Can Bush Still Grant Permanent Immunity to Rove, Others, from Testifying?


A Long-Lived Privilege?

Bush lawyer directs Rove not to talk to Congress—once again
Michael Isikoff | January 29

Newsweek Web Exclusive

Fielding Letter to Rove

Commentary from MyDD

And is this why he didn't bother issuing pardons to Libby, etc?


quiet Bill January 30, 2009 - 4:21am
( categories: USA: Presidency )

if the Dems have the balls.

tjfxh January 30, 2009 - 10:43am

we should do what some Republican citizens have started doing: Mailing pairs of balls to Congress-Critters, along with letters essentially saying: "Here, you need these to do what your constituents ask and xxxxxxxxxx..."

Ah to have a Party *not* dedicated to snatching defeat from the Jaws of Victory......

-5.75,-4.05
"God gives men a brain and a penis, and only enough blood to run one at a time." -- Robin Williams

justadood January 30, 2009 - 3:21pm

I'm sure they'll try every trick in the book from being accountable. Why not just pull some strange and obscure precedent out of their hat and rid it right into the ground.

If the House orders Rove arrested, they can salt him away in their one cell jail. Who could free him? Wouldn't it be a boundary violation of the holy trinity for SCOTUS to mandate that Rove be set free?

The claim by Rove proves the assumption by many: they Bush - Cheney crew think it's all about them.

Excellent question.

Michael Collins January 31, 2009 - 5:46am

Contempt of Congress is prosecuted by the US DOJ, which is required to proceed. In spite of this requirement the Bush DOJ ignored Congressional action, forcing the issue into the courts, where the Josh Bolton/Harriet Myers issues is now bogged down.

Presumably, the Obama DOJ will carry out its responsibilities. Rove will appeal, and the case will likely go to SCOTUS eventually, unless the Bolton-Myers case resolves the issue. But W seems determined to test his view of executive privilege, which is "novel," since there is no precedent for this extension of interpretation.

The Obama WH is expected to take a different view, and many constitutional experts think that SCOTUS will side with this president instead of expanding presidential authority without a constitutional basis. This is the real issue that is being fought. Rove is just a pawn in the game that Cheney et al concocted in the Nixon years and finally got to impose through W.

tjfxh January 31, 2009 - 12:24pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.