Party On! All is Well

The consensus is in and there is strong agreement: the US economy is on the path to a sustained recovery. 2011 will be a year of surprises on the upside, and 2012 will be even better. Among a list of the top 25 economists surveyed, not one of them predicts a recession in 2011. There is hardly any investment strategist or economist to be found who sees any risks serious enough to derail the US economy. Here is just a sample of the consensus thinking that is to be found in end-of-the year forecasts:

*Economists in universities and on Wall Street have raised their growth projections for next year. Retail sales, industrial production and factory orders are on the upswing, and new claims for unemployment benefits are trending downward. Despite persistently high unemployment, consumer confidence is improving. Large corporations are reporting healthy profits, and the Dow Jones industrial average reached a two-year high this week. ”“ New York Times

*Job growth, even with unemployment at 9.4 percent or higher since May 2009, and an increasing U.S. population mean home construction probably will improve in 2011 from its near-record low, said Charles Lieberman, chief investment officer at Advisors Capital Management LLC in Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey. Mortgage rates are less than 5 percent, further supporting affordability. ”œThe housing market is going to shock people,” said Lieberman, former head of monetary analysis at the Fed Bank of New York. ”œOnce we get the ball rolling, it becomes easy to roll. The most critical thing the Fed can do, which is not easy, is to promote job growth. If we see job growth we are going to see a very strong housing market.”

*A bottom in the housing market would improve the prospects of companies in the Standard and Poor’s Midcap Homebuilding Index, which has declined 68 percent since its peak in July 2005. Douglas Yearley, the chief of index-member Toll Brothers Inc., said in a Dec. 8 interview at Bloomberg’s New York headquarters that the worst is over for housing. ”œThe recovery is here to stay,” said Yearley, whose company, based in Horsham, Pennsylvania, is the largest U.S. luxury-home builder. ”œI think 2011 will be an improving year, but I think 2012 will be a big year for us.”

*The lack of new housing starts has been ”œholding back the recovery, but arguably that drag is fading now that the financial system is recovering,” said James O’Sullivan, chief economist at MF Global Ltd. in New York. He expects a 12 percent increase in residential investment in 2011, along with job growth of 200,000 a month by June, as much as 225,000 a month by the second half and an unemployment rate of 8.8 percent by the fourth quarter.

*Phillip L. Swagel, who was the Treasury Department’s chief economist during the administration of George W. Bush and teaches at the University of Maryland, said, ”œThe recovery in 2011 will be strong enough for us to see sustained job creation that will finally give Americans a tangible sense of an improving economy.”

*A prominent forecaster, Mark Zandi of Moody’s, predicted that the economy would be ”œoff and running” next year. ”œThe policy response, in its totality, has been very aggressive,” he said, ”œand I think ensures that the recovery will evolve into a self-sustaining expansion early in 2011.”

*Jan Hatzius, the chief United States economist at Goldman Sachs, said the economy was likely to grow at an annualized rate of around 3 percent this quarter. Goldman projected last week that the growth rate would be 4 percent for most of 2011. Morgan Stanley, which raised its growth forecast for 2011 to 4 percent, is even more optimistic, forecasting a rate of 4.5 percent this quarter. – Reuters

Given that many of these economists were forecasting continuing recession back in March 2009, when the stock market bottomed, how did this miracle turnaround occur? There are two answers to this question. First, the global economy has been successfully reflated with unprecedented and massive government support, and second, economists as a group make their projections by extrapolating from the present.

Uncle Sam on Steroids

In the United States, 20% of all disposable personal income comes from the federal government, in the form of Social Security to the elderly, food stamps to the needy, unemployment benefits to those out of work, Medicare and Medicaid, and various subsidies such as housing allowances for those in foreclosure. This percentage is at least double what was in place before the 2008 depression hit.

The federal government has been financing this beneficence with equally unprecedented budget deficits, since there has been no serious attempt to raise taxes in the US since 1992. The all-in budget deficit for this year is around $2 trillion, up from $400 billion before 2008. Because of the strain this persistent, large amount of financing can cause the bond markets, the Federal Reserve has now begun to finance this debt directly, buying up to $600 billion of the debt this year in what it calls Quantitative Easing.

For Quantitative Easing to work, interest rates need to remain stable or head lower, at least in the ten year maturity where the Fed has concentrated its bond buying. Instead, from the minute the program was initiated, interest rates have headed up. Traders understand that this program is experimental and unprecedented, except when it was used in Weimar Germany with disastrous results, or more recently in the hyperinflationary economy of Zimbabwe. There is a real fear in the markets that the inflationary consequences of all of this US debt will be hyper-serious, and people are running for cover. They are rushing to buy anything tangible that could hold its value in an inflationary environment: sugar, wheat, oil, corn, cotton, gold, silver, platinum, rare metals, and copper are some examples.

They are buying anything tangible, except real estate, which is ironic because this is one of the two asset classes that the Federal Reserve has targeted in its Quantitative Easing reflationary program. The Fed wants housing values to go up in the US to reinvigorate the housing market, just as it wants ”œa little inflation” of the 2% or higher variety for prices in general. It not only wants to avoid what it considers the scary consequences of deflation, it wants to reinstitute the very environment of asset inflation that caused the 2007-2008 financial crash and depression. Ben Bernanke is doing exactly what Alan Greenspan did when he headed the Fed: avoid any economic pain resulting from bad investment and credit decisions by the banks, and use asset inflation to stimulate the economy.

The market isn’t buying this program, at least when it comes to real estate. People’s memories as to the consequences of the most recent real estate bubble are apparently a lot more vivid than those of the Fed, or even of the US government, which wants to forget anything bad ever happened, let bygones be bygones, and let criminal behavior go unpunished. Not one major financial figure has been indicted in this financial catastrophe, much less been brought to trial. President Obama’s approach to the whole series of frauds perpetrated on the American public and global investors is to ”œlook forward, not backward”, just as he did when it came to the practice of torture under the Bush regime.

How About a Little Irrational Exuberance?

The other part of the asset inflation program of the Fed has been more successful: the attempt to inflate the stock market. Along with so much of Fed policy, the stock market program is ”œunprecedented”. Never before in the history of the Fed has the central bank stated as its goal that it wants the stock market to go up, so that people will feel good about the economy and go out and buy things. Usually the Fed has ignored the stock market; under Greenspan and Bernanke it has taken to using it as a tool of monetary policy. We have recent statements to this effect from both these gentlemen, plus Brian Sack, the Fed’s EVP in charge of implementing monetary policy:

”œI think we are underestimating and continue to underestimate how important asset prices, very specifically equity values are, not only for shareholders and the like, but for the economy as a whole.” Alan Greenspan, CNBC interview, Friday, Dec. 3, 2010.

”œAnd higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.” Ben Bernanke, Washington Post, Nov. 4, 2010.

”œNevertheless, balance sheet policy can still lower longer-term borrowing costs for many households and businesses, and it adds to household wealth by keeping asset prices higher than they otherwise would be.” Brian P. Sack, New York Fed, Oct. 4, 2010.

This was the exact same policy the Bank of Japan had in the 1990s when faced with deflation caused by a burst real estate bubble. The government stepped in periodically during the decade and bought equities, which helped the stock market and the economy temporarily for about six months or a year, but with progressively weaker benefits each time. Overall, the policy was a failure because the stock market fell from a peak of 36,000 down to 8,000 during the decade. In the US, the Fed announces the time and amount of its Treasury purchases from the banks, which promptly put this money into the stock market. It’s not clear if the banks are directed to do this, or are doing this of their own accord because there is no place else to earn a decent return. A lot of this money has also gone into commodities, emerging markets, and junk bond debt. In any event, everyone in the market is well aware of the Fed’s intention to boost consumer spending through the ”œwealth effect” of a rising stock market.

It is precisely this effect that is being given credit for a revival of consumer spending this Christmas, especially in the luxury sector. Christmas sales in the US are estimated to be 4% higher than last year and at a record level, exceeding even the pre-depression levels set in 2007. Store traffic was heavy throughout the selling season, and retailers are expected to keep margins up because they learned to control inventory and offer only a limited number of discounts.

Taking encouragement from the Christmas season, economists are extrapolating this consumer behavior into 2011 and coming up with aggressive targets on GDP growth, retail sales, and the stock market. Will they be right this time?

Economic Group Think and the Finance Economy

The tendency of economists to extrapolate from existing conditions when forecasting is well known. Economists are in this sense no different from a typical investor, who often buys high and sells low. Nor are they different from stock brokers and market analysts, who typically foresee a rising market. The advantage to these positive biases is obvious: the economy, and the stock market as well, tend to go up more often than they decline. Recessions and bear market conditions are relatively rare and brief, so the odds favor anyone who is consistently bullish. Another consequence to this pattern is that economists do poorly at both predicting a recession, which is against their natural inclination, and timing a turn down in the economy.

This was better expressed by market strategist James Montier writing in the most recent GMO newsletter (published by the GMO market analysis firm):

[A]ttempting to invest on the back of economic forecasts is an exercise in extreme folly, even in normal times. Economists are probably the one group who make astrologers look like professionals when it comes to telling the future… They have missed every recession in the last four decades! And it isn’t just growth that economists can’t forecast: it’s also inflation, bond yields, and pretty much everything else.

Economists are doubly sanguine about their 2011 growth forecasts because the economy enters January with a special dose of fiscal stimulus: Social Security withholding taxes will be decreased by a nominal 2% during the year. This will add hundreds of billions of dollars to consumer pocketbooks, especially benefiting the poor and middle class workers who form the bulk of consumer spending. There is also a fillip to homeowners who are in the foreclosure process. Hundreds of thousands of these homeowners are no longer making mortgage payments but living in their home until the foreclosure is final. This can take well over a year in most cases, giving the homeowner spending money of at least $1,000 on average per month. In many cases where monthly mortgage payments exceed $10,000, the bank isn’t even bothering to press for foreclosure because it otherwise risks a write-off of a $3 million to $5 million mortgage.

Given all this, can the economists possibly be wrong? Could a recession occur in 2011? Under the current state of the US economy and its heavy reliance on federal spending, we could answer this question quite simply if we knew when the US government credit card will reach its limit. At some point it must; the compelling reality of mathematical compounding alone makes it impossible for any country to continue to rack up new principal and interest obligations. Countries can also reach a danger zone in which the debt is so large that it can only be serviced if the nominal level of interest rates is close to zero and stays there. Japan is already in this situation and the US is rapidly approaching the point where a 2% or 3% increase in nominal interest rates (to about 6% for 30 year Treasuries) would eat up a huge portion of the annual tax intake of the federal government, forcing very painful cutbacks in military, social benefit, and other outlays.

As to how long the US can carry on sustaining its spendthrift ways, the economists are telling us for at least a few years more. Many of them don’t even mention the budget deficit or rising interest rates as a serious risk to the economy. They are saying that life will go on as it always has, at least in their professional experience ”“ the Fed is successfully reflating, even if its methods are unorthodox. Consumers are starting to spend again, banks are starting to lend again, companies are slowly beginning to hire, and all of this results in unstoppable momentum that produces a self-sustaining recovery.

If this is really what is happening, why isn’t the Fed cutting back already on its Quantitative Easing, rather than waiting for the June 30, 2011 end date? Why doesn’t the Treasury cut back on at least a trillion dollars of its $2.0 trillion debt program for this year? And if these two things were to happen, how is the economy going to survive another shock of lost liquidity and stimulus? No one seems to have an answer to these questions, if they even ask them, because like everything else we are going through, this is uncharted territory. That alone ought to make you suspicious of any economist who argues that a self-sustaining recovery is underway.

Since we’ve pointed out that economists are just like investors ”“ going along for the ride during the good times and extrapolating the experience to infinity ”“ how is that working out for the market? The record will show that as of the end of this year, the US stock market is heavily overbought, deliriously overconfident, and dangerously unprotected from a fall ”“ just the sort of situation that existed in 2007 before the financial crisis hit. In fact ”“ some of the sentiment figures are so absurdly bullish (not just in stocks but in junk bonds, precious metals, copper (the poor man’s precious metal), emerging markets ”“ pretty much any asset class), that hardly anybody is out there who believes there is risk left in the market.

This has led to another highly unusual situation where all major asset classes are nearly perfectly correlated, going up day by day together. There is, in other words, no protection to be had by being short one asset class against another. You could go short the stocks you own, and create a hedge for yourself, but no one is doing that either. The put-call ratio is back down to near record lows ”“ investors are loaded up only on calls, expecting the market to continue to rise. They are doing so using leverage once again, just like in 2007, with hedge funds running 2:1 or 3:1 debt to equity. The use of margin in the US markets as of November was up to $274 billion, just shy of the record of $302 billion set in 2007 (right before you-know-what happened). For all we know, when the December data come out a new record amount of margin debt may be outstanding, most of it certainly used to buy stocks.

Besides the laundry list of sentiment, stochastic, momentum, market breadth and other data all pointing to extreme overconfidence (some of the records going back to 1946 are being broken in this bull run), something else is happening that should be setting off alarm bells. Normally in a bull market the last people to be suckered in as buyers are the Mom and Pop investors who haven’t been paying attention until the bullishness starts spreading to television and newspaper headlines. The bullishness is certainly spreading, but Mom and Pop have continued to pull money out of the stock market, at least from the April high until this week. This has never happened before. Again, in normal times, Wall Street would be scared witless, because a market without a retail base is a market destined for calamity ”“ it is nothing but a bunch of traders playing Hot Potato among themselves.

Wall Street is ignoring all this because the Fed is giving away free money, and as everyone knows, you can’t fight the Fed. The Fed telegraphs the days it is going to be putting liquidity into the market, and on those days the stock market goes up. Because the Fed is in almost every day, the market is going up almost every day. The Fed is both preventing it from going down, and apparently prepared to step in and support the market if it ever got into trouble. Free money, as they say. If Mom and Pop are too stupid to see that, reasons Wall Street, too bad for them (though the reality probably is that Mom and Pop are pulling money out of mutual funds because they need the money to survive).

If you are employed on Wall Street you can go to work every day with the confidence that this economy is all about you. The Treasury, the Fed, the Administration, the Congress, the media, the economists ”“ they are all focused on how Wall Street is doing, and the wonderful spending power that comes from a market bubble. Taxpayer money is being shoveled out every day to Wall Street for its profit, which is all that seems to count in this economy. And it is not just taxpayer money at stake ”“ it is future tax revenues being pledged in support of the Finance Economy, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, amounts which even back in 2007 would have been eye-popping.

So far, all we have to show for all of this is are record-setting bonuses for Wall Street, and a Christmas splurge on the 3-C’s ”“ Cheap Chinese Crap. And oh yes ”“ lurking deep in the background are red flashing lights telling us that the stock market is poised, perhaps as soon as January, for another plunge down, and maybe even a second Flash Crash, since absolutely nothing has been done by the regulators to prevent Wall Street computers from once again going all to Hal on their creators.

If you believe the Fed is omnipotent and can prop up the stock market for eternity, to levels ”œhigher than they otherwise should be”, than you should be fully loaded up on stocks by now. Everybody else is, so why not you? Maybe, on the other hand, you believe in gravity, or the market theory of mean reversion, wherein prices eventually always go back to an average growth rate. Maybe you are like the 90% of Americans who aren’t wealthy enough to afford a stock portfolio of your own (outside of your 401k), and maybe you understand that this economy is neither about you or designed to benefit you. If so, read on, because the day is coming when the economic order is going to be overturned. You still won’t benefit from this ”“ in fact your standard of living may well go down ”“ but the plundering of the Treasury for the sake of Wall Street is coming to a close.

Warning Signs of an Upheaval

The warning signs that we are approaching a financial and economic end game for the United States are all around us, and not just in the short term indicators alerting us to a stock market reversal. Consider these alarums:

The Federal Reserve is out of ammunition – There is nothing left for the Fed to do if Quantitative Easing doesn’t work, and both QE1 and QE2 have been failures at keeping interest rates down. Ben Bernanke has hinted that QE3 may follow, perhaps involving the purchase of mortgage backed securities, but the new Congress will probably outlaw any such further attempt by the Fed to print massive amounts of new money. Five years ago the Fed was viewed with mystical reverence by everybody, but this depression has seriously damaged its franchise. It has been subject to calls by Congress to limit its mission, and some have even proposed that it be abolished and replaced with the gold standard (an idea that used to be considered crackpotty but is now taken seriously). An anonymous internet cartoon explaining QE2, and wickedly satirical of the Fed, has gotten nearly 4 million hits. Mystical reverence is essential to the functioning of a central bank, because its only product is confidence. The American public is losing confidence in the Fed, which means the day of trillion dollar bailouts of the banks and the markets are coming to an end.

The US credit card is tattered and not about to be renewed – The global bond market is losing patience with American fiscal profligacy. The failures of Quantitative Easing to keep interest rates down on the long end of the maturity spectrum are critical signs not only that the Fed has no real control over these rates, but that bond traders simply cannot keep digesting all these Treasuries without more compensation in the form of higher interest rates. In fact, the existence of QE2 is an important ”œtell” in the global poker game ”“ it is a desperate attempt by the Fed to replace lost international buyers such as the Chinese and Japanese, who are no longer loading up on Treasuries the way they were. And if this isn’t enough, the Tea Party Poopers about to enter the Congress may deal the coup de grace to federal borrowing. There are fifty new Congressmen put there by voters fed up with government borrowing, and while every sign so far indicates that the Republican old guard leadership in Congress is happy to spend like nothing has changed, something definitely has changed. The leadership may have their feet held to the fiscal fire in ways we haven’t seen in nearly twenty years. One way or the other, fiscal pain is coming to the US, in the form of higher interest rates, less borrowing capacity, or even both.

Economic misery is everywhere in the US and it is worsening – The media stories this Christmas have been about a rebound in consumer spending, combined with a deterioration in living standards for many Americans. We learned over the holidays that 50 million Americans no longer have health insurance, up from 43 million just two years ago. As an example of the utter uselessness of the American health system, the age group most lacking in health insurance are in their twenties, who are the healthiest Americans and who in any reasonable insurance scheme would be essential participants. Many young Americans simply aren’t earning enough to afford health insurance. Poverty is on the rise among all age groups; about 30 million Americans earn below the poverty level, and more than that number now receive food stamps. Two million Americans are homeless at least some time during the year (over 600,000 are chronically homeless). Immigrants, who are the major source of new payroll and Social Security taxes, are beginning to leave the country, hounded out by Republican demagogues. Republicans also have organized a concerted and well-funded effort to dismantle all New Deal programs, including Social Security, and President Obama and other Democrat leaders have for the first time given these campaigns credibility, which ultimately dooms the social support for the middle class and poor people. Without such support, the era of collective and community help for those in need will come to an end, and America will return to the laissez-faire, cruel world of 19th century poor houses. The indigent and the ill will be ostracized and hastened to an early death, as the federal tax system collapses. The reestablishment of the gold standard, with its use of on-going and vicious depressions to control social order, will be a fitting cap to the Republican attack on the New Deal.

The states and cities have already seen their tax systems collapse – States and municipalities are way ahead of the federal government in terms of fiscal collapse, because they don’t have unlimited borrowing capacity. A number of states are preparing the way legislatively for municipalities to declare bankruptcy, and some hard-pressed states have already entered into their own form of undeclared bankruptcy, by deferring payments indefinitely (even on income tax refunds) or by issuing vouchers rather than cash. State and local services are being cut drastically, while taxes are increased and fee schemes proliferate. State and municipal unions ”“ the last bastion of unionism in the US ”“ are under attack as never before for their ”œselfish” pension demands, which will be eliminated over time because there simply isn’t enough money to meet these obligations. Meanwhile, no one will complain about the much more expensive pension programs laid out for ex-military officers (who aren’t blue collar union workers, after all), and of course nothing will be said about the preposterous pension programs for corporate executives or ex members of Congress.

The US financial system is close to collapse – The deliberate public relations campaign by government, politicians, and business leaders to assure us that ”œall is well” when it comes to the banking system is unraveling. The dry rot that is destroying banks keeps eating away at the foundations of finance, the latest example being the revelations regarding the foreclosure process. The ugly, life-threatening reality that no one in banking wants to talk about is that the biggest asset class of the industry ”“ home mortgages ”“ may be severely compromised because the mortgages themselves may be uncollateralized. The simple fact that the banks have failed for twenty years to keep the borrower’s note connected to the mortgage document, and have both registered with local recorders of deeds, means that banks cannot really prove they are the legal lender with rights to foreclose. In at least 23 states that have a judicial foreclosure process, courts are beginning to tell banks ”œget in line with all the other creditors” rather than let them unilaterally evict a delinquent home mortgagee so they can sell the home immediately. Since most of these mortgages were securitized and sold off to investors, it also appears that the banks may be required to make these investors whole. We just saw this week one such investor ”“ Allstate Insurance ”“ file a $700 million claim against Bank of America over this very issue, alleging fraud, and using SEC findings of fraud against the bank to bolster its claim. This is just the beginning. Dozens if not hundreds of such suits will cripple the big banks, which will have to be declared insolvent and thrown into receivership, since no more bank bailouts are going to be tolerated by the public. The FDIC will be called upon to make good on hundreds of billions of dollars of deposit insurance, but because it is already broke, it will have to turn to the Congress and an already-stressed government bond market for the money. Expect the bond market to extract much higher interest rates as a penalty for this new emergency borrowing.

The housing market is already into a second, significant leg down – Home prices are slipping from their previous lows, and a market that is supported almost entirely by the federal government, through its receivership of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is about to lose that prop. The Republicans are out to ”œreform” these two mainstays of the housing market, which means ultimately kill them off. Unfortunately, the banking industry will be in no position to replace them, having no capital to support home mortgage lending. A home mortgage will become a rare and precious thing. Even if the Republicans fail at their efforts to destroy Fannie and Freddie, the losses on their $6 trillion mortgage securities portfolio (a combination of what they own and what they have guaranteed to the banks) will make it impossible for the federal government to use these agencies in support of the housing market to the degree they have done in the past.

Our elite masters have lost the capacity to lead – America suffers from a sclerotic and incompetent leadership in the political, financial, business, military, and media sectors. Years and years of ”œin-breeding”, wherein nepotism and oligarchy are not only tolerated but encouraged and lauded by the media, has created a class of rulers that focus on their narrow self-interest, or on their tribal interest politically and economically. These people are incapable of thinking of the interest of Americans as a community or a nation, despite their best intentions and misguided impression that they know and even live in the ”œreal America.” As a result, the concepts of self-restraint, of ethical dealing, of responsibility for one’s actions, and of consequences for one’s mistakes, are alien to our rulers.

The ruling class has turned parasitical, and we see examples of this all the time. People who are demonstrable failures in their job, like Timothy Geithner, are promoted and rewarded for failure. The leadership of the banking industry learned no lessons whatsoever from their massive losses in real estate, partly because the government bailed them out of their mistakes. Instead of cleaning house and reforming their operational practices, the banks put in place a misguided and poorly-supervised foreclosure process that has trampled on the legal rights of homeowners and resulted in people losing their homes because the bank made a mistake in its records. Not one financial executive has been indicted and put on trial or convicted of criminal behavior, despite rampant evidence of such behavior. The one exception has been Bernie Madoff, who defrauded wealthy people. The barriers of entry to positions of power are the highest they have ever been, since such positions are largely restricted to the scions of the wealthy, the well-connected, and those who can get into elite universities. It costs tens of millions of dollars to run a campaign for Congress, which is filled largely with millionaires as ”œrepresentatives” of the people. To run for president costs at least half a billion dollars. Once in office, the revolving door between business and government means the elite are never lacking for a high-paying lobbying job or powerful government position. We just learned this week that in the past five years, 80% of all three star and four star Pentagon generals and admirals found retirement work in the defense industry. Many of these officers were simultaneously appointed to public commissions overseeing Pentagon spending, and not one of them saw a conflict of interest in this or recused themselves. All of them received simultaneously a lucrative federal pension for their service in the military.

Our leadership has been corrupted by the opportunity for wealth, and has sold out to corporate paymasters. Moreover, the ruling classes are working to solidify their positions of power by reducing taxes on the wealthy and eliminating the estate tax, thus ensuring that a de facto aristocracy arises in the US, every bit as remote, disinterested, shallow, and intellectually feeble as the French nobility of the 18th century. If you wonder why problems don’t get solved in America, why the discussion of problems is limited or curtailed altogether, and why the media focus almost exclusively on bread and circuses, look no further than to our Congress, and count how many of them are the sons and daughters of previous Congressmen, and how many of these made fortunes serving as lobbyists once they left Congress. In America, there is no such thing as an incumbent ”œlosing” an election, because the door to riches is always open to anyone who has held power. If you want a beautiful example of how this all works even for the venal and incompetent, and how wealth is bestowed on the children of the powerful, look to Sarah Palin and the Palin dynasty that has arisen.

America is singularly unequipped to deal with emergencies and crises – Apropos of the comments above, there is no longer a capacity in the United States to plan long term, or to prepare for the unexpected. Incidences like Hurricane Katrina, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, or the recent two feet of snow dumped on the Eastern seaboard, find local and federal government officials unprepared for the event and unconcerned for the consequences. As is now commonplace, incompetent government and business officials are never disciplined for these failures, and often praised and promoted. One entire political party is actively engaged in denial of global warming and denigrates science and reasoning at every opportunity. The Flash Crash catastrophe in the financial markets has been met with useless palliatives by the SEC, allowing hedge fund computers to continue to dominate market flow and allowing market risk to compound. The response to the next inevitable financial crisis will be met by the same third-world cronyism that attempted to deal with the first crisis, only this time politics may not allow for a bailout of the financial sector. Long term problems, like the disintegrating physical infrastructure of the US, the rising cost of energy, the over-dependence on the automobile and suburban sprawl, and the effects of climate change, go undiscussed if not ridiculed. One problem that may especially haunt the US in 2011 is the possibility of a commodity blow-off, already underway as a result of Bernanke’s QE2 policy. In this environment oil could easily approach $140/bbl once again, and make it obvious even to economists that the depression never really ended.

If you think it’s bad in America… – Take a look at Europe. Here is where the next financial crisis may emanate. The rolling bond market attacks on the weak members of the European Union looks set to drag down Spain next, and Italy thereafter. At that point, Germany, France, and the UK will be completely exposed to the destruction of their banking system that cannot be averted by IMF or EU bailouts. The core problem here, as with the US and everywhere else in the world, is too much debt, much of it bad debt that is being rolled over and extended and masked from public view. At the center of this web of debt are the top 25 international banks, which act as a malicious magnet of systemic risk that is being propped up by government money. If one bank falls, they all go down. The recent bailout of Ireland was entirely unnecessary from an Irish government point of view, but essential if the German and French banks were not going to be forced to take crippling write-downs on their loans to Irish banks. To understand what the nature of the problem is, read what the board chairman of Citigroup said this month:

Richard Parsons, the chairman of the bank’s board, told CNBC “It’s not a question of too big to fail. It’s a question of being too interwoven in the fabric of the global financial life to fail.” Allowing Citi to fail would be akin to having “the heart, the pump of the economic system fail because then everybody else dies,” he said. “It’s probably the most important private financial institution for maintaining our economic strength and presence around the world. You can’t let an institution like that go down,” Parsons added.

The same thing can be said of Deutsche Bank, Barclays, BNP, JPM Chase, and on and on. Most of these banks are technically insolvent, and the world is just one bank failure away from a catastrophe that will drag them all down. That bank failure will happen, quite possibly in 2011.

And finally, there’s China – What can you say about a country that has several newly-built, but completely empty cities that even the Chinese cannot afford to live in? This is just one of many uneconomic and likely fraudulent developments in China that scream out ”œreal estate bubble!” The world is enraptured by China and the potential economic power of one billion plus consumers. The country has established itself as the manufacturing arm of the globe, and is sitting on a stated current account surplus of $2.5 trillion. China’s government stimulus program in response to the financial crisis of 2008-2009 dwarfs anything the US has put in place. Its tentacles reach to the remotest corners of Tibet, where farmers are given the money to buy televisions, washers, dryers, and laptops. The country has constructed the world’s biggest mountain of debt to finance overdevelopment and excess capacity in every industrial sector imaginable, and much of this debt is lodged with local governments and dark pools of money forged by housewives and other speculators, all away from the prying eyes and control of Beijing bureaucrats. The country is sucking in commodities from around the world, and is a co-contributor with the Fed to global inflation. While everyone sits mesmerized by all this wealth, power, and economic muscle, we ignore at our peril a fundamental fact: the world economy cannot abide even the smallest failure in the mighty Chinese industrial machine. Growth must continue at 10% per annum, the demand for raw materials must proceed unabated, overinvestment must not be stifled, etc. etc., because there is no other economic engine that can take the place of China. Yet the likelihood of a failure, or a chain reaction of failures, is quite high and could occur at any time.

But, Party On!

It’s 2011. All is well. Government statistics don’t lie, and a raft of economists cannot possibly be wrong. Don’t fight the Fed. The economic recovery will gather steam because the signs are all in place for continued growth. Everything will take place as it always has in the past. The capacity of the US to borrow its way to prosperity is bottomless.

Enjoy, Enjoy, Enjoy! And if you have a niggling sensation that you have lived through this movie before, just ignore it. Ignoring things is what Americans do best.

This post was read 230 times.

About author View all posts Author website


Numerian is a devoted author and poster on The Agonist, specializing in business, finance, the global economy, and politics. In real life he goes by the non-nom de plume of Garrett Glass and hides out in Oak Park, IL, where he spends time writing novels on early Christianity (and an occasional tract on God and religion). You can follow his writing career on his website,

28 CommentsLeave a comment

  • Excellent work as always. Let me add the video of the Quantitative Easing bears and the new sequel video about the crazy JP Morgue silver scheme and the scam run by Bank of International Settlements fractional reserve gold backed currency which Russia and China are scoffing at. I would like to hear yr feedback on the second vid.

    The dance remix is pretty funny, it might not be everyone’s cup of tea but works for me:
    Part 1

    Part 2

    Promptly after those two cuddly bears explained how the JP Morgue is manipulating the silver market, and the xtranormal video went viral, forcing the FT to release an indemnification that “according to sources” JPM had covered a major portion of its silver short (only to subsequently end up with 90% control of other metals markets), here they are back, explaining in Part 2 of the series just what the next steps in the unwind of the biggest metal manipulation scheme will look like. The kicker: a JPM insider has told one of the bears that there is no commercial silver left, “it’s all smoke and mirrors, and the CFTC can do nothing about it other than pray.” Other topical items explained: silver backwardation, that there are two commissioners at the CFTC on the JP Morgue’s payroll, the BIS’ fractional gold system and the usage of side pockets for sovereign gold, and pretty much everything that ties the loose odds and ends in the PM manipulation story.

    Alright enough vids, thanx for indulging 🙂

  • will be the driver of new jobs? We can’t have a recovery without jobs.
    Maybe if we wish for something bad enough, it will just happen. Or maybe if everyone starts to believe that it will turn around, it will turn around. Ready, get set, START THINKING HAPPY THOUGHTS.

  • We have the perfect storm:

    – a President that is showing a complete lack of spine when it comes to leadership.
    – A Republican Party that is determined to see the country fail in order to gain political points.
    – A Democratic Party that will find a way to screw it all up even though their intentions are good.

    For some reason America expects things to go back to ‘normal’, with ‘normal’ being the post WW2 economic sovereignty. In reality, we now actually have to compete with Asia, Europe and even Latin America in the areas that only we could do before.

    How long do we need to stay in recession before the bar is lowered and the recession becomes the new ‘normal’?

    Get used to it, the new ‘normal’ is basically the bottom of today’s crisis. There will be less desirable overpaid jobs, less McMansions, higher fuel costs, more difficulty overspending by borrowing personal money … a redefinition of “Middle Class”. Both the US citizens and the US government will have to adjust, starting with things like defense spending.

  • That bank failure will happen, quite possibly in 2011.

    So, what’s the average person supposed to do? Buy a few guns, a bunch of ammo, and keep your money in the mattress?

  • Who benefits from this fear mongering? who are mentioned in this fear of loss advert? And your relationship to this web site is what?

    It make absolutely no sense for JPM to go short to that degree in the silver market, based on a relationship with Ben Bernanke. Nor for the BIS to fuck around with fractional (lets say 10%) gold ownership which could result in an insta-devaluation of the dollar by a factor of 10, upon demand for delivery of the gold.

    It takes little imagination to consider the affects of an insta-devaluation of the dollar of one order of magnitude, and that level of loss of confidence.

    The potential for oil at $1,000 per bbl? You can kiss the world economy goodbye. As a reference the ’73 oil shock put the world into a recession of 10 years, contrary to the bullshit statistics published about 73-74 and 80-83, and that was just a three times rise in the price of oil. Gold moved later from $35/oz at the beginning of the decade to $800/oz when Iran went amok.

    NY went bankrupt in 77, the Dow was in the 800s and the FTSE bottomed out at 140.

    I smell a rat. And it’s based at the web site quoted for selling gold.

  • and put gold and silver in the mattress.

    Ensure you are living is a smaller town where all the food can be grown locally, preferably above 3,000 ft in the tropics.

    That precludes the US, and much of Europe. Latin America is good, as is most of Africa above the escarpment (except Zimbabwe).

  • Thank you for the magisterial summary of our current troubles. This heading says so much that isn’t even hinted at: “Economic misery is everywhere in the US and it is worsening ”

    And, you stick the knife in with such grace;)

    Traders understand that this program is experimental and unprecedented, except when it was used in Weimar Germany with disastrous results, or more recently in the hyperinflationary economy of Zimbabwe.

  • They give a lot more emphasis to people like William Dudley than the original. I don’t know enough about xtranormal to say how all of this was done, but there is something very distinctive about the way these creatures talk. I’ll henceforth always think of “The Bernank” every time I see him on television.

  • You can keep no more than $250,000 in each bank before you breach the FDIC limits. About the only thing certain in this whole mess is that the government will keep the FDIC afloat at all costs, otherwise you have a real panic underway. But if a bank goes under, you will not necessarily have your deposit covered for any amount over $250,000.

  • People are well beyond being frustrated at the way the same old stuff seems to keep happening over and over no matter who is in office. I think you expressed it very well – it’s a call for something completely different from Republican or Democratic policies and politicians. Plus, you have given us the unforgettable, cheesy name of Rush Limbaugher to cherish. It reminds me of that old pun about Cheeses of Nazareth, but that’s another story.

  • I never understood the gold and silver stockpiling. It’s the same principle as paper money, unless the metal is going to be used in electronic applications. Otherwise, it’s just shiny metal. Copper, bronze, iron, steel – they all actually have many uses and more than intrinsic value.

    I see energy being more valuable. If you can at least partially power your home, then you’re a step ahead of the other guy.

  • I am very exuberant for 2011. The well is drilled and we’re setting the windmill blades next week, no more need for buying power. The compost is turned into the area where we’re going to make a run at growing Giant Pumpkins to set a record. Drawing up plans for a large scale food dehydrator.

    To bad this lying and thieving is all real, and is going to be very bad.

    “There are two types of folk music:
    quiet folk music and loud folk music.
    I play both.”

    Dave Alvin

  • said to tell you they’re very good simmered in a milk gravy. So is rabbit. That’s the way her grandmother cooked them. In my family, we parboiled them before frying so we didn’t get a stew.

  • is a very good article from The Daily Reckoning.

    An excerpt from the tail end of the article:

    …And, there’s more. The crisis in the global financial system is far from resolved. The global banking industry may prove to be so exposed to toxic assets of its own creation that it simply can’t be saved. The industry has conjured into existence derivative worth approximately $700 trillion, an amount equivalent to the value of everything produced on earth during the last 20 years. It is a matter of public record that these financial instruments have been employed to illegally manipulate the accounts of numerous large corporations. It may be only a matter of time before losses (and fraud) related to “structured finance” are exposed on a scale that will make Bernie Madoff look like a small town rascal in comparison.

    Run away credit growth, mismanaged trade, financial sector deregulation and numerous other policy mistakes have brought the world to the brink of disaster. If a breakdown of the global economy is to be averted, policymakers must confront the structural nature of this crisis and quickly implement an aggressive strategy to restructure and rebalance the global economy. This can be done, but only a five to 10 year window of opportunity exists. Beyond that timeframe, the financial resources now available to governments to fund that transition will have been exhausted and a global economic calamity with untold geopolitical consequences will have become unavoidable.

    I did inhale.

  • Hold a gold coin in your hand. It’s amazing, like holding a piece of the sun. I didn’t get the gold thing either until then.

    His position in society, his high repute among his fellow men, his nimbus as a master biped.

    – Rex Stout

  • Oh, brother

    A couple things pop to mind. First, in history, war is often the catalyst for financial/monetary collapse. War debt set prompted Britain’s hard line against the colonies in 1760s. War debt set in motion the French Revolution. War Debt during Napoleonic Wars led Britain to suspend the Gold Standard, and the rise of the Rothschild dynasty as intermediaries.

    I am reading Lords of Finance about how WWI upended the monetary regime, and led, indirectly to the Great Depression and WWII.

    I have heard that Vietnam debt had something to do with the financial troubles of the 1970s, but I do not know what the data is on that.

    I would suspect that the financial strain of Afghanistan had something to do with Russia in the 1980s. And constant war has done nothing good for the finances of Pakistan.

    Our decade of Bush/Obama War is not helping, I bet. First and foremost, there is debt. Secondarily, we get a lot of employees and companies tied into feeding the war machine, and so stopping the disaster machine will have its own pain.

    Anyway, what next?

    There is much to be said about specific Treasury Dept policies. But the first thing: stop the war.

    Into the financial policy realm, the biggest thing to remember is that the public does not understand. The public thinks of the economy as simply balancing the checkbook. So any talk about deficits means reduced spending to the public – because it has no option to increase the amount in the checkbook. Taxing the rich is not intuitive, nor does it have moral resonance after 30 years of propaganda.

    We have to shift the pattern of investment and spending, not just reduce it. Abrupt reducing will be deflationary, and bring prolonged misery to millions. And exacerbate racial and ethnic conflicts.

    Progressives have a lot of cultural and educational hurdles to overcome to promote better policies. In those circumstances, politically, we must focus on one thing: convincing the public that we are on their side. We will speak for the poor and debt burdened working class. If we cannot convince the bulk of the populace that we are one of them, and fighting for them, then we are lost.

    The Dems got hammered in 2010 because it failed to make that connection.

  • that in a real crisis situation, the authorities will find a way to reimburse big ticket depositors (way over $250K) before the average account holder sees a cent.

  • Ha! Start stuffing lumps of coal under your bed. No, seriously, wind and solar. If you have access to a sufficient and sustainable fuel supply, I say a wood burner isn’t a bad idea.

    But gold and silver are only worth something because the other guy thinks it’s worth something (again, unless you’re using it for electronics, or maybe the silver for photography). Those metals are too soft to be used to build things – tools, weapons, infrastructure, etc. It is amazing though that throughout most of civilization, gold has held value in just about all societies. So that tells you what I know.

  • But I have to say I have been just bristling with the recent spate of very very positive economic news, so many companies doing so very very well right now. And yeah, yeah I know unemployment nationally remains high, but in my world it has fallen to 6.5%. In fact if you have the good fortune of living in a community where college education is above about 40% of the workforce you are looking at unemployment below 7%. My mantra for a long time, uneducated is becoming unemployable, which carries it’s own host of problems. But even now looking at the November job numbers the contagion will spread. 2010 was the lowest year of job layoffs in 13, and hiring in December nearly hit 300,000.

    But I digress. The last stock market high was in 2007 at around 15000 on the Dow. In that year chained GDP was 13.229 trillion, Aaa interet at 5.5% (rough average), Real GDP growth at 2.1%, and total consumption at $9.3 trillion, and manufacture growth at 1.7% following a decade of anemic performance.

    Fast forward and GDP for 2010 is shaking out at a chained $13.5 trillion, Aaa bond at 5%, Real GDP growth for the year at 2.7% (est. still), S&P earnings at an all time historic high, total consumption crossing $9.5 trillion (an all time high), and a manufacturing growth rate at 5.2% (I can’t remember a number like that). And yet the Dow sits at 11700.

    This is going to be one hell of a year. I’m thinking it could be one of the first 20% years for the S&P, easy; and it still doesn’t get it to the 2007 high.

    Personal savings are the highest since the early 80s. When consumer sentiment improves and the high savings starts to fall, now THAT is stimulus!

    And I am in too good a mood to go looking around the internet for links. I’m just going off all the in-house reports.

    The only thing I got my eye on is oil. But if electric cars can ramp up in 2011 and 2012, and the electric industry keeps adding production without building a coal plant (two years in a row of electric production being supplied from non coal sources), we could see three years in a row of declining dependence on fossil fuels.

    As a side note on Japan. We did the exact OPPOSITE of what they did in the 1990s. Their banks hid the bad assets, never wrote them off, and the Government contracted their support of the finance sector. We flushed the system, and actively wrote off and down the bad debt. Bankruptcy and foreclosure on a long term basis clears the system. Japan never never attempted to solve the long term issues, and their opaque banking systems never had to reveal their condition. Japan is also utterly dependent on foreign energy in all its forms, so in the present environment they have not been able to get any traction under them.

    I really like your notes on China. The empty cities is the result of no democracy, and a system that decrees demand, price, growth, business. It is a horrible model. That is why this is the year India cleans China’s clock.

    Just some thoughts. January alone could see a 5% rise.

  • January is turning out to be a 5% month. Oil appears to be the only menacing thing on the horizon, except perhaps for some municipal and state problems in the US.

    Is anything different between now and 2007, when we were last at these levels of growth and earnings performance? Well, several things. The S&P 500 earnings would be about 35% less now if the players who left the index in 2007 were still in there (some are back in business like GM). The index lost about 20 stocks, and when they were replaced in 2008 with healthy performers the earnings value of the index shot up overnight. I think this was very unappreciated except by Wall Street, but explains the fact that the index had to get back to 900 at least and quickly to reflect the overall earnings of the components.

    Second, compared to then, the US economy – well the global economy really – is on government steroids. The amount of stimulus added is unprecedented except in WWII, and it is not going down. About 20% of all disposable income for Americans comes in the form of federal transfer payments. Nearly 90% of Christmas sales this past year were generated by only 30% of the population. The rest of the population is just getting by; in fact the US just overtook Brazil in the category of wealth disparity between the rich and the poor.

    We don’t really know the condition of our big banks, so things in my view are as opaque here as they were in Japan (and I spent a lot of time in Japan in the 90s). For example, the haircuts the Fed took to take on some of the paper from the big banks were about 60% or higher. This paper has been returned to the banks and disappeared, but there is no evidence they are carrying it at anything other than par. The banks book as income all expected interest payments on homes in foreclosure, even though they are not receiving it. This is reminiscent of their booking interest on option ARMS in 2007, much of which had to be reversed. As I indicated in another post, the TBTF banks are a ticking time bomb in terms of being swamped with buybacks from flawed securitizations. The industry to me remains the weakest link in the economic chain.

    The stock market is being deliberately and openly manipulated by the Fed, as part of its program to monetize the debt. You and I have never lived through anything like this – even in the Depression the Fed didn’t try these things. I don’t have any good examples of a central bank successfully using stock prices as part of monetary policy.

    What many in the market are seeing is that all the usual indicators are turning up. My concern is that the usual indicators are no longer valid or helpful in figuring out the future, because of the drastic change in the underlying financial flows. Another way to say this is, the economy is responding to massive stimulus, and the stock market is rallying in a typical secular bear market fashion. At some point the underlying edifice crumbles and we find we have been looking at a facade or Potemkin Village.

    It seems pretty obvious something is going to derail the stock market soon. The question will be where does it shake out. 5% down? 15% down? At that point, whatever it is, if the market comes back to these levels and then heads higher, I will concede your point of view. What that will mean to me is that the government has succeeded in keeping the game going for another round, for longer than I anticipated. I still have a hard time believing this type of stimulus-dependent economy is healthy in the long run; it just seems another ratchet up in the game of blowing bubbles with credit, this time government credit as the last resort before we have to get serious about purging the imbalances in our economy.

Leave a Reply