Categories

Archives

Picking At A Dead Carcass

The final chapter in the Lance Armstrong saga has been written:

GENEVA—Lance Armstrong was officially stripped of his titles Monday by cycling’s governing body in the latest chapter in the doping allegations against the seven times Tour de France champion.

The International Cycling Union, or UCI, the sports governing body, acted following a damning report by the U.S. antidoping authorities which said Mr. Armstrong was at the center of “a massive team doping scheme, more extensive than any previously revealed in professional sports history.”

The UCI said it accepted the findings and punishments handed out by the U.S. Anti Doping Agency which included stripping the 41-year-old of all results dating back to Aug. 1, 1998, including his record run of seven Tour de France wins from 1999 to 2005, and banned him from competitive cycling for life.

Long time readers of my blog, Simply Left Behind, know that I support Armstrong fully, not just for some dishwater reason like his charitable works (which alone should suffice to place him in the good graces of Americans everywhere) but because he is the greatest cyclist to ever click into a set of pedals.

Long time readers of Simply Left Behind know that I also would not ban the use of performance enhancing drugs and that this latest “Captain Reynaud” moment on the part of authorities– who are shocked, SHOCKED, to find cheating going on– is an utter cowardly scam designed to foist upon the American people the mythology that somehow sports are cleaner than politics.

Anytime you put money or power on the line, people will cheat and not get caught. Period.

That Armstrong cheated does not take a single thing away from his wins, and to say otherwise is hypocrisy: he beat at least six other athletes who at times in their own careers were caught and stripped of their results. To say that Armstrong cheated is to say that if no one had cheated, he’d have seven wins in his pocket anyway.

I mean, it’s not like he nosed past the cleanest athletes, and doping doesn’t give you that enormous an advantage over the course of a grueling three week race.

A quick look at the evidence the USADA has presented reveals heresay testimony of at least eleven teammates who testified under oath that they doped and that Lance Armstrong doped. Here’s the thing: that testimony was taken two and three years ago but only released now.

The deal was that those athletes would not be punished in exchange for testifying truthfully. And yet, many of them admitted to the same “crime” that Armstrong is accused of, and nothing happened. Some were even allowed to retire gracefully with their own honors unstripped. (Likely, that will now change.)

Indeed, George Hincapie’s testimony was so key to the Armstrong investigation that it’s probable that the results were not released until he had ridden his final time trial in the Vuelta a Espana this year. An honorable man would have testified, and immediately retired if he felt that his privacy was so sanctified as to warrant immunity.

At least one of the riders has his own hell to pay in this matter, to be sure. Levi Leipheimer has been kicked off his current squad, Omega Pharma Lotto, and will have a very hard time latching onto another team, which is appropriate.

But here’s the thing: a lot of people made a lot of money off Lance Armstrong, and not once did anyone launch a serious investigation into whether or not he doped.

Sure, he’s been tested hundreds of times (some say 500, some say only 200 but he remains the most tested athlete of all time and not once have those tests revealed doping) and sure, factually there’s no basis for the charges, so people let him slide.

He brought fame and fortune to a huge number of people in the sport. Because of Lance, the Tour de France has a regular spot on American television. Because of Lance, bike manufacturers around the world saw a boom in their sales. Because of Lance, Bicycling Magazine had something to write about three months out of the year which means Rodale made a boatload of money. Because of Lance, Trek Bikes, Nike, and other products that Armstrong endorsed made tens of millions. Because of Lance, George Hincapie has a line of clothing and has made millions, as have nearly all of Armstrong’s teammates from the US Postal squad.

I mean, quick, name the only other American to win the Tour de France?¹

Suddenly, they’re racking their brains, wondering “if only”.

Here, let me tell you what “if only.” If only you had done your job and investigated, Lance Armstrong wouldn’t have been a huge force in cycling, he wouldn’t have won seven Tour de France titles, he wouldn’t be Lance Armstrong. And he wouldn’t be such an “huge disappointment” to your hypcritical tut-tutting cadre right now.

Face facts, you created this man that you now call a monster and climbed on his back and rode him as far as you could before he finally gave up.

In fairness, you also helped create a charity that helps more than 28 million people in the nation who suffer from cancer in all its nasty forms. That would never have become as big as it has if not for this faux-Lance you created. Unless, of course, he won cleanly.

Which he probably would have.

Armstrong has been scapegoated by the very people who lifted him on their shoulders and carried him to new heights, and for that, those people should be given life time banishments jsut as Armstrong has. They created a false idol and now that it lies smashed at their feet, they look anyplace but at themselves for blame.

There’s a mirror. Go point there.

¹ Greg Lemond, 1986, 1989, 1990

5 comments to Picking At A Dead Carcass

  • “Unless, of course, he won cleanly…which he probably would have”.
    The fact is that the man is an anotomical freak with a cardiovascular system 1 in million, combined with speficic body build and muscle type ideal for bike racing and the mental discipline to train and win.
    What bothers me is that there’s not even any circumstancial evidence, It’s all hearsay from people with questional motivation.. He never tested positive. If he used drugs, then the testing protocol is so full of holes as to be meaningless. If the Anti-doping mavens were so incompetent for so long, why would anyone accept their opinion today?

  • Avatar of Fatmex

    In all those years, all those tests, all those pissed off, career-smashed cyclists, not one shred of direct, incontrovertible evidence?  Armstrong was so mean and conniving and Brunyeel was such the mastermind that their spell over everyone involved was complete and unchallenged?  And, why stop at Lance?  Where does this slippery slope take us?  How about Merckx, or Anquetil or Poulidor or Indurain?  I’m sure they were taking amphetamines or other drugs, no?  I’ve heard some say so.  Let’s strip their titles on hearsay?But, really, who wins in all this?  Who stands to gain from all this mess?  The TDF? UCI? The bike makers?  FFC?  I don’t really know.  Why kill the goose now?

  • Avatar of hvd hvd

    The same, of course, applies to all sports.Why is Tommy John surgery acceptable? Why are shots of novocain to kill the pain or cortisone shots acceptable? Aspirin? Caffeine? Alcohol? etc. etc. Should Doc Ellis’ no-hitter under the influence of LSD be nullified?What a waste of time this all is.

  • Darn. I had a really good reply to post, but WP eated it.

    Let me sum it up. Circumstantial evidence has always been enough in cycling, altho they prefer scientific evidence. There is none.

    There were allegations of a 2001 (I think) urine sample ringing bells but the lab that tested released a statement today saying the levels found were nominal and the B sample was tested and found clean.

    FatMex, Merckx was suspended three times for PEDs. I think he even forfeited a Vuelta victory in 1969.

    HVD, that’s the nub of the problem: with all the money involved (and why is that, is a fair question) cheating will happen. End of discussion. For this reason, I’d like to see PEDs legalized in sports, perhaps with some training at all levels of what they can do to you. If you’re still willing to sacrifice thirty or forty years of your life or your health, then by all means, shoot yourself up.

    People cheat. Even Greg Lemond, arguably the last clean winner of the TdF in 1990 has allegations swirling around him, particularly after his gunshot wound in 1987. Indeed, Armstrong claims Lemond was injected with EPO in 1989 under the guise of “iron injections”. Given his tendinitis injury which magically disappeared, it’s not impossible these were at least lidocaine and/or cortisone needles.

    Lemond retired in 1994 of “mitochondrial myopathy,” an invariably fatal degenerative genetic disorder. If its true, how the hell did he win the Tour three times undoped, as it saps the muscles of the ability to shed lactic acid?

    • It’s not that there is no scientific evidence. It’s that scientific evidence is frequently not quite as clear cut as people think it is. Doping, more than many other areas of forensic science, is a scientific arms race.

      He tossed up a couple of samples over the span of around a year that were judged “suspect” at the time (i.e., borderline in some aspect of their character). Testing protocols shift over time and we have no real idea whether those samples would be classified as “positives” now. In addition to these oft reported suspect results, the AADA also asserts that they have scientific evidence indicative of cheating during 2009.

      Where this situation is different is the scale. This is a team sport and the team plays a huge role in getting their guy into position to perform. This team was cheating on an industrial scale. Doping does give you an advantage and when your entire team does it on that scale, it means that the notion that he didn’t just “nose past” anyone doesn’t really say too much about the native superiority of the guy over the other competitors.

Leave a Reply