NYT’s insights and content have driven learning and debate at The Agonist for many years. It comes as no great surprise that the editors of the Gray Lady have drawn many of the same conclusions we have about the Democratic candidates.
New York Times: Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination – “In the end, Mr. Sanders does not have the breadth of experience or policy ideas that Mrs. Clinton offers. His boldest proposals — to break up the banks and to start all over on health care reform with a Medicare-for-all system — have earned him support among alienated middle-class voters and young people. But his plans for achieving them aren’t realistic, while Mrs. Clinton has very good, and achievable, proposals in both areas.”
The editors of the Washington Post criticize Bernie Sanders’s fiction-filled campaign – “Mr. Sanders is not a brave truth-teller. He is a politician selling his own brand of fiction to a slice of the country that eagerly wants to buy it. He assures Democrats concerned about the political obstacles in the way of his agenda that he will lead a “political revolution” that will help him clear the capital of corruption and influence-peddling. This self-regarding analysis implies a national consensus favoring his agenda when there is none and ignores the many legitimate checks and balances in the political system that he cannot wish away.”
If a real revolution were unfolding, Congress would already be stuffed with new faces and Obama’s bill signing hand would be cramping. Progress takes work and compromise, not bluster and promises.
This post was read 1092 times.