Most of Mexico is voting today in federal elections that are widely seen as a referendum on President Felipe Calderon and his PAN party. Calderon has bet the house on a full-tilt "Drug War to the Death" strategy that has probably only increased the violence and chaos while doing little if anything to reduce the grip of the narcos on the Mexican economy and polity.
There's a big Wall Street Journal piece from Friday that merits some excerpts and analysis:
Until recent years, Mexican drug traffickers focused the bulk of their bribery efforts on law enforcement rather than politicians. Their increasing involvement in local politics -- in town halls and state capitals -- is a response, experts say, to the national-level crackdown, to changes in the nature of the drug trade itself and to the evolution of Mexico's young democracy.
Starting in 2000, a system of fiercely contested multiparty elections began to replace 71 years of one-party rule, the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI. "In this newly competitive, moderately democratic system, it takes serious money to run a political campaign," says James McDonald, a Mexico expert at Southern Utah University in Cedar City, Utah. "This has given the narcos a real entree into politics, by either running for office themselves or bankrolling candidates."
In addition, the gangs have evolved from simple drug-smuggling bands into organized-crime conglomerates with broad business interests, from local drug markets to extortion, kidnapping, immigrant smuggling and control of Mexico's rich market in knockoff compact discs. "There is more at stake than before. They need to control municipal governments," says Edgardo Buscaglia, a professor of law and economics at both Columbia University and Mexico's ITAM University.
That's all decent enough info, but the WSJ also slips in this bit of disinformation from the FBI, charges so dubious even the WSJ has to caveat them at the end:
According to a September 2007 intelligence assessment by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, the governors of the states of Veracruz and Michoacán had agreements with the Gulf Cartel allowing free rein to that large drug-trafficking gang. In return, said the report, which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the cartel promised to reduce violence in Veracruz state and, in Michoacán, financed a gubernatorial race and many municipal campaigns across the state.
...
Lázaro Cárdenas Batel, the Michoacán governor from the leftist PRD party who was in the office when the FBI said the deal was made, says the allegation is "totally false." Mr. Cárdenas Batel, grandson of the former Mexican president for whom the port is named, said Mexican ports are controlled by federal agencies, so drug traffickers have nothing to gain from bribing state officials in connection with them.
His successor, the winner of the 2007 election, is Leonel Godoy, also of the PRD. He calls the FBI allegation "an infamy" with "not a shred of evidence or any proof," and said he had never met or cut deals with drug traffickers. Messrs. Cárdenas Batel and Godoy both say they had alerted authorities before the elections about the growing infiltration of drug traffickers in Michoacán.
None of the three men -- Messrs. Cárdenas Batel, Godoy and Herrera -- have been charged with any crime. U.S. intelligence documents have occasionally proved unreliable in the past.
I find it hilarious that the FBI is out there openly blaming PRD officials of being in the thrall of the narcos. Meanwhile, Amercian oil companies are watching these elections and realizing that their hopes of cutting deals with Calderon to get at the (rapidly diminishing) Mexican reserves are bleeding away:
A former energy minister, Calderon had hoped to overhaul the state-run energy sector to open the door to some foreign investment, possibly through strategic alliances with state oil monopoly Pemex, to reverse declining oil output. But few see such a reform possible in his second half-term.
We'll see how prescient all this gringo analysis turns out to be after the election results are in.
Meanwhile a wave of citizen cynicism is playing right into the PRI's hands. From the AP:
A growing citizens' movement disillusioned with the status quo is urging voters to make their ballots invalid by crossing out candidates' names, writing in fictitious ones, or leaving them blank. Others say they will simply not vote.
Antonio Baltazar, who runs an auto repair shop in Ciudad Hidalgo, in the western state of Michoacan, is one of the disgusted.
His town's mayor is in jail on charges of protecting drug traffickers. Baltazar said the candidates running now offer more of the same, and he intends to invalidate his ballot.
"I have to do something to express my anger," Baltazar said. "I'm not voting, because none of you convince me, you bunch of corrupt politicians."
Top electoral judge Maria Alanis said she fears abstention could reach 70 percent.
Activists hope the protest movement will force politicians to change the system.
"The biggest problem isn't crime, or unemployment, or even drug trafficking," said Rogelio Narvaez of the citizen's group Fuerza Mexico. "It is that people no longer have any confidence" in politicians.
From Micheal Collins and Kenneth Thomas:
As Mexico approaches the July 5th mid-term elections, the nation confronts two critical problems. An expanding an increasingly violent "war on drugs" threatens to convert Mexico into a narcostate. This will lead to the inevitable compromise of the members of all political parties. An expanding economic crisis in the wake of NAFTA and the global financial situation, threatens private companies, the Central Bank, and government programs -- as well as the income and employment of most citizens. Rising social inequality and a workforce crisis mean that many, perhaps most, Mexicans live in conditions parallel to those of sub-Saharan Africa.
Disenchantment and dismay reign. The volatile political situation foreshadows a change in the air. Close to 80% of Mexicans voted in mid-term elections in the 90's. Tomorrow, turnout is expected to be less that 50%. An attempted "no confidence" vote on the government looms. Members of the various parties engage in what has been called "fratricide." And there is talk -- talk which hearkens back to the Revolution of 1910 -- that it's time for the people to ignore the major parties and take matters into their own hands.