Searching for a Russian Meta-Narrative, Putin Studies China


Clifford J. Levy wrote this in The New York Times over the weekend:

Like an envious underachiever, Vladimir V. Putin’s party, United Russia, is increasingly examining how it can emulate the Chinese Communist Party, especially its skill in shepherding China through the financial crisis relatively unbowed.
...
In truth, the Russians express no desire to return to Communism as a far-reaching Marxist-Leninist ideology, whether the Soviet version or the much attenuated one in Beijing. What they admire, it seems, is the Chinese ability to use a one-party system to keep tight control over the country while still driving significant economic growth.
...
The fascination with the Chinese Communist Party underscores United Russia’s lack of a core philosophy. The party has functioned largely as an arm of Mr. Putin’s authority, even campaigning on the slogan “Putin’s Plan.” Lately, it has championed “Russian Conservatism,” without detailing what exactly that is.
...
Even so, Mr. Putin’s political aides have long studied how to move the political system to the kind that took root for many decades in countries like Japan and Mexico, with a de facto one-party government under a democratic guise, political analysts said. The Russians tend to gloss over the fact that in many of those countries, long-serving ruling parties have fallen.

I'm sure that the ever-practical Putin is more concerned with matters of brass tacks like jump starting Russian industry, repairing infrastructure, cultivating a healthier, more industrious work-force than he is in forging a national narrative. But as a student of power, Putin also knows that he has to have a set of myths to feed his people to motivate them.

It's highly ironic to me that the China of Den Xiaoping has become a philosophical model. Deng after all is the man who dispensed with 90% of the ideology of Mao and said, "No matter if it is a white cat or a black cat; as long as it can catch mice, it is a good cat."

But as he showed at Tiananmen Square in 1989, he wasn't shy about sending out the tanks.

China has certainly cleaned our clock in the Deng and post-Deng era. It still amazes me that China has gone from being an utter basket case in the year of my birth (1969) to being the only world power that is unarguably on the rise. Certainly they still have many problems. Many many problems. Dictatorships are inherently criminal after all. But considering that the Cultural Revolution was the definitive exercise in implementing Chaotic Evil as a governing philosophy (the Khmer Rouge after all were just small scale imitators of Mao's practices), its just amazing that China has been able to make as much material progress as they have.

Of course, their decision to emulate our car-centric consumptionist economic model will likely prove the undoing of not only China but the human biosphere on Earth...

Putin, poor devil, is playing a bad hand and I don't think there's any chance he can trigger another Russian century. The deck is stacked against the Russians and it may be that they'll never recover from the consequences of two world wars, a revolution and Stalinism -- the genetic consequences alone of purging millions of your best and brightest cannot be understated. And the Aral Sea speaks to the ways the Communist squandered natural resources and left ashes in their wake.

I expect at some point in the next century, the Russians will get to study the Chinese methods at very close range. From under the boot heel as the Chinese finally just grab away the Siberian petroleum that is so close and so needed in the Middle Kingdom.


Nat Wilson Turner October 20, 2009 - 9:58am
( categories: Miscellany )

When you asked for book recommendations i included one called Motherland: A Philosophical History of Russia by Lesley Chamberlain. Given your interest in meta narratives, i highly recommend putting it at the top of your Russian reading list.

The meta narrative question in Russia is as long as the nation's history and of profound importance. That is, one has never been settled on. The classic, Russian question of "Are we European or Asian?" dominates Russia's search for a meta narrative...and remains unanswered.

There have been a spate of news articles about the rehabilitation of Stalin in Putin's Russia. I think that speaks to your question, but remember that the Western press--as usual--gets it wrong about Russia. It's horrified and breathless reporting of Stalin rising from the ashes is for Western consumption; Stalin has always retained more popularity than most would expect. Some Russian thinkers chalk that up to the European/Asian question by suggesting that the more brutal the tyrant the more beloved he is by Russians (assuming that they're Asians underneath the white skin).

The Stalin question also takes us into the realm about how Russians value human life, which has profound implications for meta narratives. That value system is actually close to what i've seen, heard and read of Asia: there's a great deal of value placed on it when it's personally connected, but little empathy for people outside the personal sphere.

I think Putin is concerned with the Russian meta narrative, and other than paying off Russia's debts has shown more inclination towards narratives than the nuts and bolts of building a functioning society and economy...which he's done a piss poor job of.

The conflict with China is real, and underneath the current marriage of convenience i assume there to be nothing but mistrust.

Lex October 21, 2009 - 9:57am

thanks for the recommendation! I'll have to go back to that thread and see what others I'm missing, haven't looked at it in a couple of days.

I agree very much with your point about Stalin/the value of human life and Asian beliefs.

From my readings on China I have always been struck at how tender people can be towards their true intimates but how unconcerned they are with everyone else. It sometimes seems that rice based economies never developed a concept of value for individual lives.

I'm currently reading Reeling in Russia another 90's travelogue as an appetizer for serious reading. He is also quoting Russian after Russian bemoaning the cost of Stalin's purges in terms of all the best people, all the moral people, all the conscientious people, all the stand up people, having been wiped out.

Will they ever be replaced?

And your point on the meta-narratives, is spot on. Russia really never has decided where she belongs.

Sometimes I think she never recovered from the Mongol conquest.

Nat Wilson Turner October 21, 2009 - 11:57pm

that Putin is not the only leader looking to China as a role model; maybe the USA is a little jealous of how China can get things done.

All I can say to the Americans looking up to the Chinese is that the only difference between them and you is that they are not stupid.

We need a NATION WIDE STRIKE for Real healthcare reform

Joaquin October 21, 2009 - 9:55pm

than stupid Americans and the stupid Chinese are far stupider than all but the stupidist Americans.
Unfortunately the smart Chinese are smarter than all but the smartest Americans and there are many many more smart Chinese than smart Americans.
China's been the richest and most advanced country on Earth for most of human history. There's an element of returning to the mean here.

Nat Wilson Turner October 22, 2009 - 12:03am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.