Taser Madness


Scott Thill has a powerful piece at Alternet about the insane epidemic of American police using tasers in patently ridiculous circumstances:

The latest case, as of this writing at least, involves a Syracuse mother who was pulled out her car during a routine traffic stop. She was summarily tasered, cuffed and arrested in front of her kids by an officer who left them behind, alone in their car, while he took her to the station and charged her for resisting arrest, driving five miles over the speeding limit, and disorderly conduct -- the diaphanous charge controversially leveled on Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates, Jr. earlier this year.

There's plenty more where that came from. Did you hear the one about the pregnant woman who was tasered because she wouldn't sign her speeding ticket, or the pregnant woman who was tasered at a baptism party thrown by her father, a bible-study teacher who was charged with public intoxication in his own backyard and whose wife and son were also tasered? How about the officer who tasered a pregnant woman while inside the police department?

Or the cop who tasered a girl, no lie, in the brain, because he couldn't chase her down on foot? Or the one that shoved a taser up a man's ass in Idaho? Or those who tasered and pepper-sprayed an umbrella-wielding man in a Dollar Store bathroom, and after finding out that he was both mentally disabled and deaf still decided to charge him with resisting arrest, failure to obey a police officer and (of course) disorderly conduct, charges which the on-duty magistrate refused to accept? And don't forget the belligerent baseball fan, the 72-year old grandmother, the bride and groom tasered at their wedding, the bicyclists who were tased after cops tried to run them off the road. And what about that guy who burst into flames? What about the six-year-old who was tasered after threatening to cut his own leg with a glass? (That'll teach him!)

And those are the ones that lived. The black man tasered nine times in 14 minutes? Not so lucky.

This is just a small symptom of the overall lunacy and excess of our prison industrial complex which feeds an ever growing subset of our population to out of control law enforcement while the wealthy commit any crime they wish with impunity.

Face it America, Barney Fife has been given a taser and a no knock warrant and he's coming for you.


Nat Wilson Turner August 21, 2009 - 2:29pm
( categories: Miscellany )

I have long ranted and raved in these pages and elsewhere about police abuse of all sorts. The research I've done into the "cop mentality," the psychological profile of a would-be officer and the concomitant disinclination of most states and municipalities to put a choke-chain on their uniformed, two-legged pit bulls are all fodder for a massive public outcry...but none have been forthcoming. Primarily, most of them are just punks...but we've given them guns and badges.

Are we all that scared?

Doug Richardson August 21, 2009 - 4:43pm

some cops are excessively violent. others are corrupt. some are both. some are cowardly nitwits.
many are idealistic, hard working and brave public servants.
most of the excesses of American law enforcement can be attributed to an insane propaganda apparatus that demonizes citizens (esp minorities) as criminal scum, glorifies violent police work, and terrifies voters with trumped up scares.
But saying all cops are scum is as flawed as saying all hispanics are scum.

Nat Wilson Turner August 21, 2009 - 4:56pm

ones FAR outnumber the unscummy ones. Better?

______________________________________________________
Distrust anyone who wants to teach you something.

OldLakeRat August 21, 2009 - 5:32pm

it's certainly clear that the ones abusing their power are getting a lot of attention.
my gut is that you are correct.
although scummy is the wrong term IMO for the fascists on the force. scummy is taking bribes and soliciting sexual favors, not going overboard with the violence.

Nat Wilson Turner August 21, 2009 - 6:28pm

But saying all cops are scum is as flawed as saying all hispanics are scum.

Not so.

Being a cop is a choice; being Hispanic is not. The profession attracts certain personality types--aberrant personalities.

"Lord! What Fools these Mortals be!"

Doug Richardson August 21, 2009 - 11:53pm

So following this reasoning it would be ok to make a claim about illegal aliens who are Hispanic, that's a choice so it would be fine to make a sweeping generalization about them.

Mattyb719 August 22, 2009 - 10:37am

cover for and protect the ones who are. Every single time. That makes them, in legal parlance, accessories to serious crimes.

Cops are the very definition of an organized crime syndicate. They murder, maim, rape, steal, and coerce by violence... and then they lie about it. When they're caught, they say they looked into it and decided whatever they did was OK, that there's no basis for prosecution. And then the law enforcement agencies and courts that have the responsibility to hold the offenders accountable, don't.

So rare is it that a cop is punished even for plainly witnessed murder that it's fair to say cops' crimes are beyond the reach of the law.

Abusive and impervious cops are a problem that will have to be addressed before the general issue of social equality can make progress towards undoing the damage that began on Reagan's watch.

chalo August 23, 2009 - 5:08am

Wired.com
A notorious New Jersey hate blogger charged in June with threatening to kill judges and lawmakers was secretly an FBI “agent provocateur” paid to disseminate right-wing rhetoric, his attorney said Wednesday.

Hal Turner, the blogger and radio personality, remains jailed pending charges over his recent online rants, which prosecutors claim amounted to an invitation for someone to kill Connecticut lawmakers and Chicago federal appeals court judges.

But behind the scenes the reformed white supremacist was holding clandestine meetings with FBI agents who taught him how to spew hate “without crossing the line,” according to his lawyer, Michael Orozco.

“Almost everything was at the behest of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” Orozco said in a 45-minute telephone interview from New Jersey. “Their job was to pick up information on the responses of what he was saying and see where that led them. It was an interesting dynamic on what he was being asked to do.”

“He’s a devoted American,” added the lawyer, who claims Turner was paid “tens of thousands of dollars” for his service.

Bill Carter, an FBI spokesman, said in a telephone interview the bureau’s policy is “to neither confirm nor deny whether an individual has an association with the FBI.”

More

Nat Wilson Turner August 21, 2009 - 5:00pm

So let me get this straight. Having hired some on-air scumbag, the FBI counsels people to murder elected officials and legal beagles because.... well, because... they want to see who will sign up to murder them?

Uhm... ok.... Wack--eeee! Time on their hands or what?

Why don't they just go to the nearest psychiatric ward and arrest everybody whose imaginary voices urge them towards murderous violence. Far cheaper approach, n'est pas?

Isn't there a less convoluted conclusion?

For instance let's say the FBI is counseling people to murder these people because some rogue elements want to have certain people murdered.

Funny thing, you know. The simplest answer is often the correct one. At the very least it's useful to start an investigation from that point.

No doubt about it, this "agent provocateur" thing really stinks. In more familiar parlance I think it's called "setting up a patsy" and is a utility for getting a fool to take the fall for a crime. At least that's how it's used in the "Sopranos", "Law & Order", and "CSI Miami", my go-to sources for underworld ops. :)

Anyway, what happens if an agent provocateur from some other spy agency puts forward that he's onside with these views and wants to actively participate - all in order to find out who's behind the hate monger. Oh, and then there could be still another agent provocateur from still another agency spying upon the agent provocateur behind the agent provocateur behing the hate monger, and so on and so on, all locked in a receding infinity of self-serving scam 'n sham provocateurs and haters.

As I said, time on their hands or what?


""If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can’t it get us out?" - Will Rogers (1879-1935)

Chickadee August 23, 2009 - 3:59pm

they are really nice guys and will let ya get a picture taken n everything

http://www.bikemojo.com/speak/showthread.php?p=905678-

Texas is fixin to buy China

Justin Time August 21, 2009 - 5:12pm

throw out your speeding ticket if you perform sex acts on them.

damn bad apples.

Nat Wilson Turner August 21, 2009 - 6:20pm

A burst of bad news for Fuzz Fans here in Minnesota. A) the Metro Gang Strike Force was seizing all sorts of property and giving it away under pretense of drug seizure, and now the FBI and a blueribbon panel are all involved, finding major major crimes around. see the panel remarks.
B) The cops beat the hell out of a guy in Minneapolis, it was on tape and is becoming a big mess in the last couple weeks. Yes, he was tazed. Video:
Also a DJ here died after getting blasted with a Taser.
In my opinion the only time it's acceptable for police to use a Taser is in situations where it would also be acceptable to shoot someone in the face. The Taser is a less lethal weapon, not a nonlethal weapon, and its use should be regulated accordingly. (i.e. your odds of dying from it are a greater-than-zero fraction of dying from getting shot in the face).
--
Hongpong.com

HongPong August 21, 2009 - 6:47pm

...looks like a loony bin. Having visited 2 years ago, I realize it wasn't quite as bad as the media portrays. The Tazering is getting way out of hand because it's not "lethal"; unless of course, your one of the dead. I think it speaks to the poor training/screening of many policemen. Got to remind myself not to read so much media crap.

www.iauthorbooks.com
http://iauthorbooks.blogspot.com/

Celsius 233 August 22, 2009 - 3:23am

On the short and long-term effects of Tasers? How does anyone know it does not produce serious damage? Just because you don't die does not mean that your body has been injured.

creativelcro August 22, 2009 - 3:57pm

...the scientific literature in the Braidwood Inquiry report. Website of the inquiry can be found here: http://www.braidwoodinquiry.ca/

“The absence of any US-Iran bilateral channel...may have the perverse effect of reinforcing Iranian interest in progressing in the nuclear realm so that the US will be forced to take it seriously and engage it directly." ~ Richard Haass

JustPlainDave August 22, 2009 - 4:58pm

...isn't about long term effects. This link deals with it's safety issues, which appear to be considerable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser_safety_issues

www.iauthorbooks.com
http://iauthorbooks.blogspot.com/

Celsius 233 August 22, 2009 - 10:43pm

PopSci, By Jeremy Hsu, Arpil 12

The study aimed to test whether Taser devices have caused heart-related problems or death in meth-addled suspects

Cocaine is a hell of a drug, but getting shocked with a Taser while riding high on methamphetamines probably beats any white-knuckled cocaine experience hands down. And that's exactly what happened to some lucky sheep in a new study that tested the effects of Tasers on meth-addled targets, funded in part by Taser International.

There's at least some scientific reasoning behind all the apparent madness. Growing abuse of methamphetamines has led to arrest-related deaths in situations where law enforcement officers used their Tasers on drug-intoxicated suspects. The latest study was designed to test whether electronic control devices (e.g. Tasers) can lead to dangerous cardiac responses in meth-intoxicated humans, with sheep standing in for people.

The less-lethal device of choice was the Taser X26, a standard law enforcement tool which can fire at suspects from a distance of 35 feet. Researchers shocked sixteen anesthetized sheep after dosing the animals with an IV drip of methamphetamine hydrochloride.

Some of the smaller sheep weighing less than 70.5 pounds suffered exacerbated heart symptoms related to meth use. But neither the smaller nor larger sheep showed signs of the ventricular fibrillation condition, a highly abnormal heart rhythm that can become fatal.

The study that appears in the journal Academic Emergency Medicine openly lists a few caveats. Aside from being partially funded by Taser International, the study authors include two physicians who represent medical consultants and stockholders of the company. One of the two is also the medical director of Taser International.


One owes respect to the living. To the dead, one owes only the truth.

Raja April 13, 2010 - 9:04am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.