Theocratic Governance Strikes a Blow for Despotism


“I feel like I went to sleep in one country and woke up in another." So said a Western reporter about the riots that have swept Iran following the disputed election for President between Mahmud Ahmadinejad and Mir-Hussein Mousavi. Following weeks of increasingly animated, large demonstrations in favor of Mousavi as a reform candidate, and despite polls just before the voting that showed Mousavi with a lead, Ahmadinejad emerged with a “landslide victory” from the Ministry of Interior’s election commission, which counts the votes and which conveniently reports to Ahmadinejad.

The crudity with which the voting has been conducted defies common sense. Ministry of Interior officials who were suspected of favoring Mousavi have been purged in the weeks leading up to the election. The election results are reporting districts with curiously even numbers of votes in favor of Ahmadinejad, such as 1,000 here, or 5,000 there. Districts where reform candidates reside went suspiciously in favor of Ahmadinejad. Mousavi himself has disappeared – some fear he is under house arrest – and internet social sites like Twitter and Facebook have been shut down, as has Mousavi’s website.

Ahmadinejad will come out of this electoral “victory” a damaged piece of goods domestically and internationally. He is already despised in many Western foreign ministries, and that same odium apparently is shared by millions of urban Iranians who formed the support base for Mousavi. What looked like a flowering of democracy in probably the most important country in the Middle East has turned into a withering display of theocratic despotism in action.

Things like this don’t come about overnight. The clash between the rule of the theocrats in Iran and the forces for reform has been building over many years, and dates back directly to the 1979 revolution and the religious dictatorship of Ayatollah Khomeini. Iran has continued ever since to struggle with the conflicting forces of religious rule and popular voting.

Khomeini left the seeds for this conflict buried in the Iranian constitution. There is a president and there is a parliament, the Majlis, both subject to popular vote. The president is the supposed head of government. But there is also an Assembly of Experts composed of dozens of the leading Shi’ite ayatollahs and clerics in Iran, and this group appoints themselves from among Iran’s major Islamic schools. This body elects the Supreme Jurisprudent, the most revered of all religious figures in Iran, a successor to Ayatollah Khomeini and in that sense the embodiment of the continuing revolution of 1979.

The Supreme Jurisprudent has direct constitutional control of the military, of the domestic paramilitary (the Revolutionary Guards), the police, and the judiciary. Once selected by the Assembly of Experts, he manages this organization, plus two other constitutional bodies. One is the Guardians Council, which must approve all legislation that emerges from the Majlis, and which vets and approves all candidates running for public office. The second is the Expediency Council, which arbitrates any legislative disputes that emerge in the Majlis.

In short, power resides with religious clerics and their bureaucrats, none of whom is popularly voted into office. This is the fundamental crisis, or flaw, in the Iranian constitution, which desperately seeks legitimacy through public voting, but which time and again has shown itself willing to overthrow the popular vote if any real threat emerges to theocratic rule.

The theocrats are not without some public support. They control most of the major levers of business through nationalized companies, and they dispense the largess of Iran’s oil revenues to their supporters throughout the country. This includes the thugs who man the Revolutionary Guards now intimidating the public by truncheoning or even shooting any demonstrators who protest the regime. Many small businessmen receive subsidies from the regime, and various charities direct welfare to the rural poor. These are the sort of people who probably voted for Ahmadinejad with enthusiasm, but it is hard for observers to believe that they are so numerous as to give him a landslide electoral victory.

Even within the theocracy, there have been on-going disputes over whether the regime can continue to operate with behind-the-scenes and deeply unpopular rule. For those of you familiar with the 1979 revolution, one of the firebrands at the time was Ali Hashemi Rafsanjani, who later served as president. He is now chairman of the Expediency Council, and he has been engaging in a theological battle with people even more conservative than he is over the role of the Supreme Jurisprudent.

Rafsanjani argues that the Supreme Jurisprudent should be more like a constitutional monarch, wielding limited constitutional power and leaving control of the government to the president. His opponents, considered the most radical and hardline of the clergy, see the Supreme Jurisprudent as a direct representative on earth of the 12th imam, the sacred figure in Shi’ite Islam who will one day return to rule the earth in a restoration of the heavenly kingdom. Under this interpretation, the current Supreme Jurisprudent, Ali Khameni, is Allah’s agent in the terrestrial realm, who has all earthly power because he can only act for the good.

The hardliners look at Ali Khameni as an Islamic pope of the type in the Renaissance who held real political power. This Islamic pope has in their view an unlimited power, capable of overriding any governmental decision, any legislative act, and any electoral result. This is the sort of thinking that has led hardliners in the Ministry of Interior to act brazenly and crudely in the matter of the Ahmadinejad – Mousavi election.

Ali Rafsanjani is rumored to have resigned his chairmanship of the Expediency Council in protest of these election results. Other theocrats have raised their voices in protest as well. Few who are familiar with the way power is exercised behind the scenes expect any of this to make a difference. The Supreme Jurisprudent has been content in the past to exercise his power behind the scenes and with restraint, but he has consistently spoken out against one thing – any demonstrations protesting the government or the clergy. The one thing this regime recognizes is the danger of public protest and how it can get out of hand – this is after all how they came to power in 1979.

There are so many important global issues swirling around this election result that it is difficult to focus on what the consequences will be of this transparent electoral fraud. Israel will want the world to continue to concentrate on the nuclear weapons ambitions of the Iranians. Obama’s outreach to the Iranian government may continue to be rebuffed, or may be abandoned altogether rather than risk trying to do a deal with a buffoon like Ahmadinejad. Iran’s oil reserves make it an unofficial fifth member of the BRIC community of up-coming economic powers, so there are always implications in Iranian politics for the price of oil and the global economy.

But underlying all of this is the internal struggle within Iran between the hardline theocrats who control real power, and the forces struggling for modernity, a less obstreperous approach to the West, a functioning economy, and a more open government. This is a life and death struggle and it is still early innings. How much longer this regime can hold on without any real public support, and how much more intimidation and autocracy will be necessary to keep control over the population, are the two most critical questions facing Iran.


Numerian June 13, 2009 - 5:32pm
( categories: Miscellany | Agonist Exclusives | Iran )

by all indications there is some CIA/special forces agenda to use the Baluchis & facilitate militant activities (like this Jundullah thing). So what's going on with that?
--
Hongpong.com

HongPong June 14, 2009 - 1:18am

that. A while back there was talk of the Taliban making a corridor along the border of Af/Pak and including Iran. The word was that the Taliban would create this and then attack the NATO supply lines. We know they can stop traffic at Khyber and there has been attacks on the new northern supply lines. I was thinking the uptick of unrest in the Baluchi area is to make NATO rethink resupplying Afghanistan troops thru Iran's shiny new highway.

Tina June 14, 2009 - 1:32am

this is just some stuff i heard, but it seemed like the idea was to synthesize, like with Jundullah, more Contra style separatist militants (also same scheme in S. America, Bolivia & Venezuela) and have them stage bombings or whatever around Baluchistan - much like using the Kurds, the neocons and neoliberals, neocolonialist whatevers can agree, Baluchis have to get dragged into the thing even though they will get left hanging. From a class perspective this is something the rich and militant are getting involved with, as some kind of hustle, without regard for the general interests of Baluchis. [[Sources mainly stuff by Seymour Hersh & John Radsan (Mn law professor/militant Iranian neocon, very weird person to talk to)]]

[[An additional node is how these kinds of rightwing militant pawns would be supported by "aviation support" from the likes of Viktor Bout, Xe {FKA Blackwater} etc]].
--
Hongpong.com

HongPong June 14, 2009 - 12:47pm

but I think the US would be shooting itself in the foot by supporting and financing Jundullah. It might be a prick in Iran's side but the damage they can cause in Pakistan is just not in the US's interests.
Al-Qaeda seeks a new alliance

Tina June 15, 2009 - 3:25am

background articles in comments

Iran begins voting for new president(AJ wins)

Tina June 14, 2009 - 3:48am

Tehran Down the House

The New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times all lead with reports of rioting in Tehran after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced he had won Friday's election by a landside 62.6 percent of the vote. Meanwhile, reform candidate and second-place finisher Mir Hossein Mousavi is still insisting that he won, even though official results show him garnering just 34 percent of the vote. Ayatollah Khamenei says he won't get involved in the election, meaning there's no way Mousavi can challenge the results. Following the controversial announcement, police and protesters fought, journalists were harassed, and several political opponents, possibly including Mousavi, were arrested. Why are voters so suspicious of the results? The LAT explains that during the last 6 Iranian presidential elections, conservative candidates have only won in elections with low turnout—like the 2005 election that swept Ahmadinejad to power. That year just 48 percent of Iranians voted, compared with up to 86 percent this year. Analysts say they think it's unlikely that so many more people would turn out just to support the incumbent.

In a news-analysis column, NYT Executive Editor Bill Keller writes that Ahmadinejad's victory will hobble reform efforts in Iran. Keller notes Ahmadinejad shows none of Mousavi's concern about human rights issues and he isn't likely to reverse his frosty stance toward the West suddenly. This leaves President Barack Obama in the uncomfortable position of trying to work for peace with a belligerent leader who may have rigged his re-election. Yet the election is good news for right-wing governments, Keller writes, since the outcome makes it easier for them to continue taking a hard-line stance on Iran.

SLATE
graham June 14, 2009 - 8:34am

...Rafsanjani in that he's said to have resigned from Chairmanship of the Expediency Council, but not from the Assembly of Experts. I'd give a buck right now for more insight into the internal dynamics of the Assembly...

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave June 14, 2009 - 9:03am

for something on that, all I found is here, however Al Araybia Tehran bureau has been shut down now.

Tina June 14, 2009 - 9:37am

between ahmadinejad and bush the lesser? Eyes set close together, the shit eating grin, like some overgrown rat staring at a hunk of cheese.

Two of a kind, though either would be loathe to admit it.

I did inhale.

Don June 14, 2009 - 12:08pm

apart from being hardcore weirdos used as front men by bizarre and shady circles, who constantly market messages of conflict and messianic eschatonism like the countryside preachas & imams of yore, no i don't see any resemblance @ all :D
--
Hongpong.com

HongPong June 14, 2009 - 12:40pm

eom :)

Numerian June 14, 2009 - 2:18pm

I suspect, he'd be called "Bush the Weak", in Medieval Europe,

Synoia June 14, 2009 - 4:46pm

CNN - Demonstrators on Monday defied a government decree that had declared their rallies illegal and began to gather at Tehran University for a third day of protests.
{snip}
Earlier Monday, Iran's government had rejected a request by opposition leader Mir Hossein Moussavi to hold a nationwide march to protest the results of the country's presidential election, Iranian media reported.
{snip}
But Moussavi's supporters, in messages on social-networking sites, indicated the rallies would continue with or without the blessing of the administration. Tens of thousands of people around the world championed them on social-networking Web sites and urged friends to wear green in solidarity.

graham June 15, 2009 - 4:33am

BBC - Iran's defeated moderate candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi has cancelled a big rally, amid growing unrest over last week's presidential poll. The government had declared planned protests against the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad illegal. Mr Mousavi called off the rally after being warned militias would be equiped with live rounds, the BBC understands.

graham June 15, 2009 - 4:37am

CNN - Media rights group Reporters Without Borders is urging nations to not recognize the results of Iran's presidential election, citing censorship and a crackdown on journalists.

The nongovernmental group, which advocates freedom of the press, said it has confirmed the arrest of four reporters by Iranian authorities, including one who won the organization's press freedom prize in 2001.

In addition, the France-based group said, it has no information on 10 other reporters who have either gone into hiding or have been arrested.

"A democratic election is one in which the media are free to monitor the electoral process and investigate fraud allegations, but neither of these two conditions has been met for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's supposed re-election," the group said Sunday in a statement.

Independent observers were not allowed to observe the voting on Friday, and foreign reporters have been blocked from covering the ensuing demonstrations by supporters of Ahmadinejad's rival Mir Hossein Moussavi, who are claiming ballot fraud.

graham June 15, 2009 - 4:39am

:D

Tina June 15, 2009 - 4:41am

I'm going back to short, sweet and to the point...ok I will try to be sweet :D

Tina June 15, 2009 - 4:48am

graham June 15, 2009 - 4:55am

dang, soon as i read graham's comment, i wanted to reply dissuading any discouragement.

Zuma June 15, 2009 - 5:52am

by all means protest the treatment of journalists but it is incredibly stupid for them to involve themselves in the election

Media group asks nations not to recognize Iran results

CNN.com

(CNN) -- Media rights group Reporters Without Borders is urging nations to not recognize the results of Iran's presidential election, citing censorship and a crackdown on journalists.

The nongovernmental group, which advocates freedom of the press, said it has confirmed the arrest of four reporters by Iranian authorities, including one who won the organization's press freedom prize in 2001.

In addition, the France-based group said, it has no information on 10 other reporters who have either gone into hiding or have been arrested.

"A democratic election is one in which the media are free to monitor the electoral process and investigate fraud allegations, but neither of these two conditions has been met for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's supposed re-election," the group said Sunday in a statement.

Independent observers were not allowed to observe the voting on Friday, and foreign reporters have been blocked from covering the ensuing demonstrations by supporters of Ahmadinejad's rival Mir Hossein Moussavi, who are claiming ballot fraud.

Foreign news Web sites, such as that of the BBC, have been blocked, and the satellite broadcast of the Voice of America partly jammed, the group said.

Reporters for an Italian station, RAI, and for Reuters were beaten by police in the capital, Tehran. A CNN producer was also hit with a police baton.

Iranian authorities closed Al-Arabiya's Tehran bureau for a week without explanation, the Arabic network said Sunday. Two reporters were attacked outside Moussavi's headquarters on Friday, according to Reporters Without Borders.

The Web sites of pro-opposition supporters are inaccessible, and the government also has periodically shut down access to social networking sites, making it difficult for information to reach the outside world.

"An election won by means of censorship and arrests of journalists is not democratic," the group said.

Tina June 15, 2009 - 4:40am

Sun, 06/14/2009 11:03pm
the cable - Brief Iran Update.
Iranian opposition presidential candidate Mir Hussein Moussavi is planning a march of his supporters at 4 p.m. Monday in Tehran, Iranian sources said. He apparently went to see the supreme leader Sunday to seek a permit for it, but one hasn't yet been obtained. If he is prevented from getting permission, he has said he plans to march to the mausoleum of Ayatollah Khomenei, an act that Iranians say the authorities of the Islamic Republic would be disinclined to prevent.

Iranian sources said former Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani is in Qom, seeking to persuade clerics not to certify the Iranian elections.

Another presidential candidate, Mohsen Rezai, the former head of the Revolutionary Guards, issued a statement today saying he wants to have the ballots examined, Iranian sources said.

Incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad held a press conference and victory rally Sunday, attended by tens of thousands, as sporadic protests and demonstrations and clashes with the police continued, much of it recorded on Twitter.

Many foreign journalists in Iran on 10-day visas to report on the elections are being told to depart and that they cannot get their visas extended. Several reporters and camera-people were apparently roughed up covering various protests, Iranian sources said, and Ahmadinejad blamed foreign news organizations for the demonstrations. News site Tehranbureau reported it had been taken off line by denial of service attacks, and Iranians said Al Arabiya's office in Tehran had been shut down for a week.

The Iranian ambassador to Germany has reportedly been summoned by the German government to protest the treatment of demonstrators, as well as German reporters covering the election in Iran.

Other signs of civil disobedience continued.

"Over the past two evenings, the air in Tehran has been filled with loud cries of ‘Allah-u Akbar' following a request to this end by Moussavi's supporters," a person in Tehran informed an Iran-oriented list Sunday. "Tonight, the chanting started at around 9 pm local time, and has been escalating since. People in all parts of town are reporting the same phenomenon in their neighbourhoods. Amidst the chanting, you can also hear loud bangs, which are either bullets or teargas being fired ...

graham June 15, 2009 - 4:50am

Iran Updates (VIDEO): Live-Blogging The Uprising - A plea from Mousavi. Andrew Sullivan passes along a telephone plea from Mousavi, via his contacts at BBC Persia:

I AM UNDER EXTREME PRESSURE TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF THE SHAM ELECTION. THEY HAVE CUT ME OFF FROM ANY COMMUNICATION WITH PEOPLE AND AM UNDER SURVEILLANCE. I ASK THE PEOPLE TO STAY IN THE STREETS BUT AVOID VIOLENCE.

graham June 15, 2009 - 4:52am

if that communique came from him. The journalists were there for the election and possible run off only so it is not surprising Iran asked them to leave. Oddly enough AJ is going out of the country, a new coup coming? I doubt it.

Tina June 15, 2009 - 5:08am

YEKATERINBURG, Russia, June 15 (Reuters) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will not travel to Russia for an Asian security summit on Monday, a source in the Iranian embassy in Moscow told Reuters.

"The president will definitely not come today," the official, who asked not to be named, said. The source would

Tina June 15, 2009 - 5:12am

"Iran's President Ahmadinejad to delay visit to Russia, media reports say"

graham June 15, 2009 - 5:25am

:D

graham June 15, 2009 - 5:26am

Tina June 15, 2009 - 5:44am

I was thinking more of this exchange yesterday. More like two and a half years. :) Kinda makes ya want ta ask the doctrinaire what was they thinkin'.

(Of course, the fact of remembering and digging it up makes me want to ask myself just how anal and petty I am, but what the hell...) ;P

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave June 15, 2009 - 7:42am

I bumped this one the other day LOL , it at least didn't have a troll

Tina June 15, 2009 - 7:50am

picture, I will not post...

graham June 15, 2009 - 8:13am

bbc - I will leave a message for His Excellency President Ahmadinejad to look into this. However, part of the difficulty is that the winner's power base is far more rural with few internet responses reach BBC and thus BBC's imbalanced comments may have been unintentional than provocative.

Otherwise, BBC column's responses may seem from Iranian perspective intentionally unbalached and seeking a political twist to the events.

It is also important to recollect that this was an important election and there is a need to deflate excess euphoria the lively campaings had stimulated. There is a certain justification for jamming if the media like BBC becomes unduly focused to the post-election riots and demonstrations. Indeed, the heated exchanges were rather expected.

It is important to prevent unfortunate situation like in Kenya recently when the winners and opposition were grid-locked to a dysfunctional electorate conflict.

The situation in Iran has not been like in case of Zimbabwe where there were a sustained obstruction of opposition to access media, in Iran the debates have been open including impartial TV access to opposition. Therefore, the feelings of undue inference and conspiracy from outside media is unlikely to get too much support and this soon dies out.

BBC should do a fact finding missions to those regions which voted for the winner too rather than focus on the riots.

However, it is very important to maintain a credible and accurrate vote counting systems and perhaps get international monitors to assist on non-biases. The monitoring of elections should be left for unbiased bodies rather than media whose focus, need is often on visualisation of things.

Veli Albert Kallio
Fellow of Royal Geograhpical Society
Member of His Excellency President Ahmadinejad's Personal Facebook

graham June 15, 2009 - 5:11am

if it is him. Western coverage is really biased and not giving a complete picture. The northern suburbs of Tehran is not representative of the country. That said I am not defending the beating of the students and journalists.

Tina June 15, 2009 - 5:22am

guardian comment is free - With hindsight, we should have seen it coming. Why should a man who has bluffed, blustered, twisted, intimidated and – let's not dignify it with higher prose – lied his way through his four-year term of office surrender power to the whim of anything so mundane as a ballot box?

We do not yet have any forensic proof that Iran's presidential election was stolen – and given the country's notorious opacity, it may never emerge – but the circumstantial evidence is compelling. The aftermath of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election by an alleged landslide resembles, as the respected American academic on Iranian affairs, Juan Cole, put it, "a crime scene". Legitimate election wins are generally not accompanied by mass arrests of opposition members, the blocking of mobile phone networks and a multitude of news websites, or the forced closure of other candidates' headquarters, to name but three highly irregular developments that have all the hallmarks of a coup d'état.

For many (and not just the usual scapegoats of supposedly blinkered western journalists), it is a profound shock, especially since the reformist candidate, Mir Hossein Mousavi, seemed to have the wind and a tidal wave of popular support in his sails.

It shouldn't have been. The brazen manner of Ahmadinejad's power grab is simply a fulfilment of his nature and that of his acolytes. Anyone who lived in Iran – as I did – during Ahmadinejad's first term will recognise that the developments of the past few days are rooted in a political approach that emphasises chutzpah and a ruthless will to power at the expense of consensus and dissent.

That philosophy was explained to me a couple of years ago by Ebrahim Yazdi, leader of the Freedom Movement and foreign minister in Iran's first post-revolutionary government. Yazdi characterised Ahmadinejad's surprise 2005 election victory as a "velvet coup d'état" which was reinforced via a "victory through terrorisation" credo. "The philosophy is that you terrorise people in order to succeed," Yazdi said.

{snip}
It is this backdrop that is shrouding Ahmadinejad's re-election in billowing mushroom clouds of suspicion, not some mythological failure of visiting western journalists to leave their temporary boltholes in affluent north Tehran, as claimed by Abbas Barzegar here on Saturday.

Barzegar painted a picture of gullible reporters buried in wishful thinking and hoodwinking themselves into exaggerating Mousavi's support by failing to leave the capital and sample the religious (and pro-Ahmadinejad) fervour prevailing in Iran's heartland. "Iran is a deeply religious society," he argued, a hackneyed assertion which – unlike election results – is impossible to quantify or measure but which westerners are presumably too dim to understand. This is sanctimonious drivel. Religion does indeed run deep in Iranian society, but Mousavi was hardly running on an atheist ticket. Nor were the other two candidates, Mehdi Karroubi (a turbaned cleric, let us remember) and Mohsen Rezai, a former revolutionary guard commander once close to the late Ayatollah Khomeini. Opposition to Ahmadinejad runs across social boundaries – and includes many who consider themselves religious.

It is also worth dispelling the myth of a vast cultural chasm supposedly existing between Tehran and the rest of the country. This may have been true in the days before the revolution but today's Iran is a largely urban society. Far from being at odds with its hinterland, Tehran is in fact a more representative capital than any other country I have lived in. Reports last night of riots in other cities such as Tabriz, Mashhad, Shiraz and Rasht certainly give lie to the theory that anger at Ahmadinejad's victory exist in a Tehran bubble.

If expectations of an Ahmadinejad defeat betrayed a blind naivety, it was not born of blindness to Iran's incorrigibly religious nature. Rather, it is a failure to appreciate the sheer determination of Ahmadinejad's drive for power and the resistance to change of the conservative men supporting him. Ahmadinejad and Khamenei were never going to give up power to a man whose ideas threatened to alter their rigid ideological vision of the Islamic republic. How could we have been so myopic?

graham June 15, 2009 - 5:38am

CNN - Iran's supreme leader has ordered an investigation into allegations the country's presidential vote was marred by ballot fraud as chaos following hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's declared victory continued for a third day.

The country's government-funded Press TV reported Monday that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had asked for the investigation.

graham June 15, 2009 - 5:55am

going thru the motions?

Monday June 15 2009
ANNA JOHNSON

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) Iran's state television says the supreme leader has ordered an investigation into claims of fraud in last week's presidential election.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is ordering the powerful Guardian Council to examine the allegations by pro-reform candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, who claims widespread vote rigging in Friday's election. The government declared President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner in a landslide victory.

It is a stunning turnaround for Iran's most powerful figure, who previously welcomed the results.

Mousavi wrote an appeal Sunday to the Guardian Council, a powerful 12-member body that's a pillar of Iran's theocracy. Mousavi also met Sunday with Khamenei.

Mousavi's backers have waged three days of street protests in Tehran.

Tina June 15, 2009 - 6:05am

Jun 16, 2009

Rafsanjani's gambit backfires
By M K Bhadrakumar

Iranian politics is never easy to decode. The maelstrom around Friday's presidential election intrigued most avid cryptographers scanning Iranian codes. So many false trails appeared that it became difficult to decipher who the real contenders were and what the political stakes were.

In the event, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei won a resounding victory. The grey cardinal of Iranian politics Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has been dealt a crushing defeat. Is the curtain finally ringing down on the tumultuous career of the "Shark", a nickname Rafsanjani acquired in the vicious well of the Iranian Majlis (parliament) where he used to swim dangerously as a political predator in the early years of the Iranian Revolution as the speaker?

By the huge margin (64%) with which President Mahmud Ahmedinejad won, it is tempting to say that like the great white

sperm whale of immense, premeditated ferocity and stamina in Herman Melville's epic novel Moby Dick, Rafsanjani is going down, deeply wounded by the harpoon, into the cold oblivion of the sea of Iranian politics. But you can never quite tell.

The administration of President Barack Obama in the United States could see through the allegorical mode of the Iranian election and probably anticipate the flood of destruction that would follow once vengeance is unleashed. It did just the right thing by staying aloof, studiously detached. Now comes the difficult part - engaging the house that Khamenei presides over as the monarch of all he surveys.

First, the ABC of the election. Who is Mir Hossein Mousavi, Ahmedinejad's main opponent in the election? He is an enigma wrapped in mystery. He impressed the Iranian youth and the urban middle class as a reformer and a modernist. Yet, as Iran's prime minister during 1981-89, Mousavi was an unvarnished hardliner. Evidently, what we have seen during his high-tech campaign is a vastly different Mousavi, as if he meticulously deconstructed and then reassembled himself.

This was what Mousavi had to say in a 1981 interview about the 444-day hostage crisis when young Iranian revolutionaries kept American diplomats in custody: "It was the beginning of the second stage of our revolution. It was after this that we discovered our true Islamic identity. After this we felt the sense that we could look Western policy in the eye and analyze it the way they had been evaluating us for many years."

Most likely, he had a hand in the creation of Hezbollah in Lebanon. Ali Akbar Mohtashami, Hezbollah's patron saint, served as his interior minister. He was involved in the Iran-Contra deal in 1985, which was a trade-off with the Ronald Reagan administration whereby the US would supply arms to Iran and as quid pro quo Tehran would facilitate the release of the Hezbollah-held American hostages in Beirut. The irony is, Mousavi was the very anti-thesis of Rafsanjani and one of the first things the latter did in 1989 after taking over as president was to show Mousavi the door. Rafsanjani had no time for Mousavi's anti-"Westernism" or his visceral dislike of the market.

Mousavi's electoral platform has been a curious mix of contradictory political lines and vested interests but united in one maniacal mission, namely, to seize the presidential levers of power in Iran. It brought together so-called reformists who support former president Mohammad Khatami and ultra-conservatives of the regime. Rafsanjani is the only politician in Iran who could have brought together such dissimilar factions. He assiduously worked hand-in-glove with Khatami towards this end.

If we are to leave out the largely inconsequential "Gucci crowd" of north Tehran, who no doubt imparted a lot of color, verve and mirth to Mousavi's campaign, the hardcore of his political platform comprised powerful vested interests who were making a last-ditch attempt to grab power from the Khamenei-led regime. On the one hand, these interest groups were severely opposed to the economic policies under Ahmadinejad, which threatened their control of key sectors such as foreign trade, private education and agriculture.

For those who do not know Iran better, suffice to say that the Rafsanjani family clan owns vast financial empires in Iran, including foreign trade, vast landholdings and the largest network of private universities in Iran. Known as Azad there are 300 branches spread over the country, they are not only money-spinners but could also press into Mousavi's election campaign an active cadre of student activists numbering some 3 million.

The Azad campuses and auditoria provided the rallying point for Mousavi's campaign in the provinces. The attempt was to see that the campaign reached the rural poor in their multitudes who formed the bulk of voters and constituted Ahmadinejad's political base. Rafsanjani's political style is to build up extensive networking in virtually all the top echelons of the power structure, especially bodies such as the Guardian Council, Expediency Council, the Qom clergy, Majlis, judiciary, bureaucracy, Tehran bazaar and even elements within the circles close to Khamenei. He called into play these pockets of influence.

Rafsanjani's axis with Khatami was the basis of Mousavi's political platform of reformists and conservatives. The four-cornered contest was expected to give a split verdict that would force the election into a run-off on June 19. The candidature of the former Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Commander Mohsen Rezai (who served under Rafsanjani when he was president) was expected to slice off a chunk of IRGC cadres and prominent conservatives.

Again, the fourth candidate, Mehdi Karrubi's "reformist" program was expected to siphon off support from Ahmedinejad, by virtue of his offer of economic policies based on social justice such as the immensely popular idea of distributing income from oil among the people rather than it accruing to the government's budget.

Rafsanjani's plot was to somehow extend the election to the run-off stage, where Mousavi was expected to garner the "anti-Ahmedinejad" votes. The estimation was that at the most Ahmedinejad would poll in the first round 10 to 12 million votes out of the 28 to 30 million who might actually vote (out of a total electorate of 46.2 million) and, therefore, if only the election extended to the run-off, Mousavi would be the net beneficiary as the votes polled by Rezai and Karrubi were essentially "anti-Ahmadinejad" votes.

The regime was already well into the election campaign when it realized that behind the clamor for a change of leadership in the presidency, Rafsanjani's challenge was in actuality aimed at Khamenei's leadership and that the election was a proxy war. The roots of the Rafsanjani-Khamenei rift go back to the late 1980s when Khamenei assumed the leadership in 1989.

more

Tina June 15, 2009 - 6:34am

Jun 16, 2009

THE ROVING EYE
The meaning of the Tehran spring

By Pepe Escobar

It is 1979 in Tehran all over again. From Saturday to Sunday, the deafening sound deep in the night across Tehran's rooftops was a roaring, ubiquitous "Allah-u Akbar" (God is great). Then, in 1979, to hail the Islamic revolution; now, in 2009, to signify what appears to be the hijacking of the Islamic revolution. Then, the revolution was not televised; it was via (Ruhollah Khomeini) radio. Now, it is being broadcast all across the world.

Let's cut to the chase: what Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi qualified as "this dangerous charade" and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "the sweetness of the election", or better yet, a "divine assessment", has all the non-divine markings of intervention by the Iranian Republican Guards Corps (IRGC). This follows President Mahmud Ahmadinejad officially gaining 64% of the vote in defeating Mousavi in what in the days before Friday's vote had widely been called as a very close race.

Scores of protesters equating Ahmadinejad with Augusto Pinochet in 1973's Chile might not be that far off the mark. Call it the ultra-right wing, military dictatorship of the mullahtariat.

This is emerging as a no-holds-barred civil war at the very top of the Islamic Republic. The undisputed elite is now supposed to be embodied by the Ahmadinejad faction, the IRGC, the intelligence apparatus, the Ministry of the Interior, the Basij volunteer militias, and most of all the Supreme Leader himself.

The elite wants subdued, muzzled, if not destroyed, reformists of all strands: any relatively moderate cleric; the late 1970s clerical/technocratic Revolution Old Guard (which includes Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mohammad Khatami and Mousavi); "globalized" students; urban, educated women; and the urban intelligentsia.

Even fighting a cascade of political and economic setbacks, for the past three decades the regime has always been proud of the Islamic Republic's brand of popular democracy, and its alleged legitimacy. Now the revolution enters completely uncharted territory as thousands of people have taken to the streets in protest against the result.

What will be the distinguishing features of the military dictatorship of the mullahtariat? How does the revolution recoup from a coup? A 29-year-old female journalist working in a moderately conservative Tehran newspaper spelled it out for Radio Free Europe: "Coup means that right now they're beating people in the streets. A coup means they didn't even count people's votes. They announced the results without opening the ballot boxes. It was sent as a circular to the state television, which announced it. Is it so difficult for the world to understand this?"

The trillion-dollar-question regarding this new "revolutionary" situation is that as things stand, no pacifying solution can be found within the institutional framework of the Islamic Republic. In a nutshell, Ahmadinejad has made his power play against Mousavi and Rafsanjani. The Supreme Leader fully supported him. Mousavi and Rafsanjani, plus Khatami, need an urgent counterpunch. And their only possible play is to go after Khamenei.

As Trita Parsi of the National Iranian American Council, among others, has noted, Rafsanjani is now counting his votes at the Council of Experts (86 clerics, no women) - of which he is the chairman - to see if they are able to depose Khamenei. He is in the holy city of Qom for this explicit purpose. To pull it off, the council would imperatively have to be supported by at least some factions within the IRGC. The Ahmadinejad faction will go ballistic. A Supreme Leader implosion is bound to imply the implosion of the whole Khomeini-built edifice.

much more, read

Tina June 15, 2009 - 7:22am

Iran's Khatami supports peaceful protest

TEHRAN, June 15 (Reuters) - Reformist former president Mohammad Khatami criticised Iranian authorities on Monday for denying permission for a rally in Tehran and said the country's disputed election last week had dented public trust.

Khatami said supporters of defeated election candidate Mirhossein Mousavi had a right to peaceful protest, and said he would have joined them if the Interior Ministry had given permission for their planned rally to take place.

"I was determined to take part in today's peaceful demonstration and speak to you and express my practical protest to the unkindness done to the people and the revolution," Khatami said in a faxed statement.

Despite the ban on a rally "you and we will nevertheless continue our movement in this course and would expect that the clear demands of Mr Mousavi, which is the demand of all of us, will be heeded," he said.

Mousavi has appealed the Iran's watchdog Guardian Council to annul the result.

Khatami, who served as president from 1997-2005, remains popular in Iran and publicly backed Mousavi's election bid. Mousavi was soundly defeated by hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Friday's election, but has rejected the result as a "dangerous charade".

"What took place in the course of the recent presidential elections produced a blemish in the public trust, and led to ... natural and emotional reactions," Khatami said.

"... Your cheerful and joyous presence through peaceful means, which you have observed, is your right," he said, urging Mousavi supporters to ensure their protests were legal and remained calm.

..
more

Tina June 15, 2009 - 8:51am

abc.net.au - Tens of thousands of Iranians have defied a government ban to join a mass opposition rally in protest of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's disputed election win.

Shouting "Allah Akbar" (God is great), the protesters marched towards Tehran's Revolution Square, where defeated presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi was expected to address them and call for calm after two days of violent unrest in the capital.

But they have been confronted by supporters of Mr Ahmadinejad riding motorcycles and armed with sticks.

graham June 15, 2009 - 8:56am

Reuters - Tens of thousands of supporters of defeated presidential candidate Mirhossein Mousavi gathered for a rally in downtown Tehran on Monday, defying an Interior Ministry ban, a Reuters witness said.

"The street is fully packed," the witness said, adding the crowd was waiting for Mousavi and other pro-reform leaders who back his call for the annulment of the official result of Friday's election, which showed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had won.

Wearing Mousavi's green campaign colors and photographs of him, they chanted: "Mousavi take back our votes."

Several kilometers of a central Tehran thoroughfare were packed with people taking part in the rally, the witness said.

"Where are the 63 percent who voted for Ahmadinejad?" they chanted, referring to his official election tally.

"If Ahmadinejad remains president we will protest every day," they shouted. "We fight, we die, we will not accept this vote rigging," was another chant in the crowd.

As a police helicopter flew overhead, the crowd booed.

graham June 15, 2009 - 9:00am

TEHRAN, June 15, 2009 (AFP) - - Defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi said at a rally in Tehran on Monday that he was ready to take part in a new election.

graham June 15, 2009 - 9:50am

..... Western experts now agree that even during the tenure of moderate president Mohammad Khatami (1997-2005), the nuclear program continued to advance. And in any case, the person who really decides on the nuclear issue is not the president but the spiritual leader. One of the president's advisers even made it clear recently, in an interview with Reuters, that the spiritual leader will continue to shape his country's nuclear policy, regardless of the election results.

Ahmadinejad, with his Holocaust denial and his long series of provocations, drew most of the attention, but apparently had less influence on the nuclear program. There are even senior members of the Israeli defense establishment who share the public stance of former Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy, who claimed that the Iranian president's behavior, perceived in the West as quasi-lunatic, advanced Israel's security interests.
More


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena June 15, 2009 - 6:13pm

Parisa Hafezi | Tehran | June 16

Reuters - Iranian demonstrators called for more mass protests on Tuesday, a day after hardline Islamic militiamen killed a man during a march by tens of thousands against a presidential election they say was rigged.

The Iranian capital has already seen three days of the biggest and most violent anti-government protests since the 1979 Islamic revolution after hardline incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared winner of last Friday's vote.

"Tomorrow at 5 p.m. (1230 GMT) at Vali-ye Asr Square," some of the crowd chanted at Monday's march, referring to a major road junction in the sprawling city of some 12 million.

Further protests, especially if they are maintained on the same scale, would be a direct challenge to authorities who have kept a tight grip on dissent since the overthrow of the U.S.-backed shah after months of demonstrations 30 years ago.

snip

Demonstrators filled a broad avenue in central Tehran for several kilometres (miles) on Monday, chanting "We fight, we die, we will not accept this vote rigging", in support of Mirhossein Mousavi, the defeated moderate candidate.

[emphasis added]

more

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave June 15, 2009 - 8:52pm

Ann Johnson and Brian Murphy | Tehran | June 15

AP - In a massive outpouring reminiscent of the Islamic Revolution three decades ago, hundreds of thousands of Iranians streamed through the capital Monday, and the fist-waving protesters denounced President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's claim to victory in a disputed election.

Standing on a roof, gunmen opened fire on a group of protesters who had tried to storm a pro-government militia's compound. One man was killed and several others were wounded in the worst violence since the disputed election Friday.

Angry men showed their bloody palms after cradling the dead and wounded who had been part of a crowd that stretched more than five miles (nearly 10 kilometers) supporting reform leader Mir Hossein Mousavi.

The huge rally — and smaller protests around the country — reinforced what has become increasingly clear since the election: the opposition forces rallying behind Mousavi show no signs of backing down. Their resolve appears to have pushed Iran's Islamic establishment into attempts to cool the tensions after days of unrest.

more

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave June 15, 2009 - 8:55pm

Posted at 21:19 by HTML Mencken

War is the goal of the neocon collective; more subhuman than subhuman is their motto. Always has been, always will be. Neocons have to have an external enemy, legitimate or manufactured: it gives them political power and gives them — for lack of a better phrase — personal fulfillment. War is the force that gives meaning to their lives, makes them feel part of something important. Some people collect stamps, others like to attend church; neocons fap to destruction wrought by America or Israel on “eeevildoers,” preferably dusky and Muslim.

Everyone decent reacts to the flood of news out of Iran with despair at the chaos, sympathy for the protesters, and anger toward the regime. So far, the American government has reacted cautiously and correctly. (The same, alas, cannot be said of the EU.) Everyone decent wants a legitimate, democratic Iran reformed indigenously. Everyone, that is, but the neocons, who take to geopolitical tragedy the same way that Friedmanite crapitalists take to natural disasters and buzzards take to fresh roadkill. (This tendency, by the way, explains why Richard Cheney would desire another 9/11.) Ahmadinejad’s Rove-eque campaign and Bush-esque “victory” is a perfect tragedy by which they hope to exacerbate the already considerable tensions between Iran on one side and Israel and America on the other.

Neocons want, in the old commie phrase, to heighten the contradictions. Daniel “Crack” Pipes openly roots for Ahmadinejad:

more with lotsa links

Tina June 15, 2009 - 9:37pm

AP - An opposition activist spreads word of an upcoming protest in the streets of Tehran. Another posts pictures of clashes between demonstrators and police.
As Iran's government cracks down on traditional media after the country's disputed presidential election, tech-savvy Iranians have turned to the microblogging site Twitter.
Its use to organize and send pictures and messages to the outside world — in real time as events unfolded — was a powerful example of how such tools can overcome government attempts at censorship.
"When I'm not connected to Twitter it means that I'm disconnected from the world because the state TV doesn't report many things!" wrote one Twitter user who identifies himself as "hamednz" and communicated with The Associated Press through e-mail. His profile says he lives in Rasht, a city to the north of Tehran near the Caspian Sea.
Like all the Twitter users in Iran who agreed to be interviewed for this story, hamednz did not want his identity revealed for fear of retribution from government authorities.
In Iran, as in many still-developing countries, Internet usage is mostly still a phenomenon of the affluent, the youth and city-dwellers — meaning Twitter and other networks are used mostly by the young and liberal — and may overemphasize their numbers while ignoring more-conservative political sentiments among the non-connected.
Supporters of reformist challenger Mir Hossein Mousavi are more likely to use Twitter and Facebook. Poorer, less-educated voters have flocked to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

{SNIP- article continues with interesting observations}
But some experts warn of overestimating Twitter's role. Censorship adds another layer of technology that people have to overcome.
For people following events in Iran from abroad on Twitter, it's easy to think that everyone is an outraged Mousavi supporter.
"If you follow Twitter you will think that Tehran is going through another .... revolution," said Hossam el-Hamalawy, an Egyptian blogger and activist who often uses Twitter. "And that's not the case."

graham June 16, 2009 - 3:59am

realtime...

i have more respect for twitter now, seeing it more like IRC than blogging.

i had been frustrated by the plethora of relayed twitter messages posted as posts on http://community.livejournal.com/persians/

but i get it now

Zuma June 16, 2009 - 6:08am

Please re-set your personal Twitter location to Tehran to help confuse the secret police.

graham June 16, 2009 - 6:20am

http://community.livejournal.com/liberal/3259984.html

I read a 'tweet' from a student in Teheran who suggested a way to help them. They are using Twitter to contact each other; he/she said the govt. is trying to shut them down, but if you will reset the preferences on YOUR account to show your location is Teheran, it really screws with secret police attempts to infiltrate their communications system.

There is still not a lot of love lost between most Iranians (including the protestors) and the U.S., but I'm inclined to want to help them out.

Twitter held off on doing an upgrade so they won't shut down Iran's access.

3259984.html?thread=92545872#t92545872

Here is more information about helping the protestors. PLEASE READ BEFORE resetting your Twitter preferences!

http://www.boingboing.net/2009/06/16/cyberwar-guide-for-i.html

Zuma June 16, 2009 - 1:32pm

BBc
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8102400.stm

Iran's powerful Guardian Council says it is ready to recount disputed votes in Friday's presidential poll.

Moderate candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi has contested President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election, alleging widespread fraud.

The BBC's Jon Leyne in Tehran says the council's announcement is a complete U-turn. The official results sparked three days of huge protests.

Iranian radio says seven people were killed during demonstrations on Monday.

The Guardian Council said the votes would be recounted in areas contested by the losing candidates.

Our correspondent says this could effectively allow the defeated candidates to challenge all the votes.

New demonstrations have been called by supporters of both President Ahmadinejad and Mr Mousavi and are due to take place in Vali Asr Square in central Tehran.

Monday's protest involved hundreds of thousands of people and was one of the largest since the Iranian revolution 30 years ago.

The radio report said the attack occurred at the end of the "illegal" rally as people were heading home "peacefully".

"Several thugs wanted to attack a military post and vandalise public property in the vicinity of Azadi Square," the radio said referring to the site of the protest.

"Unfortunately seven people were killed and several others wounded in the incident."

Our correspondent says that in light of what he saw of the vast and largely peaceful protests this seems an unlikely version of events.

Dozens of opposition activists have been arrested since the protests began.

A number of senior reformist politicians, including former Vice-President Mohammad Ali Abtahi and Mousavi ally Saeed Hajarian, were detained overnight, reports said.

Tina June 16, 2009 - 4:37am

Ken Ballen and Patrick Doherty | June 15

WaPo - The election results in Iran may reflect the will of the Iranian people. Many experts are claiming that the margin of victory of incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the result of fraud or manipulation, but our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin -- greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday's election.

While Western news reports from Tehran in the days leading up to the voting portrayed an Iranian public enthusiastic about Ahmadinejad's principal opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, our scientific sampling from across all 30 of Iran's provinces showed Ahmadinejad well ahead.

Independent and uncensored nationwide surveys of Iran are rare. Typically, preelection polls there are either conducted or monitored by the government and are notoriously untrustworthy. By contrast, the poll undertaken by our nonprofit organizations from May 11 to May 20 was the third in a series over the past two years. Conducted by telephone from a neighboring country, field work was carried out in Farsi by a polling company whose work in the region for ABC News and the BBC has received an Emmy award. Our polling was funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

The breadth of Ahmadinejad's support was apparent in our preelection survey. During the campaign, for instance, Mousavi emphasized his identity as an Azeri, the second-largest ethnic group in Iran after Persians, to woo Azeri voters. Our survey indicated, though, that Azeris favored Ahmadinejad by 2 to 1 over Mousavi.

more

[Comment: Highly interesting additional datapoint - I wouldn't accept the results without significant qualifications (look through the toplines in the results pdf to see what I mean), but highly interesting. ~ JPD]

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave June 16, 2009 - 9:44am

This morning, Washington Post polling director Jon Cohen blogged a helpful reality check:

[A] closer look at the one sponsored by Terror Free Tomorrow and the New America Foundation [cited by Ballen and Doherty] reveals ample reason to be skeptical the conclusions drawn from it.

Methodologically, this survey passes muster as it's relatively straightforward to pull a good sample of the Iranian population, using the country's publicly available population counts and listed telephone exchanges. But the poll was conducted from May 11 to 20, well before the spike in support for Mousavi his supporters claim.

(See here for a summary of available Iran polls that finds some evidence for Mousavi momentum late in the campaign.)

More to the point, however, the poll that appears in today's op-ed shows a 2 to 1 lead in the thinnest sense: 34 percent of those polled said they'd vote for Ahmadinejad, 14 percent for Mousavi. That leaves 52 percent unaccounted for. In all, 27 percent expressed no opinion in the election, and another 15 percent refused to answer the question at all. Six percent said they'd vote for none of the listed candidates; the rest for minor candidates.

Note further that the Ballen Doherty poll concluded that a runoff was likely, given the shakiness of their own data.

Numerian June 16, 2009 - 11:27am

...are correctly described as "light" they are heaviest in areas that are potentially very interesting. Also note that the response rate was low - respondent refusal (as opposed to item non-response) was fairly high (heck it looks as bad as one of my surveys! ;( ).

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave June 16, 2009 - 11:51am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.