Onward Christianist Soldiers


Republican leaders are already talking, albeit sotto voce and usually with anonymity, about Barack Obama’s landslide victory, and who is to blame. Being Republican means never having to say you’re sorry – it’s the Love Story approach to politics – but that doesn’t mean you can’t throw mud at some other guy in the party when everything has gone badly wrong.

Quite a gaggle of GOP geese are doing just that in a U.K. Telegraph article here. On one side are the apostates who have already criticized the party or even endorsed Barack Obama. This includes “intellectuals” like David Brooks, Andrew Sullivan, Doug Kmiec, and Peggy Noonan, as well as party stalwarts like Scott McClellan, David Frum, Matthew Dowd, and Kenneth Adelman.

More after the jump.

On the other side are the true believers like Rush Limbaugh, and columnists Charles Krauthammer and Tony Blankley. They see themselves as the guardians of conservatism, and are already hinting that those on the other side are “traitors”, which is about as bad as calling them Democrats.

The fault line for this civil war is Sarah Palin.

From everything we have read about her lately, she is not merely chafing under the campaign restraints imposed upon her by John McCain’s chief strategist Steve Schmidt – she is running “off the reservation,” contradicting what John McCain has said or what his positions are, and setting out on her own and refusing to take any blame for what could be an electoral debacle.

Her detractors have called her a “diva” – self-centered and incapable of listening to any advice since her instincts will always guide her straight and true. One wag said it was inappropriate to describe her as a hockey mom; Sarah Palin was in truth the prom queen riding in the back of the convertible waving to all the hockey moms watching the parade.

But here is another truth, assuming John McCain loses on November 4: Sarah Palin already is the head of the Republican Party. She is its future because her allies will see to it that her critics will be drummed out of the party. She is its future because only she can attract crowds of supporters with any amount of enthusiasm. Most importantly, she is its future because her supporters – the evangelicals who overwhelmingly dominate Republican primary voting in all the red states – will easily hand her the nomination in 2012.

No one can stop her ascent now as head of the party because to do so they would have to take on and defeat the evangelical wing of the party. The big business/Wall Street wing of the party, along with the Main Street business interests, are too weakened to mount such a campaign, and in any event, they only provide money, not votes. Suburban soccer moms have slowly been fleeing to the Democratic Party. That leaves no one to stand up to the Christianists who dominate the Republican party.

The Christianists adore Sarah Palin because she is one of them. She talks the talk – which is to say she talks in tongues. She has an anointing by some self-appointed Dominionist bishops who have declared her to be The One (sorry Barack, there can only be one true “The One”). The Dominionists are a growing movement of Christianists who seek political power not to enact any political agenda, but to purify America and extend their brand of Christianity across the nation. Much more so than George W. Bush, Sarah Palin is “of the faith” and understands the code words of the Christianist movement. She understands that the Bible trumps the poor, old Constitution, lying as it is in tatters from the destruction wrought by George W. Bush.

The Christianists will forgive her the Neiman Marcus clothes, the traveling make-up artist, the all-too-human family, and the rumors of past marital problems. Some of these trappings of wealth are simply necessary for her to appeal to the broader secular society requiring purification. The rumors and negative press stories are the works of the Devil, because the Christianists know that Satan is constantly present in our lives with temptations, falsehoods, and snares.

Poll results from the 2004 election showed about a third of the voters described themselves as evangelical or fundamentalist Christians. They attend Baptist or Assembly of God churches. They evangelize constantly, and ensure the growth of the movement by concentrating on the indoctrination of children (hence their hatred for homosexuality, because the whole “sanctity of marriage” concept is really about having children to bring into the religion). On moral issues, such as abortion or homosexuality, they team up with conservative fellow-travelers such as Catholics and Mormons, though on doctrinal matters many Christianists reject both of these religions.

This is the Republican Party here and now, and of the future. It is too late for Peggy Noonan or David Frum to turn the party back to the Reagan era of faux-morality and hard-headed geopolitics. The Republican party entered into a pact with God (or the Devil, depending on your view), and it has now become the Party of God. God’s elect dominate the Republican Party now; they provide the manpower and the votes that determine who runs as a Republican.

Do they have the votes to elect Sarah Palin as president in 2012? Don’t count her out. If she has any overweening sin, it is a lust for power. On November 5th, she will begin positioning herself as party leader, polishing her “policy” skills so as never to be embarrassed again in an interview. A lingering and painful economic depression will chip away at Barack Obama’s aura, and Sarah Palin will be ready to position herself as the newest savior of the country.

The only one who can undo a prom queen or diva is the person herself. It is possible that Sarah Palin in the next four years will find some way to self-destruct. She certainly now has enemies gunning for her, including quite a few back home in Alaska aware of her past indiscretions, betrayals, and even illegalities. It is also possible that Barack Obama will find it in himself to become a new FDR, able to work his way to radical new policies necessary to right the nation’s wrongs, and thereby build a lasting political majority. Sarah Palin’s detractors see Barack Obama as just such a person, and they fear 20 years or more in the political wilderness if the Republicans turn to her for salvation.

But there really is no “if” about it; through an ill-conceived vice presidential search by John McCain, Sarah Palin is in charge. She will run for president, and she may become president. God has already ordained the first event, and perhaps the second.


Numerian October 25, 2008 - 10:39pm

just rename their party "God's Own" and leave the poor old Conservatives to fend for themselves?

Let the Dems and the Cons scrap over the other 67% of the country.



"What we've got here is, failure to communicate"

Rick October 25, 2008 - 11:04pm

Nixon made a pact with the devil to begin with and Lee Atwater and Karl Rove sealed it in blood. Now they are finding that the devil has come for his due.

Will the conservative elite take a back seat on the coming ride in the hope of some crumbs falling their way, or will they bolt?

Nor am I sure that evangelicals like Mike Huckabee will accept Palin's leadership. As a Dominionist, closet secessionist and John Bircher, she seems too far out, even for at least some of them.

Looks like the coalition of Burkeans, Goldwater conservatives, Reaganites, social conservatives, and assorted rednecks and wingnuts is kaput.

Frank Rich has an interesting take from a bit of a different angle today. Plus, the demographics are against them, and the GOP is heading for civil war over this debacle.

In addition, it's no secret that lots and lots of folks have had it up to the ears with the Christianists. If a Christianist runs on the top of the GOP ticket in 2012, there will very likely be a serious third party Bull Moose conservative challenge that will siphon off votes.

Finally, I think that Obama will make good on his intention to put together a new dominant coalition by positioning himself as the uniter and integrating moderate Republican elite into his administration. My sense is that Obama is going to be able to pull this off. The US is at a watershed moment, and the GOP is going to have to change to survive in the new political environment, as people like David Brooks and David Frum are saying.

tjfxh October 25, 2008 - 11:04pm

I don't believe we need to worry about Sara Palin's aspirations to become president. She's so extreme that she'll self-destruct. The hordes that are currently clamoring for her presidential ascent will eventually dissolve into the lunatic fringe.

The Guardian, October 26

Sarah Palin has rallied socially conservative Republicans, but she angers Democrats and has alienated some moderate Republicans.

What we're finding on this trip is that Sarah Palin is an extremely polarising figure. She thrills socially conservative Republicans while alienating moderate Republicans and enraging Democrats, and we saw that during our trip through Colorado.

John McCain wasn't social conservatives' first choice of candidate, but they cheered his choice of Sarah Palin. In an interview this week, Palin told Colorado Springs-based evangelical leader and broadcaster James Dobson that God "would do the right thing" on election day. Blogger Celtic Diva writes:
Palin is herself a transformational figure: She is transforming an increasingly narrow band of Americans into a political lynch mob. Only her supporters are pro-American, only her supporters are hard-working and only her supporters serve our country in uniform. Now we can add this: only Palin's God is the real God and only a McPalin victory could be the Will of God.

Colorado bloggers have joined Democrats across the country in calling for Sarah Palin to be made more available to the press to answer questions. A sentiment echoed by CNN's Campbell Brown who has launched a "Free Sarah Palin" campaign.
More


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena October 26, 2008 - 12:04am

When she gets around to holding interviews, she will hide her religious and other views and sound moderate to most voters. She's already backtracked on teaching Intelligent Design in schools. Once in office, however, she will divert federal money precisely to foster the teaching of creationism in all schools.

Numerian October 26, 2008 - 12:21am

Good luck to her.

Synoia October 26, 2008 - 1:49am

Numerian, excellent work. Even if Palin does self-destruct with a little help from invigorated enemies within the Republican camp and hometown long-knives, she is now the anointed queen of mean and compassion, the new brand of Compassionate Conservatism. If MaCain does manage with help of the republican vote stealing machine, and closet racists, win the gold ring; Palin will be president within a year. That is my little side bet. Side bets aside, and MaCain goes down to defeat, Palin will become a nationally syndicated radio and talk show host, with a zillion watts of voice power over North American and Armed Forces Radio networks. Those radio networks want to collect a few favors if Palin makes the White House, just covering their bets. With the well underway depression just getting warmed up, will Palin’s network of evangelizing network churches be able to supply networking ability to provide food and employment to prove it pays to join and belong to bring in outsiders in need of help?

I expect as soon as Palin purges the Republican Party, her rhetoric will become evermore violent as the economy slides down. If Palin gets pushed out of the Republican Party due to getting impeached in Alaska, with the help of Republican operatives, and forms a new political party, then we are doomed either way to Palin in the news for the next 30 years.

"There are two types of folk music:
quiet folk music and loud folk music.
I play both."

Dave Alvin

Peter C October 26, 2008 - 9:42am

She makes George W Bush, that's the "Shrubuya" on his worst day look eloquent. Is there even an example of a question that she's answered well out there? One of my friends speculates that McCain's campaign has transcended presidential politics and has become a form of performance art. Palin certainly makes more sense in that context.

Running Paling against Obama in 2012, is pretty similar to running Keyes against him in 2004 - a de facto concession. There's a bit of hindsight here, but Huckabee is a much stronger presidential and vice presidential candidate than Palin will ever be. (And I say that despite my disagreement with a lot of his views.)

NateTG October 26, 2008 - 12:07am

Is her ability to create enemies. She's a poor manager and a dreadful leader becuse she's not loyal to her followers (Sarah Barracuda).

Friends come & friends go. Enemies accumulate.

And, I agree with tjfxh. I believe Obama is both a good leader & and excellent manager. Just look at his campaign organization.

And sooner or later (sooner I hope) a real christian leader will emerge, armed with the Beatitudes, to show the way forward is based on Christ's love, not Jehovah's Vengence and hate.

Synoia October 26, 2008 - 12:22am

If Alaskans are serious about impeaching her, she is toast. Go Alaska! :)

If John McCain is not elected president, which one of the following three possible candidates would you be most likely to support for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012?

Mitt Romney 35%
Mike Huckabee 26%
Sarah Palin 20%

Newsweek

Tina October 26, 2008 - 12:52am

decided to start their own party.

I'd donate generously to get them started. Maybe we all could.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch October 26, 2008 - 1:09am

It's certainly possible that Palin will end up being the GOP standard-bearer, but I have to join the skeptics in saying that such an entity would have a very hard time winning an election. It's not just Palin-the-scary-True-Believer, it's also the Palin who doesn't even dare hold a open press conference. Assuming Obama wins, right now I'd say the scariest potential 2012 challenger is name not even on that list: David Petraeus.

geoduck October 26, 2008 - 2:39am

How serious will this downturn be? How will Obama respond?

And of course, what if John McCain wins after all? As of the moment he has about a 5% chance according to the leading poll sites, but miracles happen, especially with God's anointed on your ticket. Imagine who will be taking credit if he does win.

Numerian October 26, 2008 - 6:49am

what if John McCain wins after all?

With an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress and half the country enraged, nothing. There will be total gridlock for four years, as America goes through its greatest catastrophe economically and militarily, and the world sinks into global depression and conflict. Both sides will be screaming at each other.

tjfxh October 26, 2008 - 9:15am

Petraeus! First, the name is weirder than Obama. Good luck. (Finnish?)

Second, he will run on whatever side looks like it will win.

Third, once in office he will have nobody to suck up to, so he'll be completely lost. Just like Karl "Smithers" Rove lost his bearings in 2006.

“The Playboy reader invites a female acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Picasso, Nietzsche, jazz, sex.” - Hugh Hefner

Tonsure Wimple October 26, 2008 - 6:01pm

is of Dutch ancestry. It's a Rennaisance thing. Where I'm from there are quite a few Germans with names that end in -us.

I'm hoping that Petraeus is too closely associated with Bush to find much support for a political career.

Beto October 27, 2008 - 11:11am

In fact, so do many of his fellow generals. Quite a few of them have said he puts his career above just about anything.

Numerian October 27, 2008 - 11:28am

when I was a student. He stood on a soap box bible in his hand, words coming out of his mouth continuously. "God, Jesus has Fire, Sin for you sinners! Brimstone B R I M S T O N E in Hell, all of you at this place, Jesus loves the brimstone you are going to sit on ...". None of it made any sense. I always dismissed him as a schizophrenic. He would make the perfect running mate for Palin though.

"You have no respect for excessive authority or obsolete traditions. You're dangerous and depraved, and you ought to be taken outside and shot!" - Joseph Heller

Joaquin October 26, 2008 - 3:05am

It ain't over till the fat lady sings, despite the dispute among the GOP talking heads

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama's lead over Republican rival John McCain has dropped to 5 points, according to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll released on Sunday.

Obama leads McCain by 49 percent to 44 percent among likely U.S. voters in the daily tracking poll, which has a margin of error of 2.9 points. Obama's lead has dropped over the last three days after hitting a high of 12 points on Thursday.


"The mythical John McCain is an affable, straight-talking, moderately conservative war hero who is an expert on foreign policy" - Bob Herbert

nymole October 26, 2008 - 6:24am

He could have been up nine on Thursday, and up eight today.

Numerian October 26, 2008 - 6:46am

It may be a landslide, and I will be glad, but I've heard a lot of "I guess I'm for Obama".

eom


"The mythical John McCain is an affable, straight-talking, moderately conservative war hero who is an expert on foreign policy" - Bob Herbert

nymole October 26, 2008 - 6:56am

spend some time at Pollster each day. They post excellent thumbnails of trends and sampling. Pay close attention to the Electoral map, because that's what matters - just ask Al Gore.

Also - this map:





is fun because it sizes each state by its electoral votes, not its square mileage (courtesy Classic Detritus).


"What we've got here is, failure to communicate"

Rick October 26, 2008 - 1:00pm

Zogby is a notoriously unreliable pollster and some one day noise in an single overnight tracking poll is hardly an indicator of anything except some statistical variance, especially when the shift was basically within the margin of error. If all the other one-day trackers show the same move over a couple days, then you'll have a story.

Lets look at all the trackers from today:
Research 2000: 51 (52) 40 (40) 3 LV
Reuters/Zogby: 49 (51) 44 (42) 2.9 LV
Rasmussen: 52 (52) 44 (45) 2 LV
Diageo/Hotline: 50 (50) 42 (43) 3.4 LV
Gallup: 51 (51) 42 (42) 2 RV

Hmm, that looks like statistical noise to me . . .

And as Nate Silver over at 538 notes Zogby's Republican bias this year do to him waiting his poll based on a 2004 exit poll voter turnout model:
"To the extent that Obama is leading in a Zogby poll, that means essentially that he'd have won the election given 2004 turnout dynamics. 2008 turnout dynamics are liable to be sigificantly more favorable to him."

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/10/tracking-poll-primer.html

Jesse C October 26, 2008 - 1:48pm

...an issue that folks are forgetting this is a three day rotating tracker and the seeming "trend" around the Oct. 22 poll could just be the result of getting extreme responses two days in a row. 49/44 isn't very far out of whack with what they were polling last week - what really stands out is the Oct. 22 datapoint and surrounding "trend".

Zogby series here: http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1611

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave October 26, 2008 - 2:22pm

yes, it is the removal of the outlier from their data, not a noticeable move. But the media narrative wants a close race, so we'll see lots of headlines like this.

Jesse C October 26, 2008 - 2:58pm

and McCain's got 'im right where he wants 'im.

tjfxh October 26, 2008 - 5:27pm

A day before 2004 election Intrade called all 52 states right.

The chances of McCain rose to 1/7, but now when a positive Reuters poll was released, his chances fell back to 1/8. Intrade seems to be 2-3 days ahead of polls. Nobody has not yet won, even if McCain is probably losing.

What comes to individual states, North Dakota could support Obama and North Carolina McCain.

If the variance of the poll results increases, the value of McCain option increases, because the likelihood of him losing decreases.

Singular October 26, 2008 - 10:25am

There are a couple things that are going to work very strongly against Palin if she wants to be the future of the party.

1. A lot of money in the Republican party comes from the financial conservative side of the party, not the wacko fundamentalist part of the party. It is completely possible that the evangelical base could become a massive small-donor base like Obama has built, but I really think that that is not going to be enough money to power a primary campaign, let along a presidential campaign. Look at what happened to Huckabee. He never had the money to compete. Romney is going to be a strong 'traditional' Republican candidate and he's going to get a lot of the easy money. I strong doubt that the 'adult' wing of the Republican party trusts Palin, especially given her vindictive nature and their current abandonment of her.

2. Her going rogue right now is going to count massively against her. Half the party is going to blame her for bringing McCain down--they basically already do, but this is hard evidence that she is working against him. If she had played out the campaign as McCain's team asked, then she could point to them as the reasons for failure. By breaking out on her own, she is also assuming some of the mantle of failure for herself. Being tainted with losing is not a good thing in politics.

3. And she's a woman. For Democrats to elect a black man president is not all that surprising. For the Republicans to successfully nominate a woman would shock and amazing me. There are large parts of the crazy base of the party who I just do not see supporting a woman stepping out her place.

Jesse C October 26, 2008 - 1:34pm

But in a civil war the losing side gets kicked out. Her rogue status will be celebrated by her supporters. But the other half of the party that gets kicked out is going to drift off to the Libertarian Party or become independents. It will make it harder for the pure, hard core Republican Party to win an election, and they will probably be relegated to the southern states. Still, in a bad enough Depression people could sour on Obama, opening the door for Palin.

Regardless, I don't think she is going away. If she can't succeed at politics she will be a natural for a show on FOX News.

Numerian October 26, 2008 - 2:28pm

She won't be a 'babe' in 8...

She'll be 52 - no longer a MILF - in eight years.

Her voice - partly the accent but mostly that 'nail on a chalkboard' timber is genuinely irritating - I'm not so sure she's got the nine lives you think she has on talk radio.

As Stirling pointed out, she sort of gives center right yuppie types a guilty conscience - they don't really truck with the cracker type rurals. You're not going to get the 'real' GOP - the rich 'bundlers' of the Bush years to really pony up for this hack as long as a pseudo Mitt Romney is around.

Think of the crippling fault lines in her persona - how long will she still be a 'barracuda' while she plays victim too - I'm not sure you can maintain that - even with the 'stupid' cracker type right for years and years on end.

KingElvis October 27, 2008 - 10:18am

The argument here is that she will lead the party in challenging Barack in 2012. Besides, I think the babe thing is overrated. There certainly seem to be guys who go to her rallies because she is "hot", but she's not movie star attractive. Most of her male supporters seem to like the fact that she kicks ass, just like the guys on radio do to liberals. It's her aggressiveness that is the real key to her popularity, and that isn't going to go away in four years.

Numerian October 27, 2008 - 11:11am
Tina October 27, 2008 - 11:20am

I would like to see someone take on Palin as the governor taking the biggest bite out of federal tax dollars, not counting the second tax she imposes on everyone by claiming a 75% "dividend" on all Prudhoe Bay oil. She is the grandest welfare queen of all.

Numerian October 28, 2008 - 8:49am
Tina October 28, 2008 - 10:25am

eom

Numerian October 28, 2008 - 1:12pm

heres another :)

From America's homeless, varied views on the campaign

Roger Boursma, 46, was in McPherson Square on a recent afternoon, chatting with a nervous, long-haired young man who melted away as a stranger approached.

Skeletally thin, with a thatch of sandy hair and a smile revealing gaps and erosions, Boursma was lost in a drastically outsized pair of black jogging pants, pulled high above his waist.

He was happy to talk politics. He said he worried most about security. "I kind of think McCain and this governor from Alaska are probably moderate conservatives and are very well-equipped to get the job done," said Boursma, a self-described "homeless photographer."

If not outright suspicious of Obama, he was at least doubtful. "Who were the ones that brung 'im?" he asked with a smile, meaning, who were his backers and, possibly, his string-pullers?

Not far away, Tom Ashley, a lean fellow with unkempt hair, was standing on a street corner with a few plastic bags propping up a hand-lettered cardboard sign pleading for help. The wind kept threatening to carry off the sign.

Behind him loomed the massive Veterans Administration office building, itself with a view of the White House and, across the river, the Pentagon. Ashley is a navy veteran like McCain, a woodworker and homeless, following a painful divorce and custody fight that he said left him with $12 to his name. Being a veteran and homeless is not unusual - 2 in 10 of the homeless are vets - but being a veteran and an Obama supporter is a bit more so.

Tina October 28, 2008 - 10:53pm

The Independent, By Rupert Cornwall, October 28

The election hasn't even been lost yet. But as John McCain slides towards likely defeat, the sniping between Republican factions has degenerated into something close to outright civil war – one that presages a wrenching struggle for the future of the party.

In the past few days, the feuding has reached to the very top of the campaign, with the McCain camp accusing Sarah Palin, his own vice-presidential running mate, of acting like a "rogue" candidate, going her own way and defying the instructions of her boss's top advisers. "She's a diva," one unidentified McCain aide told CNN. "She takes no advice from anyone ... she does not have any relationships of trust with any of us, her family or anyone else."

Mutual recrimination is the norm in a losing presidential campaign, as aides position themselves for the blame game after defeat. A week before the election, the McCain campaign seems headed in that direction, trailing Barack Obama by between 7 and 10 points in most national polls, and behind in the major swing states that will decide the outcome on 4 November. But the backbiting this time is of rare ferocity.

"How did we get into this mess?" Newt Gingrich, former House speaker and a driving force behind the Republican dominance for most of the past 20 years, says of the disarray. "It's not where we should be and it's not where we had to be. This was not bad luck."

For the second time this month, Bill Kristol, a leading voice on the party's conservative wing, used his column in The New York Times yesterday to urge the struggling candidate to throw his advisers to the winds. "He might as well muzzle the campaign," Mr Kristol wrote. Senior McCain staffers were now "spending more time criticising one another than Obama, and more time defending their own reputations than pursuing a McCain-Palin victory."


"Frankly, we've lost a lot in recent years." - General Colin Powell

Raja October 27, 2008 - 10:21pm

... of mine here really belongs in this thread.

Although, I'm late to the party and it looks like Numerian has scooped Shipman over at the Telegraph by a day. Excellent work!

Shipman also wrote about a desperate Hillary campaign just before the TX and OH primaries. Desperation looks like his thing. :)

ww October 28, 2008 - 9:05am

He came up with the juicy quotes from Republican insiders. I took it all a step further and started prognosticating who is going to inherit the Republican Party.

I think Shipman was the first with this story, which is now being picked up by other reporters eager to do a pre-mortem on the McCain campaign.

Numerian October 28, 2008 - 1:15pm

:)

ww October 28, 2008 - 4:37pm

October 28, 2008
Categories: Republicans
Conservatives plan secret post-election strategy session

Two days after next week's election, top conservatives will gather at the Virginia weekend home of one of the movement's most prominent members to begin a conversation about their role in the GOP and how best to revive a party that may be out of power at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue next year.

The meeting will include a "who's who of conservative leaders -- economic, national security and social," said one attendee, who shared initial word of the secret session only on the basis of anonymity and with some details about the host and location redacted.

The decision to waste no time in plotting their moves in the post-Bush era reflects the widely-held view among many on the right, and elsewhere, that the GOP is heading toward major losses next week.

One of the topics of discussion will be how to fashion a "national grassroots political and policy coalition similar to the out Reagan years," said the attendee, a reference to the development of the so-called New Right apparatus following Jimmy Carter's 1976 victory and Reagan's election four years later.

"There's a sense that the Republican Party is broken, but the conservative movement is not," said this source, suggesting that it was the betrayal of some conservative principles by Bush and congressional leaders that led to the party's decline.

more at Politico/J Martin

Tina October 28, 2008 - 9:50pm

The right flank is positioning to change the GOP's leadership and direction -- even if John McCain wins the presidency. Some moderates fear such a shift would alienate more voters.

By Peter Wallsten
October 28, 2008
LA Times

Reporting from Washington -- The social conservatives and moderates who together boosted the Republican Party to dominance have begun a tense battle over the future of the GOP, with social conservatives already moving to seize control of the party's machinery and some vowing to limit John McCain's influence, even if he wins the presidency.

In skirmishes around the country in recent months, evangelicals and others who believe Republicans have been too timid in fighting abortion, gay marriage and illegal immigration have won election to the party's national committee, in preparation for a fight over the direction and leadership of the party.

The growing power of religious conservatives is alarming some moderate Republicans who believe that the party's main problem is that it has narrowed its appeal and alienated too many voters. They cite the aggressive tone of the McCain campaign in challenging Barack Obama, who has close to universal support from African American voters; as well as the push by many Republican leaders to clamp down on illegal immigration using rhetoric that has driven away Latinos.

Some moderates argue that the party's top priority must be to broaden its outreach, a caution laid down by retired Gen. Colin L. Powell on national television this month when he broke from the party and endorsed Obama. Surveys show McCain beating Obama among white men but losing with almost every other demographic group.

The fight within the party has been building since voters stripped Republicans of their House and Senate majorities in 2006. It has become especially tense recently, because many Republicans are bracing for McCain to lose the election, leaving the party with no obvious leader with broad public appeal at a time when President Bush is exiting the national stage as a depleted figure.

Bush, now widely unpopular, held his final fundraiser of the campaign season last week and has no additional campaign events for McCain or GOP candidates scheduled in the final days before the election.

A focal point of the GOP fight is the selection of the next chairman of the Republican National Committee -- the party's power center for fundraising and strategic thinking. With various factions already trying to build support for their favored candidates, some conservatives are warning that McCain cannot serve as the party's spiritual guide even if he becomes president. The Arizona senator, after all, has a history of breaking with the party's mainstream on such issues as immigration and campaign financing.

"Committee members want to see our party move forward and be part of a branding process, as opposed to just simply supporting and putting a rubber stamp on the policies of a sitting president," said Robin Smith, chairwoman of the Tennessee state GOP and a supporter of turning the party to the right.

Conservative champion Rush Limbaugh, who often provides the rallying cry to the party's most ardent supporters via his radio program, last week laid out a similar warning, suggesting that a McCain win would do little to deter conservatives from pushing for major changes.

"One step at a time," Limbaugh told his listeners. "We're going to drag McCain across the finish line -- then we start rebuilding the conservative movement. It's going to happen whether he wins or loses, but especially if he wins too."

more

Tina October 28, 2008 - 10:04pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.