Cuomo Takes on The Money Party


Bank of America Looks Like First of Many

Michael Collins

"This merger (Bank of America and Merrill Lynch) is a classic example of how the actions of our nation’s largest financial institutions led to the near-collapse of our financial system," said Attorney General Cuomo. "Bank of America, through its top management, engaged in a concerted effort to deceive shareholders and American taxpayers at large. This was an arrogant scheme hatched by the bank’s top executives who believed they could play by their own set of rules. In the end, they committed an enormous fraud and American taxpayers ended up paying billions for Bank of America’s misdeeds."(Image)

New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo

Andrew Cuomo's complaint filed in the New York Supreme Court, County of New York against the Bank of America and two former top executives has the potential to push that too big to fail entity off the edge of a very steep cliff. The charges of massive fraud are based on a compelling and exhaustive filing on February 4.

A trial will likely involve testimony by the current Bank of America CEO and President Brian Moynihan against defendants Kenneth Lewis, the bank's former CEO and board chairman, former chief financial officer (CFO) Joseph L. Price, and the bank itself. Price is currently in charge of BofA's credit card division.

The complaint charges fraud before, during and after the bank's merger with struggling brokerage firm Merrill Lynch in late 2008. The fraud cost bank shareholders and citizens billions of dollars. This is the first major case brought against our nation's largest financial institutions. These are the same financial institutions and executives that nearly destroyed the economy.

Cuomo's press release states clearly that Lewis and the bank are examples of a much larger problem. It appears to be a leading indicator of future actions by the New York attorney general. Why else would Cuomo have generalized about institutions (plural) in his statement about this particular case?

If Cuomo succeeds in taking down one of the toughest guys on the block, he'll make a point to the rest of the crew: you're next, get ready to cooperate. Many of the key perpetrators are located in Cuomo's jurisdiction, although Bank of America (BofA) is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. Clearly, there are others in line for some New York style law and order.

Cuomo is joined in this action by Niel Barofsky, Special Inspector General for the federal government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). TARP provides the billions in bailouts to bogus bankers and corporations. There's a credit line of $23.7 trillion should it be needed for even more bailouts. Ever wonder why you can't get a loan? They've taken all the money.

Charges and remedies

The bank and the two named executives are charged with failing to inform the bank's board of directors and shareholders of the major red ink on Merrill Lynch's books prior to the merger. CEO Lewis, CFO Price, and other BofA officers and professionals chose to hide $16 billion of Merrill Lynch known pre tax losses prior to board approval. That's fraud, plain and simple. Complaint filed by New York Attorney General, Feb 4, 2009

The complaint also charges that the same parties with strong arming the federal government for $20 billion to cover Merrill's debt by threatening to back out of the merger if the money wasn't forthcoming. Then Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had encouraged BofA to acquire Merrill, apparently without a rider that BofA would get billions in the process to cover their fraudulent business practices.

The lawsuit seeks two overriding remedies. The two named defendants and the entire Bank of America are enjoined from "any conduct, conspiracy, contract, or agreement, and from adopting or following any practice, plan, program, scheme, artifice or device similar to, or having a purpose and effect similar to, the conduct complained of above."

In addition, the defendants and the bank are to "disgorge all gains, pay all penalties and pay all restitution and damages caused, directly or indirectly, by the fraudulent and deceptive acts complained of herein"

These and the other remedies promise a degree of justice and, quite frankly retribution for the mess caused by the defendants. An unnamed and unintended remedy could be serious damage to the good will value of the Bank of America. The spectacle of a conviction of the bank and a former CEO and current division head for fraud would have a devastating effect on public confidence. Too big to fail may be a notion upended once and for all by a guilty verdict.

Witness Lineup – It's Bank of America versus Bank of America

Andrew Caffrey and Todd Wallach of the Boston Globe, hinted that Bank of America president and CEO, Brian T. Moynihan will be a key witness for the prosecution. The Globe article notes that the current BofA chief, "who was involved in negotiations (for the Merrill acquisition) as the bank’s general counsel, was not charged." Later in the same article, they quote Cuomo as saying, Moynihan, "has been candid with our office with respect to the roles he played after becoming general counsel."

Put simply, Moynihan was central to the merger, knew about the fraud, participated in it, but didn't blow the whistle. All of that is established in Cuomo's complaint. He cooperated with Cuomo and wasn't indicted. His name will be at the top of the attorney general's witness list, no doubt.

As if that's not bad enough for the bank, defendant Joseph L. Price, former CFO, is currently heading up Bank of America's credit card division.

Should Moynihan testify, we'll see BofA's current CEO helping Cuomo convict his predecessor of fraud. Moynihan's testimony will also argue for a conviction of his current head of credit card operations. Since Bank of America is charged, we'll also see its current CEO plus the “Relevant Parties” described in the complaint testifying that the corporation was also guilty of fraud. Many of the 35 Relevant Parties named are current or former BofA executives or board members.

Other key witnesses may include Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Barnanke and former Treasury Secretary and TARP architect Henry Paulson, They encouraged the Bank of America - Merrill Lynch merger as part of their efforts to prevent an alleged financial meltdown at the end of the Bush administration..

Charlie Gasparino of the Daily Beast reports that the defense counsel, former U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White, wants the case dismissed. If not, Gasparino says that "one person close to the defense” claims that White will call Paulson and Bernanke to testify. Cuomo has the facts and obviously believes Paulson and Bernanke on the sequence of events leading to these charges. Absent a “Perry Mason” moment by the defense, their testimony holds no surprises or benefits for the defendants. Mary Jo White has little or nothing at this point other than bluster.

Justice for the people?

It's been ten years since Congress and President Clinton freed Wall Street and the major banks to open a big casino on Wall Street. That resulted in ruinous schemes like the real estate bubble. It's been five years since Alan Greenspan told citizens to get an adjustable rate mortgage, cash out the equity in their homes, and jump into the stock market. It's been over a year since Wall Street and the big banks nearly ruined the economy, cost citizens jobs, savings, retirements, and countless other hard earned gains through a variety of no-win schemes sold as solid investments.

Nothing of any importance has been done to regulate the financial industry since the bailouts. Prior to the Cuomo-Barofsky charges, there have been no major cases brought against the perpetrators of our current troubles.

Hopefully, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo started what will become an era of accountability for those at the very top. This should be about more than just one case. It's an example of top down accountability.

May the bank, Mr. Lewis, and Mr. Price have the speediest of trials and the absolute maximum penalties should they be found guilty.

They knew exactly what they were doing every step of the way.

END

This article may be reproduced in full or part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

Next Monday - Cuomo's Lock Down – The Case in Detail

Complaint filed by New York Attorney General, Feb 4, 2009

Rep. Kucinich Grills Ken Lewis on Fed Emails, June 11, 2009

Rep. Cummings Questions Brian Moynihan Regarding the BofA/Merrill Lynch Merger, Nov 17, 2009


Michael Collins February 8, 2010 - 8:12am
( categories: Global Financial Crisis )

A key witness or defendant will die, like Ken Lay. The message Wall Street will get is not "cooperate" but "contribute even more to the political institution and candidates that will give get out of jail free cards." The press will promote the idea that the time for populism has come, in the form of the tea party of course, and will therefore find an excuse to highlight colorless, odorless, inoffensive-seeming and highly lethal corporatist GOP candidates like Sen. Brown of Mass, who out of concern for the deficit will reach across the aisle to shake hands with Obama to finally drive a stake in the heart of Social Security and craft yet more "reform" legislation that not unsurprisingly unfetters and re-entrenches our kleptocratics.

Jonathryn February 8, 2010 - 9:26am

This is New York. They actually know how to do things there, as opposed to the capitol which is run by elected and appointed officials who can't put one foot in front of the other. Politics is dead on a national level. It's Post-Obama reality, only Obama, Reid, and the other Hallow Men don't know it's time to fall over. So Cuomo takes up the flag. He'll win the case. The complaint is a work of art. These guys should take a plea but they won't, not with the pit bull law firm that will make tens of millions. We'll have the current president testifying against a guy he appointed (Price) and his former boss. Lewis and Price can slip on a banana peel on the court house steps but there is one defendant that can't go down before trial, the corporate entity (aka "a person") called the Bank of America.

The press probably won't know what to do, maybe switch in mid stream. Populism is good, populist politicians generally suck - Long (crook), William Jennings Bryan and Thomas E. Watson (became racists), etc. Cuomo is too elegant to be a populist politician but he may ride the wave of populism if he takes down these products of nepotistic inbreeding. We'll see. Maybe you're right;)

Michael Collins February 8, 2010 - 9:46am

Rudy Guiliani was unknown nationally until he successfully prosecuted criminals on Wall Street. Elliot Spitzer reached the governors mansion using the same tactic. It is almost as if Wall Street is easy pickings and the AG can assume the mantle of reformer and scourge of the fat cats on behalf of the people.

Andrew Cuomo is very ambitious and has an illustrious family name to build on. This is a perfect case for his ambitions, and there are plenty of other such indictments he can file. You are right in thinking he could use this situation to stand out among Democratic Party officials as the one person doing something serious about Wall Street crime. Obama certainly doesn't have that reputation. In fact, it is the inactivity of Eric Holder on so many issues - Wall Street, the TARP bailout frauds, mortgage fraud across the nation, prosecution of those who tortured - that is Obama's greatest weakness. He looks like he is defending the status quo every step of the way, whereas Cuomo can position himself as the defender of the people.

Numerian February 8, 2010 - 10:35am

Parlayed prosecutor to presidential candidate.

You said it well:

In fact, it is the inactivity of Eric Holder on so many issues - Wall Street, the TARP bailout frauds, mortgage fraud across the nation, prosecution of those who tortured - that is Obama's greatest weakness. Numerian

Michael Collins February 8, 2010 - 11:49am

Escaped by dying. If that was indeed his body. Was there a DNA test?

Synoia February 8, 2010 - 12:57pm

Here's a funeral noir send off - Ken Lay's Last Evasion.

As for DNA, he was cremated.

Michael Collins February 9, 2010 - 12:40am

Nobody's going to jail (they all have a get out of jail free card); they all get $200 (million) and will pass go.
When are "the people" (who are they really) going to understand the game? Pathetic, simply pathetic.


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 February 8, 2010 - 10:26am

Nothing ever changes, we always lose, they're so powerful that nobody can get anything by them, and then what? If things are generally oppressive and you predict oppression 100% of the time, does that make you brilliant or accurate? History runs in cycles. There have been bursts of great progress in our history. While I'm generally pessimistic, this is, in my opinion, one of those points where there's a shot at changing things. I suspect that I understand the game just as well as you do and one thing that I know is that ruling out any progress simply because there isn't much is not the way history unfolds. It is, however, the mindset of people permanently oppressed.

Michael Collins February 8, 2010 - 11:40am

But, with nearly 65 years of perspective, I've earned my pessimism. In 65 years of observation, and I might add, activism; things never change? Au contraire; things change a lot and god knows, I've seen a lot. So, just what are you on about?
We are losing ever so slowly and ever so completely everything we take for granted.
You must be young and don't remember when you could walk down a street and a policeman couldn't demand identification if you hadn't done anything wrong. I'm sure there are many things you are unaware of in terms of the civil rights we no longer have or "enjoy".
Spare me your neo-philosophy of subservience, I'll have none of it.


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 February 8, 2010 - 12:01pm

take a look at the movie/documentary, Food Inc. If that doesn't chap your ass, then nothing will.


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 February 9, 2010 - 10:02am

You're right about the issue of nutrition and food. In that case, we can actually do something about the problem on an individual level. It's highly political but political people don't incorporate it frequently, although there's an entire group of nutrition/farming focused folks who are very active. It is highly aggravating to see how things get manipulated, including Monsanto's ongoing efforts to do whatever it is they're up to. Here's a resource on this entire issue from a little different perspective. I don't read it enough even though a friend of mine writes it

FoodFreedom

We need a serious reboot as a culture and world community. Way too much denial and b.s.

Michael Collins February 9, 2010 - 2:47pm

It's 90 pages long but goes quickly. It is a masterful job of discovering and then laying out the facts, and it reads like a financial thriller. I've read quite a few of these states attorney and district attorney indictments against bankers over the years, but this one is far and away the most concise, carefully constructed, and utterly damning story I've come across.

Ken Lewis and Joseph Price will have a very hard time avoiding prison if this case gets to a jury trial. The evidence is there of willful violation of SEC laws and regulations in not revealing to BOA shareholders the true extent of Merrill Lynch's losses before the shareholder vote on the buyout. The losses were well known to Price and to Lewis as CEO because Merrill was sending them complete reports as requested by BOA, but these two refused to pass this information to their other executives like the General Counsel, or to their board of directors, or their outside attorneys. Instead they kept assuring these people the losses were within a much smaller, more manageable range. When the BOA General Counsel was starting to find out the truth, he was summarily fired and escorted immediately out of the building. Once the shareholders approved the buyout, Lewis and Price switched tunes and started to argue to the federal government that the losses had suddenly escalated within a week after the vote, and that the government needed to come up with more money or BOA would renege on the merger. Naturally, the government caved and came up with $20 billion more.

Oh yes - on top of all this, BOA approved a $3.2 billion bonus payout for Merrill Lynch employees, of whom the top management walked away with $6 million or more each. This is for a bankrupt company that had no money to pay a penny in bonuses if the government hadn't come up with more.

You don't think this won't stink in front of a jury?

Numerian February 8, 2010 - 10:46am


"We're all of us children in a vast kindergarten trying to spell God's name with the wrong alphabet blocks." ~ Edwin Arlington Robinson

Celsius 233 February 8, 2010 - 11:26am

That some dirt about the sex life of Cuomo will emerge in the next few days/weeks?

creativelcro February 8, 2010 - 10:53am

Not necessarily relevant but outstanding. Louisiana Governor Edwin Edwards on his opponent in the governors race, KKK leader David Duke:

"They'll have to find me in bed with a dead girl or a live boy to lose this race." Edwin Edwards, Gov., LA

The man should be set free immediately and he never should have been put in jail. He faced down real fascism, understood it, and spoke about it.

Anyway, sex is not OK twice in a row in the same state. There's a rule about that. They'll have to think up something else. But it won't work on this. They're all afraid if they try and fail, they're next;)

Michael Collins February 8, 2010 - 11:44am

It's a funny old world, and if you live long enough in it you'll make enough mistakes to embarrass yourself some day. I think Cuomo's weighed everything very carefully and from what Numerian says about the indictment, he has decided to go after something very specific, very discreet, something incontrovertible and easy to prove in a court of law. What he has not done is go after someone who is currently considered "indispensable," but he's coming pretty close to goring a bunch of bulls. If the thing really does go to court--and it won't--it would put several very important people in the catbird seat, not least of which would be Eric Holder and FBI chief--oh yeah, we haven't seen much of Robert Mueller lately have we? What's going on with all that stuff that should be investigated and prosecuted? What indeed. . . . Karl Denninger, with whom I hold no political court, is practically casting kittens and writing the skeletons of what would be some pretty interesting legal cases against a host of bad financial actors. Matt Taibbi too. But who reads Rolling Stone?

The problem with going after Cuomo right now is that it would be too obvious. I hope he has the chance to take the lot of them down before it's shown that he drowns puppies or something.

Jonathryn February 8, 2010 - 12:57pm

Not just any dog will do.

Where indeed has the FBI been? They took a shot at mortgage fraud investigations way back but the War on Terra called this force of 500 to look for a dead guy. They went back at banker fraud, leaked this to the Times of London ...

The FBI is investigating every level of the conspiracy that it believes perpetuated the housing boom…TimesOnline Jan. 31, 2007

...and then what? Nothing.

It's like Meuller's reaction to GITMO. There was FBI presence through out with the reminder, "we don't torture." They didn't stop it but they're clean of any of that (their interrogator did the right thing on the first big case there). They can help with Cuomo/Barofsky or not. I'd like to see their posturing put into action in behalf of this and other cases.

If Cuomo gets to try this and wins, it will be extremely difficult to stop. But, as you said, trying to trash him now would be a huge give away after Spitzer.

Michael Collins February 9, 2010 - 12:53am

This kind of prosecution has been long overdue.

And I cannot fucking wait to see Bernanke and Paulson stuttering and sweating and shitting themselves on the stand, under oath.

forty2 February 8, 2010 - 11:48pm

They will be very nervous, under oath and all, and they'll also be nailling the BofA execs. Then there are those 35 "Relevant Parties" - many of whom could be charged - who will have to drop a big dime on their former pals. Shadenfreude!

Michael Collins February 9, 2010 - 1:40am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.