Economic Warfare? Europe versus Wall Street



Michael Collins

(March 10) Wall Streets is headed toward international pariah status thanks to two recent actions by the European Union (EU).

On Tuesday, the EU announced that it was banning Wall Street banks from the lucrative government bond business in Europe. They didn't express official concern or fire off a warning shot. They simply banned Wall Street from financing government bond deals like the one Goldman Sachs sold to Greece. The Guardian pointed out that Wall Street bond business from European governments has gone down over the last two years. Now the business is gone period. In effect, the EU has labeled Wall Streets business tactics as too dangerous for their governments to handle.

Then on Wednesday, the President of the European Commission said that the EU was considering a ban on government debt speculation through Credit Default Swaps (CDS) President José Manuel Barroso announced that, "the Commission will examine closely the relevance of banning purely speculative naked sales on Credit Default Swaps of sovereign debt." While not an outright ban, the threat of banning CDS on national debt would be a major loss for the world's financial speculators, particularly those in the United States and Great Britain.

These two hostile moves toward Wall Street by Europe were discussed by officials in the context of the current Greek debt crisis. Wall Street firm Goldman Sachs has been implicated in helping the Greek government hide the true nature and size of the debt. Discovery of this sleight-of-hand action exacerbated an already challenging crisis.

While the Greek crisis was presented as the proximate cause of the anti Wall Street actions, these announcements follow a March 6 national referendum in Iceland. Citizens voted overwhelmingly, 93% to 2%, to reject their government’s plan to have citizens to cover the losses of Iceland’s second largest private bank, around $6 billion.

In January, public opinion polls showed opposition to the bailout in the mid 50% range. The 93% opposition vote Saturday was a startling and bold statement of citizen opposition to subsidies for the private sector.

A few days before the vote, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said:

"The debt that had to be accumulated, when it’s going badly, is now becoming the object of speculation by precisely those institutions that we saved a year-and-a-half ago. That’s very difficult to explain to people in a democracy who should trust us." Business Week, February 23

Escaping the sinking ship?

The Chancellor is right. It has becomes increasingly difficult to explain socialism for the financial elite and survival of the fittest for the rest of us. Despite promises of trickle down benefits from policies that benefit only those at the top, the record since the 1970’s has been one of declining living standards and benefits for those who produce the wealth through their hard work.

The politicians behind the two policies are the center-right Merkel of Germany and hard right President Nicolas Sarkozy of France. Could their sudden, harsh actions against Wall Street reflect a general awareness among their patrons, the European financial elite, that citizens have had enough? Are the leaders worried that the contrived government debt crises throughout the continent will be met by citizens with sustained, angry protests and democratic defiance of de facto socialism for the financial elite?

Goldman and other Wall Street banks are a perpetual presence along the corridors of power in Washington, DC. Will this insider influence be used to dictate a U.S. response that reflects the will of Wall Street at the expense of the people?

Merkel and Sarkozy are hardly heroes of working men and women. They're reacting to the excesses of Wall Street as those excesses threaten the Euro currency and its beneficiaries, not their people. To a greater degree, no doubt, their actions reflect fear among the European elite that the entire continent might rise up in a rage if they continue policies that turn the vast majority of citizens into indentured servants.

Citizens all over the world are getting a crash course on the politics of scarcity for the many and abundance for the very few.

END

This article may be reproduced in full or part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.


Michael Collins March 10, 2010 - 6:33am
( categories: European Union | Opinion )

shouldn't be so controversial. By banning credit default swaps on European government debt, they're basically making sure that wealthy arsonists can't take out insurance on a neighbor's house. Let's not forget, after Goldman Sachs "structured" the Greek government debt, they immediately sold Credit Default Swaps on that debt. Not only do those CDSs create instability within the system because they're bought and sold by parties who don't have any real interest in whether a credit default event occurs (that is, they don't own, live in, or hold the mortgage on the house that's "insured" for fire), there's additional instability added because of the financial incentive for the house to burn down.

They don't care when a Greek mother rushes to the window as smoke streams out of the house, shaking her limp, lifeless child in the open air. Oh no. She gets lectured on how irresponsible it was for her to work all her life for a pension she negotiated, and expect to be paid for it in real cash money.

But as it so often happens to sociopaths who play with matches, I think some fat cats have bitten off more than they can chew. Do governments have any compunction about whether someone who is destroying their currency gets assassinated? Or if the building where CDS on their government debt, and the building where the counterparty resides, should get blown up by a "terrorist" event?

Jonathryn March 10, 2010 - 7:32am

"But as it so often happens to sociopaths who play with matches, I think some fat cats have bitten off more than they can chew."

Their ban on Wall Street bond deals makes perfect sense. I hope they follow through with the CDS ban. We should ban betting atainst the United States via sovereign debt CDS as well.

There's an interesting connection here. The phenomenon of major corporations taking out life insurance on their employees is really no different than a CDS scheme - you're betting, "buying insurance" on a person with whom you have no relationship. It is utterly vulger but a sign of the times. Another sign is the continuation of this "dead poll." It's the type of thing that could and should have been outlawed upon exposure. Zip, zero, nada action.

Michael Collins March 10, 2010 - 12:17pm

They are doing the right thing!

creativelcro March 10, 2010 - 9:09am

I want those bastards in Wall Street and the European financial elites to piss and shit in their pants from fear. You go Icelanders! You go Greeks! ..... Power to the People!


Tolerating prostitution is tolerating abuse and torture of women and children.

adrena March 11, 2010 - 10:48pm

"The politicians behind the two policies are the center-right Merkel of Germany and hard right President Nicolas Sarkozy of France"

Right in Europe would be well to the left of the Blue Dogs in the US.

Can't think of a better description of "Sucker!!" from the Banks, It's understandable they are affronted that the Banks who got bailed out are now betting against the people who bailed them out.

The Banks have pissed off a collection of powerful people and threatened their hard won control of their countries. The retribution is going to be harsh. Oh, hubris is such a wonderful spectator sport!

It's extremly unlikly that the Banks have the same lobbying power in Europe as the have in the US.

Synoia March 10, 2010 - 10:46am

run by a democratic government. Unfortunately we pretty much have to prepend "so-called" in front of any description of our government as democratic. I suppose if we need to call tax-payer support of the rich "socialism" then maybe we need to prepend "national" before it. Am I crossing a Godwin line here?

Jeff Wegerson March 10, 2010 - 11:53am

I should have attributed the source of "socialism for the rich" - Kropotkin's expropriation turned upside down.

Michael Collins March 10, 2010 - 12:19pm

You know in all this discussion about Greece, nobody is talking about what got Greece in this position.

Greece's problem is its excess military spending by the previous Conservative government. What they did to get into the Euro zone was to hide the purchases of military equipment by "leasing" it instead of purchasing it. That's called "off-balance sheet" financing.

Here is a reference: http://www.eurointelligence.com/article.581+M567c8704f1e.0.html
Albert

Albertde March 11, 2010 - 8:36pm

And here's the data:

This is what they get from us. Their weapons purchases from France and other EU members are higher.

Peace and reduced military spending versus the following cuts:

"Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou has come up with a plan to shave his budget deficit by freezing wages, raising the retirement age, curbing bonuses, and raising taxes." CS Monitor http://tinyurl.com/yfynrcu

This is a very creative ahd positive solution for the problem. Wonder who financed those purchases?

Michael Collins March 12, 2010 - 2:34am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.