And the Gold Medal Goes to --- China!


Five days are left in the Beijing Olympics, or as they are called in the U.S., the Michael Phelps reality show. NBC surprised even itself at the enormous U.S. viewing audience that was generated by Michael Phelps every time he swam, though in China he is not much of a story. There the press talks about China’s record 43 gold medals, twice as many so far as they achieved in the Athens games.

It does look like China’s state-sponsored athletic training program, modeled on the old Soviet and Eastern European medal producing machines, is performing as requested by the Politburo (I didn’t know they still had one of these in China). China is destined to grab the gold medal lead from the United States, proving that collective national spirit ultimately trumps the American individualistic ethic. That may be what it proves, but a lot of questions have come up about how little a role the individual plays in China’s state-organized games.

China has been relatively tight-lipped about its Project 119, designed following the Athens Olympics to boost the country’s gold medal count in 2008. What is known is that scouts were sent around the country looking for young athletes who might be able to compete in sports otherwise unknown in China. There is, for example, no amateur or professional kayaking circuit in China, which is also true for dozens of other sports, so China has had to create de novo athletes who can not only perform at the Olympic level but surpass all other competitors to take home the gold.

In many cases, there wasn’t even professional coaching or training staff, so China imported experts and put them under close governmental supervision so they understood the importance of achieving Project 119 goals. For the most part this has succeeded, though the government has not always chosen well. It only takes a modest knowledge of American sports culture to realize that you aren’t likely to go far in Olympic baseball if you’ve selected a former coach of the Chicago Cubs as your team manager.

One of the Project 119 organizers did let on that children with athletic potential were “given opportunities to mature quickly.” There is a natural pace at which any child’s body matures, so exactly what this means isn’t clear, but it doesn’t sound healthy. Many of China’s gold medal winters don’t look like they’ve matured much at all, especially in gymnastics where light body weight wins medals. All of them, judging by what we know of the training process, have practiced their skills over and over for as long as 12 hours a day, at least six days a week, for up to four years. They have been sequestered in training centres all this time, and it’s no wonder many of them after winning a medal express the hope that they can now visit their families for longer than a few days a year.

Olympic medalists from any country have more than likely lived and breathed their sports for years to achieve their success, but this is often in the company of family and friends. In China, the state becomes your family, friend, coach, counselor, provider, and task master. In state-sponsored sports programs, very little is left to chance, which is why the old Communist bloc countries were so keen on doping and steroid use.

To judge the intensity and focus of this form of athletic training, we can take some clues from China’s approach to the games outside of the area of competition. Everyone knows about the young vocalist at the Opening Ceremonies who at the last minute was replaced (at the request of a Poliburo member) by a much more photogenic girl who lip-synced the song. The original vocalist’s teeth were crooked, and apparently no individual imperfections were going to be allowed in this Olympics.

Take as an example the young women who assist the judges in the awards ceremonies, holding a platter of medals or bestowing bouquets of flowers. Among thousands of applicants, several hundred were chosen who fit a particular standard of beauty. The ratio of the width of the nose to the length of the face had to fall within a certain range, and the eyes had to be 30% of the length of the face. Complexion and body fat were all taken into consideration. These young girls, all within a limited age and height range, have been practicing this role for over a year. They have spent hours each day standing in high heels, and they have been required to practice their smile by holding a chopstick between their lips so that exactly eight teeth are showing.

Do you recall the young women who were wearing short white outfits and spent nearly two hours in constant motion as cheerleaders during the parade of nations portion of the Opening Ceremonies? These perky girls, who also performed an opening umbrella scene in the ceremony, practiced their performances for three years, and this was after they went through a selection process that included a examination of their naked bodies to ensure minimum standards of body fat, weight and height were met.. The rehearsals lasted at least 10 hours several days a week, and on days when the girls started rehearsal in the afternoon, they could go as late as 4:00 a.m. the next morning.

I was admiring one part of the Opening Ceremonies where a large rectangle of boxes moved up and down in constant motion, sometimes simulating ocean waves, other times mountains, always with a precision that left me thinking what a clever computer program they had devised. At the end, however, a surprise was revealed – there was no computer program. The hundreds of boxes were lifted up and down from inside by hundreds of men in flawless synchronization. How many years of practice did that take?

And what was the point? The performance until the end didn’t seem all that extraordinary because we have seen many similar things done by computers. We didn’t get to admire the men who put on this performance, because they received maybe 10 seconds of television time, and they weren’t the point anyway. What we were supposed to admire was the organization and management of this exercise. This was a metaphor for what the state could achieve in organizing over one billion Chinese for particular goals.

This was also an example of the diminished role of the individual when it came to state enterprises and governmental goals. Zhang Yimou, the Chinese filmmaker who directed the Opening Ceremonies, said that no matter the technical difficulty faced, he could always fall back on one basic resource – an unlimited supply of people. An unlimited supply of people has been the backbone of the Chinese manufacturing miracle, where industrial processes done by machinery in the West are duplicated much more cheaply in China using human labor.

True enough, some of these gold medal winners are going to be famous in China for a long time, so the individual is allowed a degree of personal recognition once the state’s goals have been met. But the tens of thousands of extras who spent years practicing even such basic tasks as smiling have only their fleeting moment of fame, and the knowledge that they served China’s interests. For most of them, that is apparently more than enough.

In America, on the other hand, we have an Olympics where one individual is responsible so far for over 30% of all the gold medals the country has achieved. Nobody is bemoaning this fact or worrying about what would have been accomplished if Michael Phelps wasn’t in Beijing swimming for the U.S. Instead, everybody is celebrating his success and athletic skill, and to be sure, a number of his medals were awarded for team efforts.

I can’t say whether the American method or the Chinese method of achieving success in the field of sports is better. Probably neither is ideal, and maybe a healthy approach would be somewhere in the middle. What can be said is that these approaches are very far apart, and they emanate from practices deep within these cultures. China and the U.S. are destined to interact with each other politically, economically, and militarily more and more as this century progresses. What these Olympics have shown is that we can expect these two cultures to clash, and a lot depends on how these conflicts are managed.


Numerian August 19, 2008 - 8:49pm
( categories: Agonist Exclusives | China )

“Is not our first thought to go on the road? The road is our source, our vault of treasures, our wealth. Only on the road does the ‘traveller’ feel like himself, at home.”
Ryszard Kapuscinski

Sean Paul Kelley August 19, 2008 - 10:22pm

Olympic attire


"While not a Playboy reader, she invites a male acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Chagall, Nietzsche, jazz, sex." - not a Hugh Hefner quote

adrena August 19, 2008 - 10:53pm

I cherish my daughter's take on women's beach volleyball unis ("Obviously designed by a man"), but beyond that particular event, where do you see T&A as an issue in Olympic sports? Is it the divers or gymnasts or sprinters or pole vaulters? Dude, the guys in those sports are as scantily spandexed as the women. In most cases, abbreviated costumes that offer support to only the most sensitive areas while allowing strenuous motion without binding are the norm. I have read many studies on the new full-body swimsuits, and it seems they are much more efficient than bare flesh. We move further and further away from the "gymnos" in gymnastics, apart from the beach 'ballers, whom I believe have Major Beer sponsors to answer to.


The Ideal?



"One of the things that, duh, uh..."

Rick August 19, 2008 - 11:32pm

http://viv.id.au/blog/?p=2066

http://independentsources.com/2008/08/16/nbc-introduces-olympics-upskirt-cam-for-womens-steeplechase/

I would imagine TV coverage influences future athletes quite a bit. NBC's coverage has been atrocious, it's all been T&A and and the one word michaelphelps. Titillation and exceptionalism, that about sums up American motivation.
I saw that steeplechase pile-up, a good 20 seconds of women's bodies piled on top of each other, focusing on the asses. It was truly an amazing choice of camera angles. (I don't know about that independantsources link, but it was the first pic I could find)

dk August 20, 2008 - 7:48am

Where are all the breasts?
Those who have been watching the swimming at the Olympic Games could be forgiven for asking the obvious question. I mean: what’s happened to women’s breasts? Once, female swimming champions had them, now they don’t.
and on men's synchronized diving:
Theirs is a sport not without beauty, but it always seems to have a homoerotic whiff about it as well. It all looks like a wonderfully elegant gay suicide pact.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/olympics/article4521060.ece

dk August 20, 2008 - 7:57am



"One of the things that, duh, uh..."

Rick August 20, 2008 - 12:52pm

Numerian mentions the pretty little girl who lip-synced a song because the singer was deemed to be unattractive. Well, why were us women forced to look at this short fat-faced guy singing with Sarah Brightman? There's never any eye candy for the girls, is there?. At the next Olympics I insist that the guy below lip-sync whatever song they're singing. I don't know his name but who cares as long as he looks good. And this guy simply looks gorgeous. :)

GorgeousGuy


"While not a Playboy reader, she invites a male acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Chagall, Nietzsche, jazz, sex." - not a Hugh Hefner quote

adrena August 20, 2008 - 7:41pm

I can’t say whether the American method or the Chinese method of achieving success in the field of sports is better. Probably neither is ideal.

Spending most of your early life trying to "achieve success" when that success is defined as racing a couple of hundred meters a hundredth of a second faster than anyone else is just looney. Enjoying a sport so that you want to spend the time to get better is positive, but competition becomes obscene when conducted in either the American or Chinese Olympic training method. This is no longer about healthy athletics; it's about promoting the concept that hierarchical ordering of human beings is desirable.

(Yeah, I know -- Bah, humbug!)

nihil obstet August 20, 2008 - 12:38pm

All those foot races, discus and javelin throws, and wrestling competitions provided fame and glory for some naturally talented athletes, though there was probably a fair bit of training involved. So the modern Olympics is sticking to its roots in that respect.

Both most of the other stuff- kayak, canoe, archery, volleyball, synchronized swimming, diving - are recreations struggling to impose some rules and structure in order to mimic competitive sports. Deciding who is the best kayaker in the world doesn't quite compare to the fastest runner; it's a phony hierarchical ordering.

Numerian August 20, 2008 - 2:40pm

looked little like modern Olympic athletes. The Greek goal was arete - all-around excellence.

A well rounded human could compose and recite a poem as well as they could hurl a javelin or navigate a ship or farm their land. The idea that one could be a full human being by focussing as narrowly on one physical activity as modern Olympic athletes do would be ridiculous to them.


"The best-informed man is not necessarily the wisest. Indeed there is a danger that precisely in the multiplicity of his knowledge he will lose sight of what is essential."

- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Escher Sketch August 20, 2008 - 4:14pm

James Lawton: Greatest stories at the Games are etched in gold of Chinese characters

Friday, 22 August 2008

British glory has been so relentless in these 29th Olympics, and that of Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps so spectacular, it has been easy to forget that the most remarkable story of all has been written in Chinese characters.

It has been the long march of the biggest, most carefully vetted army in the history of organised sport and the extent of the pressure applied to those selected will probably never be accurately measured.

Some have been as programmed and unblinking as Chairman Mao's Red Guards, some have cracked as though the weight of their vast nation had been directed entirely on to their shoulders – and others, the smallest of minorities, it has appeared, have been as defiantly balanced as Tian Jia, a 27-year-old beach volleyball player who here yesterday refused to hang her head in shame despite the fact that she had won merely a silver medal. Her stance, in its way, was as startling as if a member of the Terracotta army had suddenly come to life.

Apparently unmindful that her compatriot Zhu Qinan, the defending Olympic champion in the 10-metre air rifle shooting category had rushed away in tears at the dawn of the Games after failing to hold her nerve, and that another reigning champion, the superstar hurdler Liu Xiang hid his head when injury cut him down in the heats, Tian Jia declared that whoever you are, and however immense the sporting programme in which you are a small and eminently dispensable cog, you can only give everything you have.

This, she also pointed out, is especially true when you have just gone down to the best players in the world, the American champions Kerri Walsh and Misty May-Treanor. who were winning their 108th consecutive match.

Tian Jia might have added that her conquerors Kerri and Misty were not picked out for training in a strange game from a culture which might have been devised on another planet. They grew up playing in the sand.

Such is the pressure around every Chinese competitor in these Games that the strong-minded Tian Jia might well have made her statement without the provocation which came when all the fans were packed into the buses and driven away.

She and her team-mate Wang Jie had, after all, slaved to reward some of the most intense support received by any of the army of "patriot" competitors who have met, give or take a few heart-broken casualties, the government edict that they must finish at the top of the medals table, and thus beat America, for the first time in their Olympic history.

Each American point yesterday provoked groans from the fans who sat in the steady downpour with their little red flags poised even as the rain ran down their noses. Each Chinese riposte, in the 21-18, 21-18 defeat, brought howls of delight. It was part sport, part political rally – and then there was the question that brought the glint of defiance to Tian Jia's eyes.

She was asked by a Chinese journalist why the passion had left her play when another gold beckoned for the people's athletic army. In preliminary games she had been the noisy, scrappy one, yelling at the sky and urging on the taller Wang Jie at critical moments.

"No," she said. "It was not like that. I didn't lose my motivation today – quite the opposite. I knew I had done all I could and that I could win if I played better than I have ever done before.

"In the early games I wasn't so sure about myself or our chances of progressing, and when you are not so certain of what you can do, you do shout more. Maybe you are trying to convince yourself.

"But today I felt very calm and I knew that there was only one thing I could do. It was to play the best I could and I can assure you that was what I did.

"We are quite new to this game and the Americans we faced are great players. They have a great legacy and we are catching up – but I think we will be better in the next Olympics. In sport all you can do is fight as hard as you can. We just had to accept that we were against the better players – but that was only after the game was over."

more

Tina August 21, 2008 - 8:41pm

Her silver is as good as gold. Tian Jia, instead of following the script, speaks her mind. Imagine!


"While not a Playboy reader, she invites a male acquaintance in for a quiet discussion of Chagall, Nietzsche, jazz, sex." - not a Hugh Hefner quote

adrena August 22, 2008 - 8:00pm

China's not going to invite a "loser" such as her back on the team. It's all about the gold for them, nothing less.

Numerian August 23, 2008 - 1:17pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.