Joe Klein's Fatuous Fantasy



Michael Collins

Time Magazine's Joe Klein is having an allergic reaction to free speech and public debate. The title of his latest column says it all: The Left's Idiocy on Health Reform. It's an ex cathedra pronouncement from a made man at one of the nation's oldest media properties.

What's got Joe so worked up?

Two things. He's upset at the lack of respect that internet based writers show for the mainstream media and Washington insiders. He's also beside himself that people are actually finding fault with the health care reform bill which many bloggers have the nerve to describe as just another government bailout for big business.

In the snarkier precincts of the left-wing blogosphere, mainstream journalists like me are often called villagers. Joe Klein, Dec. 30

That's some pretty nasty name calling isn't it. "Hey villager!" Accusing an entire class of people of idiocy pales by comparison. If I've ever read the term villager, I didn't pay enough attention to remember it. But let's take Joe's word that it's out there in all its rhetorical glory. According to Klein, leftist bloggers see villagers as "regurgitating spin spoon-fed by our sources or conjuring a witless conventional wisdom that has nothing to do with reality as it is lived outside the village." Now there's some idiocy – from Joe's keyboard to our screens.

What Joe is doing at the start is an old trick called setting up a straw man. You create the perceived problem on your own but label it as your opponent's position. You tailor it for your purposes with a little accuracy added for effect. Then you blast the straw man to smithereens in a self righteous rejoinder. Those who fabricate a straw man are essentially talking to themselves. The straw man fallacy is one of the first taught in logic classes because it is so easy to spot and so far afield from any form of serious dialog.

It's a good thing Joe did this. Had he paid serious attention, he would have noted that over and over, on blogs and web sites of many persuasions, citizens refer to Joe's kind of mainstream journalism as … the corporate media. It's a dispassionate descriptor that invokes nearly immediate understanding.

Corporations almost never tolerate public criticisms or critiques of the corporate products and services from their employees. Corporate employees are aware of this rule. You go along or you find someone else to pay your salary. There are eight major corporations that "dominate" the United States news media. The obvious conclusion is that opinion journalists and reporters, to a lesser degree, have certain clear limits in their expression of opinions and reporting.

Given the problems with monopolistic behavior, predatory business practices, rigging regulations through bought and sold members of Congress, and the ultimate goal, the transfer of wealth from just about everybody to the financial elite running the major corporations, the corporate injunction against going after the company results in a corporate media that often fails to get to the bottom of our current troubles. It's not a secret or a veiled conspiracy . It's just the way parent corporations treat their subsidiaries and employees. But Joe doesn't want to go there.

Joe takes down the straw man of his own creation by accusing the leftists of living in a "claustrophobic hamlet," emulating Fox News, and a few other asides. However, once you know the straw man trick, it's hard to take the author's rebuttal seriously.

Actually, both the left and right opponents of health care reform are drinking from the same watercooler. Joe Klein, Dec. 30

After creating an interior dialog that he says represents a reality that he calls idiocy, Joe gets around to talking about health reform. He feels the need to explain why there is so much opposition by citizens, his leftists. Klein offers this.

"The dyspepsia of the left blogosphere is less easily explained, though. It has its roots in an issue the left got right and almost everyone else got wrong: the war in Iraq."

This statement is factually incorrect. It was not only the left that got Iraq right, it was the left, the right (the paleocons, Ron Paul and his supporters), a majority of Democrats, and a majority of Republicans. Some of those good citizens were swayed by the scare tactics of a president we now know lied repeatedly about weapons of mass destruction and much more. This occurred with the support of Klein's mainstream media which failed to ask the tough questions we'd like from journalists.

Klein's argument about Iraq and the left is simply wrong. The public has serious problems trust those in power that create pervasive doubts about this legislation.

One key element in the distrust of the corporate media and the perpetual insiders who run our capitol concerns the Wall Street bailouts, a topic Klein avoids entirely. The intital bailout of 2008 was defeated after the most intense public outcry on any piece of legislation in memory. Wall Street mobilized quickly and with the help of both 2008 presidential candidates got the first of many bailouts. When administrations changed, the new president continued the tradition and opened up the full credit of the United States to the failed Wall Street enterprises to the tune of $23.7 trillion.

In the mean time, the people got virtually nothing. Facing record foreclosures, soaring unemployment (17% real unemployment, see "U-6"), and a constant fear of losing the ability to care for their families, health coverage included, many citizens have noticed a consistent pattern. We are always the last in line and there's nothing but scraps left over when it is our turn to use our own contributions to the Treasury to help the nation as a whole.

The bipartisan coalition in Washington, DC, representing the vested interests of the very wealthiest individuals and firms consistently neglects citizens while it rewards the perpetrators of our current economic collapse. That's why the people have little trust those who claim to represent them. The distrust is not limited to just "leftists." It is pervasive.

Klein brushes aside the real winners in health care reform, the nation's health insurance companies. The bill bails out an industry that adds no value to health care. However, the industry does take value from the health care consumer with a 12% to 30% overhead on the direct cost of insurance. In addition, companies extract huge added fees by their constant meddling with health care providers; something Medicare manages to avoid as evidenced by its low overhead. The "reform" proposal gives the insurance companies new customers by the millions, citizens will be forced to buy insurance with only the promise of cost containing regulations.

Klein avoids the key question -- why are health insurance companies placed at the center of citizen health care? He also avoids the consistent support of citizens, as high as 65%, for a program with the federal government as the payer of claims. It's called "single payer," "Medicare for all," etc. and has strong public support despite hardly any coverage by the mainstream media.

"populist exaggeration — the idea that Washington is controlled by crooks and sellouts" Joe Klein, Dec. 30

Klein's essay isn't about health care reform. It's an attack on those in the Democratic Party and others who dare to speak out against what they perceive as the poor performance and neglect of the majority by the president and Congress.

In his closing, Klein says "those of the left blogosphere consider themselves the Democratic base" then quickly points out that the base is really "African Americans, union members, Jews, women and Latinos." Klein's transparent and somewhat ugly divide-and-conquer ploy ignores the important fact that all of those groups are heavily represented on the same "blogosphere" that is providing such troubling criticism of an overly sensitive national government that promises much but delivers just about nothing.

The source of increasing criticism is not an irrational response to the alleged good our leaders offer us. It's the reality of getting nothing while those who created the problems reap untold rewards … every single day without any end in sight.

END

This article may be reproduced in whole or in part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.


Michael Collins January 1, 2010 - 8:39am
( categories: Israel and Palestine )

Paul Rosenberg and others at OpenLeft.com use it a lot. It goes with Versailles as in Versailles villagers and the village of Versailles. I suppose that Joe Klein could be reading OpenLeft but I expect he's seen the reference at some place bigger like Huffington Post.

Jeff Wegerson January 1, 2010 - 10:57am

they really are LOL

Tina January 1, 2010 - 11:04am

Matt Stoller of OpenLeft used it in 2007.

So I'd like to ask readers here, is there a website you associate the word with, or is there a writer you associate it with? Do you have any idea of when you first noticed the use of the word as Joe Klein likely understands it.

Jeff Wegerson January 1, 2010 - 11:09am

to be sure. lol I'm not sure where I first saw it.

Tina January 1, 2010 - 11:31am

The kickoff may have been a column by David Broder or David Brooks lamenting how the Clintons had "trashed the place" - meaning Washington, adding that this was "their" place and rubes like the Clintons didn't belong there.

Someone like Digby or Atrios or Markos converted this into the concept of "The Village," a small insular place where the elites live in comfort and look down condescendingly on the plebians. The Village included not just the politicians who spend their lives in Washington, especially as lobbyists once they leave Congress, but the media stars like Joe Klein and David Brooks and the late Tim Russert who bristled at anyone questioning their judgment. Glenn Greenwald likes to ridicule the Village People for their hubris, their group thinking, their pontificating smugness, the emptiness of their thinking, and the fact that ultimately they are corporate toadies because corporations allow them to be multi-millionaire celebrities.

You can find a good deal of Village references on Daily Kos as well.

Joe Klein seems especially prickly about the ridicule he gets on the internet blogs. I've noticed that a number of these people in the Washington media are starting to lash back, especially at someone like Greenwald who writes convincingly and with assurance and convinction, and who skewers these people constantly by referencing their previous writings or broadcasts. The internet attacks are beginning to hurt, especially at a time when the corporations behind the media are hurting for advertising revenue and subscribers.

Note also two other hallmarks of the Village People. Because they get attacked daily from the right and left, they pride themselves on inhabiting the precious political center. This causes them to put great value on bipartisan solutions as the only solutions worth discussing, so that a guy like Lieberman can be looked up to in the Village for his supposed bipartisanship.

Second, given their wealth and status, they view themselves as part of the nation's elite, and to be a part of that you have to be Serious. Being Serious means willing to invade places like Iraq and send hundreds of thousands of people to their death, or taking deficits Seriously except when Republicans create them, or passing health care with a minimum of 60 senate votes, rather than tackling the stupid cloture rules that prevent majority rule.

Those who don't agree with the Village People are not Serious and therefore not worthy of attention, like bloggers for example.

Numerian January 1, 2010 - 11:53am

Excellent summary, Numerian! I was going to mention Greenwald, too. I believe Klein has been particularly stung by Greenwald's criticism. At a party (last year, I believe) Klein got into a verbal argument in which he excoriated (the absent) Greenwald. This incident was followed up by Klein criticizing Greenwald on a journalism list-serve, that someone then leaked to Greenwald. Greenwald then responded in his Salon column.

In other words, the two have history. When it comes to debate, however, Greenwald wipes the floor with Klein. A former constitutional and civil rights litigator, Greenwald supports every assertion he makes in print with copious sources and supporting quotes. Put the two side by side, and any sane, intelligent person can see Klein for the empty suit he is--which even Klein realizes at some level. Hence, his ire.

tehBrynn January 1, 2010 - 2:31pm

Eschaton uses it a lot. Maybe They Could Watch General Hospital Instead?, December 31 (Also: Site Search).

Glennzilla's right that for Villagers it's all some exciting soap opera in which they have minor bit parts. It isn't just terrorism - though that's super exciting!! - it's the whole thing. It's all personality and entertainment, the substance is mostly irrelevant except to the extent that it involves someone punching hippies.

Crooks and Liars: Heh. Howard Dean Calls David Broder Inside the Beltway Gossip Columnist, Villager Head Explodes, November 28

Blue Hampshire Villager Trots Out Six Year Old Anti-Dean Narrative, December 18

Baloon Juice: "Villager Alert", December 27

Zandar Versus The Stupid: The Worst Thing Ever, December 28:

Nothing will ever improve until the existing Village structure is dismantled.

Rising Hegemon, But the Village doesn't like it... , October 20


Commentary...

Digby: Goldilocks Punditry

The truth is that the left-blogosphere is a bunch of individual actors and discrete communities who have many different opinions about the Democratic Party, President Obama and the current state of progressive politics. We also mostly agree that the right wing is a collection of hypocritical corporate sponsored wealth protectors and resentful, reactionary stooges. But the one thing we all pretty much agree on is that Villagers will be Villagers --- and forming false equivalences between the left and right is a defining characteristic.

Driftglass: "...If Christ is not Risen"

Because we know that, in the end, reflexively loathing Liberals for being right and excusing the grotesque failures of Conservatives to create a wholly false "Sensible Center" will always be to Villagers what the Risen Christ was to Paul: the central pillar of their theology, without which their entire world would fall apart.

[...]

Notice how buying this plate of Villager Feculinni al Dente hinges completely on first accepting -- grudgingly -- that while Left might have gotten one thing right -- once -- the act of being right about Iraq has somehow cursed the Left, making us as insufferably awful as the "right-wing Fox News and Limbaugh slum".

Shadow of the Hegemon, Klein's Revealing Tantrum, December 30

Sure, Joe Klein is an idiot. We all know that. You can be reminded of it by watching his commentators absolutely eat him alive for his ignorance about what the term "villager" means, or the weird incoherence of his defense of LieberCare.

(He not only mischaracterizes the policy differences over it, he completely falls down on defending it, relying on the same-old same-old "it ain't perfect but it'll insure millions of people" Maserati Defense.)

It's also abundantly clear how personal this all is for him. He's ranted about Glenn Greenwald and other Bush critics before, screaming about "civil liberties extremists", and been completely humiliated for doing it. If you haven't, read about his outburst at a beach party about Glenn Greenwald. It's comedy gold.

[...]

See it? Klein thinks that the Dems are nothing more than a collection of special interests. There are no beliefs, no political philosophies, no ideologies; to him it's just a bunch of grasping minorities shouting "more, more, I want MORE!" This is a right-wing stereotype from the nineties; yet as the first terrible decade of the twenty-first century comes to a close, it's made perfectly clear that Klein still believes it.

And, remember, Klein is not an original thinker. He doesn't have thoughts or beliefs of his own. He simply parrots whatever his betters say, reciting the conventional wisdom of Washington at the time. That's what makes him boring, but that's also what makes him useful.

This is what the Dems really think of progressives and liberals. Hell, this is what Washington thinks of progressives and liberals. They spent the whole of the past year blaming "the left" for every problem with health care reform while bending over backwards to please the Republicans and their maniac base. They recoiled at every attempt to highlight the overwhelming influence of Wall Street on Washington's financial planners, and lavished attention on the right-wing's deficit shibboleth while ignoring progressives' concerns about anemic job growth.

Sure, progressives are useful. They're passionate, donate time and money, and do a lot of the hard work of organizing human beings so that the professionals can get down to the far more important work of begging for cash.

But for God's sake, you don't listen to them. You don't legislate based on anything they have to say. You don't side with them in debate. You don't hold the line for them. And if they hold the line themselves, you and everybody else who is part of the Washington community is fully entitled—if not REQUIRED—to smack them down.

You have to smack them down, because they've forgotten their place. It doesn't matter which side of the aisle you're on, or which institute you're at, or how many baseball statistics you've collated. At the end of the day, progressives are objects.

Tools.

Nothing more.


They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.

Raja January 1, 2010 - 11:52am

uses "the village" and "villagers" relatively frequently.

For example, here.

Bolo January 1, 2010 - 1:13pm

I'm pretty sure I first saw the word to connote the provincialism implicit in Broder's "it's not his place." Since then I've seen invoked the old Patrick McGoohan series The Prisoner, which took place in the Village. This part of the description from Wikipedia is relevant:

Ostensibly, the Village is run by a democratically elected council, with a popularly-elected executive officer known as "Number Two" presiding over it and the Village itself. Though most Village inhabitants seem to go along with this, internal dialogue indicates that the entire process is rigged.

nihil obstet January 1, 2010 - 1:15pm

I thought of #6 right away when I saw villager but then realized that Klein would probably lack the patience and curiosity to sit through even one episode. He seems to be a very "mutual" kind of guy.

Michael Collins January 1, 2010 - 7:44pm

1. Person living is a small environment, isolated from outside infulences
2. Hick, peasant, limited knowledge
3. Small minded, unable to comprehend the larger picture

Synoia January 1, 2010 - 3:25pm

Huffington Post - It's New Year's Eve, that time of year when you toss aside your better instincts and succumb to America's need for Contemplative Listicles that Explain The Year In Which We Lived.

And then, one day, you make a Listicle About Listicles, or you do one better and make a Listicle of The Best 85 Words Ending In -icle, In Order.

Of course, both of those things have already been done this year.

So, we begin today with Ten Things About The Media That Did Not Suck In 2009.

continued at link


Paging Obama: no more global photo ops - start working on creating jobs at home, now !

nymole January 1, 2010 - 11:13am

When someone like Joe Klein regurgitates the kind of tripe mentioned here, should we really be calling it his opinion? Klein gets paid big bucks by a corporation to say what the corporation wants to hear.

Maybe it would be better to say, "Time corporate spokesman Joe Klein said today," or something more appropriate like that. Let us not pretend that Joe Klein's opinion is the same as what he writes for Time. Of course, Klein himself would claim it is his opinion, but that is because he lives in fear of losing his highly paid job as a corporate mouthpiece. Who knows what his real opinions are? He is being paid to lie.
.
Good times for Smiley! :-D

Jimbo92107 January 1, 2010 - 11:35am

He probably believes this nonsense. The claim that being right on Iraq lead to the "dyspepsia" that caused the "left" to oppose health care reform is just absurd. That leads me to believe that he's so embedded that he can say just anything as long as it is subordinate to the party line.

From Hitler as Man of the Year to the fabrication of the "false memory" memory phenomenon through today, Time is constantly seeking a lower standard.

Michael Collins January 1, 2010 - 7:49pm

JK writes "we live in this little village on the Potomac" then says he "doesn't" missing the point. it is a mental village. intellectually a Potemkin village. then he ends his piece saying something is "beyond comprehension" a lot is beyond his mere scrivener comprehension.

stevelaudig January 1, 2010 - 11:38am

That's a wonderful image for our self-appointed intellectual elite. Klein can barely make an argument amidst the most sophomoric rhetorical tricks and he's considered "smart." imho, This beat down for diverting from the Democratic health "reform" effort started when Dean went off script. They got to him quickly and he was back peddling just a couple of days later. Then they went after Hamsher with a gusto. That didn't work very well. Now they're tagging critics as "leftists." Scary stuff;) This might just turn into a bad year for hypocrites, crooks, and fascists.

Michael Collins January 1, 2010 - 7:55pm

Is becoming a consensus view. The Left has been too brittle and too shrill about too many things. No sense of context and no ability to think strategically. This is all unfortunate because with better strategic thinking and ability to build coalitions more could be accomplished. It's like listening to someone that complains all the time. You eventually just tune them out.

Scotjen61 January 1, 2010 - 3:01pm

Hmm. I always thought this referred more to the "Potemkin Village" aspect of Washington insiders; they have set up this perfect little village as dictated by their owners and they don't want anybody from "outside" to disturb their fantasy world. Hence Joe (and others's) ire at having their precious peace disturbed by reality.

dejah thoris January 1, 2010 - 5:10pm

I agree with you. Maybe that's why his reaction to the term was so over the top. He doesn't seem to understand that calling people idiots is a problem. But this fits in with the feudal theme - the rules only apply to the serfs with Klein and his masters able to apply the lash at will. I'm waiting for President ("I never said I was a liberal") Obama to turn bitter. I suspect that will happen when he's in the low 40% approval range.

Michael Collins January 1, 2010 - 8:00pm

See

"Joe Klein Purports to Help those He knows NOTHING about. Joe Klein needs help, He should call me."

Calling people "poor people" is a sure sign they know nothing about them as real people. How, then, can Klein or others like him "help" those they don't understand? I'm offering to help Klein understand the left opposition, on the telephone, if he's serious and wants to contact me to set up a time to talk on the telephone. I qualify for one of those vaunted "subsidies" and since he wants to "help" my family, shouldn't he care enough to call before forcing me to pay hundreds of dollars (thousands in the end) to private insurance companies? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7374937

Land Shark January 1, 2010 - 11:07pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.