Dead White Girl Destroys Octogenarian's Criminal Empire! (Details Inside, Nudie Pics on Page 3!)


Rupert Murdoch has always prided himself on his ability to make or break prime ministers, presidents, and princes, but in the end it was a lowly 13-year-old schoolgirl who has reached out from the grave to bring him down. Milly Dowler, a murdered British teenager, has extracted revenge against Rupert Murdoch for his many crimes, something the wealthy and the powerful have never been able to do.

Rupert Murdoch has been about wealth and power from his earliest days as a newspaper proprietor in Australia, but it is power that he lusts after. The power to shape and move public opinion is intoxicating for ambitious men like Murdoch, and when he first got into the business, merely owning a megaphone like the editorial page of a large national newspaper was enough to provide him the tools to guide the general public into a particular voting direction. Those days are long gone. Murdoch may own respectable newspapers like The Times of London, or The Wall Street Journal, but their editorial pages carry a fraction of the influence they had a quarter century ago. The reading audience – or more particularly the voting public – have long since moved on to television, and more recently cable television and the internet. To maintain his influence over the public, and to continue to intimidate, bribe, and possibly blackmail politicians, Rupert Murdoch has had to step up his game in a very nefarious way.

Making a Dying Business Pay

It is no good being a medial mogul if no one watches your television programs or reads your newspapers. This is the problem Murdoch has faced with his traditional, highly respectable print media outlets – readership has dropped off drastically as people turn to the internet to get their news and editorial content free of charge, and advertisers have followed the readers by channeling their advertising dollars to places like Google. Murdoch continues to lose money every year at The Times, so he subsidizes the paper with money-makers like FOX News in the US, and the British tabloids The Sun and The News of the World.

The News of the World - NOTW to its employees – was not the only newspaper to follow the search for Milly Dowler, whose disappearance in 2002 led to a massive manhunt across Britain. But NOTW was the only newspaper to hack into her voicemail, and then delete messages to see what new ones might show up. This was illegal on many counts, not the least of which were interfering with a police investigation and destroying evidence. But why should NOTW management care? The newspaper had been intercepting mail, rooting through garbage, and tapping phone calls routinely. Celebrities and royals were the usual targets of these probes, because these people sold newspapers, but the editors weren’t averse to playing up crimes involving nobodies like Milly Dowler if the case was lurid or tugged some emotional chords. By hacking into Milly Dowler’s voicemail, NOTW also gave the impression she was still alive and listening in on her messages from afar – another great way to keep the story alive and sell newspapers.

Except Milly Dowler was very much dead, the victim of a brutal murder perpetrated by parties unknown. Year after year followed, with various people coming forward with false confessions, and eventually after many false starts the real killer was tried, convicted, and brought to justice. Prime ministers came and went: Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, and now David Cameron, and like all Murdoch properties, NOTW poured on the vitriol or lavished the praise on these men, depending on which way Rupert Murdoch wanted to turn the election. Cameron was one of those to receive praise, and perhaps in gratitude, David Cameron took on a Murdoch editor – one Andrew Coulson – as his communications aide.

Andrew Coulson, as managing editor of the paper, was directly responsible for the illegal wiretapping and other crimes perpetrated by NOTW. The public knew nothing of this, and maybe David Cameron knew nothing as well, and all would have remained secret if not for the dogged reporting of The Guardian, an establishment British newspaper that decided not to ignore the sleazy practices of its media brethren. It recently revealed the voice mail hacking of British royal family members that NOTW perpetrated a few years ago, and as a result Coulson was investigated on charges of illegal wiretapping. Coulson was never charged with a crime, though an operative working for him was convicted of wiretapping and is now serving a jail term. Coulson nevertheless became such a liability to David Cameron that he resigned his position this January.

Shocking!, said the public, which went right along reading the newspapers. The rich and powerful, it was assumed, could fend for themselves, and the public enjoyed celebrities and royals being exposed for crass and degenerate behavior. Why, who would have thought some famous person was just as awful as the poor drudges who also were the subject of NOTW’s exposés into the lower reaches of British society?

After Coulson left to work for the new government, a new managing editor was brought into NOTW – Rebekah Brooks – and she reported to James Murdoch, one of Rupert’s sons. By this time Rupert was well over seventy years old, and was spending more of his time on charitable activities with his trophy wife, Wendi Deng. A pleasant way for Rupert Murdoch to exit the stage gracefully, except for the occasional foray into strategic developments at his umbrella company, News Corporation. One such development was a recent bid to purchase BSkyB, establishing a position in pay television in Britian much like Murdoch’s position in the US, where he owns the highest rated cable television program, FOX News.

Milly Dowler Activates Her Voice Mail from the Great Beyond

Just as this proposal was ready to be approved by the UK government, Milly Dowler spoke up from the grave, through yet more revelations published in The Guardian.. This is when the public first learned of the manipulation of Milly Dowler’s voice mail. They also learned a bit more, that Prime Minister David Cameron had flown out of the country to meet Murdoch at his request, and pay obeisance of some sort. Cameron also lives near Rebekah Brooks, and the two of them frequently go horse back riding. The Guardian has learned all this personal information the legal way, through investigative reporting and tips from employees of NOTW.

For the first time, the public turned against Murdoch and his media franchises. There are open calls on the internet for people to boycott anything to do with News Corporation and its many media arms, and as advertisers always mimick the public, they have taken their business elsewhere. Just why this scandal in particular has broken the hold Murdoch has had over the public is something social psychologists will be better able to answer, but it has something to do with disgust at the thought that a 13 year old could be betrayed twice – first by her murderer, and second by Murdoch exploiting her victimhood to draw readers to his tabloid. Perhaps it was also the revelations that NOTW tapped into more than 4,000 voice mail accounts, including those of the victims of the 7/7 attacks in the UK, and the 9/11 attacks in the US. The tabloid even poked into the personal accounts of UK soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

People were beginning to ask, what sort of pervert is Rupert Murdoch that he could traffic in and exploit terrible human tragedies? Of course, he has always done it, or his tabloids would not have been so successful, but the 7/7 victims? They had done nothing to earn his hatred and opprobrium, which is really what he was selling – celebrities involved in sex scandals were always described as morally weak and debauched characters deserving of no sympathy whatever from the reader, who was encouraged to judge them from a morally superior position. It was impossible to have a morally superior position to random victims of terrorist attacks or soldiers killed in the line of duty. It was Murdoch himself who was now seen to be the morally inferior person, willing to break the law, manipulate politicians, and ghoulishly use innocent victims of tragedy to foster his own craving for power and wealth.

Murdoch’s response to all this has been so bizarre as to invite even more questions. Rather than fire Rebekah Brooks, who has been in charge of the paper during the most recent wiretappings and must have known of them, and rather than reassign James Murdoch within the empire (no Murdoch is going to be fired as long as Rupert is around, even though the family does not own a controlling interest in News Corporation), Rupert Murdoch has decided to shut down NOTW. After being in business since 1843, which allowed it to be described as a British institution (though by no means a venerable one), News of the World published its last newspaper this Sunday. Over 280 employees lost their jobs.

Why would a media mogul cut lose his biggest money-earning property in the UK, just to save the hides of two executives? It beggars belief, so much so that speculation is arising as to why Rebekah Brooks in particular must be protected and kept within the family. What else does she know about David Cameron, and what does she know about Rupert Murdoch and his family members who control News Corporation? Images of a wide-spread blackmail and extortion ring, used to keep politicians under control, come to mind. Nor is this fanciful thinking. Former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has now gone public with revelations that Murdoch interests probed illegally into his personal life, including obtaining private hospital records relating to his infant son’s cystic fibrosis condition. The police are said to be reluctant to investigate Murdoch fully, lest information comes out about bribes paid over the years to policemen to deliver confidential arrest and surveillance records to Murdoch reporters.

Now the Trail Leads to FOX News

The question of bribery of public officials has now spread across the Atlantic to the US, where it is being asked openly how FOX News received certain privileged information on public figures. Murdoch’s approach to FOX News is supposedly as hands-off as his management of his UK properties, but that is because it seems that within the corporation no one can stand up to FOX News manager and CEO, Roger Ailes. He provides the greatest revenue stream by far to News Corporation, and this is one property Murdoch cannot afford to lose. What Ailes has done with FOX News, however, is somewhat different from the way NOTW operates. Ailes specializes in drawing an audience of true believers, committed to a fantasy world where conservatism and the free markets are good, and liberals are evil.

In the US, FOX News uses lies, distortions, straw men arguments, ad hominem attacks on liberals, and other unprofessional devices to nurture a frightened and credulous audience for demagogues like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and the late Glenn Beck. Roger Ailes is a crucial player in a culture of like-minded figures in talk radio and right-wing think tanks, and legal vultures like Nancy Grace, who constantly stoke the public's anxiety. They have deliberately contributed to, if not been the primary creator of, the red-blue political and cultural divide that is destroying the political center in the US. Politicians spend endless hours bemoaning the lack of bipartisanship, but they never point their fingers at Murdoch and the people who work for him who have created this destructive form of politics.

The hatred of liberals and liberalism has been a fixture of the right-wing media for almost 30 years, coinciding with the time Murdoch began to build his empire. This hatred continues to infest the ordinary public discourse - you can see it manifest itself every day in political chat rooms, or the comments section on any media blog. It won't stop until men like Murdoch and Ailes and others who control media outlets, including US talk radio, put a stop to it, which means abandoning their most potent tool for dragging in audience, selling advertising, and selling books by right-wing "authors" like Ann Coulter.

Maybe a bribery scandal will be what it takes to crack open the inner secrets of FOX News. It would not be far-fetched to believe that Rupert Murdoch has at least tried to intimidate and control US politicians like he has done in the UK. Recently there have been calls from some senior, “moderate” figures in the Republican Party to free themselves from being slaves to the demands of FOX News. What is really needed, however, is for the dutiful regular viewers of FOX News to be disenthralled from their daily fix of paranoia and loathing.

Keeping the Public Distracted May Not Work Anymore

Rupert Murdoch’s game has always been very simple. It is to force you to look upon some poor person, some minority, some liberal, some socialist, some godless atheist, some union member, some immigrant, some irresponsible parent, some pampered celebrity or sports figure, some welfare leech, some do-gooder, as The Enemy Within. See how degenerate they are! Notice how different they are from you. They don’t have your morals, your patriotism, or your hard work ethic. You are entitled to feel superior in every way possible to such people, who are undermining society with their debauchery, their indolence, the sniggering way in which they talk down to you, and the fact they force you to pay higher taxes to make up for their privileged lifestyles.

While your attention is focused on The Enemy, Rupert Murdoch is expecting that you will not notice his behavior or that of his employees. You will not see the coziness with which he plays with presidents and prime ministers, the threats he makes against them, perhaps backed up with cold, damaging facts about them or their ministers. You will not see the deals he gets approved on favorable terms to himself. Hidden from public view will be the bribes he pays people for the information that is his stock and trade, and the illegal phone tapping he uses to exploit and extort his vicitms.

His hope is that if The News of the World is demolished, his crimes will be covered up in the rubble. Then he can go back to the real business of focusing your attention on other people just like you, victims of his deceptions, but who are dressed up to look like Enemies of the People. This is one of the rare moments when his hopes may be dashed. The façade of Rupert Murdoch as all-powerful political maneuverer has been toppled. There are now 280 ex-employees of NOTW who are in shock over the loss of their jobs, all so Rebekah Brooks can be kept on the payroll. Some of them may speak up about even more crimes that were committed at the paper. Rebekah Brooks even said, when announcing to her staff the closure of the paper, that they would all understand a year from now why this was necessary, implying that more indictments may be coming down.

Prime Minister David Cameron may not even survive these developments. He has shown his closeness to the Murdoch criminal enterprise, and his possible subservience to Murdoch himself. Whether he knew of the criminal behavior may not be important, since his basic political judgment has been called into question. But it is more than political judgment that is questionable here: it is the way the political system works that is being revealed to a disgusted public. Politics and politicians work hand in hand around the globe with monied interests. Criminal behavior is routinely practiced and accepted. The media are under the control of a handful of men – Rupert Murdoch, Silvio Berlusconi, Sumner Redstone (owner of CBS News and Viacom) – and these men provide a service to the rich and powerful. They keep their crimes out of the public eye, and they keep the public distracted with diversions, as long as politicians and others give the media moguls the monopolies they desire.

This system has been in place now for at least 30 years, as media properties have increasingly been concentrated in the hands of a few billionaires, just as global wealth has been concentrated in the hands of a few people and families already supremely rich and influential. In the United States, it has given us the virtually-complete cover-up of criminal behavior in the mortgage and housing markets, so that no major perpetrator of fraud, such as Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide or Dick Fuld of Lehman Brothers, has been sent to jail, or even brought to trial. The system is doing everything it can to hold itself together and continue life as usual, but cracks are showing. Media properties that are on the fringe of the system, and that never wanted to play by the dirty rules, like The Guardian, are turning state’s evidence, and are forcing the authorities to do their jobs. Even if the police and prosecutors are reluctant to enforce the law, because of their own culpability in pervasive corruption, the financial markets are serving as instruments of justice. News Corporation stock has tanked under a succession of criminal revelations about the company. Not only are advertisers fleeing the company, investors are jumping ship for fear of losing even more money. Plus, it is now seriously doubtful whether Murdoch will be able to complete his $14 billion takeover of SkyB.

Global Markets Begin to Comprehend the Collapse of the Establishment

This week as global financial markets opened, the credit worthiness of Italy was called into question as never before. The spread on credit default swaps between Italy and Germany widened beyond their worst levels during the 2008 financial crisis. There was no particular news out about Italy; it was merely a sudden loss of confidence. Everybody has known that Italy is a weak link in the European community. Its debt is greater than that of all the PIGS combined (Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain). Italy owes the market trillions of dollars, not hundreds of billions like these other governments, and Italy ranks third in total debt, behind the United States and Japan. If the market were to treat it like Greece, and make it impossible for Italy to roll over its debt, there is no one big enough to bail it out.

That this may be where we are heading struck reporters yesterday as inexplicable. Since everyone has known abut the basic financial facts, and no new news is out, financial reporters were calling this a Black Swan event – something that simply appears out of the blue. But it wasn’t really a Black Swan event; it is just that people cannot yet connect the dots. Italy already has a Murdoch scandal of its own. Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is on trial for corruption, ostensibly for a sex scandal. He has faced such trials before, and gotten off. He controls most of the major Italian media outlets. He has had parliament pass laws giving him special personal exemption from prosecution for crimes. He appears invulnerable, and at the very top of the Italian political pecking order. Yet Rupert Murdoch also appeared invulnerable until recently. What if Berlusconi can be brought down? What would the public learn about what has been going on behind the scenes?

Bond market traders may not think rationally about the connections here, but they certainly are suspectible to gut instinct and emotions, and these talents are telling them that something may be badly wrong with the established order. The system as a whole may be breaking down, exposing unimaginable amounts of fraud and corruption, all of which have been fueled by enormous amounts of debt that are deliberately being pushed on to the taxpayers now that the private sector has found it cannot pay back what it owes. Unfortuantely, so much of the debt has been taken on by governments that the markets are seriously questioning whether Italy will be the next to default.

The prospect that the US may default within a month is also very real; the political gulf between Democrats and Republicans over the debt limit seems unbridgeable so far. In the past, one side or the other has blinked, and a new round of debt issuance is approved. This time may be different. The Tea Party activists elected to the House are intransigent about the issuance by the US of any new debt, and they may prefer to engineer a default as a matter of principle. At the very least, the system is as fragile as it has ever been since Rupert Murdoch first began building his media empire. Black Swan events are occurring with more frequency, and the strain of each event is getting harder and harder to handle. In the 1990s Japan and the financial markets rebounded from the effects of the Kobe earthquake; today a debt-laden Japanese government does not have the means to recover as quickly from the recent earthquake and tsunami.

Similarly, the global financial system, which is intricately bound with the global political structure, may not be able to withstand the collapse of the media empires which have kept the public from understanding what has been going on. A financial system which deliberately transfers incredible amounts of wealth to a select few insider players cannot function unless the means by which all this occurs is kept secret. The system needs its Rupert Murdochs to keep the public focused on its neighbors as The Enemy, diverting attention from the true criminals and miscreants operating at the highest levels of power and wealth. When Rupert Murdoch and other protectors of arcane information can no longer do their jobs, the entire edifice collapses.

Since the media moguls are even more important to the established order than the banks, their collapse might well signify the point where we all learn that the game is up; that governments can no longer mask problems by taking on more debt, because there is not enough money to service the debts that already exist; that the wheels of commerce have all along been stoked by bribery, extortion, and other forms of malfeasance; and that “leaders” such as David Cameron and Barack Obama are merely servants to powerful business figures who control most of the world’s wealth and are now desperate to keep it that way.

Author's Note: Sorry there are no Nudie Pics. It was just a come-on to get you to read to the end of the article.


Numerian July 12, 2011 - 4:21pm

thank you :)

Tina July 12, 2011 - 2:23pm

Another excellent essay. I am not disappointed in the lack of nudie pics, as I read this at work. I particularly like how you brought the connection around between Murdoch and the bond market. Well done, indeed.

rumor July 12, 2011 - 2:28pm

Empirically I'd agree, but:

1. Got any data on the increase in occurrence of Black Swans?
2. Increase in perturbations in the market (Black Swans) are a strong indication of increasing instability, which precludes a strange attractor (aka: CATASTROPHIC BLACK SWAN)

As for Murdock? He'll be stamped on by the British Establishment, his enemies who are his legacy. The whole matter is Sub Judicie now, so any attempt by Murdock to use the power of the media will result in Contempt of Court.

Synoia July 12, 2011 - 2:35pm

A nice white swan event. The black swan meme is so overused, a regular old white one would be downright unique.

zot23 July 12, 2011 - 9:40pm

OP-ED COLUMNIST
In Defense of Murdoch
By ROGER COHEN
Published: July 11, 2011

NEW YORK — Fair warning: This column is a defense of Rupert Murdoch. If you add everything up, he’s been good for newspapers over the past several decades, keeping them alive and vigorous and noisy and relevant. Without him, the British newspaper industry might have disappeared entirely.

This defense is prompted in part by seeing everyone piling in on the British hacking scandal, as if such abuses were confined to News International (we shall see) and as if significant swathes of the British establishment had not been complicit. It is also prompted by having spent time with Murdoch 21 years ago when writing a profile for The New York Times Magazine and coming away impressed.

Before I get to why, a few caveats. First, the hacking is of course indefensible as well as illegal. Second, Fox News, the U.S. TV network started by Murdoch, has with its shrill right-wing demagoguery masquerading as news made a significant contribution to the polarization of American politics, the erosion of reasoned debate, the debunking of reason itself, and the ensuing Washington paralysis. Third, I disagree with Murdoch’s views on a range of issues — from climate change to the Middle East — where his influence has been unhelpful.

So why do I still admire the guy? The first reason is his evident loathing for elites, for cozy establishments, for cartels, for what he’s called “strangulated English accents” — in fact for anything standing in the way of gutsy endeavor and churn. His love of no-holds-barred journalism is one reason Britain’s press is one of the most aggressive anywhere. That’s good for free societies.

Murdoch once told me: “When I came to Britain in 1968, I found it was damn hard to get a day’s work out of the people at the top of the social scale. As an Australian, I only had to work 8 or 10 hours a day, 48 weeks of the year, and everything came to you.”

So it was easy enough, from 1969 onward, to rake in the media heirlooms. Along the way he’s often shown fierce loyalty to his people — as now with Rebekah Brooks, the embattled head of News International — and piled money into important newspapers like The Times that would otherwise have vanished.

The second thing I admire is the visionary, risk-taking determination that has placed him ahead of the game as the media business has been transformed through globalization and digitization. It’s been the ability to see around corners that has ushered him from two modest papers inherited from his father in Adelaide to the head of a company with about $33 billion in annual revenues.

Yes, there have been mistakes — MySpace, the social media site just sold for a fraction of its purchase price is one. But I’d take Murdoch’s batting average. He’s gambled big on satellite TV, on global media opportunities in sports, and on the conflation of television, publishing, entertainment, newspapers and the Internet. British Sky Broadcasting and Fox alone represent big businesses created from nothing against significant odds.

A favorite Murdoch saying is: “We don’t deal in market share. We create the market.”

Of course, his success makes plenty of people envious, one reason the Citizen Kane ogre image has attached to him. (He would have endorsed Kane who, when asked in the movie how he found business conditions in Europe, responded: “With great difficulty!”) His success has caused redoubled envy in Britain because there he is ever the outsider from Down Under. (America doesn’t really do outsiders.)

The Times, which I’ve found a good read since moving to London last summer, has impressed me with its continued investment in foreign coverage, its bold move to put up a pay wall for the online edition (yes, people should pay for the work of journalists), and with the way the paper plays it pretty straight under editor James Harding. The Telegraph to the right and Guardian to the left play it less straight.

British Sky Broadcasting is emphatically not Fox. It’s a varied channel with some serious news shows. Overall, the British media scene without Murdoch would be pretty impoverished. His breaking of the unions at Wapping in 1986 was decisive for the vitality of newspapering. He took The Times tabloid when everyone said he was crazy. He was right. He loves a scoop, loves a scrap, and both the Wall Street Journal and The Times show serious journalists can thrive under him.

But Murdoch’s in trouble now. An important deal for all of British Sky Broadcasting hangs on his being able to convince British authorities News Corp management is in fact reputable. He’ll probably have to sacrifice Brooks for that. Politicians who fawned now fulminate. Prime Minister David Cameron is embarrassed. Both Murdoch and his savvy son James Murdoch (of more centrist views than his father) are scrambling.

I’d bet on them to prevail. When I asked Murdoch the secret of TV, he told me “Bury your mistakes.” The guy’s a force of nature and his restless innovations have, on balance and with caveats, been good for the media and a more open world.

Tina July 12, 2011 - 3:22pm

I Am Either As Big a Twat as Murdoch or I Just Really Wish I Was.

Subtitle: Please give me a job, Rupert Murdoch!

--

Gag me with a spoon.

rumor July 12, 2011 - 3:55pm

When Murdock bought the moribund Daily Herald (A Liberal Newspaper, dying, as the Liberal Party had died under the onslaught of the Labor Party) and produced The Sun Newspaper. Complete with those ever-so-tasteful nudes on P3.

Newspapers in the UK have party affiliations, and have always had party affiliations. The Times and the Telegraph were and are Tory newspapers. The Mirror Labor.

There is no such animal as "independent press" -- independent of political affiliations that is.

Synoia July 12, 2011 - 4:05pm

He certainly wouldn't buy the "Hitler was a visionary" argument........


The origin of the universe has not as yet been shown to be a conspiracy theory

nymole July 13, 2011 - 12:46pm

"In the 1930s, the broadcast industry grew steadily, and the FCC had to grapple with
the issue of broadcast station ownership. The FCC felt that a diversity of viewpoints
on the airwaves served the public interest and was best achieved through diversity
in station ownership. Therefore, to prevent individuals or companies from controlling too
many broadcast stations in one area or across the country, the FCC eventually instituted
ownership rules. These rules limit how many broadcast stations a person can own in a
single market or nationwide."
http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/5332_Sadler_Chapter_5.pdf

Well now because of new information the rules formulated in the 1930s
no longer apply because diversity of information will not be affected by the fact that traditional means of information desemination is now controlled by just a few.
The Glass–Steagall Act repeal worked out too.
What a mess we are in!
Great essay Numerian, thanks

mcgrande July 12, 2011 - 3:41pm

I thought he was in Israel. O well, when he calls from the great beyond, he is still with us. I guess he does that every day.

http://mauberly.blogspot.com/

mauberly July 12, 2011 - 3:49pm

He's dead to Murdoch and FOX News. He does expect to resurrect himself on some other network. Maybe Trinity Broadcasting will pick him up, from the Great Beyond, as it were.

Numerian July 12, 2011 - 6:10pm
mauberly July 12, 2011 - 6:39pm

eom

"Lord! What Fools these Mortals be!"

Doug Richardson July 12, 2011 - 4:18pm

as a result Coulson was brought up on charges of illegal wiretapping. Coulson was convicted and is now serving a jail term, and David Cameron was suddently without a communications officer.

I thought the big story of the past week was that Coulson had been arrested by the Met, questioned then released until later. I don't believe he's even been formally charged, let alone convicted.

"For the most part, when people discuss international law they are using it as a tool in a broader policy debate.... Very few people, it turns out, care about international law for its own sake." ~ David Bosco

JustPlainDave July 12, 2011 - 5:04pm

Coulson is indeed free, but like so many others, he is looking for a job. Thanks for alerting me. Should I send you a Nudie Pic?

Numerian July 12, 2011 - 7:09pm

(same thing)

Synoia July 12, 2011 - 8:08pm

[No, I have no idea why Nudie Pics with guns are popular.]

"For the most part, when people discuss international law they are using it as a tool in a broader policy debate.... Very few people, it turns out, care about international law for its own sake." ~ David Bosco

JustPlainDave July 12, 2011 - 8:25pm

Not only can they get pregnant, they can shoot you in the head, too. Total domination.


One owes respect to the living. To the dead, one owes only the truth.

Raja July 12, 2011 - 8:35pm

...from Oberndorf or Kitchener as could possibly be.

"For the most part, when people discuss international law they are using it as a tool in a broader policy debate.... Very few people, it turns out, care about international law for its own sake." ~ David Bosco

JustPlainDave July 12, 2011 - 8:57pm

Party leaders unite against Murdoch
Rare show of common resolve as MPs prepare to call for News Corp to drop BSkyB takeover bid

By Andrew Grice, Stephen Foley, Oliver Wright, Nigel Morris, Ian Burrell, Martin Hickman and Cahal Milmo

...
One government insider said the only way News Corp could possibly buy 100 per cent of BSkyB after tonight's vote would be to sell off his three remaining NI papers – The Sun, The Times and The Sunday Times. "That would be a game-changer," he said.

The Tories' decision to back the motion is a coup for Ed Miliband who has been calling for the bid to be abandoned since last week. But the Liberal Democrats claimed they had forced Mr Cameron's hand by making clear they would vote with Labour.

In New York, News Corp's board is coming under pressure to lance the boil in the UK, so the company can concentrate on the parts of the business that have the most growth potential, particularly cable television in the US.

In an attempt to see off concerns from shareholders Mr Murdoch announced plans to divert $5bn from News Corp's profits to shore up its share price. The company said it would spend the money over the next 12 months buying back its own shares, something that reduces the chance of a share price slump. By doing so, Mr Murdoch calculates that he can keep investors sweet while he considers how to prevent the scandal at his UK newspapers from infecting the rest of the $45bn empire.

Mr Murdoch knows that if he fails to act, shareholders could conclude that it is the mogul himself, and family control of the business, that is holding their investment back. Already, he and his fellow directors are the subject of a lawsuit from rebel shareholders saying that they have put the family's interests above those of outside investors.

His gamble appeared to be paying off, as News Corp shares stabilised and several leading shareholders came out in support of the Murdochs. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal – News Corp's biggest investor after the Murdoch family – gave a series of interviews saying the closure of News of the World was sufficient to draw a line under the scandal, and News Corp itself remained a powerful company. "News is a lot bigger than a newspaper," he said.

But there were signs yesterday that News Corp's problems in the UK could affect other parts of the business. In evidence to MPs, two senior police officers accused the company of deliberately covering up evidence of widespread phone hacking. At the time News International was being run by Les Hinton – a confidant of Mr Murdoch for decades who now runs Dow Jones in the US. He is likely to be compelled to give evidence at the public inquiry about whether he authorised the misleading evidence to police officers that was given by the company.

Tina July 12, 2011 - 9:49pm

y BEN FORER, KEVIN DOLAK and MAGGY PATRICK
July 13, 2011
Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. dropped its $12 billion bid to takeover British Sky Broadcasting today. With the company in the midst of a massive journalistic scandal, the deal had lost the support of the British government.

"We believed that the proposed acquisition of BSkyB by News Corporation would benefit both companies but it has become clear that it is too difficult to progress in this climate," said Chase Carey, News Corp.'s deputy chairman and president in a statement.

BSkyB stock declined 4 percent following the announcement.

The deal would have given Murdoch 100 percent control of BSkyB and 40 percent ownership of all British commercial TV. He already owns 37 percent of newspapers in Great Britain.

Prior to the announcement, the House of Commons had planned a vote in which all three major political parties were to demand News Corp. withdraw its offer.

more at ABC

Tina July 13, 2011 - 2:06pm

They bet wrong on a buy-out.

Numerian July 13, 2011 - 2:58pm

tons of money to pay off his reporters ;)

Tina July 13, 2011 - 3:03pm

...go towards a stock buy-back to prop up their prices.

I mean, pshaw, spend money on journos? Investing in content producers is so last century media...

"For the most part, when people discuss international law they are using it as a tool in a broader policy debate.... Very few people, it turns out, care about international law for its own sake." ~ David Bosco

JustPlainDave July 13, 2011 - 3:39pm

I mean pay them to keep quiet :D I thought they said that money was separate from the bid money.

Tina July 13, 2011 - 3:44pm

News of the World legal manager Tom Crone to leave News International

Departure is latest in string of company executives who were involved with the tabloid newspaper to leave the company

Dan Sabbagh and Jane Martinson
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 13 July 2011 13.24 BST

Tom Crone: worked for both the Sun and the News of the World during more than 20 years at NI. Photograph: PA

Tom Crone, the News of the World's long-standing legal manager, is leaving News International – the latest in a string of company executives who were involved with the tabloid newspaper to leave the company.

The departure comes a week after Crone's boss, James Murdoch, implied that the lawyer and the former editor of News of the World, Colin Myler, may have misled him about the reasons for making a £700,000 payment to football chief Gordon Taylor in 2008.

The payment, revealed by the Guardian two years ago, was the first evidence that phone hacking had spread beyond the royal reporter, Clive Goodman. In his statement last week Murdoch said: "The company paid out-of-court settlements approved by me. I now know that I did not have a complete picture when I did so. This was wrong and is a matter of serious regret."

more

Tina July 13, 2011 - 3:16pm

Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 13/07/2011
Reporter: Craig McMurtrie

In the US, News Corporation is facing a lawsuit from institutional investors who claim the board failed to adequately investigate allegations of phone hacking or to hold the Murdoch family accountable.

Transcript
TONY JONES, PRESENTER: News Corporation and its chairman could also be facing trouble on the other side of the Atlantic.

The Democratic senator Jay Rockefeller has called for an investigation into News Corp and warned of severe consequences if allegations that the phones of September 11 victims were hacked are found to be true.

And a group of US institutional investors has launched a lawsuit against the company, accusing the directors of failing to investigate the hacking claims and of blatant nepotism.

more

Tina July 13, 2011 - 3:18pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.