M.Collins: The Money Party (3) - Big Lies that You Must Believe



Bansky

Big Lies that You Must Believe

Michael Collins
Washington, D.C.

Because if you don't, the whole scam may fall apart.

In the first two parts of this ongoing series on The Money Party, we discussed the fact that there is only one political party in the United States, The Money Party. It has two wings, Republican and Democratic. That party represents excessive concentrations of wealth in the hands of corporations, other organizations, and individuals. They put up the money and get what they pay for every time.

They make sure that the election system is rigged to rely on money like a junkie relies on heroin. The system takes care of them. They don't have to obey the same rules that we do. Why? Because they're above the law.

The Money Party owns the mainstream media entirely. NBC is really General Electric, ABC is Disney, CBS was Viacom but now it's just the name for a mega-corporation, and Fox is News Corp., the Rupert Murdoch financial empire. That's why it's called the corporate media. They're publicity shops, "corporate communications divisions," owned and controlled by Money Party members.

Their job is to emulate George Orwell's "1984" by generating meaningless concepts that bind us to false choices.

It's a series of interconnected lies. Let's look at some of the key lies that we must believe to keep them in power.

Big lie 1: "We're the world's leading democracy." Not since Bush-Cheney took over. We're dropping fast. Maybe it has something to do with the Patriot Act and all that illegal wire tapping of U.S. citizens? Maybe it has something to do with a Congress that does nothing to stop an out of control president. Ratings on democracy show us behind 14 other countries.

Big lie 2: "Just let the markets handle it. The free enterprise system will work it out." This is supposed to appeal to our love of capitalism. Well, we don't have capitalism in the United States.

We have socialism for the rich and survival of the fittest for the rest of us.

When you hear about the wisdom of "the markets," you know that The Money Party is attacking some new law or regulation that might give us an equal footing and create real competition. The party can't stand free enterprise because it won't play any game that it might lose. Count on it. NAFTA - just let the markets handle it. Health care – it's the market at your service. Pollution – you guessed correctly, it's a "market thing. "We wouldn't understand." Dumping mercury in the Great Lakes, it all makes sense to the party.

Big lie 3: "There are two sides to every issue." Does that have anything to do with two parties? Where in the world did this come from? Who knows? But the corporate media rides this one into the ground.

Take climate change for example. Two sides, really? Well just about every respectable scientist in the world, at least those who get published in real science journals, says climate change is real, it's man made, and it's dangerous. The explanations are varied (many sided) but there's only one side of the larger issue if you want your children to survive. Climate change is a very real, scary deal. We're all threatened. But a correction might hurt their short term profits. As a result, the dangerous lies persist brought to you by The Money Party "communications divisions."

Big lie 4: "The federal government just screws everything up." Oh, like going to the moon, developing the internet, and providing health insurance (Medicare) for many times less overhead than private health insurance companies. The Money Party hates the government with a passion when it serves the general public. But when the federal government fixes competition so that only big money wins, when it ignores problems that might require some sacrifice, and when it prolongs a war for profits, the federal government is their best friend.

It's not a conspiracy. It's just what they do, what they've always done…further their own interests at our expense. There used to be some restraint to maintain appearances but the Money Party is now on steroids.

When you see some corporate news reader cock his or her head to deliver a "gem of wisdom," count on it to be a big fat lie, one that's essential to justify the theft of our well being for the interests of a very few, their bosses. They don't care because they don't have to. We're the ultimate donors to The Money Party through our hard work, time, and taxes.

The Money Party thinks that they own the country, they know that they own most of the politicians, and they're 100% sure that they know what we need to believe. These are just a few of the big lies that we hear all the time from the usual suspects. It's time to wake up, call their bluff, and take the country back.

In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.

George Orwell

ENDS

Previously:
The Money Party – The Essence of Our Political Troubles
The Money Party (2) – Why We Get Such Lousy Leaders and How to Get Rid of Them

Permission to reproduce in whole or part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.


Michael Collins November 16, 2007 - 12:28pm
( categories: Opinion | USA: Domestic Issues )

(or The Ignored Impact Of The 20th Century)

the system was never revised to account for the mobility and diversification of the citizenry that occurred in the 20th century with explosion of communication and transportation influences. representing us geographically, and so minimally so, is beyond antiquated.

as a flaming uberliberal in oklahoma city, i have no more chance of being accurately and honestly represented than the reddest redneck in boston or san francisco. we need greater multiplicity of representation. we need actual representation, nongeography based. we move, we travel, we wish to be represented regardless. we may not even have homes *anywhere* for that matter!

election *reform* may well begin with recognizing the pivotal changes the 20th century alone wrought, much less the current century's. campaign *reform* may well begin with such election *reform*.

the big lie underlying all is that we can face 32bit challenges and effect 32bit accomplishments on an 8bit system. so to speak.

the declaration of independence tasks us to abolish the current system. an entirely new convention is called for. but now i'm repeating myself.

re: the electoral 'college'...
"Drop out and get an education." -Frank Zappa

Zuma November 16, 2007 - 10:21pm

"Democracy" is a totem that we're supposed to venerate without anyone asking the questions you raised The Electoral College, based on revisions of the census every 10 years or whenever the states feel like it, is not democracy, it's "Democracy."

In practical terms, Jim Crow might as well be the Secretary of State in every state with felon disenfranchisement, voter identification bills, and voter registration purges - all relics of the KKK inspired Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Yet there's no open debate on the EC and the state and county voting authorities who reinforce the racist voting laws referenced do so without asking so much as a question.

The 8 bit analogy is excellent. Ironically, one of the most popular touch screen systems does an 8 bit to 16 bit text conversion with a 15 year old chip. Now that's "Democracy."

Michael Collins November 16, 2007 - 10:59pm

I love the Electoral College. It is a last-ditch chance to avoid a terrible mistake. One faction claims that it saved the US in 1876.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1876)

Half of the US population lives within 200 miles of the coasts. With a popular vote, the heartland would be frozen out of power. What's wrong with the US electoral power distribution is that the western states are under-represented per capita in the Senate. We Californians should have maybe 8 Senators. And a pony.

p.s. 15-year-old chips work.

Forget it, Jake - it's AmnesiaTown

Tonsure Wimple November 17, 2007 - 4:14am

There is a marriage between the pols and the media. If the pols don't support legislation that favors the broadcast media (tax breaks and consolidation efforts) then they risk becoming invisible.

If you media ignores you, you don't exist. This is fatal to a politician.

But this works both way, if the media is too critical of a pol (especially one on a key committee) they risk finding their interests not being furthered in congress.

One hand washes another.

robertdfeinman November 17, 2007 - 9:58am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.