number of civilian casualties.’

Speaking publicly for the first time on the controversial CIA drone strikes, Obama claimed last week they are used strictly to target terrorists, rejecting what he called ‘this perception we’re just sending in a whole bunch of strikes willy-nilly’.

‘Drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties’, he told a questioner at an on-line forum. ‘This is a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists trying to go in and harm Americans’.

But research by the Bureau has found that since Obama took office three years ago, between 282 and 535 civilians have been credibly reported as killed including more than 60 children. A three month investigation including eye witness reports has found evidence that at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims. More than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners. The tactics have been condemned by leading legal experts.

Although the drone attacks were started under the Bush administration in 2004, they have been stepped up enormously under Obama.

Via Glenn Greenwald: U.S. drones targeting rescuers and mourners


Raja February 6, 2012 - 9:10am
( categories: USA: Foreign Relations )

has had a long history of calling their strikes 'funerals'

That these folks travel in groups as was the case with bin Laden does not surprise. These are a hell of a lot more targeted than going in with troops.

Letting these groups coalesce into the training camps of the 1990s, is that what folks want? I don't get it. The numbers show an incredible ability to precisely target these individuals.

The numbers simply are not that high, and that 24 of 30 al qaeda targets have been successfully eliminated shows the success of the program.

Scotjen61 February 6, 2012 - 6:29pm

Did you not read the article? We are deliberately targeting civilians. That is a war crime. Civilized people condemn such things.

Raja February 6, 2012 - 8:54pm

They're making a cold calculation about what collateral they're willing to inflict. Given that that's what's underwriting America's ability to disengage, I don't think anyone will look too closely.

"In combat one should be very suspicious of painless moral choices. When you are confronted with a seemingly painless moral choice, the odds are that you haven't looked deeply enough." ~ Karl Marlantes

JustPlainDave February 6, 2012 - 11:59pm

Perhaps they were armed or:
In 2010, Pakistan continued to experience attacks by armed groups influenced by and/or associated with Taliban or Al-Qaida, including Tehrik-i-Taliban, on Government institutions and civilians, which escalated and expanded beyond Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) to several major urban centres. Sectarian violence also continued as attacks by armed groups, including the Taliban and Lashkar i Jhangvi, were launched mainly against Shiite processions and mosques. Children have been used by these armed groups to carry out suicide attacks.
http://www.un.org/children/conflict/english/pakistan.html

mcgrande February 7, 2012 - 2:29pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.