Editor-at-Large:Sean Paul Kelley News Editor: Tina Contributing Editor: Quiet Bill Contributing Editor: Nat Wilson Turner Contributing Editor: Michael Collins Special Contributor: Numerian Special Contributor: Don Henry Ford, Jr. Special Contributor: Brian Downing
Universal Pantograph provides technical support for The Agonist.
Abu Aardvark ACS Blog America Adrift The Arabist Blah 3 Tracy Barnett Booman Tribune Corrente Wire Disturbing Trends Drudge Retort Electric Politics Glenn Greenwald The Gist Registan The Huffington Post Informed Comment Intrepid Liberal Col. Patrick Lang The Left Coaster Mahablog Mish's Global Econ Lance Mannion MyDD Total WonKerr Raw Story Seeing the Forest The Sideshow Skippy the Bush Kangaroo TalkLeft Undiplomatic View From Iran Watching America Ian Welsh The Young Turks
aliasBruce Armchair Generalist Arms Control Wonk Jack Cluth Feministing NewsHog Off The Kuff The Reaction Rook's Rant Rubber Hose Scholars and Rogues State of the Division Xymphora
Mixed Bag of Candy: BAGnewsNotes PKU News St Martin Private Eye Scoop.com.nz Lazy Laces Quiet Bill's Corner: Effect Measure Brian Downing's Picks: Al Jezeera Asia Times Night Watch Emirates Journal Soldiers for the Truth The War Report Iraq Casualties Global Security Numerian's Numbers: Mother Jones Tom Dispatch Der Spiegel Big Picture Calculated Risk Bonddad House Bubble Prudent Bear
Richardson to be a candidate?
http://mauberly.blogspot.com/
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. This principle is, contempt prior to examination."
Can I vote for none of the above?
Could've gone with Edwards too. They're the only two that I feel ok voting for. Actually, I'm pretty positive on both of them. Unfortunately, Gore's been savaged in the press for most of the last decade, so I doubt that he'd have much of a chance. They'd all pile on again if he ran.
I agree that as in '04, Gore is making a big mistake passing up the '08 election. Along with Hillary/Obama/Edwards, he's the only other Democrat who could get competitive in this race. In Gore's absence, it would be of benefit to Edwards to take up the environmental issues. He's already got the southerner and populist thing down.
Here's the list of Official and Potential Candidtates
as well as some some additional info including about Gore
I put down Gore. In Gore's absence, still Edwards, though I wasn't pleased with what Stoller characterizes as his "insane" comments on Iran.
I wasn't a fan of Gore in 2000 - he was the better man for the job, but he had a lot of weaknesses. Unlike most, the loss has made him stronger.
Take a look at the forum entries too
might well tap into a very potent unconscious urge for a "do over" in the American public.
having actually won once only to have the Supremes negate it is an advantage. People would take it to the streets if it happened again.
...likely that others will announce their candidacy at a MUCH later date? It seems as though the recent onslaught of exploratory committees are really getting a head start on the election. What if there are a few sleeper candidates waiting to see what happens and then jump in at the last minute after this current crop have savaged each other for months on end?
I voted Edwards. Edwards/Obama, or Edwards/Clinton would be fine tickets. Having said that, I'll vote for the primary victor. :P
An Edwards/Obama ticket would be dogged as the most inexperienced ticket in US history (not true but perception is everything). An Edwards/Clinton ticket would get a lot of popular votes but wouldn't help, and if anything, hurt in the electoral college. Edwards/Bayh, Edwards/Richardson, or Edwards/Clark is the ticket!
choice. Go to draftgore.com and sign the petition.
Except for Al Gore, more experience than all of them, in more areas. The Yeah-Buts about Richardson make me feel like he knows how to drive everything from a sportscar to a schoolbus to a jeep to a semi, and he's had a couple of accidents, while Obama just got his license... Hillary watched a lot of driving and now does quite well in one kind of vehicle. Edwards has as much government experience as, oh, Obama.
Richardson has actually been a diplomat in North Korea, and the Sudan, served in the House, in two Cabinet positions, and been a very popular governor, of a border state! All this, and he's Hispanic, too.
"Yeah, he'd be a good vice-presidential candidate." To someone less experienced? Why?!
Because that's the way it works!
1. Can't believe Kucinich isn't included on the list. I think, however, that that's sufficient indication of his chances;
2. I couldn't in good conscience vote for any of these clowns.
forgot him. Just slipped my mind. My bad.
The Learning Center Financial Questions Answered
Advertise Liberally